Distance Difficult to Overcome? Analysis of Norwegian and Polish Position on the Path to Sustainable Development

Artur Zimny


State University of Applied Sciences in Konin, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Department of Managerial Studies and Logistics, ul. Przyjaźni 1, 62-510 Konin (Poland)

Karina Zawieja-Żurowska


State University of Applied Sciences in Konin, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Department of Political Studies and Internal Security, ul. Przyjaźni 1, 62-510 Konin (Poland)


Abstract

Sustainable development is undoubtedly the key challenge of the contemporary world. On the way to this development Poland if far behind the other countries, especially Norway, which seems to be an unquestionable leader in this respect in Europe. There is a distance between Norway and Poland in all ten dimensions (themes) described in the EU Sustainable Development Strategy (socio-economic development, sustainable consumption and production, social inclusion, demographic changes, public health, climate change and energy, sustainable transport, natural resources, global partnership and good governance). Unfortunately it is not likely that the distance could be significantly reduced in the coming years. Poland must accept that fact and simultaneously learn from the leader and take advantage of its experience, but can also benefit from financial support, which is possible to obtain from the EEA and Norway Grants – the funds provided to particular programs aimed at reducing economic and social disparities and strengthening bilateral relations between Norway and Poland.


Keywords:

sustainable development, development gap, Poland, Norway

CBOS, 2013, Poczucie wpływu na sprawy publiczne, Komunikat z badań CBOS nr BS/121/2013, Warszawa, p. 1.
  Google Scholar

CBOS, 2014, Opinie o działalności parlamentu, prezydenta i Państwowej Komisji Wyborczej, Komunikat z badań CBOS nr 169/2014, Warszawa, p. 1.
  Google Scholar

EUROPEAN COMMISSION, UE Budget in My Country, http://ec.europa.eu/budget/mycountry/PL (12.02.2015).
  Google Scholar

EUROPEAN COMMISSION, 2005, The 2005 Review of the EU Sustainable Development Strategy: Initial Stocktaking and Future Orientation, COM(2005) 37 final, Brussels.
  Google Scholar

EUROPEAN COMMISSION, 2007, Progress Report on the Sustainable Development Strategy 2007, COM(2007) 642 final, Brussels.
  Google Scholar

EUROPEAN COMMISSION, 2009, Mainstreaming sustainable development into EU policies: 2009 Review of the European Union Strategy for Sustainable Development, COM(2009) 400 final, Brussels.
  Google Scholar

EUROPEAN COMMISSION, 2010, Europe 2020. A European Strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth, http://ec.europa.eu/eu2020/pdf/COMPLET%20EN%20BARROS0%20%20%20007%20-%20Europe% 202020%20-%20EN%20version.pdf (1.02.2015).
  Google Scholar

EUROPEAN COUNCIL, 2001, A Sustainable Europe for a Better World: A European Union Strategy for Sustainable Development, COM(2001)264 final, Brussels.
  Google Scholar

EUROPEAN COUNCIL, 2006, Renewed EU Sustainable Development Strategy, Brussels.
  Google Scholar

EUROSTAT, Headline Indicators, http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/sdi/indicators (6.02.2015).
  Google Scholar

EUROSTAT, 2013, 2013 monitoring report of the EU sustainable development strategy, Luxembourg.
  Google Scholar

EUROPEAN UNION, 2008, Consolidated Version of the Treaty on European Union, http://www.basiclaw.net/Appendices/eu_cons_treaty_en.pdf (1.03.2015).
  Google Scholar

Fundusze norweskie i EOG na lata 2009-2014, http://www.eog.gov.pl (12.02.2015).
  Google Scholar

GŁÓWNY URZĄD STATYSTYCZNY, Information Portal, http://stat.gov.pl (06.02.2015).
  Google Scholar

GŁÓWNY URZĄD STATYSTYCZNY, URZĄD STATYSTYCZNY W KATOWICACH, 2011, Wskaźniki zrównoważonego rozwoju Polski, Katowice, p. 8.
  Google Scholar

Konstytucja Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej z dnia 2 kwietnia 1997 r., 1997, Dz. U. z 1997 r. Nr 78 poz. 483 z późn. zm., art. 5.
  Google Scholar

OECD, Statistics, http://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx (06.02.2015).
  Google Scholar

RYDZEWSKI P., 2015, Sustainable Development as Seen by the Residents of Eastern and Western Europe on the Basis of ISSP Environment Data, in: Problemy Ekorozwoju/ Problems of Sustainable Development, vol. 10, no 1, p. 49-53.
  Google Scholar

Ustawa z dnia 27 kwietnia 2001 r. Prawo ochrony środowiska, 2001, Dz. U. z 2001 r. Nr 62 poz. 627 z późn. zm., art. 3 pkt 50.
  Google Scholar

WCED, 1987, Our Common Future, Oxford University Press, New York.
  Google Scholar

WORLD BANK, Indicators, http://data.worldbank.org/indicators (10.02.2015).
  Google Scholar

Download


Published
2015-07-01

Cited by

Zimny, A., & Zawieja-Żurowska, K. (2015). Distance Difficult to Overcome? Analysis of Norwegian and Polish Position on the Path to Sustainable Development. Problemy Ekorozwoju, 10(2), 127–135. Retrieved from https://ph.pollub.pl/index.php/preko/article/view/4916

Authors

Artur Zimny 

State University of Applied Sciences in Konin, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Department of Managerial Studies and Logistics, ul. Przyjaźni 1, 62-510 Konin Poland

Authors

Karina Zawieja-Żurowska 

State University of Applied Sciences in Konin, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Department of Political Studies and Internal Security, ul. Przyjaźni 1, 62-510 Konin Poland

Statistics

Abstract views: 27
PDF downloads: 8