Towards Co-existence. Responsibility in the Anthropocene Debate
Article Sidebar
Open full text
Issue Vol. 17 No. 2 (2022)
-
Sustainable Development and Sustainable Science. Where We Came From, Where We Are Now and Where We Are Heading? Part I: The History of the Concept
Magdaléna Drastichová7-18
-
The Real Tragedy of the Commons – Garrett Hardin (1968) Revised
Stefan Brunnhuber19-23
-
Towards Co-existence. Responsibility in the Anthropocene Debate
Jeremiasz Szyndler24-30
-
Post-COVID-19 Revitalisation and Prospects for Climate Neutral Energy Security Technologies
Olena Borysiak, Vasyl Brych31-38
-
COVID-19: Vaccine Hesitancy in Africa and the Way Forward
Lukman Ahmed Omeiza, Abul Kalam Azad, Kateryna Kozak, Abaniwo Rose Mafo, Ukashat Mamudu, Daniel Aikhonmu Oseyemen39-46
-
Impact of Entrepreneurship on Sustainable Development in Emerging Markets under the Conditions of COVID-19
Maja Ivanović-Đukić, Tamara Rađenović, Nemanja Veselinović47-58
-
Do the Outbreak of COVID-19 Influence the China Stock Market?
Junaid Ashraf, Franck Edouard Gnahe, Fei-Ming Huang, Zeinab Rizk59-68
-
Digitalization and Sustainable Development: the New COVID-19 Challenge Requires Non-standard Solutions
Oksana Polishchuk, Tetiana Kulinich, Nataly Martynovych, Yuliia Popova69-79
-
Digital Information Security: Coronavirus Crisis Impact on the Accountants, Business Analysts and Auditors Training
Karina Nazarova, Mariia Nezhyva, Tetіana Metil, Volodymyr Hordopolov, Liudmyla Prystupa, Olesya Moyseyenko80-90
-
Transition of Logistics to Sustainable Development Under the Impact of COVID-19
Maksym Kutsenko, Оleksii Kostiennikov, Petr Yaremovich, Zoreslava Liulchak, Serhii Voroshnov91-100
-
Tax Policy for Economic Recovery and Sustainable Development After COVID-19
Tetiana Kaneva, Igor Chugunov, Mykola Pasichnyi, Andriy Nikitishin, Nataliia Husarevych102-109
-
Renewable Energy and Poverty in Sustainable Development of the European Union
Julita Mlaskawa110-123
-
Evaluation of Social Protection Performance in EU Countries: Multiple-criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA)
Milan Marković, Jelena J. Stanković, Panagiota Digkoglou, Ivana Marjanović124-132
-
Environmental Refugees, Suggested Solutions of the Problem in the Framework of International Law
Piotr Krajewski133-139
-
A Brief Analysis of SDG 3 – Good Health and Well-being – and its Synergies and Trade-offs with the other Sustainable Development Goals
G Venkatesh140-147
-
Impact of Financial Globalization on Environmental Degradation in the E7 Countries: Application of the Hybrid Nonparametric Quantile Causality Approach
Tomiwa Sunday Adebayo148-160
-
International Trade, Corruption and Economic Growth: Evidence from Selected Sub-Saharan Countries
Busayo Aderounmu, Eniola Ayoade, Emmanuel Oni161-165
-
Corporate Entrepreneurship in the Pursuit of Sustainable Development: Creating a More Sustainable Future
Rajesh Kumar, Govind Swaroop Pathak166-177
-
Circular Economy as a Model of Achieving Sustainable Development
Viktoriia Roleders, Tetyana Oriekhova, Galina Zaharieva178-185
-
International Tourism as a Tool of European Integration Within Eastern European Countries
Anatoliy Parfinenko, Olena Yevtushenko, Iryna Panova, Polina Podlepina, Maksym Onatskyi186-196
-
Eco-innovation and Sustainable Development
Silvana Ilic, Tanja Petrovic, Gordana Djukic197-203
-
Intangible Heritage and Sustainable Development Strategies
Jawdat Goussous204-209
-
Sericulture in Terms of Sustainable Development in Agriculture
Joanna Grześkowiak, Małgorzata Łochyńska, Jakub Frankowski210-217
-
Arsenic Contamination of Groundwater in Bhojpur District of Bihar, India: A Threat to Sustainability
Avinash Ranjan, Pammy Kumari218-229
-
How Humble Leadership Affects Voluntary Green Behavior and Green Performance? The Roles of Job Autonomy and Green Supporting Climate in Hotels
Omar Alsetoohy, Mohammed Hasan Ali Al-Abyadh, Esra Sipahi Döngül, Mohamed Fathy Agina, Abdallah Elshaer230-242
-
Storytelling for Behavior Change: Use of Folktales for Promoting Sustainable Behaviors
Soumita Mitra, Ahmed Sameer243-247
Archives
-
Vol. 19 No. 2
2024-07-01 24
-
Vol. 19 No. 1
2024-01-08 27
-
Vol. 18 No. 2
2023-07-10 25
-
Vol. 18 No. 1
2023-01-01 25
-
Vol. 17 No. 2
2022-07-04 26
-
Vol. 17 No. 1
2022-01-03 28
-
Vol. 16 No. 2
2021-07-01 26
-
Vol. 16 No. 1
2021-01-04 24
-
Vol. 15 No. 2
2020-07-01 24
-
Vol. 15 No. 1
2020-01-02 24
Main Article Content
DOI
Authors
Abstract
P. Crutzen and E. Stoermer’s concept that humanity has entered a new geological epoch – the Anthropocene, in which the human species has become the leading geological force, is the subject of multidisciplinary scientific research. The debate on the Age of Man reconnects the sphere of facts and the normative sphere, while still continuing the eco-developmental concept oriented towards the search for new socio-economic solutions. One of the assumptions of the naturalistic narrative of the Anthropocene is the conviction that human action has the greatest impact on the environment and we are responsible for its condition. Often compared in literature to other great revolutions in science – Copernicus‘ and Darwin‘s theory – the paradigm shift in thinking in the Anthropocene forces us to rethink the key concepts of classical philosophy: human, nature, responsibility. The article presents an outline of the ethical debate on responsibility in the Anthropocene, considering its collective and individual aspects, and introduces a new concept of co-existence, which integrates ecosystems with the technosphere.
Keywords:
References
BIŃCZYK E., 2018, Epoka człowieka, PWN, Warszawa.
BIŃCZYK E., 2013, Ocalić Gaję i zbawić zbiorowość. Ekoteologiczne sugestie Brunona Latour, Stan rzeczy, 2(5): 137- DOI: https://doi.org/10.51196/srz.5.10
BIŃCZYK E., 2018 Troska o postprzyrodę w epoce antropocenu, Etyka 57: 137-155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14394/42
BONNEUIL C., FRESSOZ J.B., 2017, Shock of The Anthropocene, Verso Books Press, Londyn.
CIANCONI P., BETRO S., JANIIRI L., 2020, The Impact of Climate Change on Mental Health: A Systematic Descriptive Review, Frotniers in Psychiatry, 11(74): 1-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00074
CIĄŻELA H., 2006, Etyka odpowiedzialności H. Jonasa, a ‘trwały i zrównoważony rozwój’ (Imperatywy i dylematy), Problemy Ekorozwoju/ Problems of Sustainable Development, 1(2): 107-114.
GARDINER S., 2004, Ethics and Global Climate Change, Ethics 114(3): 555-600. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/382247
HAMILTON C., 2017, Defiant Earth, Allen & Unwin Press, Crow’s Nest.
HAYES K., BLASHKI G., BURKE S., REIFELS L., 2018, Climate change and mental health: risks, impacts and priority actions, International Journal of Mental Health Systems, 12(28): 1-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13033-018-0210-6
HOŁY-ŁUCZAJ M., BLOK V., 2019, How to Deal with Hybrids in the Anthropocene? Towards a Philosophy of Technology and Environmental, Philosophy 2.0, Environmental Values, 28: 325–345. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3197/096327119X15519764179818
HORNBORG A., 2015, The Political Ecology of Technocene: uncovering ecologically unequal exchange in the world DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315743424-5
system, The Anthropocene and Global Environmental Crisis, Routledge, New York Studies, 44(3): 594-630.
JAMIESON D., 1992, Ethics, Public Policy and Global Warming, Science, Technology & Human Values, 17(2): 139- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/016224399201700201
JONAS H., 1984, The Imperative of Responsibility, in Search of an Ethics for the Technological Age, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
IPPC, Special report: Climate Change and Land, https://www.ipcc.ch/srccl/ (20.05.2021).
KIPEAS A., Człowiek wobec dylematów filozofii techniki, Wydawnictwo Gnome, Katowice.
KEMPF H., 2008, How the Rich are Destroying the Earth, Green Books, Cambridge.
LATOUR B., 2017, Facing Gaia: Eight Lectures on the New Climate Regime, John Wiley & Sons, Cambridge.
MARZEC A, 2018, ‘Jesteśmy połączonym z sobą światem’ – Timothy Morton i widmo innej wspólnoty, Teksty drugie 2: 88-101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18318/td.2018.2.6
MARZEC A, 2019, Czy warzywa pamiętają o swoich korzeniach? O nostalgii w społeczeństwie roślin i projekcie ekologii bez ‘Natury’, Poetyki ekocydu. Historia, natura, konflikt, eds. Ubertowska A., Korczyńska-Partyka D., Kuliś E., IBL, Warsaw: 69-83.
MCKIBBEN B., 2006, The End of Nature, Random House inc.
MOORE J., 2017, The Capitalocene Part I: On the Nature & Origins of Our Ecological Crisis, Journal of Peasant: 1-39.
MORTON T., 2016 Dark Ecology: For a Logic of Future Coexistence, Columbia University. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7312/mort17752
NORGARD K., 2012, Climate Change, Emotions and Everyday Life, MIT Press, Cambridge.
ORESKES N., Conway E., 2011, Merchants of Doubt, Bloomsbury Publishing, Londyn.
RENN J., 2020, The Evolution of Knowledge: rethinking Science for the Anthropocene, Princeton University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691185675
RIPPLE J & 15 364 scientists from 184 countries, 2017, World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notic, BioScience, 67(12): 1026-1028. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/bix125
ROCKSTROM J., STEFFEN W., 2009, Planetary Boundaries: Exploring the Safe Operating Space for Humanity, Ecology and Society, 14(2): 32-66.
STIEGLER B., 2018, Neganthropocene, Open Humanities Press.
TYBURSKI W., 2006, Powstanie i rozwój filozofii ekologicznej, Problemy Ekorozwoju/ Problems of Sustainable Development, 1(1): 7-15.
UNEP, Global Environmental Outlook 6, https://www.unep.org/resources/global-environment-outlook-6 (20.05.2021).
VOGEL S., 2015, Thinking Like a Mall Environmental Philosophy After the End of Nature, MIT Press, Cambridge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262029100.001.0001
WILISTON B., 2015, The Anthropocene Project: Virtue in the Age of Climate Change, University of Oxford Press, Oxford. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198746713.001.0001
Article Details
Abstract views: 199
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
