Regional Development Environment, Local Government’s Character Behavior, and Sustainability: Empirical Evidence from China
Article Sidebar
Open full text
Issue Vol. 18 No. 1 (2023)
-
In Gratitude to Professor Leszek Gawor
Artur Pawłowski7-8
-
Sustainable Development and Sustainable Science. Where We Came From, Where We Are Now and Where We Are Heading? Part II: An In-Depth Analysis of the Concept of Sustainable Development
Magdalena Drastichová9-27
-
Modelling Regional Sustainable Development in Ukrainian Crisis and War
Olena Shevchuk, Olha Ilyash, Glib Mazhara, Nadiia Roshchyna, Svitlana Hrynkevych, Ruslan Lavrov, Serhii Kozlovskyi37-50
-
European Experience in the Construction of Territories with Special Economy Regime after an Armed Conflict: A Trajectory of Sustainability
Inna Zablodska, Yuliia Rohozian, Olena Khandii, Stanislav Sieriebriak, Iryna Litvinova51-60
-
Challenges of Sustainable Development in International Public Opinion
Paweł Rydzewski61-67
-
Is Globalization Driving the Use of Renewable Energy? A Global Macro Perspective
Verda Salman, Imtiaz Ahmad, Shahzad Alvi68-80
-
Research on The Path of Carbon Emission Trading in China Under The Double Carbon Background
Jiangxin- He, Wenhao- Zhao81-89
-
Sustainability of EU Labour Markets During the Coronavirus Crisis
Sandra Milanović, Jelena J. Stanković, Ivana Marjanović, Milica Jovanović Vujatović89-99
-
Differences in the Implementation of Labor Rights of Refugees and Migrants in Europe
Viktor Shcherbyna, Kateryna V. Kutsovol, Polozhyshnyk Polozhyshnyk, Nadiya O. Babych, Oleksandra V. Voytsyshena100-110
-
Resilient Openness of Eastern European Cities in the Conditions of Sustainable Development
Olena Tarasevych, Yevhen Akhromkin, Anastasiia Volkova, Dariia Zablodska, Andriy Akhromkin111-119
-
Institutional Development of Organic Farming in the EU
Mirela Tomaš Simin, Dragan Dragan Milić, Marica Petrović, Danica Glavaš-Trbić, Bojana Komaromi, Katarina Đurić120-128
-
Civilizational Imperative of Social Economy
Dmytro Lukianenko, Anastasiia Simakhova129-138
-
Asymmetry as a Factor Weakening Resilience and Integration in the Sustainable Development of the Polish-Czech Borderland in the Context of the Dispute About the Turów Mine
Ewa Łaźniewska, Artur Boháč, Joanna Kurowska-Pysz139-151
-
Biblical and Quranic Argumentation for Sustainable Behaviors Toward Nature
Ryszard F. Sadowski, Zafer Ayvaz152-163
-
Liberty, Utilitarian Morality and Sustainable Development
Mayavee Singh164-169
-
Relativity of Environmental Sustainability Illustrated by the Red Queen Hypothesis
Kamila Musiał170-176
-
Human and Nature: Developing Virtues for Environmental Responsive Behaviour
Anita Jena, Sarita Kar177-182
-
An Analysis of Ethical Theories in the Direction of Sustainable Development: Aristotelian Virtue Ethics is the Greatest Option for Long-term Sustainability
Subhasmita Maharana, Ajit Kumar Behura183-187
-
Employee Well-being and Sustainable Development: Can Occupational Stress Play Spoilsport
Vikash Thakur, Govind Swaroop Pathak188-198
-
Role of Sericulture in Achieving Sustainable Development Goals
Ruyida Mushtaq, Binish Qadiri, Fayaz Ahmad Lone, Tariq Ahmad Raja, Harmeet Singh, Pervez Ahmed, Ravinder Sharma199-206
-
Geopolitical Risk, Globalization and Environmental Degradation in South Africa: Evidence from Advanced Quantiles Approach
Gold Olamide Lawal, Bisola Aladenika, Akadiri Akadiri, Ayodeji Samson Fatigun, Victoria Olushola Olanrewaju207-215
-
Boko-Haram Insurgency and Rural Livelihood Dilemma: Implication for Sustainable Development in North-East Nigeria
Tafida Ahmadu Abubakar, Michael Amurtiya216-225
-
Systematic Approach to Sustainable Development in Agricultural and Food Systems – Example of Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) and the Arctic Zone
Aigul M. Kazambayeva, Mira K. Begeyeva, Kanbibi U. Nursapina, Rakhila Rakhmetova226-234
-
Regional Development Environment, Local Government’s Character Behavior, and Sustainability: Empirical Evidence from China
Rong Zhou, Jian Wang, Dengke Yu235-250
-
The Configuration Effect of Tea Enterprises’ Sustainable Production Technologies in China: Based on the FsQCA Method
Yihui Chen251-260
Archives
-
Vol. 20 No. 2
2025-09-16 20
-
Vol. 20 No. 1
2025-01-10 22
-
Vol. 19 No. 2
2024-07-01 23
-
Vol. 19 No. 1
2024-01-08 27
-
Vol. 18 No. 2
2023-07-10 25
-
Vol. 18 No. 1
2023-01-01 25
-
Vol. 17 No. 2
2022-07-04 26
-
Vol. 17 No. 1
2022-01-03 28
-
Vol. 16 No. 2
2021-07-01 26
-
Vol. 16 No. 1
2021-01-04 24
Main Article Content
DOI
Authors
Abstract
After the rapid economic growth through reform and opening-up over 40 years, Chinese governments are seeking transformation for high-quality and sustainable development currently. Regional economic development is related to internal and external environments as well as local government’s character behaviors. Employing Neuro Linguistic Programming (NLP) and Consciousness-Context-Behavior (CCB) theory, we construct a theoretical framework to measure the relationships between regional development environment (RDE), local government’s character behavior (LGCB), and regional sustainable capability (RSC). We collect the data of 30 provinces in mainland China from 2001 to 2020 to conduct hypothesis testing and empirical analysis. The results show that both RDE and LGCB are associated with RSC, and LGCB significantly mediates the relationship between RDE and RSC. However, the effects of different RDE elements on RSC are heterogeneous. Our study enriches regional sustainable development theory. It arouses us to better understand LGCB and attach importance to the roles of RDE and LGCB in regional sustainability. The enlightenment is important to global developing countries.
Keywords:
References
ALDERETE M. V., 2018, The Mediating Role of ICT in the Development of Open Government, Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 21(3): 172-187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1097198X.2018.1498273
ANDERSSON S., SVENSSON G., MOLINA-CASTILLO F. J., OTERO-NEIRA C., LINDGREN J., KARLSSON N. P. E., LAURELL H., 2022, Sustainable Development – Direct and Indirect Effects Between Economic, Social, and Environmental Dimensions in Business Practices, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, early access, https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2261. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2261
CARAYANNIS E. G., CAMPBELL D. F. J., GRIGOROUDIS E., 2021, Democracy and the Environment: How Political Freedom is Linked with Environmental Sustainability, Sustainability, 13(10): 5522. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105522
CHU C. C., TSAI S. B., CHEN Y. H., et al., 2017, An Empirical Study on the Relationship Between Investor Protection, Government Behavior, and Financial Development, Sustainability, 9(12): 2199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su9122199
DONGWOO Y., JUNG J. K., 2019, Social Responsibility and Local Government: Soft Budget Constraint and Internal Decision Making Process, The Korean Journal of Local Government Studies, 23(1): 437-452. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20484/klog.23.1.18
DOU S. Q., YUE C., XU D. Y., WEI Y., LI H., 2022, Rethinking the ‘Resource Curse’: New Evidence from Nighttime Light Data, Resources Policy, 76: 102617. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102617
FOSS N. J., 2016, Reflections on a Decade of Microfoundations Research, Revista de Administracao, 51(1): 117-120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5700/rausp1227
GALERA A. N., BERJILLOS A. D., LOZANO M. R., VALENCIA P. T., 2015, Identifying Motivation of the Local Governments to Improve the Sustainability Transparency, Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 45E: 149-167.
GAO Y., MENG Y., 2021, Study on Construction and Evaluation Method of Eco-Environment Index System for Re-gional Economic Development, Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 30(4): 3394-3401.
GU S., ZHANG X., ZHONG S., XIE M., LU J., 2011, Features and Functional Orientation of Underdeveloped Re-source-Rich Regions, Resources Science, 33(1): 10-17.
GUO S., XI Y., LANG C., 2008, Organizational Personality: The Homogeneity of Individuals in the Organization, Management Review, 20(1): 17-25.
HONG D. L., CHIEN S. S., LIAO Y. K., 2020, Green Developmentalism and Trade-offs between Natural Preservation and Environmental Exploitation in China, Environment and Planning E – Nature and Space, 3(3): 688-705. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2514848619880896
HOU C. X., ZHANG M. M., WANG M. M., FU H. L., ZHANG M. J., 2021, Factors Influencing Grazing Behavior by Using the Consciousness-Context-Behavior Theory - a Case Study from Yanchi County, China, Land, 10(11): 1157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/land10111157
HOU X. H., LIU J. M., ZHANG D. J., 2019, Regional Sustainable Development: The Relationship between Natural Capital Utilization and Economic Development, Sustainable Development, 27(1): 183-195. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1915
JABBAR H., 2016, The Visible Hand: Markets, Politics, and Regulation in Post-Katrina New Orleans, Harvard Educational Review, 86(1): 1-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17763/0017-8055.86.1.1
JI H. J., DARNALL N., 2020, How Do External Conditions Affect the Design of Local Governments' Sustainability Strategies? Regulation & Governance, early access, DOI: 10.1111/rego.12334. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12334
KAJIKAWA Y., OHNO J., TAKEDA Y., MATSUSHIMA K., KOMIYAMA H., 2007, Creating an Academic Land-scape of Sustainability Science: An Analysis of the Citation Network, Sustainability Science, 2(2): 221-231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-007-0027-8
KAMMERBAUER J., 2001, The Dimensions of Sustainability: Ecological Fundamentals, Paradigmatic Models and Pathways, Interciencia, 26(8): 353-359.
KEMMI, S., MUTTON R., 2012, Education for Sustainability (EfS): Practice and Practice Architectures, Environmen-tal Education Research, 18(2):187-207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2011.596929
KHIZAR H. M. U., IQBAL, M. J., RASHEED, M. I., 2021, Business Orientation and Sustainable Development: A Systematic Review of Sustainability Orientation Literature and Future Research Avenues, Sustainable Development, 29(5): 1001-1017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2190
KIM S. D., 2017, The Effect of City Image on Public Administration Satisfaction and City Loyalty: Moderating Effect of Regional Pride, Journal of Channel and Retailing, 22(3):39-67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17657/jcr.2017.07.31.3
KLIEVINK B., JANSSEN M., 2009, Realizing Joined-up Government – Dynamic Capabilities and Stage Models for Transformation, Government Information Quarterly, 26(2): 275-284. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2008.12.007
KOTERA Y., SWEET M., 2019, Comparative Evaluation of Neuro-Linguistic Programming, British Journal of Guid-ance & Counselling, 47(6): 744-756. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03069885.2019.1622075
LI B., SHI Z. Y., TIAN C., 2018, Spatio-Temporal Difference and Influencing Factors of Environmental Adaptability Measurement of Human-Sea Economic System in Liaoning Coastal Area, Chinese Geographical Science, 28(2): 313-324. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-018-0948-4
LI C. L., YUAN R. S., KHAN M. A., PERVAIZ K., SUN X. R., 2020, Does the Mixed-Ownership Reform Affect the Innovation Strategy Choices of Chinese State-Owned Enterprises?, Sustainability, 12(7): 2587. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072587
LIN L., HONG Y. R., 2022, Developing a Green Bonds Market: Lessons from China, European Business Organization Law Review, 23(1): 143-185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40804-021-00231-1
LINDE L., SJODIN D., PARIDA V., WINCENT J., 2021, Dynamic Capabilities for Ecosystem Orchestration: A Capa-bility-based Framework for Smart City Innovation Initiatives, Technological Forecasting and Social Change,166: 120614. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120614
LIU M. J., QIN Q., ZOU Q. C., WANG Y., WEN Y. L., 2021, Natural Resource Dependence of Communities Around the Giant Panda Protected Land Based on Livelihood Capital, Agriculture - Basel, 11(11): 1123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11111123
LU Y. L., ZHANG Y. Q., CAO X. H., et al., 2019, Forty Years of Reform and Opening Up: China's Progress toward a Sustainable Path, Science Advances, 5(8): eaau9413. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aau9413
MA X., ZHAO K. C., LI Y. X., ZHU,H. Y., 2019, Infrastructure Investment and Sustainable Development in Coastal Areas in China, Journal of Coastal Research,94: 67-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2112/SI94-012.1
MOORE G., 2015, Corporate Character, Corporate Virtues, Business Ethics – A European Review, 24: S99-S114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12100
NAM T., 2015, Challenges and Concerns of Open Government: A Case of Government 3.0 in Korea, Social Science Computer Review, 33(5): 556-570. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439314560848
NAVARRO-GALERA A., ORTIZ-RODRIGUEZ, D., ALCARAZ-QUILES, F. J., 2019, A Stimulus to Transparency on Sustainability in European Local Governments through Population, Socioeconomic, Financial and Legal Factors, Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting, 48(4): 525-554.
NEUBERT M., CARLSON D., KACMAR K. M., ROBERTS J., CHONKO, L., 2009, The Virtuous Influence of Ethi-cal Leadership Behaviour: Evidence from the Field, Journal of Business Ethics, 90(2): 157-170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0037-9
OZSOY, I., 2009, From Economic Man to Social Man, Bilig, 48: 177-206.
PENG J., WANG Y., YE M., WU J., ZHANG Y., 2007, Environmental Impact Assessment of Industrial Structure Change in a Rural Region of China, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 132(1-3): 419-428. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-006-9544-7
SAJJAD A., SHAHBAZ W., 2020, Mindfulness and Social Sustainability: An Integrative Review, Social Indicators Research, 150(1): 73-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-020-02297-9
SHETH J. N., PARVATIYAR A., 2021, Sustainable Marketing: Market-Driving, not Market-Driven, Journal of Mac-romarketing, 41(1): 150-165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0276146720961836
SHIH H. S., SHYUR H. J., LEE E. S., 2007, An Extension of TOPSIS for Group Decision Making, Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 45(7-8): 801-813. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2006.03.023
SHIN D., 2019, The Determinants of Military Spending: Focusing on Democratic Accountability and Government Stabil-ity, Journal of Governance Studies, 14(3): 23-50.
SMETANA S., TAMASY C., MATHYS A., HEINZ V., 2016, Measuring Relative Sustainability of Regions Using Regional Sustainability Assessment Methodology, Geographical Analysis, 48(4): 391-410. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gean.12102
SMIEJA M., 2015, Weighted Approach to General Entropy Function, IMA Journal of Mathematical Control and Infor-mation, 32(2): 329-341. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/imamci/dnt044
SODERBAUM P., BROWN J., 2010, Democratizing Economics Pluralism as a Path toward Sustainability, Ecological Economics Reviews, 1185: 179-195. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05283.x
SOL J., VAN DER WAL M. M., BEERS P. J., WALS A. E. J., 2018, Reframing the Future: The Role of Reflexivity in Governance Networks in Sustainability Transitions, Environmental Education Research, 24(9): 1383-1405. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2017.1402171
SONG Y. J., HWANG J. S., 2018, A Study on Future Preparation Factors Affecting the Regional Strategy for Futures: Focusing on Sustainability and Competitiveness Factors, Legislation and Policy Studies,10(3): 33-71.
SUN W., WANG C., LIU C. G., WANG L., 2022, High-speed Rail Network Expansion and its Impact on Regional Economic Sustainability in the Yangtze River Delta, China, 2009-2018, Sustainability, 14(1): 155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010155
TAN R., HU R. M., VATN A., 2021, What Does Sustainability Demand? An Institutionalist Analysis with Applica-tions to China, Journal of Chinese Governance, 6(4): 486-514. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23812346.2021.1940690
TSAI K. H., LIAO Y. C., 2017, Sustainability Strategy and Eco-Innovation: A Moderation Model, Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(4): 426-437. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1926
WANG J. M., WANG J. H., 2011, The Influencing Elements of the Public Low-Carbon Consumption, and the Govern-ments' Regulatory Policies (in Chinese), Management World, 4: 58-68.
WANG Q., LI, W., 2020, Research Progress and Prospect of Regional Resources and Environment Carrying Capacity Evaluation, Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 29(7): 1487-1498.
WANG, T. K., JU, H. J., JIM, J. B., 2017, The Influencing Factors on Innovation of Local Governments: Focusing on the Moderating Effect of the External-Focus Culture, The Korea Local Administration Review, 31(4): 199-220.
WANG YU., FAN Y., WEI Y., 2006, Study on the Impact of Human Capital on the Regional Sustainability, Applica-tion of Statistics and Management, 25(2): 149-155.
WCED (World Commission on Environment and Development), 1987, Our common future, Oxford University Press, New York.
WHITEHEAD M., JONES R., PYKETT J., 2011, Governing Irrationality, or a More Than Rational Government? Re-flections on the Rescientisation of Decision Making in British Public Policy, Environment and Planning A – Economy and Space, 43(12): 2819-2837. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/a43575
XU W., SUN T., 2021, Evaluation of Rural Habitat Environment in Under-Developed Areas of Western China: A Case Study of Northern Shaanxi, Environment Development and Sustainability, early access, doi: 10.1007/s10668-021-01881-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01881-4
XU X., WU Q., 2018, A Model for Optimizing Regional Structure of Transport Infrastructure Investment based on Sustainability of Economic Growth, Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 35(11): 144-152.
YAHYA F., ABBAS G., HUSSAIN M., WAQAS M., 2022, Financial Development and Sustainable Competitiveness in Arctic Region: A Dynamic Panel Data Analysis, Problemy Ekorozwoju/ Problems of Sustainable Development, 17(1): 267-278. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35784/pe.2022.1.24
ZHONG R., PEI F. S., YANG K. Q., XIA Y., WANG H. L., YAN G. X., 2021, Coordinating Socio-Economic and Environmental Dimensions to Evaluate Regional Sustainability – Towards an Integrative Framework, Ecological Indicators, 130: 108085. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108085
Article Details
Abstract views: 226
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
