The Impact of Environmental Preferences on Public Supporting for the River Ecosystem Restoration Program in China
Yifei Zhang
International Business School, Shanghai University of International Business and Economics, Shanghai, 201620 (China)
Sheng Li
Department of Agricultural Economics, Auburn University, USA, 36849-5406 and Department of Economic and Management, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai, China, 201306 (United States)
Abstract
Restoration of the urban river system is urgently needed as urban river pollution is becoming an important environmental problem in China. Apart from the technical challenge, explicitly including the local residents’ preferences toward ecosystem management and restoration often is critical for municipal planners and policy implementation. This study used a contingent valuation method to estimate the public preferences for supporting urban river restoration in Hangzhou and Nanjing, China. The results show that environmental preferences including perception, beliefs and past behavior were better explanatory variables than socio-demographic characteristics for explaining people’s support for ecosystem restoration actions. But the respondents’ demand and supply on environment goods are mismatch. People want better environments goods but they are unwilling to make an effort to build the environments. We also find that the average conjectural payment for the restoration project is only 36 Yuan RMB per capital. Efforts to assess and foster support for urban ecosystem restoration should be pay more attentions to the public’s perception, beliefs and past behavior.
Keywords:
river restoration, public preference, environmental awareness, city planning, water quality, urbanization, ChinaReferences
ADAMOWICZ W., BOXALL P., WILLIAMS M., LOUVIERE J., 1998,Stated Preference Approaches for Measuring Passive Use Values: Choice Experiments and Contingent Valuation, in: American Journal of Agricultural Economics 80 (1), p. 64-75.
Google Scholar
AJZEN I., FISHBEIN M.,Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behaviors, Prentice-Hall, New York 1980.
Google Scholar
APPLETON J., 1975, Landscape Evaluation: The Theoretical Vacuum, in: Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 66, p. 120-123.
Google Scholar
BAE H., 2011, Urban Stream Restoration in Korea: Design Considerations and Residents’ Willingness to Pay, in: Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 10(2), p. 119-126.
Google Scholar
BARRO S. C., BRIGHT A. D.,1998, Public Views on Ecological Restoration A Snapshot from the Chicago Area, in: Ecological Restoration, 16 (1), p. 59-65.
Google Scholar
BOHM P., 1994, CVM Spells Responses to Hypothetical Questions, in: Journal of Natural Resources 34, p. 37.
Google Scholar
BOYD J., WAINGER L., 2003,Measuring Ecosystem Service Benefits: The Use of Landscape Analysis to Evaluate Environmental Trades and Compensation.Discussion Paper, http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/handle/10738.
Google Scholar
(1.02.2014).
Google Scholar
CAIRNS Jr. J., 1991, The Status of the Theoretical and Applied Science of Restoration Ecology, in: Environmental Professional 13(3), p. 186-194.
Google Scholar
CAMERON T. A., 1988, A New Paradigm for Valuing Non-market Goods Using Referendum Data: Maximum Likelihood Estimation by Censored Logistic Regression, in: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 15 (3), p. 355-379.
Google Scholar
CAMERON T. A., 1991, Interval Estimates of Non-market Resource Values from Referendum Contingent Valuation Surveys, in: Land Economics 67 (4), p. 413-421.
Google Scholar
CAMERONT.A., JAMES M.D., 1987. Efficient Estimation Methods for ‘Closed-ended’ Contingent Valuation Surveys, in: The Review of Economics and Statistics 69(2), p. 269-276.
Google Scholar
CARNES S.A., SCHWEITZER M., PEELLE E.B., WOLFE A.K., MUNRO J.F., 1998, Measuring the Success of Public Participation on Environmental Restoration and Waste Management Activities in the US Department of Energy, in: Technology in Society 20 (4), p. 385-406.
Google Scholar
CARPENTER S. R., CARACO N. F., CORNELL D. L., HOWARTH R. W., SHARPLEY A. N., SMITH V. H., 1998, Nonpoint Pollution of Surface Waters with Phosphorus and Nitrogen, in: Ecological Applications 8 (3), p. 559-568.
Google Scholar
CHAN K. W., 2010, The Household Registration System and Migrant Labor in China: Notes on a Debate, in: Population and Development Review 36 (2), p. 357-364.
Google Scholar
CICCHETTI C. J., PECK N., 1989, Assessing Natural Resource Damages: The Case Against Contingent Value Survey Methods, in: Natural. Resources & Environment 4, p. 6.
Google Scholar
COBBING P., SLEE B., 1994, The Application of CVM to a Land Use Controversy in the Scottish Highlands, in:Landscape Research 19 (1), p. 14-17.
Google Scholar
DAMIGOS D., KALIAMPAKOS D., 2003, Assessing the Benefits of Reclaiming Urban Quarries: a CVM Analysis, in: Landscape and Urban Planning 64 (4), p. 249-258.
Google Scholar
DOWNS P. W., KONDOLF G. M., 2002, Post-project Appraisals in Adaptive Management of River Channel Restoration, in: Environmental Management 29 (4), p. 477-496.
Google Scholar
DUNLAP R. E., 1991, Trends in Public Opinion Toward Environmental Issues: 1965-1990, in: Society & Natural Resources 4 (3), p. 285-312.
Google Scholar
ENDTER-WADA J., BLAHNA D., KRANNICH R., BRUNSON M., 1998,A Framework for Understanding Social Science Contributions to Ecosystem Management, in: Ecological Applications 8 (3), p. 891-904.
Google Scholar
FAN C. C., 2008, China on the Move: Migration, the State, and the Household, in: The China Quarterly 196, p. 924-956.
Google Scholar
GORE J.A., Restoration of Rivers and Streams, Butterworth Publishers, MA:985.
Google Scholar
HADKER N., SHARMA S., DAVID A., MURALEEDHARAN T. R., 1997, Willingness-to-pay for Borivli National Park: Evidence from a Contingent Valuation, in: Ecological Economics, 21 (2), p. 105-122.
Google Scholar
HAGER M. A., WILSON S., POLLAK T. H., ROONEY P. M., 2003, Response Rates for Mail Surveys of Nonprofit Organizations: A Review and Empirical Test, in: Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 32 (2), p. 252-267.
Google Scholar
HANEMANN M., LOOMIS J., KANNINE B., 1991, Statistical Efficiency of Double-bounded Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation, in: American Journal of Agricultural Economics 1255-1263.
Google Scholar
HANEY A., POWER R. L., 1996, Adaptive Management for Sound Ecosystem Management, in: Environmental Management 20 (6), p. 879-886.
Google Scholar
HITE D., HUDSON D., INTARAPAPONG W., 2002, Willingness to Pay for Water Quality Improvements: The Case of Precision Application Technology, in: Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 27 (2), p. 433-449.
Google Scholar
HONG H., TAMER E., 2003, A Simple Estimator for Nonlinear Error in Variable Models, in: Journal of Econometrics 117 (1), p. 1-19.
Google Scholar
HUANG M., JIANG H., 2009, The spatial and temporal characteristics of surface ultraviolet radiation and total ozone in urban agglomeration of Yangtze River Delta, in: Urban Remote Sensing Event, p. 1-7.
Google Scholar
KAPLAN S., 1987, Aesthetics, Affect, and Cognition Environmental Preference from an Evolutionary Perspective, in: Environment and Behavior 19 (1), p. 3-32.
Google Scholar
KEMPTON W. M., BOSTER J. S., HARTLEY J. A., Environmental Values in American Culture, MIT Press, 1996.
Google Scholar
KERN K., 1992,Rehabilitation of Streams in South-west Germany, in: River Conservation and Management, p. 321-335.
Google Scholar
LEE K. N., 1995, Deliberately Seeking Sustainability in the Columbia River Basin, in: Barriers and Bridges to the Renewal of Ecosystems and Institutions, p. 214-238.
Google Scholar
LOOMIS J., KENT P., STRANGE L., FAUSCH K., COVICH A., 2000, Measuring the Total Economic Value of Restoring Ecosystem Services in an Impaired River Basin: Results from a Contingent Valuation Survey, in: Ecological Economics 33 (1), p. 103-117.
Google Scholar
MANGIONE T. W.,Mail Surveys: Improving the Quality, California: Thousand Oaks, 1995.
Google Scholar
MANSKI C. F., TAMER E., 2003,Inference on Regressions with Interval Data on a Regressor or Outcome, in: Econometrica, 70 (2), p. 519-546.
Google Scholar
McCARTHY N., 2004,Local-level Public Goods and Collective Action. International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), http://www.ifpri.org/publication/local-level-public-goods-and-collective-action (1.02.2014).
Google Scholar
McCOY E.D., MUSHINSKY H.R., 2002, Measuring the Success of Wildlife Community Restoration, in: Ecological Applications 12 (6), p. 1861-1871.
Google Scholar
MILON J. W., ADAMS C. M., CARTER D. W.,Floridians’ Attitudes About the Environment and Coastal Marine Resources, Florida Sea Grant College Program, University of Florida 1998.
Google Scholar
PRATKANIS A. R., BRECKLER S. J., GREENWALD A. G.,Attitude Structure and Function, NJ: Hillsdale 1989.
Google Scholar
PROCTOR J. D., 1998, Environmental Values and Popular Conflict over Environmental Management: A Comparative Analysis of Public Comments on the Clinton Forest Plan, in: Environmental Management 22 (3), p. 347-358.
Google Scholar
PRUCKNER G. J., 1995, Agricultural Landscape Cultivation in Austria: An Application of the CVM, in: European Review of Agricultural Economics 22 (2), p. 173-190.
Google Scholar
RIVERS D., VUONG Q. H., 1988, Limited Information Estimators and Exogeneity Tests for Simultaneous Probit Models, in: Journal of Econometrics 39 (3), p. 347-366.
Google Scholar
ROSENBERGER R. S., WALSH R. G., 1997, Nonmarket Value of Western Valley Ranchland Using Contingent Valuation, in: Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 22, p. 296-309.
Google Scholar
SCHMIDT D. C., CARLSON S. R., KYLE G. B., FINNEY B. P., 1998, Influence of Carcass-derived Nutrients on Sockeye Salmon Productivity of Karluk Lake, Alaska: Importance in the Assessment of an Escapement Goal, in: North American Journal of Fisheries Management 18 (4), p. 743-763.
Google Scholar
SCHMIDT J.C., WEBB R.H., VALDEZ R.A., MARZOLF G.R., STEVENS L.E., 1998, Science and Values in River Restoration in the Grand Canyon, in: BioScience, 48 (9), p. 735-747.
Google Scholar
SMITH C. L., GILDEN J. D., CONE J. S., STEEL B. S., 1997, Contrasting Views of Coastal Residents and Coastal Coho Restoration Planners, in: Fisheries 22 (12), p. 8-15.
Google Scholar
VAN der STEDE W. A., YOUNG S. M., CHEN C. X., 2005, Assessing the Quality of Evidence in Empirical Management Accounting Research: The Case of Survey Studies, in: Accounting, Organizations and Society 30 (7), p. 655-684.
Google Scholar
STEEL B. S., LIST P., SHINDLER B., 1994, Conflicting Values About Federal Forests: a Comparison of National and Oregon Publics, in: Society & Natural Resources 7 (2), p. 137-153.
Google Scholar
STEEL B. S., SODEN D. L., WARNER R. L., 1990, The Impact of Knowledge and Values on Perceptions of Environmental Risk to the Great Lakes, in: Society & Natural Resources 3(4), P. 331-348.
Google Scholar
STEVENS T. H., ECHEVERRIA J., GLASS R. J., HAGER T., MORE T. A., 1991, Measuring the Existence Value of Wildlife: What Do CVM Estimates Really Show?, in: Land Economics 67 (4), p. 390-400.
Google Scholar
TOURANGEAU R., COUPER M. P., CONRAD F., 2004, Spacing, Position, and Order Interpretive Heuristics for Visual Features of Sur vey Questions, in: Public Opinion Quarterly 68 (3), p. 368-393.
Google Scholar
TUNSTALL S. M., TAPSELL S. M., EDEN S., 1999, How Stable Are Public Responses to Changing Local Environments? A’before’and’after’case Study of River Restoration, in: Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 42 (4), p. 527-545.
Google Scholar
ULRICH R. S., 1984, View Through a Window May Influence Recovery from Surgery, in: Science 224 (4647), p. 420-421.
Google Scholar
WILKINS S., KEITH D.A., ADAM P., 2003, Measuring Success: Evaluating the Restoration of a Grassy Eucalypt Woodland on the Cumberland Plain, Sydney, Australia, in: Restoration Ecology 11 (4), p. 489-503.
Google Scholar
WONG L., WAI P. H., 1998, Reforming the Household Registration System: A Preliminary Glimpse of the Blue Chop Household Registration System in Shanghai and Shenzhen, in: International Migration Review 32(4), p. 974-994.
Google Scholar
WU X., & TREIMAN D. J., 2004, The Household Registration System and Social Stratification in China: 1955-1996, in: Demography 41 (2), p. 363-384.
Google Scholar
ZHAO Y., 1997, Labor Migration and Returns to Rural Education in China, in: American Journal of Agricultural Economics 79 (4), p. 1278-1287.
Google Scholar
ZHAO Y., 1997, Labor Migration and Returns to Rural Education in China, in: American Journal of Agricultural Economics 79 (4), p. 1278-1287.
Google Scholar
Authors
Yifei ZhangInternational Business School, Shanghai University of International Business and Economics, Shanghai, 201620 China
Authors
Sheng LiDepartment of Agricultural Economics, Auburn University, USA, 36849-5406 and Department of Economic and Management, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai, China, 201306 United States
Statistics
Abstract views: 11PDF downloads: 5
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
