Axiological Associations of the Notion of Sustainable Development
Rober Piotrowski
Uniwersytet Zielonogórski, Wydział Humanistyczny, Instytut Filozofii, Al. Wojska Polskiego 71A, 65-762 Zielona Góra, Poland (Poland)
Abstract
Basic axiological associations of the notion of sustainable development are analysed from two perspectives: anthropocentric and ecocentric. Some difficulties in establishing and implementing fully-fledged environmental ethics are also emphasised.
Keywords:
sustainable development, ecological ethic, ecophilosophy, anthropology, ecologyReferences
ATTFIELD, ROBIN & al. (red.) Philosophy and the Natural Environment (Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement: 36), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1994.
Google Scholar
AYRES, ROBERT U., VAN DEN BERGH, JEROEN C.J.M. & GOWDY, JOHN M. „Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability”, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers, No. 98-103/3, http://www.tinbergen.nl/discussionpapers/98103.pdf.
Google Scholar
WCED, Our Common Future: The World Commission on Environment and Development, Oxford University Press, Oxford 1987.
Google Scholar
EHRLICH, PAUL R. & al. “Global Change and Carrying Capacity: Implications for Life on Earth”, (w:) DeFries, Ruth S. & al. (red.) Global Change and Our Common Future: Papers from a Forum, National Academy Press, Waszyngton 1989, s. 19–27.
Google Scholar
HARDIN, GARRETT „The Tragedy of the Commons”, Science, vol. 162, No. 3859 (Dec. 13, 1968), s. 1243–1248.
Google Scholar
KONECZNY, FELIKS Prawa dziejowe oraz dodatek Bizantynizm niemiecki, Wydawnictwa Towarzystwa imienia Romana Dmowskiego nr 21, Londyn 1982.
Google Scholar
MEYER, LUKAS „Intergenerational Justice”, (w:) Edward N. Zalta (red.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2006 Edition) http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2006/entrie s/justice-intergenerational/.
Google Scholar
LEOPOLD, ARNO A Sand County Almanac, and Sketches Here and There, Oxford University Press, Nowy Jork 1987.
Google Scholar
NÆSS, ARNE DEKKE EIDE „The Shallow and the Deep, Long Range Ecology Movements. A Summary”, Inquiry, vol. 16 (1973), s. 95–100.
Google Scholar
NEUMAYER, ERIC Weak Versus Strong Sustainability: Exploring the Limits of Two Opposing Paradigms, 2. wyd., Edward Elgar, Londyn 2003.
Google Scholar
ORTON D., „Deep Ecology Perspectives”, Synthesis/Regeneration, 32 (Fall 2003), http://www.greens.org/s-r/32/32-12.html.
Google Scholar
PEARCE D., MARKANDYA A. & BARBIER E. B. (red.) Blueprint for a Green Economy, Earthscan, Londyn 1989.
Google Scholar
ROUTLEY R., „Is there a need for a new, an environmental ethic?’ Proceedings of the 15th World Congress of Philosophy, vol. 1, Sophia Press Sofia 1973, s. 205–10.
Google Scholar
SARRE P. & BLUNDEN J. (red.) An Overcrowded World? Population, Resources and the Environment, Oxford University Press, Oxford 1995.
Google Scholar
SINGER P. „Animal Liberation”, The New York Review of Books, vol. 20, No. 5 (Apr. 5, 1973) [recenzja z Godlovitch, S. & al. (red.) Animals, Men and Morals].
Google Scholar
SINGER P. Animal Liberation: A New Ethics for our Treatment of Animals, New York Review/Random House, Nowy Jork, 1975.
Google Scholar
TEICHMAN J., Social Ethics: A Student’s Guide, Blackwell, Oxford 1996.
Google Scholar
TURNER R. K., „Speculations on Weak and Strong Sustainability”, CSERGE Working Pa per GEC 92-26, http://www.uea.ac.uk/envcserge/pub/wp/gec/gec_1992_26.pdf
Google Scholar
Authors
Rober PiotrowskiUniwersytet Zielonogórski, Wydział Humanistyczny, Instytut Filozofii, Al. Wojska Polskiego 71A, 65-762 Zielona Góra, Poland Poland
Statistics
Abstract views: 6PDF downloads: 2
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.