Geopolitical Risk, Globalization and Environmental Degradation in South Africa: Evidence from Advanced Quantiles Approach
Article Sidebar
Open full text
Issue Vol. 18 No. 1 (2023)
-
In Gratitude to Professor Leszek Gawor
Artur Pawłowski7-8
-
Sustainable Development and Sustainable Science. Where We Came From, Where We Are Now and Where We Are Heading? Part II: An In-Depth Analysis of the Concept of Sustainable Development
Magdalena Drastichová9-27
-
Modelling Regional Sustainable Development in Ukrainian Crisis and War
Olena Shevchuk, Olha Ilyash, Glib Mazhara, Nadiia Roshchyna, Svitlana Hrynkevych, Ruslan Lavrov, Serhii Kozlovskyi37-50
-
European Experience in the Construction of Territories with Special Economy Regime after an Armed Conflict: A Trajectory of Sustainability
Inna Zablodska, Yuliia Rohozian, Olena Khandii, Stanislav Sieriebriak, Iryna Litvinova51-60
-
Challenges of Sustainable Development in International Public Opinion
Paweł Rydzewski61-67
-
Is Globalization Driving the Use of Renewable Energy? A Global Macro Perspective
Verda Salman, Imtiaz Ahmad, Shahzad Alvi68-80
-
Research on The Path of Carbon Emission Trading in China Under The Double Carbon Background
Jiangxin- He, Wenhao- Zhao81-89
-
Sustainability of EU Labour Markets During the Coronavirus Crisis
Sandra Milanović, Jelena J. Stanković, Ivana Marjanović, Milica Jovanović Vujatović89-99
-
Differences in the Implementation of Labor Rights of Refugees and Migrants in Europe
Viktor Shcherbyna, Kateryna V. Kutsovol, Polozhyshnyk Polozhyshnyk, Nadiya O. Babych, Oleksandra V. Voytsyshena100-110
-
Resilient Openness of Eastern European Cities in the Conditions of Sustainable Development
Olena Tarasevych, Yevhen Akhromkin, Anastasiia Volkova, Dariia Zablodska, Andriy Akhromkin111-119
-
Institutional Development of Organic Farming in the EU
Mirela Tomaš Simin, Dragan Dragan Milić, Marica Petrović, Danica Glavaš-Trbić, Bojana Komaromi, Katarina Đurić120-128
-
Civilizational Imperative of Social Economy
Dmytro Lukianenko, Anastasiia Simakhova129-138
-
Asymmetry as a Factor Weakening Resilience and Integration in the Sustainable Development of the Polish-Czech Borderland in the Context of the Dispute About the Turów Mine
Ewa Łaźniewska, Artur Boháč, Joanna Kurowska-Pysz139-151
-
Biblical and Quranic Argumentation for Sustainable Behaviors Toward Nature
Ryszard F. Sadowski, Zafer Ayvaz152-163
-
Liberty, Utilitarian Morality and Sustainable Development
Mayavee Singh164-169
-
Relativity of Environmental Sustainability Illustrated by the Red Queen Hypothesis
Kamila Musiał170-176
-
Human and Nature: Developing Virtues for Environmental Responsive Behaviour
Anita Jena, Sarita Kar177-182
-
An Analysis of Ethical Theories in the Direction of Sustainable Development: Aristotelian Virtue Ethics is the Greatest Option for Long-term Sustainability
Subhasmita Maharana, Ajit Kumar Behura183-187
-
Employee Well-being and Sustainable Development: Can Occupational Stress Play Spoilsport
Vikash Thakur, Govind Swaroop Pathak188-198
-
Role of Sericulture in Achieving Sustainable Development Goals
Ruyida Mushtaq, Binish Qadiri, Fayaz Ahmad Lone, Tariq Ahmad Raja, Harmeet Singh, Pervez Ahmed, Ravinder Sharma199-206
-
Geopolitical Risk, Globalization and Environmental Degradation in South Africa: Evidence from Advanced Quantiles Approach
Gold Olamide Lawal, Bisola Aladenika, Akadiri Akadiri, Ayodeji Samson Fatigun, Victoria Olushola Olanrewaju207-215
-
Boko-Haram Insurgency and Rural Livelihood Dilemma: Implication for Sustainable Development in North-East Nigeria
Tafida Ahmadu Abubakar, Michael Amurtiya216-225
-
Systematic Approach to Sustainable Development in Agricultural and Food Systems – Example of Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) and the Arctic Zone
Aigul M. Kazambayeva, Mira K. Begeyeva, Kanbibi U. Nursapina, Rakhila Rakhmetova226-234
-
Regional Development Environment, Local Government’s Character Behavior, and Sustainability: Empirical Evidence from China
Rong Zhou, Jian Wang, Dengke Yu235-250
-
The Configuration Effect of Tea Enterprises’ Sustainable Production Technologies in China: Based on the FsQCA Method
Yihui Chen251-260
Archives
-
Vol. 20 No. 2
2025-09-16 20
-
Vol. 20 No. 1
2025-01-10 22
-
Vol. 19 No. 2
2024-07-01 23
-
Vol. 19 No. 1
2024-01-08 27
-
Vol. 18 No. 2
2023-07-10 25
-
Vol. 18 No. 1
2023-01-01 25
-
Vol. 17 No. 2
2022-07-04 26
-
Vol. 17 No. 1
2022-01-03 28
-
Vol. 16 No. 2
2021-07-01 26
-
Vol. 16 No. 1
2021-01-04 24
Main Article Content
DOI
Authors
olaranrewajuvictoria8@gmail.com
Abstract
Sustainable development involves the incorporation of socio-economic concerns and environmental protection into the economic decision-making process, in such a way that, any developmental effort would eventually be favorable to immediate and future generations. It is against this backdrop this study investigates the effects of geopolitical risk and globalization on environmental degradation in South Africa over the period 1985Q1-2018Q4. This study improves on existing studies and raises concerns on the potential twin-effect of geopolitical risk and globalization on the environment. We deviate from the existing studies that make use of the mean causality approaches that do not consider possible dependence in the conditional tail of the series distribution. To examine whether the causality exists among the series, we make use of the novel Troster (2018) Granger non-causality in condition quantiles, which captures the pattern of causality in various quantiles. Empirical results show that there is feedback causality nexus between geopolitical risk and CO2 emissions. In majority of the quantiles, feedback causality is also observed between globalization and CO2 emissions. We find a bidirectional Granger causality nexus between geopolitical risk and environmental degradation, and between globalization and environmental degradation. Globalization and geopolitical risk negatively influence environmental degradation. We conclude that environmental degradation is not driven by globalization and geopolitical risk in South Africa, among other policy suggestions.
Keywords:
References
ABUBAKAR L., SALEMCITY A. J., ABASS O. K., OLAJUYIN A. M., 2021, The impacts of COVID-19 on envi-ronmental sustainability: A brief study in world context, Bioresource Technology Reports, 15: 100713. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2021.100713
ADEBAYO T. S., AKADIRI S. S., AKPAN U., ALADENIKA B., 2022, Asymmetric effect of financial globalization on carbon emissions in G7 countries: Fresh insight from quantile-on-quantile regression, Energy & Environment, https://doi.org/0958305X221084290. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305X221084290
AKADIRI S. S., ADEBAYO T. S., 2021, Asymmetric nexus among financial globalization, non-renewable energy, re-newable energy use, economic growth, and carbon emissions: impact on environmental sustainability targets in India, Environmental Science and Pollution Research: 1-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16849-0
AKADIRI S. S., ALOLA A. A., BEKUN F. V., ETOKAKPAN M. U., 2020, Does electricity consumption and globali-zation increase pollutant emissions? Implications for environmental sustainability target for China, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(20): 25450-25460. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08784-3
AKADIRI S. S., LASISI T. T., UZUNER G., AKADIRI A. C., 2020, Examining the causal impacts of tourism, globali-zation, economic growth and carbon emissions in tourism island territories: bootstrap panel Granger causality analy-sis, Current Issues in Tourism, 23(4): 470-484. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2018.1539067
ADEBAYO T. S., AKADIRI S. S., AKANNI E. O., SADIQ-BAMGBOPA Y., 2022, Does political risk drive environ-mental degradation in BRICS countries? Evidence from method of moments quantile regression, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(21): 32287-32297. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20002-w
ANSER M. K., SYED Q. R., APERGIS N., 2021, Does geopolitical risk escalate CO2 emissions? Evidence from the BRICS countries, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(35): 48011-48021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14032-z
ALOCH M. A., OZTURK I., BEKUN F. V., KHAN, D., 2021, Modelling the dynamic linkage between financial devel-opment, energy innovation, and environmental quality: Does globalization matter?, Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(1): 176-184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2615
BROOCK W. A., SCHEINKMAN J. A., DECHERT W. D., LEBARON B., 1996, A test for independence based on the correlation dimension, Econometric reviews, 15(3): 197-235. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07474939608800353
CALDARA D., IACOVIELLO M., 2018, Measuring geopolitical risk, FRB International Finance Discussion Paper, (1222). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17016/IFDP.2018.1222
CLEVELAND W. S., 1979, Robust locally weighted regression and smoothing scatterplots, Journal of the American statistical association, 74(368): 829-836. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1979.10481038
ENGLE R. F., GRANGER C. W., 1987, Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation, and test-ing, Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society: 251-276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1913236
FAROOQ S., OZTURK I., MAJEED M. T., AKRAM R., 2022, Globalization and CO2 emissions in the presence of EKC: A global panel data analysis, Gondwana Research, 106: 367-378. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2022.02.002
GÜNGÖR H., ABU-GOODMAN M., OLANIPEKUN I. O., USMAN O., 2021, Testing the environmental Kuznets curve with structural breaks: The role of globalization, energy use, and regulatory quality in South Africa, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(16): 20772-20783. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11843-4
GRANGER C. W., 1969, Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods, Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society: 424-438. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1912791
GYGLI S., HAELG F., POTRAFKE N., STURM J. E., 2018, The KOF globalisation index-revisited. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3338784
JIAO Y., XIAO X., BAO X., 2022, Economic policy uncertainty, geopolitical risks, energy output and ecological foot-print – Empirical evidence from China, Energy Reports, 8: 324-334. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.03.105
KOENKER R., BASSETT J.R.G., 1978, Regression quantiles. Econometrica: journal of the Econometric Society: 33-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1913643
LE H. P., OZTURK I., 2020, The impacts of globalization, financial development, government expenditures, and institu-tional quality on CO2 emissions in the presence of environmental Kuznets curve, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(18): 22680-22697. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08812-2
LEE C. C., OLASEHINDE‐WILLIAMS G., AKADIRI S. S., 2021, Geopolitical risk and tourism: Evidence from dynam-ic heterogeneous panel models, International Journal of Tourism Research, 23(1): 26-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jtr.2389
MISHRA P., PANDEY C. M., SINGH U., GUPTA A., SAHU C., KESHRI A., 2019, Descriptive statistics and normal-ity tests for statistical data, Annals of cardiac anaesthesia, 22(1): 67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/aca.ACA_157_18
RAFINDADI A. A., 2016, Does the need for economic growth influence energy consumption and CO2 emissions in Nigeria? Evidence from the innovation accounting test, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 62: 1209-1225. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.05.028
RAFINDADI A. A., OZTURK I., 2017, Dynamic effects of financial development, trade openness and economic growth on energy consumption: Evidence from South Africa, International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 7(3): 74-85.
RAFINDADI A. A., USMAN O., 2019, Globalization, energy use, and environmental degradation in South Africa: Star-tling empirical evidence from the Maki-cointegration test, Journal of Environmental Management, 244: 265-275. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.05.048
RITI J. S., SHU Y., RITI M. K. J., 2022, Geopolitical risk and environmental degradation in BRICS: Aggregation bias and policy inference, Energy Policy, 166: 113010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113010
SAINT AKADIRI S., ALKAWFI M. M., UĞURAL S., AKADIRI A. C., 2019, Towards achieving environmental sus-tainability target in Italy. The role of energy, real income and globalization, Science of the Total Environment, 671: 1293-1301. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.448
SAINT AKADIRI S., ALOLA A. A., AKADIRI A. C., 2019, The role of globalization, real income, tourism in environ-mental sustainability target. Evidence from Turkey, Science of the Total Environment, 687: 423-432. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.139
SAINT AKADIRI S., ELUWOLE K. K., AKADIRI A. C., AVCI T., 2020, Does causality between geopolitical risk, tourism and economic growth matter? Evidence from Turkey, Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 43: 273-277. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2019.09.002
SALAHUDDIN M., ALI M., VINK N., GOW J., 2019, The effects of urbanization and globalization on CO2 emissions: evidence from the Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) countries, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(3): 2699-2709. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3790-4
SIM N., ZHOU H., 2015, Oil prices, US stock return, and the dependence between their quantiles, Journal of Banking & Finance, 55: 1-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2015.01.013
STONE C. J., 1977, Consistent nonparametric regression, The annals of statistics, 595-620. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176343886
SWEIDAN O. D., 2021, Is the geopolitical risk an incentive or obstacle to renewable energy deployment? Evidence from a panel analysis, Renewable Energy, 178: 377-384. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.06.089
TIWARI A. K., DAS D., DUTTA A., 2019, Geopolitical risk, economic policy uncertainty and tourist arrivals: Evidence from a developing country, Tourism Management, 75: 323-327. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2019.06.002
TROSTER V., 2018, Testing for Granger-causality in quantiles, Econometric Reviews, 37(8): 850-866. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07474938.2016.1172400
USMAN O., AKADIRI S. S., ADESHOLA I., 2020, Role of renewable energy and globalization on ecological footprint in the USA: Implications for environmental sustainability, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(24): 30681-30693. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09170-9
UZUNER G., AKADIRI S. S., LASISI T. T., 2020, The asymmetric relationship between globalization, tourism, CO2 emissions, and economic growth in Turkey: Implications for environmental policy making, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(26): 32742-32753. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09190-5
WANG X., WU Y., XU W., 2019, Geopolitical risk and investment, SSRN 3305739. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3305739
XIAO Z., 2009, Functional-coefficient cointegration models, Journal of Econometrics, 152(2): 81-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2009.01.008
ZHAO W., ZHONG, R., SOHAIL, S., MAJEED, M. T., ULLAH, S., 2021, Geopolitical risks, energy consumption, and CO2 emissions in BRICS: An asymmetric analysis, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(29): 39668-39679. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13505-5
Article Details
Abstract views: 378
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
