Simple Living and Sustainable Consumption
Jakub Kronenberg
Department of International Economics, University of Lodz, POW 3/5, 90-255 Lodz (Poland)
Natsuyo Iida
e’s Inc./Change Agent Inc., Sanko Bldg. 3 Fl., Funabashi 1-11-12, Setagaya-ku, Tokyo 156-0055 (Japan)
Abstract
After a brief reference to the philosophical background of simple living and its basic ideas, we explore how simple living can aid sustainable consumption. We look at general linkages between the two concepts and suggest how simple living can be used to support sustainable development (what elements to promote, what policy instruments to use, what barriers may be encountered). We conclude that philosophical reflection is the most important element of simple living that might enrich the current debate on sustainable consumption and suggest how to further strengthen the popularity of simple living movement.
Keywords:
simple living, sustainable consumption, voluntary simplicity, rebound effect, happinessReferences
BROWN K.W., KASSER T., 2005, Are psychological and ecological well-being compatible? The role of values, mindfulness, and lifestyle, in: Social Indicators Research, vol. 74 no 2, p. 349-368.
Google Scholar
BRÜLDE B., 2007, Happiness and the good life, in: Journal of Happiness Studies, vol. 8 no 1, p. 1-14.
Google Scholar
CLARK A.E., FRIJTERS P., SHIELDS M.A., Income and happiness: Evidence, explanations and economic implications, Paris-Jourdan Sciences Economiques, Paris 2006.
Google Scholar
CLAXTON G., 1994, Involuntary simplicity: Changing dysfunctional habits of consumption, in: Environmental Values, vol. 3 no 1, p. 71078.
Google Scholar
DALY H.E., Toward a steady-state economy, W.H. Freeman, San Francisco 1973.
Google Scholar
EEA, Household consumption and the environment, EEA, Copenhagen 2005.
Google Scholar
EPOCH GROUP, Nine commentaries on the Communist Party, Broad Press, Flushing NY 2005.
Google Scholar
ETZIONI A., 1998, Voluntary simplicity: Characterization, select psychological implications, and societal consequences, in: Journal of Economic Psychology, vol. 19 no 5, p. 619-643.
Google Scholar
FABER M., MANSTETTEN R., PROOPS J.L.R., 1992, Humankind and the environment, in: Environmental Values, vol. 1 no 3, p. 217-241.
Google Scholar
FIALA N., 2008, Measuring sustainability: Why the ecological footprint is bad economics and bad environmental science, in: Ecological Economics, vol. 67 no 4, p. 519-525.
Google Scholar
GREGG R., 1974, Voluntary simplicity, in: MANAS Reprint, vol. XXVII no. 36, p. 1-5.
Google Scholar
HUNEKE M.E., 2005, The face of the un-consumer: An empirical examination of the practice of voluntary simplicity in the United States, in: Psychology and Marketing, vol. 22 no 7, p. 527-550.
Google Scholar
HUNT BADINER A. (ed.), Mindfulness in the Marketplace: Compassionate Responses to Consumerism, Parallax Pr., Berkley 2002.
Google Scholar
HUPPES G., ISHIKAWA M., 2010, Eco-efficiency for sustainability, in: Problemy Ekorozwoju/Problems of Sustainable Development, vol. 5 no 2, p. 155-156.
Google Scholar
JACKSON T., 2005a, Live better by consuming less?, in: Journal of Industrial Ecology, vol. 9 no 1-2, p. 19-36.
Google Scholar
JACKSON T., Motivating sustainable consumption, University of Surrey, Guildford 2005b.
Google Scholar
JACKSON T., How to change consumer behaviour, Presentation at the Expert Conference on the Marrakech Process, Wuppertal, 22 November 2006.
Google Scholar
JENSEN R., The dream society, McGraw-Hill, New York 1999.
Google Scholar
KASSER T., GROW KASSER V., 2001, The dreams of people high and low in materialism, in: Journal of Economic Psychology, vol. 22 no 6, p. 693-719.
Google Scholar
KRAS E., 2011, The Deep Roots of Sustainability, in: Problemy Ekorozwoju/Problems of Sustainable Development, vol. 6 no 1, p. 11-30.
Google Scholar
KRONENBERG J., 2007, Making consumption “reasonable”, in: Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 15 no 6, p. 557-566.
Google Scholar
LASZLO C., 2008, Sustainable Value, in: Problemy Ekorozwoju/Problems of Sustainable Development, vol. 3 no 2, p. 25-29.
Google Scholar
LONGHURST M., 2003, Advertising and sustainability: a new paradigm, in: Admap July/August, p. 44-46.
Google Scholar
MARTÍNEZ-ALIER J., PASCUAL U., VIVIEN F.-D., ZACCAI E., 2010, Sustainable de-growth: Mapping the context, criticisms and future prospects of an emergent paradigm, in: Ecological Economics, vol. 69 no 9, p. 1741-1747.
Google Scholar
MCDONALD S., OATES C., YOUNG W., HWANG K., 2006, Towards sustainable consumption: researching beginner voluntary simplifiers, in: Psychology and Marketing, vol. 23 no 6, p. 515-534.
Google Scholar
MEADOWS D., Indicators and information systems for sustainable development, Sustainability Institute, Hartland VT, 1998.
Google Scholar
MEADOWS D., Leverage points: Places to intervene in a system, Sustainability Institute, Hartland VT, 1999.
Google Scholar
MILBRATH L.W., 1993, Redefining the good life in a sustainable society, in: Environmental Values, vol. 2 no 3, p. 261-269.
Google Scholar
MILLS S., Epicurean simplicity, Island Press, Washington DC, 2002.
Google Scholar
MYERS D., DIENER E., 1995, Who is happy?, in: Psychological Science, vol. 6 no 1, p. 10-19.
Google Scholar
MYERS N., KENT J., The new consumers: The influence of affluence on the environment, Island Press, Washington DC, 2004.
Google Scholar
NEF, The Happy Planet Index, New Economics Foundation, London 2006.
Google Scholar
PUGNO M., 2007, Ricchezza e ben-essere: l’importanza delle relazioni sociali e personali, in: Studi e Note di Economia, vol. 12 no 1, p. 23-58.
Google Scholar
REDCLIFT M.R., 2009, Sustainable Development – an Oxymoron Comes of Age, in: Problemy Ekorozwoju/Problems of Sustainable Development, vol. 4 no 1, p. 33-50.
Google Scholar
SANCHÈZ A., 2008, Perspectives and Problems in Sustainable Development, in: Problemy Ekorozwoju/Problems of Sustainable Development, vol. 3 no 2, p. 21-23.
Google Scholar
SCHNEIDER F., KALLIS G., MARTINEZ-ALIER J., 2010, Crisis or opportunity? Economic degrowth for social equity and ecological sustainability, in: Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 18 no 6, p. 511-518.
Google Scholar
SCHUMACHER E.F., Small is Beautiful, Blond and Briggs, London 1973.
Google Scholar
SHAW D., NEWHOLM T., 2002, Voluntary simplicity and the ethics of consumption, in: Psychology & Marketing, vol. 19 no 2, p. 167-185.
Google Scholar
TAINTER J.A., Complexity, problem solving, and sustainable societies, in: Getting down to Earth: Practical applications of ecological economics, eds. Costanza R., Segura O., Martinez-Alier J., Island Press, Washington DC 1996, p. 61-76.
Google Scholar
THOREAU H.D., Walden, Harper & Row, New York 1961 (originally 1854).
Google Scholar
TURNBULL C.M., The forest people, Jonathan Cape, London 1961.
Google Scholar
TUZIAK A., 2010, Socio-Economic Aspects of Sustainable Development, in: Problemy Ekorozwoju/Problems of Sustainable Development, vol. 5 no 2, p. 39-49.
Google Scholar
VAN DEN BERGH J., FERRER-I-CARBONELL A., Economic theories of sustainable consumption, Free University, Amsterdam 1999.
Google Scholar
Authors
Jakub KronenbergDepartment of International Economics, University of Lodz, POW 3/5, 90-255 Lodz Poland
Authors
Natsuyo Iidae’s Inc./Change Agent Inc., Sanko Bldg. 3 Fl., Funabashi 1-11-12, Setagaya-ku, Tokyo 156-0055 Japan
Statistics
Abstract views: 20PDF downloads: 9
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.