Studies on Improving the Performance of Small and Micro Enterprises through Green Innovation
Article Sidebar
Open full text
Issue Vol. 17 No. 1 (2022)
-
The Efficiency of Health Systems in Response to the Covid-19 Pandemic: Evidence from the EU Countries
Tamara Rađenović, Vladimir Radivojević, Bojan Krstić, Tanja Stanišić, Snežana Živković7-15
-
Efficiency Assessment of Tax Measures in the European Countries Against the Effects of COVID-19
Daria Bilenko, Serhii Kozlovskyi, Natalya Ivanyuta, Viktoriia Baidala, Ruslan Lavrov, Volodymyr Kozlovskyi16-22
-
Formation of Sustainable Investment Attractiveness of Regions Under the Conditions of COVID-19
Tetiana Polozova, Yurii Kutsenko, Oleksandra Kanova23-35
-
Going Green Supply Chain Management During COVID-19, Assessing the Best Supplier Selection Criteria: A Triple Bottom Line (TBL) Approach
Maryam Khokhar, Sayma Zia, Tahir Islam, Anshuman Sharma, Wasim Iqbal, Muhammad Irshad36-51
-
Empowering Theory of Poverty Reduction for Sustainable Development: Does the Welfare of Descendants Matter?
Juliusz Piwowarski, Larysa Yankovska, Bohdan-Petro Koshovyi, Ira Von-Nagy, Andrii Yevstakhevych52-63
-
Natural Resources in Function of Sustainable and Competitive Tourism Development of the EU Countries
Tanja Stanišić, Snežana Milićević, Bojan Krstić64-70
-
Suitability of Rural Living & Work Facilities, Spatial Behavior of Farmers and Family Income
Yanling Mao, Na Li71-83
-
Sustainable Development and Religion. A European Perspective
Paweł Rydzewski84-95
-
Role of Religion in Environmental Sustainability: An Indian Perspective
Sarita Kar, Manisha Tripathy96-100
-
Analysis of Child Marriage and Related Policies in Indonesia: Sustainable Development Issue
Noverman Duadji, Novita Tresiana101-113
-
Inclusive Education as a Tool For Implementing the Sustainable Development Goals on the Basis of Humanization of Society
Oksana Zhukova, Larysa Platash, Liudmyla Tymchuk114-122
-
What is Right and What is Wrong in the Environmental Governance Model? Environmental Regulations for Improving Environmental Sustainability Ratings
Jajat S. Ardiwinata, Khalid Zaman, Abdelmohsen A. Nassani, Mohamed Haffar, Chairil Faif Pasani, Sriyanto Sriyanto123-139
-
Efficiency Evaluation and Influencing Factors of Government Financial Expenditure on Environmental Protection: An SBM Super-efficiency Model Based on Undesired Outputs
Su Jialu, Ma Zhiqiang, Li Mingxing, Fredrick Oteng Agyeman, Zhu Yue140-150
-
Studies on Improving the Performance of Small and Micro Enterprises through Green Innovation
Yuhong Cao, Jianxin You, Yongjiang Shi, Wei Hu151-161
-
Possibilities of Developing Sustainable World by Introducing Bioeconomy: Global Perspective
Oleh V. Skydan, Maryna I. Yaremova, Liudmyla V. Tarasovych, Vitalii Ye. Dankevych, Nataliia M. Kutsmus162-170
-
Green Economy – Vector of Sustainable Development
Anar Ospanova, Iryna Popovychenko, Elena Chuprina171-181
-
Challenges for Improving Agricultural Resilience in the Context of Sustainability and Rural Development
Mangirdas Morkunas, Agnė Žičkienė, Tomas Baležentis, Artiom Volkov, Dalia Štreimikienė, Erika Ribašauskienė182-195
-
Time-Frequency Co-Movements Between Biomass Energy Consumption and Human Development in Brics Countries
Ngo Thai Hung196-210
-
Impact of the Agreements of the Eurasian Economic Union on the Competitiveness of the Agricultural Sector of the Member States
Saule S. Shintaeva, Alexandr A. Pyagay, Makhabbat K. Iskakova, Botagoz N. Naukenova, Saule T. Zhumasheva211-221
-
Air Pollution Regulations in China: A Policy Simulation Approach with Evolutionary Game
Zhaopeng Chu, Chen Bian, Jun Yang222-233
-
Feminist Mining: A Step Towards Sustainable Mininig in India
Priya Singh, Ajit Kumar Behura235-245
-
Trade Openness, Foreign Direct Investment and Sustainable Agriculture in Africa
Ping Ju, Muhammad Khalid Anser, Romanus Osabohien, Onyinye Ochuba, Rolle Remi Ahuru, Junaid Ashraf246-255
-
Systematic Review on Urban Ecosystem Services in South-East Asia: Asean Countries
Nur Shazwanie Rosehan, Azlan Abas, Kadaruddin Aiyub256-266
-
Financial Development and Sustainable Competitiveness in Arctic Region: A Dynamic Panel Data Analysis
Farzan Yahya, Ghulam Abbas, Muhammad Hussain, Muhammad Waqas267-278
-
Green Energy in the Caribbean: Influence on Toursim and Economic Development
Tatiana Tazikhina, Vladimir Kvasha, Yulia Solovova, Igbal Guliev279-287
-
Samkhya Philosophy, Deep Ecology and Sustainable Development
Nanda Gopal Biswas, Gyan Prakash288-292
-
Reproduction of Human Capital as a Strategic Priority for Sustainable Development of Regions
Olena Krasnonosova, Daria Mykhailenko, Ihor Yaroshenko293-300
-
Environmental Aspects of the European Experience in Landscape Planning
Bao Yu, Jianmei Wang, Ya Li301-309
Archives
-
Vol. 19 No. 2
2024-07-01 23
-
Vol. 19 No. 1
2024-01-08 27
-
Vol. 18 No. 2
2023-07-10 25
-
Vol. 18 No. 1
2023-01-01 25
-
Vol. 17 No. 2
2022-07-04 26
-
Vol. 17 No. 1
2022-01-03 28
-
Vol. 16 No. 2
2021-07-01 26
-
Vol. 16 No. 1
2021-01-04 24
-
Vol. 15 No. 2
2020-07-01 24
-
Vol. 15 No. 1
2020-01-02 24
Main Article Content
DOI
Authors
Abstract
It is an important goal of China’s 2025 Strategy to build an environmental governance system with the government as the leading role, enterprises as the main body, and social organizations and the public all participate actively. In this context, whether and how small and micro enterprises, as a force of rejuvenating the country through science and technology, participate in the construction of environmental governance system is discussed in this paper. This study uses the 12th China small and micro enterprise survey database to deeply analyze the direct and indirect effects between green innovation and small and micro enterprise performance, and finds that: in the direct effect analysis, the direct promotion effect of green innovation on the financial performance of small and micro enterprises is related to the development stage of small and micro enterprises, which is significant in the initial stage and mature stage, but not significant in the growth stage; in the indirect effect analysis, green innovation can indirectly improve the overall performance of small and micro enterprises by improving their environmental and social responsibility performance. At the same time, green innovation can amplify the role of other factors in promoting the overall performance. This study not only enriches the research scope of green innovation theory from the subdivision dimension, provides a new perspective for the integration of green innovation and social responsibility theory, it also provides theoretical reference and guidance for the green innovation practice of small and micro enterprises.
Keywords:
References
ARFI W.B., HIKKEROVA L., SAHUT J.,2017, External knowledge sources, green innovation and performance, Technological forecasting and social change, 129: 210-220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.09.017
AGHION P., FESTRÉ A.,2017, Schumpeterian growth theory, schumpeter, and growth policy design, Journal of evolutionary economics, 27(1): 25-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-016-0465-5
BLOCK J.H., 2012, R&D investments in family and founder firms: an agency perspective, Journal of business venturing, 27(2): 248-265. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2010.09.003
CAO H.J., CHEN Z.W., 2017, The driving effect of internal and external environment on green innovation strategy of enterprises-the regulatory role of senior executives' environmental awareness, Nankai management review, 20(6): 95-103.
CALABRO A., VECCHIARINI M., GAST J., 2019, Innovation in family firms: a systematic literature review and guidance for future research, International journal of management reviews, 21(3): 317-355. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12192
CHAN H.K.YEE R.W.Y., DAI J., LIM M.K., 2016, The moderating effect of environmental dynamism on green product innovation and performance, International journal of production economics, 181: 384-391. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.12.006
CHEN S., HE W.L., ZHANG R., 2017, Venture capital and enterprise innovation: impact and potential mechanism, Management world, 1: 158-169.
CHEN L.T., ZHU Y.L., GUO L., 2018, Research on the motivation of enterprises' green innovation response behavior under multiple institutional pressures, Journal of management, 15(5): 710-717.
CHIOU T.Y., CHAN H.K., LETTICE F., CHUNG S.H.,2011, The Influence of greening the suppliers and green innovation on environmental performance and competitive advantage in Taiwan, Transportation research part E: logistics and transportation review, 47(6): 822-836. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2011.05.016
CRAIG J., DIBRELL C., 2006, The natural environment, innovation and firm performance: a comparative study, Family business review, 19(4): 275-288. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2006.00075.x
DANGELICO R.M., NASTASI A., PISA S., 2019, A comparison of family and nonfamily small firms in their approach to green innovation: A study of Italian DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2324
companies in the agri-food industry, Business strategy and the environment, 28(7): 1434-1448.
EDWARDS J.R., LISAS L., 2007, Methods for integrating moderation and mediation, Psychological methods, 12(1):1-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.12.1.1
FERNANDO Y., JABBOUR C.J.C., WAH W.X.,2019, Pursuing green growth in technology firms through the connections between environmental innovation and sustainable business performance: does service capability matter? Resources,conservation and recycling, 141: 8-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.09.031
FU R., TANG Y., CHEN G.,2020, Chief Sustainability officers and corporate social responsibility, Strategic management journal, 41(4): 656-680. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3113
GEMECHU A., 2016, TEKLEMARIAM. Determinants of micro and small enterprises performance in south west Ethiopia: the case of manufacturing enterprises in Bench Maji, Sheka and Kefa Zones, Global journal of management and business research, 16(10): 28-38.
HAYES A., 2013, Introduction to mediation,moderation,and conditional process analysis, Journal of educational measurement, 51(3): 335-337.
IOANNOU I., SERAFEIM G., 2012, What drives corporate social performance? The role of nationlevel institutions, Journal of international business studies, 43(9): 834-864. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2012.26
JIANG B., XU M.B., 2016, Evaluation of innovation capability of small and micro enterprises based on angular fuzzy number and its closeness, China management science, 24(1): 685-692.
JIN H., LIU X., 2021, Industrial coagglomeration, technological innovation and economic growth: based on the mediating effect mode, Science & technology process and policy, 39(2): 1-8.
LI Y.H., LIU Y., HU Y.Y., 2015, Research on collaborative innovation strategy of small and micro technology-based enterprises and large technology-based enterprises from the perspective of dynamic evolutionary game, Scientific and technological progress and countermeasures, 32(3): 90-93.
MALLIN C., MICHELON G., RAGGI D., 2013, Monitoring intensity and stakeholder’s orientation: how does governance affect social and environmental disclosure? Journal of business ethics, 114(1): 29-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1324-4
MILLER D., LE BRETON-MILLER I., 2014, Deconstructing socioemotional wealth, Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 38(4): 713-720. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12111
PREACHER K.J., HAYES A.F., 2008, Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models, Behavior research methods, 40(3): 879-891. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
QIAO P.H., JU X.F., FUNG H.G., 2014, Industry association networks, innovations, and firm performance in Chinese small and medium-sized enterprises, China economic review, 29: 213-228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2014.04.011
TARGOUTZIDIS A., KOUKOULAKI T., SCHMITZ-FELTEN E., 2014, The business case for safety and health at work: Cost-benefit analyses of interventions in small and medium-sized enterprises, European agency for safety and health at work, Luxembourg.
TU C., HWANG S.N., WONG J.Y.,2014, How does cooperation affect innovation in micro-enterprises? Management decision, 52(8): 390-1409. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-07-2013-0388
US CENSUS BUREAU, 2019, Statistics about business size (including small business from the U.S. Census Bureau) 2011-2018.
XIE X.M., ZHU Q.W., 2021, How Can Green Innovation Solve the Dilemmas of Harmonious Coexistence? Management world, 1: 128-150.
ZHANG H., KANG F., 2016, Analysis method of multiple mediating effects based on bootstrap, Statistics and decision, 5: 75-78.
Article Details
Abstract views: 209
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
