Sustainable Development of One of the Poorest Province of the European Union: Lublin Voivodeship, Poland – Attempt of Assessment
Article Sidebar
Open full text
Issue Vol. 10 No. 2 (2015)
-
Contribution to the UN Post-2015 Development Agenda Based on the Concept of Resilience
Jürg Bloesch, Michael von Hauff, Klaus Mainzer, S. Venkata Mohan, Ortwin Renn, Verena Risse, Yonghui Song, Kazuhiko Takeuchi, Peter A. Wilderer7-13
-
Social Sozophilosophy and the Care for Sutainability of Some Areas of the Social Reality
Wiesław Sztumski15-29
-
Sustainable Development as a Single Measure: Case Study of Some Developing Asian Countries
Venkatesh G.31-42
-
Delinquency Hostile to Women – a Hurdle for Sustainable Development in Multidimensional Outlook
N. Gayathri, P. Karthikeyan43-50
-
Sustainable Development of Middle East Region
Wiktoria Sobczyk51-62
-
How We Think: How it Affects Sustainable Thinking
Eva Kras63-69
-
Evaluation of Sustainable Development in the Member States of the European Union
Barbara Bujanowicz-Haraś, Paweł Janulewicz, Anna Nowak, Artur Krukowski71-78
-
Beyond the North-South Debate: The Global Significance of Sustainable Development Debates in South Korea
Michael S. Pak78-86
-
Lost in Translation: Problems of Rendering the Term Sustainable Development into Non-Western Languages as Demonstrated in the Case of South Korea
Kwang-Hoon Baek, Nakil Ko87-93
-
A Curriculum on Sustainable Information Communication Technology
Barış Özkan, Alok Mishra95-101
-
The Holistic Concept of Sustainable Development in Strategies of Polish Voivodeships to the Year 2020
Agnieszka Makarewicz-Marcinkiewicz71-78
-
Furthering sustainable development: The implementation of Green Procurement in Central and Eastern Europe Methods and Experiences from Hungarian Public and Private Organizations
Orsolya Diófási-Kovács, László Valkó115-126
-
Distance Difficult to Overcome? Analysis of Norwegian and Polish Position on the Path to Sustainable Development
Artur Zimny, Karina Zawieja-Żurowska127-135
-
Sustainable Development of One of the Poorest Province of the European Union: Lublin Voivodeship, Poland – Attempt of Assessment
Marcin K. Widomski, Piotr Gleń, Grzegorz Łagód, Katarzyna M. Jaromin-Gleń137-149
-
Roshwald’s Philosophy of Care – the Creative Nature of the Concern (Implications for Sustainable Development)
Jakub Bartoszewski151-157
-
Integrating Role of Sustainable Development Paradigm in Shaping the Human-landscape Relation
Elżbieta Jolanta Bielińska, Barbara Futa, Stanisław Baran, Grażyna Żukowska, Małgorzata Pawłowska, Wojciech Cel, Tao Zhang159-168
-
The Measures of Sustainable Development – a Study Based on the European Monitoring of Energy-related Indicators
Agnieszka Żelazna, Justyna Gołębiowska167-177
Archives
-
Vol. 12 No. 2
2017-07-03 18
-
Vol. 12 No. 1
2017-01-02 16
-
Vol. 11 No. 2
2016-07-01 17
-
Vol. 11 No. 1
2016-01-04 20
-
Vol. 10 No. 2
2015-07-01 17
-
Vol. 10 No. 1
2015-01-05 16
-
Vol. 9 No. 2
2014-07-01 16
-
Vol. 9 No. 1
2014-01-02 19
-
Vol. 8 No. 2
2013-07-01 13
-
Vol. 8 No. 1
2013-01-02 12
Main Article Content
Authors
Abstract
This paper presents the attempt of sustainable development assessment for one of the poorest regions of the European Union (EU), Lublin Voivodeship in Poland, during its first decade in the EU, i.e. 2004-2013. Our analyses, performed for all pillars of sustainability: social, economic and environmental-technical, were based on sustainable development indicators (SDIs). The set of 21 sustainable development indicators, based on freely available statistical data, was proposed in this paper. The SDIs for Lublin Voivodeship were compared to values for Poland and the European Union. The special attention was put to assessment of sustainable development diversification between urbanized and rural areas of Poland and Lublin province. Our analyses showed than both, Poland and Lublin Voivodeship, clearly developed during the last decade but their sustainable development is still endangered and slowed down by several causes. Moreover, the value of most tested sustainability indicators was significantly below the European mean.
Keywords:
References
EUROPEAN COUNCIL, 2013, Regulation 1177/2003 of 16 June 2003 concerning Community statistics on income and living conditions (EU-SILC).
EUROPEAN COUNCIL, 2005, Regulation 1553/2005 of 7 September 2005 amending Regulation 1177/2003 concerning Community statistics on income and living conditions (EU-SILC).
EUROPEAN COUNCIL, 2006, Regulation 1791/2006 of 20 November 2006 adapting certain Regulations and Decisions in the fields of statistics, by reason of the accession of Bul-garia and Romania.
EUROSTAT, 2013a, Energy, transport and environment indicators, 2013 edition, Statistical Books, Luxembourg.
EUROSTAT, 2013 b, Sustainable development in the European Union, 2013 monitoring re-port of the EU sustainable development strat-egy, Eurostat, Statistical Books, Luxembourg.
GILBERT A., 1996, Criteria for sustainability in the development of indicators for sustainable development, in: Chemosphere, vol. 33, no. 9, p. 1739-1748.
GŁÓWNY URZĄD STATYSTYCZNY, Ochrona Środowiska, Informacje i opracowania statystyczne, Warszawa 2011.
HARDING R., 2006, Ecologically sustainable development: origins, implementation and challenges, in: Desalination, vol. 187, p. 229-239.
HARRIS J.M., WISE T.A., GALLAGHER K.P., GOODWIN N.R., A Survey of Sustainable Development, Social and Economic Dimensions, Island Press, Washington, Covelo, London 2001.
HEZRI A.A., NORDIN HASAN M., 2004, Management framework for sustainable development indicators in the State of Selangor, Malaysia, in: Ecological Indicators, vol. 4, p. 287-304.
IORIS A.A.R., HUNTER C., WALKER S., 2008, The development and application of water management sustainability indicators in Brazil and Scotland, in: Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 88, p. 1190-1201.
KONDRATYEV S., GRONSKAYA T., IGNA-TIEVA N., BLINOVA I., TELESH I., YE-FREMOVA L., 2002, Assessment of present state of water resources of Lake Ladoga and its drainage basin using Sustainable Development Indicators, in: Ecological Indicators, vol. 2, p. 79-92.
MUNITLAK IVANOVIC O.D., GOLUSIN M.T., DODIC S.N, DODIC J.M., 2009, Perspectives of sustainable development in countries of Southeastern Europe, in: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 13, p. 2079-2087.
PALME U., LUNDIN M., TILLMAN A.M., MOLANDER S., 2005, Sustainable development indicators for wastewater systems – researchers and indicator users in a cooperative case study, in: Resources, Conservation and Recycling, vol. 43, no. 3, p. 293-311.
PALME U., TILLMAN A.M., 2008, Sustainable development indicators: how are they used in Swedish water utilities, in: Journal of Clean-er Production, vol. 16, no. 13, p. 1346-1357.
PAWŁOWSKI A., 2010, The role of environmental engineering in introducing sustainable development, in: Ecological Chemistry and Engineering S, vol. 17, no. 3, p. 264-278.
PAWŁOWSKI A., 2009, Rewolucja rozwoju zrównoważonego, in: Problemy ekorozwoju/Problems of Sustainable Development, vol. 4, No. 1, p. 65-76.
The Constitution of The Republic of Poland, 1997, Dziennik Ustaw No. 78, item 483.
TSAI W.-T., 2010, Energy sustainability from analysis of sustainable development indica-tors: A case study in Taiwan, in: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 14, p. 2131-2138.
UNITED NATIONS, Agenda 21: The United Nations Programme of Action form Rio, United Nations, New York 1992.
UNITED NATIONS, Indicators of Sustainable Development: Guidelines and Methodologies, United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, New York 2007.
WCED, Our Common Future, Oxford University Press, Oxford 1987.
Article Details
Abstract views: 81
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
