Evaluation of Social Protection Performance in EU Countries: Multiple-criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA)

Milan Marković

markovicmilan89@gmail.com
University of Niš, Innovation Centre, Univerzitetski trg 2, 18000 Niš, Serbia (Serbia)
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9617-6697

Jelena J. Stanković


University of Niš, Faculty of Economics, Trg kralja Aleksa IMCSAdra Ujedinitelja 11, 18000 Niš, Serbia (Serbia)
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9875-9861

Panagiota Digkoglou


University of Macedonia, Egnatia 156, Thessaloniki, Central Macedonia 546 36, Greece (Greece)
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7101-5136

Ivana Marjanović


University of Niš, Faculty of Economics, Trg kralja Aleksandra Ujedinitelja 11, 18000 Niš, Serbia (Serbia)
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9526-0467

Abstract

The paper aims to rank European Union (EU) countries according to the composite index, which uses selected social protection indicators from the relevant database at EU level – Eurostat. The total score of social performance for 2020 was determined using the CRITIC-TOPSIS framework. The study showed that Austria, Luxembourg and Germany, respectively, had the best level of social protection, while Latvia, Romania and Spain were at the bottom, as the countries with the worst values of indicators. The importance of research is reflected in the fact that the social component of sustainable development is still not sufficiently researched, especially when it comes to the application of multi-criteria analysis methods in the empirical analysis of social sustainability. In this regard, depending on the obtained performance values, socio-economic policymakers can redesign existing measures and programs, as well as the amounts of social transfers to certain EU member states. The authors expect that the results of the study will help build higher social standards and well-being in the EU.


Keywords:

social sustainability, social protection, socio-economic indicators, poverty, unemployment, CRITIC-TOPSIS method, EU countries

ADALI E. A., IŞIK A. T., 2017, CRITIC and MAUT methods for the contract manufacturer selection problem, European Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 2(5): 93-101.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26417/ejms.v5i1.p93-101   Google Scholar

ALEXANDRIS POLOMARKAKIS K., 2020, The European pillar of social rights and the quest for EU social sustainability, Social & Legal Studies, 29(2): 183-200, https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0964663919829199.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663919829199   Google Scholar

ASTERIA D., HANDAYANI R. D., UTARI D., MUTIA E. F., 2018, Gender and life cycle approach in social protection to improve environmental management for urban sustainability, E3S Web of Conferences, 74: 10002, EDP Sciences.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20187410002   Google Scholar

BENÍTEZ R., LIERN V., 2021, Unweighted TOPSIS: a new multi-criteria tool for sustainability analysis, International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 28(1): 36-48, https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2020.1778583.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2020.1778583   Google Scholar

BILAN Y., MISHCHUK H., SAMOLIUK N., YURCHYK H., 2020, Impact of income distribution on social and economic well-being of the state, Sustainability, 12(1): 429, https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010429.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010429   Google Scholar

BORGONOVI, E., ADINOLFI, P., PALUMBO R., & PISCOPO G., 2018, Framing the shades of sustainability in health care: pitfalls and perspectives from Western EU countries, Sustainability, 10(12): 4439, https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010429.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124439   Google Scholar

CHEN Y., LI W., YI P., 2020, Evaluation of city innovation capability using the TOPSIS based order relation method: The case of Liaoning province, China, Technology in Society, 63, 101330, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101330.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101330   Google Scholar

CHUGUNOV I., NASIBOVA O., 2021, Public funding of social protection: Impact on social indicators in Eurozone countries, Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 18(2): 181-192, https://doi.org/10.21511/imfi.18(2).2021.15.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21511/imfi.18(2).2021.15   Google Scholar

CRABTREE L., 2005, Sustainable housing development in urban Australia: exploring obstacles to and opportunities for ecocity efforts, Australian Geographer, 36(3): 333-350, https://doi.org/10.1080/00049180500325728.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00049180500325728   Google Scholar

DALAMPIRA E. S., NASTIS S. A., 2020, Back to the future: simplifying Sustainable Development Goals based on three pillars of sustainability, International Journal of Sustainable Agricultural Management and Informatics, 6(3): 226-240, https://doi.org/10.1504/ijsami.2020.112089.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSAMI.2020.10034327   Google Scholar

Marković et al./Problemy Ekorozwoju/Problems of Sustainable Development 2/2022, 124-132
DOI: https://doi.org/10.35784/pe.2022.2.13   Google Scholar

DEMPSEY N., BRAMLEY G., POWER S., BROWN C., 2011, The social dimension of sustainable development: Defining urban social sustainability, Sustainable development, 19(5): 289-300, https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.417.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.417   Google Scholar

DIAKOULAKI D., MAVROTAS G., PAPAYANNAKIS L., 1995, Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The critic method, Computers & Operations Research, 22(7): 763-770, https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0548(94)00059-H.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0548(94)00059-H   Google Scholar

EIZENBERG E., ABAREEN Y., 2017, Social sustainability: A new conceptual framework, Sustainability, 9(1): 68, https://doi.org/10.3390/su9010068.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su9010068   Google Scholar

Eurostat, 2022, Social protection performance monitor – indicators, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database (2.01.2022).
  Google Scholar

HAGEMEJER K., 2018, Review of approaches to assess the sustainability of social protection floors, Social Protection Goals in East Asia: 23-42, Routledge.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315232348-2   Google Scholar

HALASKOVA R., BEDNÁŘ P., 2020, Relationship of social protection expenditures and socio-economic indicators: A panel data analysis of the EU countries, Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 16(2): 19-31, https://doi.org/10.14254/1800-5845/2020.16-2.2.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14254/1800-5845/2020.16-2.2   Google Scholar

HALE J., LEGUN K., CAMPBELL H., CAROLAN M., 2019, Social sustainability indicators as performance, Geoforum, 103: 47-55, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.03.008.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.03.008   Google Scholar

HALLER A. P., GHERASIM O., BĂLAN M., UZLĂU C., 2020, Medium-term forecast of European economic sustainable growth using Markov chains, Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta u Rijeci: časopis za ekonomsku teoriju i praksu / Proceedings of Rijeka Faculty of Economics: Journal of Economics and Business, 38(2): 585-618, https://doi.org/10.18045/zbefri.2020.2.585.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18045/zbefri.2020.2.585   Google Scholar

HWANG C. L., YOON K., 1981, Multiple attributes decision making methods and applications, Springer, Berlin.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9_3   Google Scholar

KAMALI F. P., BORGES J. A. R., OSSEWEIJER P., POSADA, J. A., 2018, Towards social sustainability: Screening potential social and governance issues for biojet fuel supply chains in Brazil, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 92: 50-61, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.04.078.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.04.078   Google Scholar

KRSTIĆ M., 2018, Dimensions of sustainable development, Ekonomika održivog razvoja/ Economics of Sustainable Development, 2(2): 19-28.
  Google Scholar

MAO Y., LI N., 2022, Suitability of Rural Living & Work Facilities, Spatial Behavior Patterns of Farmers and Family Income, Problemy Ekorozwoju / Problems of Sustainable Development, 17(1): 71-83, https://doi.org/10.35784/pe.2022.1.07.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.35784/pe.2022.1.07   Google Scholar

MARJANOVIĆ I., MARKOVIĆ M., 2022, Relationship Between Population Health and Economic Development on the Example of European Countries, Handbook of Research on Key Dimensions of Occupational Safety and Health Protection Management, eds. Živković S., Krstić B., Rađenović T., IGI Global, https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-8189-6.ch018.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-8189-6.ch018   Google Scholar

MISSIMER M., ROBÈRT K. H., BROMAN G., 2017, A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 1: exploring the social system, Journal of Cleaner Production, 140: 32-41, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.170.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.170   Google Scholar

NETO J., CUNHA M., 2020, Agricultural sustainability assessment using multicriteria indicators and hierarchical tools-a review, International Journal of Sustainable Agricultural Management and Informatics, 6(4): 381-400, https://doi.org/10.1504/ijsami.2020.10035192,
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSAMI.2020.112849   Google Scholar

OECD, 2022, Social spending (indicator), https://doi.org/10.1787/7497563b-en.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/7497563b-en   Google Scholar

OECD, 2022a, Social security contributions, Database, https://data.oecd.org/tax/social-security-contributions.htm (9.01.2022).
  Google Scholar

OUDENIOTIS N., TSOBANOGLOU G., 2020, Social financing as a driver for sustainable local development in EU Mediterranean countries. Spain, Portugal, and Greece in perspective, Review of Applied Socio-Economic Research, 20(2):26-40.
  Google Scholar

POPOVIĆ T., BARBOSA-PÓVOA A., KRASLAWSKI A., CARVALHO A., 2018, Quantitative indicators for social sustainability assessment of supply chains, Journal of cleaner production, 180: 748-768, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.142.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.142   Google Scholar

RADULOVIĆ M., KOSTIĆ M., 2020, Globalization and economic growth of Eurozone economies, Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta u Rijeci: časopis za ekonomsku teoriju i praksu/ Proceedings of Rijeka Faculty of Economics: Journal of Economics and Business, 38(2): 183-214, https://doi.org/10.18045/zbefri.2020.1.183.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18045/zbefri.2020.1.183   Google Scholar

SIERRA L. A., YEPES V., PELLICER E., 2018, A review of multi-criteria assessment of the social sustainability of infrastructures, Journal of Cleaner Production, 187: 496-513, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.022.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.022   Google Scholar

STANKOVIĆ J. J., MARJANOVIĆ I., DREZGIĆ S., & POPOVIĆ Ž., 2021, The Digital Competitiveness of European Countries: A Multiple-Criteria Approach, Journal of Competitiveness, 13(2): 117-134, https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2021.02.07.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2021.02.07   Google Scholar

TORKAYESH A. E., ECER F., PAMUČAR D., KARAMAŞA Ç., 2021, Comparative assessment of social sustainability performance: Integrated data-driven weighting system and CoCoSo model, Sustainable Cities and Society, 71: 102975, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.102975.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.102975   Google Scholar

TORRES J., VALERA D. L., BELMONTE L. J., HERRERO-SÁNCHEZ C., 2016, Economic and social sustainability through organic agriculture: Study of the restructuring of the citrus sector in the ‘Bajo Andarax’ District (Spain), Sustainability, 8(9): 918, https://doi.org/10.3390/su8090918.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su8090918   Google Scholar

VALLANCE S., PERKINS H. C., DIXON J. E., 2011, What is social sustainability? A clarification of concepts, Geoforum, 42(3): 342-348, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.01.002.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.01.002   Google Scholar

VASILIĆ N., SEMENČENKO D., POPOVIĆ-PANTIĆ S., 2020, Evaluating ICT Usage in Enterprises in Europe: Topsis Approach, Economic Themes, 58(4): 529-544, https://doi.org/10.2478/ethemes-2020-0030.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ethemes-2020-0030   Google Scholar

VESELINOVIĆ P., VELJKOVIĆ M., 2021, Intellectual Capital in Terms of Regional Development of the Republic of Serbia, Economic Themes, 59(3): 315-340, https://doi.org/10.2478/ethemes-2021-0018.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ethemes-2021-0018   Google Scholar

VON JACOBI N., EDMISTON D., ZIEGLER R., 2017, Tackling marginalisation through social innovation? Examining the EU social innovation policy agenda from a capabilities perspective, Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 18(2): 148-162, https://doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2016.1256277.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2016.1256277   Google Scholar

YI P., LI W., ZHANG D., 2019, Assessment of city sustainability using MCDM with interdependent criteria weight, Sustainability, 11(6): 1632, https://doi.org/10.3390/su11061632.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11061632   Google Scholar

YOON K. P., HWANG C. L., 1995, Multiple Attribute Decision Making: An Introduction, 104, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412985161.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412985161   Google Scholar

ZEITLIN J., VANHERCKE B., 2014, Socializing the European Semester? Economic Governance and Social Policy Coordination in Europe 2020, Economic governance and social policy coordination in Europe (SIEPS report; No. 2014:7), Swedish Institute for European Policy Studies.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2511031   Google Scholar

ŽIŽOVIĆ M., MILJKOVIĆ B., MARINKOVIĆ D., 2020, Objective methods for determining criteria weight coefficients: A modification of the CRITIC method, Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 3(2): 149-161, https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame2003149z.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame2003149z   Google Scholar

Download


Published
2022-07-03

Cited by

Marković, M., Stanković, J. J., Digkoglou, P., & Marjanović, I. (2022). Evaluation of Social Protection Performance in EU Countries: Multiple-criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA). Problemy Ekorozwoju, 17(2), 124–132. https://doi.org/10.35784/pe.2022.2.13

Authors

Milan Marković 
markovicmilan89@gmail.com
University of Niš, Innovation Centre, Univerzitetski trg 2, 18000 Niš, Serbia Serbia
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9617-6697

Authors

Jelena J. Stanković 

University of Niš, Faculty of Economics, Trg kralja Aleksa IMCSAdra Ujedinitelja 11, 18000 Niš, Serbia Serbia
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9875-9861

Authors

Panagiota Digkoglou 

University of Macedonia, Egnatia 156, Thessaloniki, Central Macedonia 546 36, Greece Greece
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7101-5136

Authors

Ivana Marjanović 

University of Niš, Faculty of Economics, Trg kralja Aleksandra Ujedinitelja 11, 18000 Niš, Serbia Serbia
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9526-0467

Statistics

Abstract views: 48
PDF downloads: 28