Evaluation of Social Protection Performance in EU Countries: Multiple-criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA)
Milan Marković
markovicmilan89@gmail.comUniversity of Niš, Innovation Centre, Univerzitetski trg 2, 18000 Niš, Serbia (Serbia)
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9617-6697
Jelena J. Stanković
University of Niš, Faculty of Economics, Trg kralja Aleksa IMCSAdra Ujedinitelja 11, 18000 Niš, Serbia (Serbia)
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9875-9861
Panagiota Digkoglou
University of Macedonia, Egnatia 156, Thessaloniki, Central Macedonia 546 36, Greece (Greece)
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7101-5136
Ivana Marjanović
University of Niš, Faculty of Economics, Trg kralja Aleksandra Ujedinitelja 11, 18000 Niš, Serbia (Serbia)
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9526-0467
Abstract
The paper aims to rank European Union (EU) countries according to the composite index, which uses selected social protection indicators from the relevant database at EU level – Eurostat. The total score of social performance for 2020 was determined using the CRITIC-TOPSIS framework. The study showed that Austria, Luxembourg and Germany, respectively, had the best level of social protection, while Latvia, Romania and Spain were at the bottom, as the countries with the worst values of indicators. The importance of research is reflected in the fact that the social component of sustainable development is still not sufficiently researched, especially when it comes to the application of multi-criteria analysis methods in the empirical analysis of social sustainability. In this regard, depending on the obtained performance values, socio-economic policymakers can redesign existing measures and programs, as well as the amounts of social transfers to certain EU member states. The authors expect that the results of the study will help build higher social standards and well-being in the EU.
Keywords:
social sustainability, social protection, socio-economic indicators, poverty, unemployment, CRITIC-TOPSIS method, EU countriesReferences
ADALI E. A., IŞIK A. T., 2017, CRITIC and MAUT methods for the contract manufacturer selection problem, European Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 2(5): 93-101.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26417/ejms.v5i1.p93-101
Google Scholar
ALEXANDRIS POLOMARKAKIS K., 2020, The European pillar of social rights and the quest for EU social sustainability, Social & Legal Studies, 29(2): 183-200, https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0964663919829199.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663919829199
Google Scholar
ASTERIA D., HANDAYANI R. D., UTARI D., MUTIA E. F., 2018, Gender and life cycle approach in social protection to improve environmental management for urban sustainability, E3S Web of Conferences, 74: 10002, EDP Sciences.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20187410002
Google Scholar
BENÍTEZ R., LIERN V., 2021, Unweighted TOPSIS: a new multi-criteria tool for sustainability analysis, International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 28(1): 36-48, https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2020.1778583.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2020.1778583
Google Scholar
BILAN Y., MISHCHUK H., SAMOLIUK N., YURCHYK H., 2020, Impact of income distribution on social and economic well-being of the state, Sustainability, 12(1): 429, https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010429.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010429
Google Scholar
BORGONOVI, E., ADINOLFI, P., PALUMBO R., & PISCOPO G., 2018, Framing the shades of sustainability in health care: pitfalls and perspectives from Western EU countries, Sustainability, 10(12): 4439, https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010429.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124439
Google Scholar
CHEN Y., LI W., YI P., 2020, Evaluation of city innovation capability using the TOPSIS based order relation method: The case of Liaoning province, China, Technology in Society, 63, 101330, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101330.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101330
Google Scholar
CHUGUNOV I., NASIBOVA O., 2021, Public funding of social protection: Impact on social indicators in Eurozone countries, Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 18(2): 181-192, https://doi.org/10.21511/imfi.18(2).2021.15.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21511/imfi.18(2).2021.15
Google Scholar
CRABTREE L., 2005, Sustainable housing development in urban Australia: exploring obstacles to and opportunities for ecocity efforts, Australian Geographer, 36(3): 333-350, https://doi.org/10.1080/00049180500325728.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00049180500325728
Google Scholar
DALAMPIRA E. S., NASTIS S. A., 2020, Back to the future: simplifying Sustainable Development Goals based on three pillars of sustainability, International Journal of Sustainable Agricultural Management and Informatics, 6(3): 226-240, https://doi.org/10.1504/ijsami.2020.112089.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSAMI.2020.10034327
Google Scholar
Marković et al./Problemy Ekorozwoju/Problems of Sustainable Development 2/2022, 124-132
DOI: https://doi.org/10.35784/pe.2022.2.13
Google Scholar
DEMPSEY N., BRAMLEY G., POWER S., BROWN C., 2011, The social dimension of sustainable development: Defining urban social sustainability, Sustainable development, 19(5): 289-300, https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.417.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.417
Google Scholar
DIAKOULAKI D., MAVROTAS G., PAPAYANNAKIS L., 1995, Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The critic method, Computers & Operations Research, 22(7): 763-770, https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0548(94)00059-H.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0548(94)00059-H
Google Scholar
EIZENBERG E., ABAREEN Y., 2017, Social sustainability: A new conceptual framework, Sustainability, 9(1): 68, https://doi.org/10.3390/su9010068.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su9010068
Google Scholar
Eurostat, 2022, Social protection performance monitor – indicators, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database (2.01.2022).
Google Scholar
HAGEMEJER K., 2018, Review of approaches to assess the sustainability of social protection floors, Social Protection Goals in East Asia: 23-42, Routledge.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315232348-2
Google Scholar
HALASKOVA R., BEDNÁŘ P., 2020, Relationship of social protection expenditures and socio-economic indicators: A panel data analysis of the EU countries, Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 16(2): 19-31, https://doi.org/10.14254/1800-5845/2020.16-2.2.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14254/1800-5845/2020.16-2.2
Google Scholar
HALE J., LEGUN K., CAMPBELL H., CAROLAN M., 2019, Social sustainability indicators as performance, Geoforum, 103: 47-55, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.03.008.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.03.008
Google Scholar
HALLER A. P., GHERASIM O., BĂLAN M., UZLĂU C., 2020, Medium-term forecast of European economic sustainable growth using Markov chains, Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta u Rijeci: časopis za ekonomsku teoriju i praksu / Proceedings of Rijeka Faculty of Economics: Journal of Economics and Business, 38(2): 585-618, https://doi.org/10.18045/zbefri.2020.2.585.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18045/zbefri.2020.2.585
Google Scholar
HWANG C. L., YOON K., 1981, Multiple attributes decision making methods and applications, Springer, Berlin.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9_3
Google Scholar
KAMALI F. P., BORGES J. A. R., OSSEWEIJER P., POSADA, J. A., 2018, Towards social sustainability: Screening potential social and governance issues for biojet fuel supply chains in Brazil, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 92: 50-61, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.04.078.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.04.078
Google Scholar
KRSTIĆ M., 2018, Dimensions of sustainable development, Ekonomika održivog razvoja/ Economics of Sustainable Development, 2(2): 19-28.
Google Scholar
MAO Y., LI N., 2022, Suitability of Rural Living & Work Facilities, Spatial Behavior Patterns of Farmers and Family Income, Problemy Ekorozwoju / Problems of Sustainable Development, 17(1): 71-83, https://doi.org/10.35784/pe.2022.1.07.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.35784/pe.2022.1.07
Google Scholar
MARJANOVIĆ I., MARKOVIĆ M., 2022, Relationship Between Population Health and Economic Development on the Example of European Countries, Handbook of Research on Key Dimensions of Occupational Safety and Health Protection Management, eds. Živković S., Krstić B., Rađenović T., IGI Global, https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-8189-6.ch018.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-8189-6.ch018
Google Scholar
MISSIMER M., ROBÈRT K. H., BROMAN G., 2017, A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 1: exploring the social system, Journal of Cleaner Production, 140: 32-41, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.170.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.170
Google Scholar
NETO J., CUNHA M., 2020, Agricultural sustainability assessment using multicriteria indicators and hierarchical tools-a review, International Journal of Sustainable Agricultural Management and Informatics, 6(4): 381-400, https://doi.org/10.1504/ijsami.2020.10035192,
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSAMI.2020.112849
Google Scholar
OECD, 2022, Social spending (indicator), https://doi.org/10.1787/7497563b-en.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/7497563b-en
Google Scholar
OECD, 2022a, Social security contributions, Database, https://data.oecd.org/tax/social-security-contributions.htm (9.01.2022).
Google Scholar
OUDENIOTIS N., TSOBANOGLOU G., 2020, Social financing as a driver for sustainable local development in EU Mediterranean countries. Spain, Portugal, and Greece in perspective, Review of Applied Socio-Economic Research, 20(2):26-40.
Google Scholar
POPOVIĆ T., BARBOSA-PÓVOA A., KRASLAWSKI A., CARVALHO A., 2018, Quantitative indicators for social sustainability assessment of supply chains, Journal of cleaner production, 180: 748-768, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.142.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.142
Google Scholar
RADULOVIĆ M., KOSTIĆ M., 2020, Globalization and economic growth of Eurozone economies, Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta u Rijeci: časopis za ekonomsku teoriju i praksu/ Proceedings of Rijeka Faculty of Economics: Journal of Economics and Business, 38(2): 183-214, https://doi.org/10.18045/zbefri.2020.1.183.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18045/zbefri.2020.1.183
Google Scholar
SIERRA L. A., YEPES V., PELLICER E., 2018, A review of multi-criteria assessment of the social sustainability of infrastructures, Journal of Cleaner Production, 187: 496-513, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.022.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.022
Google Scholar
STANKOVIĆ J. J., MARJANOVIĆ I., DREZGIĆ S., & POPOVIĆ Ž., 2021, The Digital Competitiveness of European Countries: A Multiple-Criteria Approach, Journal of Competitiveness, 13(2): 117-134, https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2021.02.07.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2021.02.07
Google Scholar
TORKAYESH A. E., ECER F., PAMUČAR D., KARAMAŞA Ç., 2021, Comparative assessment of social sustainability performance: Integrated data-driven weighting system and CoCoSo model, Sustainable Cities and Society, 71: 102975, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.102975.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.102975
Google Scholar
TORRES J., VALERA D. L., BELMONTE L. J., HERRERO-SÁNCHEZ C., 2016, Economic and social sustainability through organic agriculture: Study of the restructuring of the citrus sector in the ‘Bajo Andarax’ District (Spain), Sustainability, 8(9): 918, https://doi.org/10.3390/su8090918.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su8090918
Google Scholar
VALLANCE S., PERKINS H. C., DIXON J. E., 2011, What is social sustainability? A clarification of concepts, Geoforum, 42(3): 342-348, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.01.002.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.01.002
Google Scholar
VASILIĆ N., SEMENČENKO D., POPOVIĆ-PANTIĆ S., 2020, Evaluating ICT Usage in Enterprises in Europe: Topsis Approach, Economic Themes, 58(4): 529-544, https://doi.org/10.2478/ethemes-2020-0030.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ethemes-2020-0030
Google Scholar
VESELINOVIĆ P., VELJKOVIĆ M., 2021, Intellectual Capital in Terms of Regional Development of the Republic of Serbia, Economic Themes, 59(3): 315-340, https://doi.org/10.2478/ethemes-2021-0018.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ethemes-2021-0018
Google Scholar
VON JACOBI N., EDMISTON D., ZIEGLER R., 2017, Tackling marginalisation through social innovation? Examining the EU social innovation policy agenda from a capabilities perspective, Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 18(2): 148-162, https://doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2016.1256277.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2016.1256277
Google Scholar
YI P., LI W., ZHANG D., 2019, Assessment of city sustainability using MCDM with interdependent criteria weight, Sustainability, 11(6): 1632, https://doi.org/10.3390/su11061632.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11061632
Google Scholar
YOON K. P., HWANG C. L., 1995, Multiple Attribute Decision Making: An Introduction, 104, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412985161.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412985161
Google Scholar
ZEITLIN J., VANHERCKE B., 2014, Socializing the European Semester? Economic Governance and Social Policy Coordination in Europe 2020, Economic governance and social policy coordination in Europe (SIEPS report; No. 2014:7), Swedish Institute for European Policy Studies.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2511031
Google Scholar
ŽIŽOVIĆ M., MILJKOVIĆ B., MARINKOVIĆ D., 2020, Objective methods for determining criteria weight coefficients: A modification of the CRITIC method, Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 3(2): 149-161, https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame2003149z.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame2003149z
Google Scholar
Authors
Milan Markovićmarkovicmilan89@gmail.com
University of Niš, Innovation Centre, Univerzitetski trg 2, 18000 Niš, Serbia Serbia
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9617-6697
Authors
Jelena J. StankovićUniversity of Niš, Faculty of Economics, Trg kralja Aleksa IMCSAdra Ujedinitelja 11, 18000 Niš, Serbia Serbia
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9875-9861
Authors
Panagiota DigkoglouUniversity of Macedonia, Egnatia 156, Thessaloniki, Central Macedonia 546 36, Greece Greece
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7101-5136
Authors
Ivana MarjanovićUniversity of Niš, Faculty of Economics, Trg kralja Aleksandra Ujedinitelja 11, 18000 Niš, Serbia Serbia
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9526-0467
Statistics
Abstract views: 92PDF downloads: 53
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.