Air Pollution Regulations in China: A Policy Simulation Approach with Evolutionary Game
Article Sidebar
Open full text
Issue Vol. 17 No. 1 (2022)
-
The Efficiency of Health Systems in Response to the Covid-19 Pandemic: Evidence from the EU Countries
Tamara Rađenović, Vladimir Radivojević, Bojan Krstić, Tanja Stanišić, Snežana Živković7-15
-
Efficiency Assessment of Tax Measures in the European Countries Against the Effects of COVID-19
Daria Bilenko, Serhii Kozlovskyi, Natalya Ivanyuta, Viktoriia Baidala, Ruslan Lavrov, Volodymyr Kozlovskyi16-22
-
Formation of Sustainable Investment Attractiveness of Regions Under the Conditions of COVID-19
Tetiana Polozova, Yurii Kutsenko, Oleksandra Kanova23-35
-
Going Green Supply Chain Management During COVID-19, Assessing the Best Supplier Selection Criteria: A Triple Bottom Line (TBL) Approach
Maryam Khokhar, Sayma Zia, Tahir Islam, Anshuman Sharma, Wasim Iqbal, Muhammad Irshad36-51
-
Empowering Theory of Poverty Reduction for Sustainable Development: Does the Welfare of Descendants Matter?
Juliusz Piwowarski, Larysa Yankovska, Bohdan-Petro Koshovyi, Ira Von-Nagy, Andrii Yevstakhevych52-63
-
Natural Resources in Function of Sustainable and Competitive Tourism Development of the EU Countries
Tanja Stanišić, Snežana Milićević, Bojan Krstić64-70
-
Suitability of Rural Living & Work Facilities, Spatial Behavior of Farmers and Family Income
Yanling Mao, Na Li71-83
-
Sustainable Development and Religion. A European Perspective
Paweł Rydzewski84-95
-
Role of Religion in Environmental Sustainability: An Indian Perspective
Sarita Kar, Manisha Tripathy96-100
-
Analysis of Child Marriage and Related Policies in Indonesia: Sustainable Development Issue
Noverman Duadji, Novita Tresiana101-113
-
Inclusive Education as a Tool For Implementing the Sustainable Development Goals on the Basis of Humanization of Society
Oksana Zhukova, Larysa Platash, Liudmyla Tymchuk114-122
-
What is Right and What is Wrong in the Environmental Governance Model? Environmental Regulations for Improving Environmental Sustainability Ratings
Jajat S. Ardiwinata, Khalid Zaman, Abdelmohsen A. Nassani, Mohamed Haffar, Chairil Faif Pasani, Sriyanto Sriyanto123-139
-
Efficiency Evaluation and Influencing Factors of Government Financial Expenditure on Environmental Protection: An SBM Super-efficiency Model Based on Undesired Outputs
Su Jialu, Ma Zhiqiang, Li Mingxing, Fredrick Oteng Agyeman, Zhu Yue140-150
-
Studies on Improving the Performance of Small and Micro Enterprises through Green Innovation
Yuhong Cao, Jianxin You, Yongjiang Shi, Wei Hu151-161
-
Possibilities of Developing Sustainable World by Introducing Bioeconomy: Global Perspective
Oleh V. Skydan, Maryna I. Yaremova, Liudmyla V. Tarasovych, Vitalii Ye. Dankevych, Nataliia M. Kutsmus162-170
-
Green Economy – Vector of Sustainable Development
Anar Ospanova, Iryna Popovychenko, Elena Chuprina171-181
-
Challenges for Improving Agricultural Resilience in the Context of Sustainability and Rural Development
Mangirdas Morkunas, Agnė Žičkienė, Tomas Baležentis, Artiom Volkov, Dalia Štreimikienė, Erika Ribašauskienė182-195
-
Time-Frequency Co-Movements Between Biomass Energy Consumption and Human Development in Brics Countries
Ngo Thai Hung196-210
-
Impact of the Agreements of the Eurasian Economic Union on the Competitiveness of the Agricultural Sector of the Member States
Saule S. Shintaeva, Alexandr A. Pyagay, Makhabbat K. Iskakova, Botagoz N. Naukenova, Saule T. Zhumasheva211-221
-
Air Pollution Regulations in China: A Policy Simulation Approach with Evolutionary Game
Zhaopeng Chu, Chen Bian, Jun Yang222-233
-
Feminist Mining: A Step Towards Sustainable Mininig in India
Priya Singh, Ajit Kumar Behura235-245
-
Trade Openness, Foreign Direct Investment and Sustainable Agriculture in Africa
Ping Ju, Muhammad Khalid Anser, Romanus Osabohien, Onyinye Ochuba, Rolle Remi Ahuru, Junaid Ashraf246-255
-
Systematic Review on Urban Ecosystem Services in South-East Asia: Asean Countries
Nur Shazwanie Rosehan, Azlan Abas, Kadaruddin Aiyub256-266
-
Financial Development and Sustainable Competitiveness in Arctic Region: A Dynamic Panel Data Analysis
Farzan Yahya, Ghulam Abbas, Muhammad Hussain, Muhammad Waqas267-278
-
Green Energy in the Caribbean: Influence on Toursim and Economic Development
Tatiana Tazikhina, Vladimir Kvasha, Yulia Solovova, Igbal Guliev279-287
-
Samkhya Philosophy, Deep Ecology and Sustainable Development
Nanda Gopal Biswas, Gyan Prakash288-292
-
Reproduction of Human Capital as a Strategic Priority for Sustainable Development of Regions
Olena Krasnonosova, Daria Mykhailenko, Ihor Yaroshenko293-300
-
Environmental Aspects of the European Experience in Landscape Planning
Bao Yu, Jianmei Wang, Ya Li301-309
Archives
-
Vol. 19 No. 2
2024-07-01 23
-
Vol. 19 No. 1
2024-01-08 27
-
Vol. 18 No. 2
2023-07-10 25
-
Vol. 18 No. 1
2023-01-01 25
-
Vol. 17 No. 2
2022-07-04 26
-
Vol. 17 No. 1
2022-01-03 28
-
Vol. 16 No. 2
2021-07-01 26
-
Vol. 16 No. 1
2021-01-04 24
-
Vol. 15 No. 2
2020-07-01 24
-
Vol. 15 No. 1
2020-01-02 24
Main Article Content
DOI
Authors
Abstract
In the institutional context of China’s political centralization and fiscal decentralization, this study explores the environmental regulations that make the central and local governments join efforts in air pollution control. Policy simulations in an evolutionary game show that the best approach is to internalize environmental costs and benefits in local governments’ objective function. The effectiveness of several policy instruments is examined individually and jointly, including administrative inspection, transfer payment, and environmental taxes. It is shown that in case environmental consequences are not internalized, appropriate application of policy instruments can incentivize goal-oriented local governments to choose the socially optimal strategy.
Keywords:
References
ALM J., BANZHAF H. S., 2012, Designing economic instruments for the environment in a decentralized fiscal system, Journal of Economic Surveys, 26(2): 177-202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2010.00632.x
ASLIM E. G., NEVAPTI B., 2017, Optimal fiscal decentralization: Redistribution and welfare implications, Economic Modelling, 61: 224-234. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2016.12.008
CHEN X. D., QIN Q. D., WEI Y. M., 2016, Energy productivity and Chinese local officials’ promotions: Evidence from provincial governors, Energy Policy, 95: 103-112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.04.041
CHU Z. P., LIU C. X., LI G., GUAN K. X., 2018, Sustainable development of the economic circle around Beijing: A view of regional economic disparity, Sustainability, 10: 3691. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103691
DIAO X. D., ZENG S. X., TAM C. M., TAM V. W., 2009, EKC analysis for studying economic growth and environmental quality: A case study in China, Journal of Cleaner Production: 17(5): 541-548. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.09.007
DIEBECKER J., SOMMER F., 2017, The impact of corporate sustainability performance on information asymmetry: The role of institutional differences, in: Review of Managerial Science: 11(2): 471-517. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-016-0195-y
ENIKOLOPOV R., ZHURAVSKAYA E., 2007, Decentralization and political institutions, Journal of Public Economics, 91: 2261-2290. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2007.02.006
FELDMAN L., SOL HART P., 2018, Climate change as a polarizing cue: Framing effects on public support for low-carbon energy policies, Global Environmental Change, 51: 54-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.05.004
FREDRIKSSON P. G., WOLLSCHEID J. R., 2014, Environmental decentralization and political centralization, Ecological Economics, 107: 402-410. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.09.019
FRIEDMAN D., 1991, Evolutionary game in economics, Econometrica, 59(3): 637-666. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2938222
GAO X., SHEN J. Q., HE W. J., SUN F. H., ZHANG
Z. F., GUO W. J., ZHANG X., KONG Y., 2019, An evolutionary game analysis of governments' decision-making behaviors and factors influencing watershed ecological compensation in China, Journal of Environmental Management, 251: 109592. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109592
HE Q. C., 2015, Fiscal decentralization and environmental pollution: Evidence from Chinese panel data, in: China Economic Review, 36: 86-100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2015.08.010
JIANG K., YOU D. M., MERRILL R., LI Z. D., 2019, Implementation of a multi-agent environmental regulation strategy under Chinese fiscal decentralization: An evolutionary game theoretical approach, Journal of Cleaner Production, 214: 902-915. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.252
KUNCE M., SHOGREN J. F., 2007, Destructive interjurisdictional competition: Firm, capital and labor mobility in a model of direct emission control, Ecological Economics, 60(3): 543-549. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.04.024
LAI Y. B., 2019, Environmental policy competition and heterogeneous capital endowments, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 75: 107-119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2019.01.011
LIU H. L., HE J., GUO J. P., MIAO Y. C., YIN J. F., WANG Y., XU H., LIU H., YAN Y., LI Y., ZHAI P. M., 2017, The blue skies in Beijing during APEC 2014: A quantitative assessment of emission control efficiency and meteorological influence, Atmospheric Environment, 167: 235-244. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.08.032
LIU Y. L., WEN H. D., 2008, The trend and forecast of environment loss based on economic analyze, Ecological Environment, 1: 376-380 (in Chinese).
MAYNARD-SMITH J., PRICE G. R., 1973, The logic of animal conflict, Nature, 246: 15-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/246015a0
MOK K. H., WU X. F., 2013, Dual decentralization in China's transitional economy: Welfare regionalism and policy implications for central-local relationship, in: Policy and Society, 32(1): 61-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2013.02.002
NEWTON J., 2018, Evolutionary game theory: A renaissance, Games, 9(2), p. 1-67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/g9020031
PENG B. H., WANG Y. Y., ELAHI E., WEI G., 2019, Behavioral game and simulation analysis of extended producer responsibility system's implementation under environmental regulations, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(17): 17644-17654. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05215-w
QUE W., ZHANG Y. B., LIU S. B., YANG C. P., 2018, The spatial effect of fiscal decentralization and factor market segmentation on environmental pollution, Journal of Cleaner Production, 184: 402-413. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.285
RAVETTI C., SWANSON T., JIN Y. N., MU Q., ZHANG S. Q., 2019, A dragon eating its own tail: Public control of air pollution information in China, Environment and Development Economics, 24(1): 1-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X18000414
SAARIMAA T., TUKIAINEN J., 2015, Common pool problems in voluntary municipal mergers, European Journal of Political Economy, 38: 140-152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2015.02.006
SHEN Y. D., AHLERS A. L., 2019, Blue sky fabrication in China: Science-policy integration in air pollution regulation campaigns for mega-events, Environmental Science & Policy, 94: 135-142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.12.005
SILVA E. C. D., Caplan A. J., 1997, Transboundary pollution control in federal systems, in: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 34: 82-101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1997.1008
SJöBERG E., 2016 An empirical study of federal law versus local environmental enforcement, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 76: 14-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2015.11.007
SJöBERG E., XU J., 2018, An empirical study of US environmental federalism: RCRA enforcement from 1998 to 2011, Ecological Economics, 147: 253-263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.01.024
SONG M. L., DU J. T., TAN K. H., 2018, Impact of fiscal decentralization on green total factor productivity, International Journal of Production Economics, 205: 356-367. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.09.019
XUE L., WENG L. F. YU H. Z., 2018. Addressing policy challenges in implementing Sustainable Development Goals through an adaptive governance approach: A view from transitional China, Sustainable Development, 26: 150-158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1726
YAO S., CHENG S. Y., LI J. B., ZHANG H. Y., JIA J., SUN X. W., 2019, Effect of wet flue gas desulfurization (WFGD) on fine particle (PM2.5) emission from coal-fired boilers, Journal of Environmental Sciences, 77: 32-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2018.05.005
YOU D. M., ZHANG Y., YUAN B. L., 2019, Environmental regulation and firm eco-innovation: Evidence of moderating effects of fiscal decentralization and political competition from listed Chinese industrial companies, Journal of Cleaner Production, 207: 1072-1083. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.106
ZHANG B., CHEN X. L., GUO H. X., 2018, Does central supervision enhance local environmental enforcement? Quasi-experimental evidence from China, Journal of Public Economics, 164: 70-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2018.05.009
ZHANG M., LI H., SONG Y., LI C., 2019, Study on the heterogeneous government synergistic governance game of haze in China, Journal of Environmental Management, 248: 109318. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109318
ZHAO R., HAN J. J., ZHONG S. Z., HUANG Y., 2018, Interaction between enterprises and consumers in a market of carbon-labeled products: A game theoretical analysis, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25(2): 1394-1404. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0595-9
ZHAO H. Y., PERCIVAL R., 2017, Comparative environmental federalism: Subsidiarity and central regulation in the United States and China, Transnational Environmental Law, 6(3): 531-549. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S2047102517000206
Article Details
Abstract views: 194
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
