The Configuration Effect of Tea Enterprises’ Sustainable Production Technologies in China: Based on the FsQCA Method

Yihui Chen

chenyihui@fafu.edu.cn
Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Anxi College of Tea Science, 15 Shangxiadian Rd, 350002, Fuzhou, China (China)
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1561-8888

Abstract

Using the survey data of 45 tea enterprises in Fujian Province, China, this paper adopted fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) to study the adoption of the sustainable production technologies by tea enterprises. The results show that there are two configurations for the path to achieve the adoption of high sustainable production technologies. The core condition combination of the first configuration is the existence of sustainable development capabilities, the degree of government support, and the resource and environmental endowment, while that of the second configuration is the existence of enterprise expected value, industrial organization mode and the resource and environmental endowment. Moreover, the path achieving non-highly sustainable production technologies adoption mainly summarized as a configuration. Specifically, the core condition is the absence of sustainable development capabilities, enterprise development strategies, and the resource and environmental endowments. Furthermore, some practical policy recommendations were put forward based on the above conclusions in this paper.


Keywords:

agricultural enterprise, sustainable production technologies, fsQCA, China

AI F. Y., WANG M. Z., 2018, Economic benefit evaluation of industrial enterprises based on BP neural network optimi-zation algorithm, Latin American Applied Research, 48(3): 223-227.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.52292/j.laar.2018.232   Google Scholar

BOSCOIANU M., PRELIPCEAN G., LUPAN M., 2018, Innovation enterprise as a vehicle for sustainable development - A general framework for the design of typical strategies based on enterprise systems engineering, dynamic capabilities, and option thinking, Journal of Cleaner Production, 172: 3498-3507.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.120   Google Scholar

BOTEY M., VAQUERO-DIEGO M., SASTRE F. J., 2020, Perceived emotional intelligence of university professors based on the nature of the subject taught, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 161, 120292.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120292   Google Scholar

CALABRESE A., COSTA R., LEVIALDI N., MENICHINI T., 2019, Integrating sustainability into strategic decision-making: A fuzzy AHP method for the selection of relevant sustainability issues, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 139: 155-168.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.11.005   Google Scholar

FELZENSZTEIN C., DEANS K. R., DANA L., 2019, Small firms in regional clusters: Local networks and international-ization in the Southern Hemisphere, Journal of Small Business Management, 57(2): 496-516.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12388   Google Scholar

GLIGOR D., BOZKURT S., RUSSO I., 2019, Achieving customer engagement with social media: A qualitative compar-ative analysis approach, Journal of Business Research, 101: 59-69.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.04.006   Google Scholar

GRECKHAMER T., FURNARI S., FISS P. C., AGUILERA R. V., 2018, Studying configurations with qualitative comparative analysis: Best practices in strategy and organization research, Strategic Organization, 16(4): 482-495.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127018786487   Google Scholar

GRZEŚKOWIAK J., ŁOCHYŃSKA M., FRANKOWSKI J., 2022, Sericulture in terms of sustainable development in agriculture, Problemy Ekorozwoju/ Problems of Sustainable Development, 17(2): 210-217.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.35784/pe.2022.2.23   Google Scholar

GUO K., ZHANG T. T., 2021, Research on the development path and growth mechanism of unicorn enterprises, Mathe-matical Problems in Engineering, 2021, 9960828.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9960828   Google Scholar

HUANG M. X., WANG Z. Z., CHEN T., 2019, Analysis on the theory and practice of industrial symbiosis based on bibliometrics and social network analysis, Journal of Cleaner Production, 213: 956-967.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.131   Google Scholar

HUYBERS T., BENNETT J., 2003, Environmental management and the competitiveness of nature-based tourism desti-nations, Environmental and Resource Economics, 24(3): 213-233.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022942001100   Google Scholar

KRAUS S., RIBEIRO-SORIANO D., SCHÜSSLER M., 2018, Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) in entrepreneurship and innovation research - the rise of a method, International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 14: 15-33.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-017-0461-8   Google Scholar

LI Y., XIAO H., BU N., LUO J., XIA H., KONG L., YU H., 2021, Configuration-based promotion: A new approach to destination image sustainability, Sustainability, 13(21), 12174.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su132112174   Google Scholar

LI Z. G., LI Y. K., LONG D., 2021, Research on the improvement of technical efficiency of China’s property insurance industry: A fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis, International Journal of Emerging Markets, 16(6): 1077-1104.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-01-2020-0091   Google Scholar

LIAO Z., 2018, Content analysis of China’s environmental policy instruments on promoting firms’ environmental innova-tion, Environmental Science and Policy, 88: 46-51.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.06.013   Google Scholar

LIU Y., MEZEI J., KOSTAKOS V., LI H., 2017, Applying configurational analysis to IS behavioral research: A meth-odological alternative for modelling combinatorial complexities, Information Systems Journal, 27(1): 59-89.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12094   Google Scholar

PAPATHEODOROU A., PAPPAS N., 2017, Economic recession, job vulnerability, and tourism decision making: A qualitative comparative analysis, Journal of Travel Research, 56(5): 663-677.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287516651334   Google Scholar

QIN Y. J., YANG J., 2020, Influence of the configuration effect of environment and organization factors on the innova-tion of information technology enterprises – Qualitative comparative analysis based on fuzzy set, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 38(6): 6765-6775.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-179754   Google Scholar

SCOTT A., STORPER M., 2003, Regions, globalization, development, Regional Studies, 37(6-7): 579-593.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340032000108697a   Google Scholar

ŠEREMEŠIĆ S., DOLIJANOVIĆ Ž., SIMIN M., VOJNOV B., TRBIĆ D., 2021, The future we want: Sustainable development goals accomplishment with organic agriculture, Problemy Ekorozwoju/ Problems of Sustainable Develop-ment, 16(2): 171-180.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.35784/pe.2021.2.18   Google Scholar

THOMANN E., MAGGETTI M., 2020, Designing research with qualitative comparative analysis (QCA): Approaches, challenges, and tools, Sociological Methods and Research, 49(2): 356-386.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124117729700   Google Scholar

TRACEY M., VONDEREMBSE M. A., LIM J.-S., 1999, Manufacturing technology and strategy formulation: Keys to enhancing competitiveness and improving performance, Journal of Operations Management, 17(4): 411-428.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(98)00045-X   Google Scholar

VEIGA L. E., MAGRINI A., 2009, Eco-industrial park development in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: a tool for sustainable development, Journal of Cleaner Production, 17: 653-661.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.11.009   Google Scholar

WU Y. N., XIAO X. L., SONG Z. Y., 2017, Competitiveness analysis of coal industry in China: A diamond model study, Resources Policy, 52: 39-53.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2017.01.015   Google Scholar

YANG T., LONG R., LI W., 2018, Suggestion on tax policy for promoting the PPP projects of charging infrastructure in China, Journal of Cleaner Production, 174: 133-138.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.197   Google Scholar

ZHANG Y. H., CHEN S., FAN J., 2020, Enterprise growth model: ‘pollution’ or ‘environmental protection’, Environ-mental Engineering and Management Journal, 19(9): 1605-1613.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.30638/eemj.2020.150   Google Scholar

ZHOU Y., XU G., MINSHALL T., LIU P., 2015, How do public demonstration projects promote green-manufacturing technologies? A case study from China, Sustainable Development, 23(4): 217-231.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1589   Google Scholar

ZHU N., BU Y., JIN M., MBROH N., 2020, Green financial behavior and green development strategy of Chinese power companies in the context of carbon tax, Journal of Cleaner Production, 245, 118908.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118908   Google Scholar

Download


Published
2023-07-10

Cited by

Chen, Y. (2023). The Configuration Effect of Tea Enterprises’ Sustainable Production Technologies in China: Based on the FsQCA Method. Problemy Ekorozwoju, 18(1), 251–260. https://doi.org/10.35784/pe.2023.1.26

Authors

Yihui Chen 
chenyihui@fafu.edu.cn
Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Anxi College of Tea Science, 15 Shangxiadian Rd, 350002, Fuzhou, China China
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1561-8888

Statistics

Abstract views: 313
PDF downloads: 28


License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.