Evaluation of Social Protection Performance in EU Countries: Multiple-criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA)
Article Sidebar
Open full text
Issue Vol. 17 No. 2 (2022)
-
Sustainable Development and Sustainable Science. Where We Came From, Where We Are Now and Where We Are Heading? Part I: The History of the Concept
Magdaléna Drastichová7-18
-
The Real Tragedy of the Commons – Garrett Hardin (1968) Revised
Stefan Brunnhuber19-23
-
Towards Co-existence. Responsibility in the Anthropocene Debate
Jeremiasz Szyndler24-30
-
Post-COVID-19 Revitalisation and Prospects for Climate Neutral Energy Security Technologies
Olena Borysiak, Vasyl Brych31-38
-
COVID-19: Vaccine Hesitancy in Africa and the Way Forward
Lukman Ahmed Omeiza, Abul Kalam Azad, Kateryna Kozak, Abaniwo Rose Mafo, Ukashat Mamudu, Daniel Aikhonmu Oseyemen39-46
-
Impact of Entrepreneurship on Sustainable Development in Emerging Markets under the Conditions of COVID-19
Maja Ivanović-Đukić, Tamara Rađenović, Nemanja Veselinović47-58
-
Do the Outbreak of COVID-19 Influence the China Stock Market?
Junaid Ashraf, Franck Edouard Gnahe, Fei-Ming Huang, Zeinab Rizk59-68
-
Digitalization and Sustainable Development: the New COVID-19 Challenge Requires Non-standard Solutions
Oksana Polishchuk, Tetiana Kulinich, Nataly Martynovych, Yuliia Popova69-79
-
Digital Information Security: Coronavirus Crisis Impact on the Accountants, Business Analysts and Auditors Training
Karina Nazarova, Mariia Nezhyva, Tetіana Metil, Volodymyr Hordopolov, Liudmyla Prystupa, Olesya Moyseyenko80-90
-
Transition of Logistics to Sustainable Development Under the Impact of COVID-19
Maksym Kutsenko, Оleksii Kostiennikov, Petr Yaremovich, Zoreslava Liulchak, Serhii Voroshnov91-100
-
Tax Policy for Economic Recovery and Sustainable Development After COVID-19
Tetiana Kaneva, Igor Chugunov, Mykola Pasichnyi, Andriy Nikitishin, Nataliia Husarevych102-109
-
Renewable Energy and Poverty in Sustainable Development of the European Union
Julita Mlaskawa110-123
-
Evaluation of Social Protection Performance in EU Countries: Multiple-criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA)
Milan Marković, Jelena J. Stanković, Panagiota Digkoglou, Ivana Marjanović124-132
-
Environmental Refugees, Suggested Solutions of the Problem in the Framework of International Law
Piotr Krajewski133-139
-
A Brief Analysis of SDG 3 – Good Health and Well-being – and its Synergies and Trade-offs with the other Sustainable Development Goals
G Venkatesh140-147
-
Impact of Financial Globalization on Environmental Degradation in the E7 Countries: Application of the Hybrid Nonparametric Quantile Causality Approach
Tomiwa Sunday Adebayo148-160
-
International Trade, Corruption and Economic Growth: Evidence from Selected Sub-Saharan Countries
Busayo Aderounmu, Eniola Ayoade, Emmanuel Oni161-165
-
Corporate Entrepreneurship in the Pursuit of Sustainable Development: Creating a More Sustainable Future
Rajesh Kumar, Govind Swaroop Pathak166-177
-
Circular Economy as a Model of Achieving Sustainable Development
Viktoriia Roleders, Tetyana Oriekhova, Galina Zaharieva178-185
-
International Tourism as a Tool of European Integration Within Eastern European Countries
Anatoliy Parfinenko, Olena Yevtushenko, Iryna Panova, Polina Podlepina, Maksym Onatskyi186-196
-
Eco-innovation and Sustainable Development
Silvana Ilic, Tanja Petrovic, Gordana Djukic197-203
-
Intangible Heritage and Sustainable Development Strategies
Jawdat Goussous204-209
-
Sericulture in Terms of Sustainable Development in Agriculture
Joanna Grześkowiak, Małgorzata Łochyńska, Jakub Frankowski210-217
-
Arsenic Contamination of Groundwater in Bhojpur District of Bihar, India: A Threat to Sustainability
Avinash Ranjan, Pammy Kumari218-229
-
How Humble Leadership Affects Voluntary Green Behavior and Green Performance? The Roles of Job Autonomy and Green Supporting Climate in Hotels
Omar Alsetoohy, Mohammed Hasan Ali Al-Abyadh, Esra Sipahi Döngül, Mohamed Fathy Agina, Abdallah Elshaer230-242
-
Storytelling for Behavior Change: Use of Folktales for Promoting Sustainable Behaviors
Soumita Mitra, Ahmed Sameer243-247
Archives
-
Vol. 19 No. 2
2024-07-01 24
-
Vol. 19 No. 1
2024-01-08 27
-
Vol. 18 No. 2
2023-07-10 25
-
Vol. 18 No. 1
2023-01-01 25
-
Vol. 17 No. 2
2022-07-04 26
-
Vol. 17 No. 1
2022-01-03 28
-
Vol. 16 No. 2
2021-07-01 26
-
Vol. 16 No. 1
2021-01-04 24
-
Vol. 15 No. 2
2020-07-01 24
-
Vol. 15 No. 1
2020-01-02 24
Main Article Content
DOI
Authors
jelena.stankovic@eknfak.ni.ac.rs
ivana.veselinovic@eknfak.ni.ac.rs
Abstract
The paper aims to rank European Union (EU) countries according to the composite index, which uses selected social protection indicators from the relevant database at EU level – Eurostat. The total score of social performance for 2020 was determined using the CRITIC-TOPSIS framework. The study showed that Austria, Luxembourg and Germany, respectively, had the best level of social protection, while Latvia, Romania and Spain were at the bottom, as the countries with the worst values of indicators. The importance of research is reflected in the fact that the social component of sustainable development is still not sufficiently researched, especially when it comes to the application of multi-criteria analysis methods in the empirical analysis of social sustainability. In this regard, depending on the obtained performance values, socio-economic policymakers can redesign existing measures and programs, as well as the amounts of social transfers to certain EU member states. The authors expect that the results of the study will help build higher social standards and well-being in the EU.
Keywords:
References
ADALI E. A., IŞIK A. T., 2017, CRITIC and MAUT methods for the contract manufacturer selection problem, European Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 2(5): 93-101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26417/ejms.v5i1.p93-101
ALEXANDRIS POLOMARKAKIS K., 2020, The European pillar of social rights and the quest for EU social sustainability, Social & Legal Studies, 29(2): 183-200, https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0964663919829199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663919829199
ASTERIA D., HANDAYANI R. D., UTARI D., MUTIA E. F., 2018, Gender and life cycle approach in social protection to improve environmental management for urban sustainability, E3S Web of Conferences, 74: 10002, EDP Sciences. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20187410002
BENÍTEZ R., LIERN V., 2021, Unweighted TOPSIS: a new multi-criteria tool for sustainability analysis, International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 28(1): 36-48, https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2020.1778583. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2020.1778583
BILAN Y., MISHCHUK H., SAMOLIUK N., YURCHYK H., 2020, Impact of income distribution on social and economic well-being of the state, Sustainability, 12(1): 429, https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010429. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010429
BORGONOVI, E., ADINOLFI, P., PALUMBO R., & PISCOPO G., 2018, Framing the shades of sustainability in health care: pitfalls and perspectives from Western EU countries, Sustainability, 10(12): 4439, https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010429. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124439
CHEN Y., LI W., YI P., 2020, Evaluation of city innovation capability using the TOPSIS based order relation method: The case of Liaoning province, China, Technology in Society, 63, 101330, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101330. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101330
CHUGUNOV I., NASIBOVA O., 2021, Public funding of social protection: Impact on social indicators in Eurozone countries, Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 18(2): 181-192, https://doi.org/10.21511/imfi.18(2).2021.15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21511/imfi.18(2).2021.15
CRABTREE L., 2005, Sustainable housing development in urban Australia: exploring obstacles to and opportunities for ecocity efforts, Australian Geographer, 36(3): 333-350, https://doi.org/10.1080/00049180500325728. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00049180500325728
DALAMPIRA E. S., NASTIS S. A., 2020, Back to the future: simplifying Sustainable Development Goals based on three pillars of sustainability, International Journal of Sustainable Agricultural Management and Informatics, 6(3): 226-240, https://doi.org/10.1504/ijsami.2020.112089. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSAMI.2020.10034327
Marković et al./Problemy Ekorozwoju/Problems of Sustainable Development 2/2022, 124-132 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35784/pe.2022.2.13
DEMPSEY N., BRAMLEY G., POWER S., BROWN C., 2011, The social dimension of sustainable development: Defining urban social sustainability, Sustainable development, 19(5): 289-300, https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.417. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.417
DIAKOULAKI D., MAVROTAS G., PAPAYANNAKIS L., 1995, Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The critic method, Computers & Operations Research, 22(7): 763-770, https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0548(94)00059-H. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0548(94)00059-H
EIZENBERG E., ABAREEN Y., 2017, Social sustainability: A new conceptual framework, Sustainability, 9(1): 68, https://doi.org/10.3390/su9010068. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su9010068
Eurostat, 2022, Social protection performance monitor – indicators, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database (2.01.2022).
HAGEMEJER K., 2018, Review of approaches to assess the sustainability of social protection floors, Social Protection Goals in East Asia: 23-42, Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315232348-2
HALASKOVA R., BEDNÁŘ P., 2020, Relationship of social protection expenditures and socio-economic indicators: A panel data analysis of the EU countries, Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 16(2): 19-31, https://doi.org/10.14254/1800-5845/2020.16-2.2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14254/1800-5845/2020.16-2.2
HALE J., LEGUN K., CAMPBELL H., CAROLAN M., 2019, Social sustainability indicators as performance, Geoforum, 103: 47-55, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.03.008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.03.008
HALLER A. P., GHERASIM O., BĂLAN M., UZLĂU C., 2020, Medium-term forecast of European economic sustainable growth using Markov chains, Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta u Rijeci: časopis za ekonomsku teoriju i praksu / Proceedings of Rijeka Faculty of Economics: Journal of Economics and Business, 38(2): 585-618, https://doi.org/10.18045/zbefri.2020.2.585. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18045/zbefri.2020.2.585
HWANG C. L., YOON K., 1981, Multiple attributes decision making methods and applications, Springer, Berlin. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9_3
KAMALI F. P., BORGES J. A. R., OSSEWEIJER P., POSADA, J. A., 2018, Towards social sustainability: Screening potential social and governance issues for biojet fuel supply chains in Brazil, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 92: 50-61, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.04.078. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.04.078
KRSTIĆ M., 2018, Dimensions of sustainable development, Ekonomika održivog razvoja/ Economics of Sustainable Development, 2(2): 19-28.
MAO Y., LI N., 2022, Suitability of Rural Living & Work Facilities, Spatial Behavior Patterns of Farmers and Family Income, Problemy Ekorozwoju / Problems of Sustainable Development, 17(1): 71-83, https://doi.org/10.35784/pe.2022.1.07. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35784/pe.2022.1.07
MARJANOVIĆ I., MARKOVIĆ M., 2022, Relationship Between Population Health and Economic Development on the Example of European Countries, Handbook of Research on Key Dimensions of Occupational Safety and Health Protection Management, eds. Živković S., Krstić B., Rađenović T., IGI Global, https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-8189-6.ch018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-8189-6.ch018
MISSIMER M., ROBÈRT K. H., BROMAN G., 2017, A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 1: exploring the social system, Journal of Cleaner Production, 140: 32-41, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.170
NETO J., CUNHA M., 2020, Agricultural sustainability assessment using multicriteria indicators and hierarchical tools-a review, International Journal of Sustainable Agricultural Management and Informatics, 6(4): 381-400, https://doi.org/10.1504/ijsami.2020.10035192, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSAMI.2020.112849
OECD, 2022, Social spending (indicator), https://doi.org/10.1787/7497563b-en. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/7497563b-en
OECD, 2022a, Social security contributions, Database, https://data.oecd.org/tax/social-security-contributions.htm (9.01.2022).
OUDENIOTIS N., TSOBANOGLOU G., 2020, Social financing as a driver for sustainable local development in EU Mediterranean countries. Spain, Portugal, and Greece in perspective, Review of Applied Socio-Economic Research, 20(2):26-40.
POPOVIĆ T., BARBOSA-PÓVOA A., KRASLAWSKI A., CARVALHO A., 2018, Quantitative indicators for social sustainability assessment of supply chains, Journal of cleaner production, 180: 748-768, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.142
RADULOVIĆ M., KOSTIĆ M., 2020, Globalization and economic growth of Eurozone economies, Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta u Rijeci: časopis za ekonomsku teoriju i praksu/ Proceedings of Rijeka Faculty of Economics: Journal of Economics and Business, 38(2): 183-214, https://doi.org/10.18045/zbefri.2020.1.183. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18045/zbefri.2020.1.183
SIERRA L. A., YEPES V., PELLICER E., 2018, A review of multi-criteria assessment of the social sustainability of infrastructures, Journal of Cleaner Production, 187: 496-513, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.022
STANKOVIĆ J. J., MARJANOVIĆ I., DREZGIĆ S., & POPOVIĆ Ž., 2021, The Digital Competitiveness of European Countries: A Multiple-Criteria Approach, Journal of Competitiveness, 13(2): 117-134, https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2021.02.07. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2021.02.07
TORKAYESH A. E., ECER F., PAMUČAR D., KARAMAŞA Ç., 2021, Comparative assessment of social sustainability performance: Integrated data-driven weighting system and CoCoSo model, Sustainable Cities and Society, 71: 102975, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.102975. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.102975
TORRES J., VALERA D. L., BELMONTE L. J., HERRERO-SÁNCHEZ C., 2016, Economic and social sustainability through organic agriculture: Study of the restructuring of the citrus sector in the ‘Bajo Andarax’ District (Spain), Sustainability, 8(9): 918, https://doi.org/10.3390/su8090918. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su8090918
VALLANCE S., PERKINS H. C., DIXON J. E., 2011, What is social sustainability? A clarification of concepts, Geoforum, 42(3): 342-348, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.01.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.01.002
VASILIĆ N., SEMENČENKO D., POPOVIĆ-PANTIĆ S., 2020, Evaluating ICT Usage in Enterprises in Europe: Topsis Approach, Economic Themes, 58(4): 529-544, https://doi.org/10.2478/ethemes-2020-0030. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ethemes-2020-0030
VESELINOVIĆ P., VELJKOVIĆ M., 2021, Intellectual Capital in Terms of Regional Development of the Republic of Serbia, Economic Themes, 59(3): 315-340, https://doi.org/10.2478/ethemes-2021-0018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ethemes-2021-0018
VON JACOBI N., EDMISTON D., ZIEGLER R., 2017, Tackling marginalisation through social innovation? Examining the EU social innovation policy agenda from a capabilities perspective, Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 18(2): 148-162, https://doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2016.1256277. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2016.1256277
YI P., LI W., ZHANG D., 2019, Assessment of city sustainability using MCDM with interdependent criteria weight, Sustainability, 11(6): 1632, https://doi.org/10.3390/su11061632. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11061632
YOON K. P., HWANG C. L., 1995, Multiple Attribute Decision Making: An Introduction, 104, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412985161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412985161
ZEITLIN J., VANHERCKE B., 2014, Socializing the European Semester? Economic Governance and Social Policy Coordination in Europe 2020, Economic governance and social policy coordination in Europe (SIEPS report; No. 2014:7), Swedish Institute for European Policy Studies. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2511031
ŽIŽOVIĆ M., MILJKOVIĆ B., MARINKOVIĆ D., 2020, Objective methods for determining criteria weight coefficients: A modification of the CRITIC method, Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 3(2): 149-161, https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame2003149z. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame2003149z
Article Details
Abstract views: 251
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
