The Configuration Effect of Tea Enterprises’ Sustainable Production Technologies in China: Based on the FsQCA Method
Yihui Chen
chenyihui@fafu.edu.cnFujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Anxi College of Tea Science, 15 Shangxiadian Rd, 350002, Fuzhou, China (China)
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1561-8888
Abstract
Using the survey data of 45 tea enterprises in Fujian Province, China, this paper adopted fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) to study the adoption of the sustainable production technologies by tea enterprises. The results show that there are two configurations for the path to achieve the adoption of high sustainable production technologies. The core condition combination of the first configuration is the existence of sustainable development capabilities, the degree of government support, and the resource and environmental endowment, while that of the second configuration is the existence of enterprise expected value, industrial organization mode and the resource and environmental endowment. Moreover, the path achieving non-highly sustainable production technologies adoption mainly summarized as a configuration. Specifically, the core condition is the absence of sustainable development capabilities, enterprise development strategies, and the resource and environmental endowments. Furthermore, some practical policy recommendations were put forward based on the above conclusions in this paper.
Keywords:
agricultural enterprise, sustainable production technologies, fsQCA, ChinaReferences
AI F. Y., WANG M. Z., 2018, Economic benefit evaluation of industrial enterprises based on BP neural network optimi-zation algorithm, Latin American Applied Research, 48(3): 223-227.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.52292/j.laar.2018.232
Google Scholar
BOSCOIANU M., PRELIPCEAN G., LUPAN M., 2018, Innovation enterprise as a vehicle for sustainable development - A general framework for the design of typical strategies based on enterprise systems engineering, dynamic capabilities, and option thinking, Journal of Cleaner Production, 172: 3498-3507.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.120
Google Scholar
BOTEY M., VAQUERO-DIEGO M., SASTRE F. J., 2020, Perceived emotional intelligence of university professors based on the nature of the subject taught, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 161, 120292.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120292
Google Scholar
CALABRESE A., COSTA R., LEVIALDI N., MENICHINI T., 2019, Integrating sustainability into strategic decision-making: A fuzzy AHP method for the selection of relevant sustainability issues, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 139: 155-168.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.11.005
Google Scholar
FELZENSZTEIN C., DEANS K. R., DANA L., 2019, Small firms in regional clusters: Local networks and international-ization in the Southern Hemisphere, Journal of Small Business Management, 57(2): 496-516.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12388
Google Scholar
GLIGOR D., BOZKURT S., RUSSO I., 2019, Achieving customer engagement with social media: A qualitative compar-ative analysis approach, Journal of Business Research, 101: 59-69.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.04.006
Google Scholar
GRECKHAMER T., FURNARI S., FISS P. C., AGUILERA R. V., 2018, Studying configurations with qualitative comparative analysis: Best practices in strategy and organization research, Strategic Organization, 16(4): 482-495.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127018786487
Google Scholar
GRZEŚKOWIAK J., ŁOCHYŃSKA M., FRANKOWSKI J., 2022, Sericulture in terms of sustainable development in agriculture, Problemy Ekorozwoju/ Problems of Sustainable Development, 17(2): 210-217.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.35784/pe.2022.2.23
Google Scholar
GUO K., ZHANG T. T., 2021, Research on the development path and growth mechanism of unicorn enterprises, Mathe-matical Problems in Engineering, 2021, 9960828.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9960828
Google Scholar
HUANG M. X., WANG Z. Z., CHEN T., 2019, Analysis on the theory and practice of industrial symbiosis based on bibliometrics and social network analysis, Journal of Cleaner Production, 213: 956-967.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.131
Google Scholar
HUYBERS T., BENNETT J., 2003, Environmental management and the competitiveness of nature-based tourism desti-nations, Environmental and Resource Economics, 24(3): 213-233.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022942001100
Google Scholar
KRAUS S., RIBEIRO-SORIANO D., SCHÜSSLER M., 2018, Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) in entrepreneurship and innovation research - the rise of a method, International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 14: 15-33.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-017-0461-8
Google Scholar
LI Y., XIAO H., BU N., LUO J., XIA H., KONG L., YU H., 2021, Configuration-based promotion: A new approach to destination image sustainability, Sustainability, 13(21), 12174.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su132112174
Google Scholar
LI Z. G., LI Y. K., LONG D., 2021, Research on the improvement of technical efficiency of China’s property insurance industry: A fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis, International Journal of Emerging Markets, 16(6): 1077-1104.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-01-2020-0091
Google Scholar
LIAO Z., 2018, Content analysis of China’s environmental policy instruments on promoting firms’ environmental innova-tion, Environmental Science and Policy, 88: 46-51.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.06.013
Google Scholar
LIU Y., MEZEI J., KOSTAKOS V., LI H., 2017, Applying configurational analysis to IS behavioral research: A meth-odological alternative for modelling combinatorial complexities, Information Systems Journal, 27(1): 59-89.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12094
Google Scholar
PAPATHEODOROU A., PAPPAS N., 2017, Economic recession, job vulnerability, and tourism decision making: A qualitative comparative analysis, Journal of Travel Research, 56(5): 663-677.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287516651334
Google Scholar
QIN Y. J., YANG J., 2020, Influence of the configuration effect of environment and organization factors on the innova-tion of information technology enterprises – Qualitative comparative analysis based on fuzzy set, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 38(6): 6765-6775.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-179754
Google Scholar
SCOTT A., STORPER M., 2003, Regions, globalization, development, Regional Studies, 37(6-7): 579-593.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340032000108697a
Google Scholar
ŠEREMEŠIĆ S., DOLIJANOVIĆ Ž., SIMIN M., VOJNOV B., TRBIĆ D., 2021, The future we want: Sustainable development goals accomplishment with organic agriculture, Problemy Ekorozwoju/ Problems of Sustainable Develop-ment, 16(2): 171-180.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.35784/pe.2021.2.18
Google Scholar
THOMANN E., MAGGETTI M., 2020, Designing research with qualitative comparative analysis (QCA): Approaches, challenges, and tools, Sociological Methods and Research, 49(2): 356-386.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124117729700
Google Scholar
TRACEY M., VONDEREMBSE M. A., LIM J.-S., 1999, Manufacturing technology and strategy formulation: Keys to enhancing competitiveness and improving performance, Journal of Operations Management, 17(4): 411-428.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(98)00045-X
Google Scholar
VEIGA L. E., MAGRINI A., 2009, Eco-industrial park development in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: a tool for sustainable development, Journal of Cleaner Production, 17: 653-661.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.11.009
Google Scholar
WU Y. N., XIAO X. L., SONG Z. Y., 2017, Competitiveness analysis of coal industry in China: A diamond model study, Resources Policy, 52: 39-53.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2017.01.015
Google Scholar
YANG T., LONG R., LI W., 2018, Suggestion on tax policy for promoting the PPP projects of charging infrastructure in China, Journal of Cleaner Production, 174: 133-138.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.197
Google Scholar
ZHANG Y. H., CHEN S., FAN J., 2020, Enterprise growth model: ‘pollution’ or ‘environmental protection’, Environ-mental Engineering and Management Journal, 19(9): 1605-1613.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.30638/eemj.2020.150
Google Scholar
ZHOU Y., XU G., MINSHALL T., LIU P., 2015, How do public demonstration projects promote green-manufacturing technologies? A case study from China, Sustainable Development, 23(4): 217-231.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1589
Google Scholar
ZHU N., BU Y., JIN M., MBROH N., 2020, Green financial behavior and green development strategy of Chinese power companies in the context of carbon tax, Journal of Cleaner Production, 245, 118908.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118908
Google Scholar
Authors
Yihui Chenchenyihui@fafu.edu.cn
Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Anxi College of Tea Science, 15 Shangxiadian Rd, 350002, Fuzhou, China China
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1561-8888
Statistics
Abstract views: 439PDF downloads: 45
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.