Discourses of Ecology and the Sketches of Creative Ecology in the Context of Sustainable Development

Tomas Kačerauskas


Department of Philosophy and Communication, Vilnius Gedimino Technical University Saulėtekio al. 11, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania (Lithuania)


Abstract

The paper deals with the different discourses of ecology, including creative ecology, in the context of sustainable development. The author presents a classification of the ecological discourses as follows: meta-ecology, area ecology, educational ecology, linguistic ecology, ecology of novelty, technological ecology, epistemological ecology, approach ecology, political ecology, and ecology of visuality. Additionally, every branch of ecology has been divided into 3 sub-branches. According to the author, ecology has become a problem only after human activity has started to threaten for the very human environment including natural and ipso facto for human being, i.e. for social sustainable development. The extension of ecology discourse could be treated as the result for both of the mania of nature protection and of invasion of cultural area into natural one. The ecological discourses are also often incommensurable, since they stem from very different scientific rims despite analogous terms (ecology) and approaches (environmental). Even in the cases when they do not deal with the nature and natural environment, the laws of nature and the relationships between the organisms within it, serve as a model for an ecological discourse. Some features are characteristic for different discourses of ecology: 1) reference to certain environment; 2) suggested protection of a natural or cultural area; 3) systematic approach; 4) the attitude that the parts of a system are fighting for their survival like the organisms in the nature; 5) dynamic approach towards both the system and its parts under the evolution; 6) conviction that the human activity should be regulated and limited. Creative ecology could be treated both: as a branch in ecology of novelty and as a kind of meta-discourse, since every discourse requires creative thinking. 


Keywords:

creative ecology, ecological thinking, classification of ecologies, creative and cultural industries, discourses of environment

ADKINS B., FOTH M., SUMMERVILLE J., HIGGS P., 2007, Ecologies of innovation – Symbolic aspects of cross-organizational linkages in the design sector in an Australian inner-city area, in: American Behavioral Scientist, vol. 50, no 7, p. 922-934.
  Google Scholar

BALTRĖNAS P., BALTRĖNAITĖ E., KAČERAUSKAS T., 2015, Social environment of creativity, in: Filosofija. Sociologija, vol. 26, no 1, p. 46-54.
  Google Scholar

BAZIUKE D., JUSCENKO N., SIAULYS A., 2014, Switching to numerical scale in marine environmental decision support systems: Fuzzy logic approach, in: Ocean & Coastal Management, vol. 101, no SI, p. 35-41.
  Google Scholar

BOTHA C. F., 2003, Heidegger, technology and ecology, in: South African Journal of Philosophy, vol. 22, no 2, p. 157-172.
  Google Scholar

BOURDIEU P., 1998, On Television, The New Press, New York.
  Google Scholar

BOURDIEU P., 1993, The Field of Cultural Production, Polity, Cambridge.
  Google Scholar

BRUNI L. E., 2015, Sustainability, cognitive technologies and the digital semiosphere, in: International Journal of Cultural Studies, vol. 18, no 1, p. 103-117.
  Google Scholar

CETINDAMAR D., GUNSEL A., 2012, Measuring the creativity of a city: a proposal and an application, in: European Planning Studies, vol. 20, no 8, p. 1301-1318.
  Google Scholar

COHEN-ROSENTHAL E., 2004, Making sense out of industrial ecology: a framework for analysis and action, in: Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 12, no 8-10, p. 1111-1123.
  Google Scholar

COKADAR H., YILMAZ G. C., 2010, Teaching ecosystems and matter cycles with creative drama activities, in: Journal of Science Education and Technology, vol. 19, no 1, p. 80-
  Google Scholar

COLYVAN M., LINQUIST S., GREY W. et al., 2009, Philosophical issues in ecology: Recent trends and future directions, in: Ecology and Society, vol. 14, no 2, p. 1-12.
  Google Scholar

CARUSO C., COLORNI A., PARUCINI M., 1993, The regional Urban Solid Waste management System: A Modeling Approach, in: European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 70, p. 16-30.
  Google Scholar

CHRISTENSEN C. B., 2014, Human ecology as philosophy, in: Human Ecology Review, vol. 20, no 2, p. 31-49.
  Google Scholar

COTTLE S., 2004, Producing nature(s): on the changing production ecology of natural history TV, in: Media Culture & Society, vol. 26, no 1, p. 81-101.
  Google Scholar

CRANWELL C., 2010, Embracing Thanatos-in-Eros: Evolutionary ecology and pantheism, in: Sophia, vol. 49, no 2, p. 271-283.
  Google Scholar

DUL J., CEYLAN C., 2014, The impact of a creativity-supporting work environment on a firm’s product innovation performance, in: Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol. 31, no 6, p. 1254-1267.
  Google Scholar

FEIST G. J., 1998, A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity, in: Personality and Social Psychology Review, vol. 2, no 4, p. 290-309.
  Google Scholar

FITZHUGH B., 2001, Risk and invention in human technological evolution, in: Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, vol. 20, no 2, p. 125-167.
  Google Scholar

FLORIDA R., 2002, The Rise of Creative Class. And how it’s transforming work, leisure, communitiy and everyday life, Basic, New York.
  Google Scholar

FLORIDA R., 2005, Cities and Creative Class, Routledge, New York.
  Google Scholar

FLORIDA R., TINAGLI I., 2004, Europe in the creative age, Europe, Demos.
  Google Scholar

FOWLER C. A., HODGES B. H., 2011, Dynamics and languaging: Toward an ecology of language, in: Ecological Psychology, vol. 23, no 3, p. 147-156.
  Google Scholar

GABORA L., ROSCH E., AERTS D., 2008, Toward an ecological theory of concepts, in: Ecological Psychology, vol. 20, no 1, p. 84-116.
  Google Scholar

GIBSON J. J., 1979,The ecological approach to visual perception, Houghton-Mifflin, Boston.
  Google Scholar

GINO F., WILTERMUTH S.S., 2014, Evil genius? How dishonesty can lead to greater creativity, in: Psychological Science, vol. 25, no 4, p. 973-981.
  Google Scholar

GONG X., 2013, The Modeling of China City Creativity Index and an Empirical Research, in: 20th International Annual Conference on Management Science and Engineering (ICMSE), p. 2289-2295.
  Google Scholar

HEILIG G. K., 1997, Sustainable development – ten arguments against a biologistic ‘slow-down’ philosophy of social and economic development, in International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, vol. 4 (1), p. 1-16.
  Google Scholar

HIRONAKA A., SCHOFER E., 2000, The nation-state and the natural environment over the twentieth century, in: American Sociological Review, vol. 65, p. 96-116.
  Google Scholar

HOWKINS J., 2009, Creative ecologies: where thinking is a proper job, New Brunswick and London, Transaction Publishers.
  Google Scholar

HOWKINS J., 2013, The Creative Economy: How People Make Monet from Ideas, Penguin, London.
  Google Scholar

HULL Z., 2008, The philosophical and social conditioning of sustainable development, in: Problemy Ekorozwoju/Problems of Sustainable Development, vol. 3, no 1, p. 27-31.
  Google Scholar

IVAKHIV A., 2007, Green film criticism and its futures, in: Foreign Literature Studies, vol. 29, no 1, p. 46-65.
  Google Scholar

JOHRI A., TEO H. J., LO J. et al., 2014, Millennial engineers: Digital media and information ecology of engineering students, in: Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 33, p. 286-301.
  Google Scholar

KAČERAUSKAS T., TAMOŠAUSKAS P., 2015, Sport as factor of creativity, in: Filosofija. Sociologija, vol. 26, no 1, p. 64–71.
  Google Scholar

KORNILOVA T. V., KORNILOV S. A., 2012, Is it possible to create a model of creativity without psychology of creativity?, in: Psikhologicheskii zhurnal, vol. 33, no 6, p. 76-83.
  Google Scholar

KULBYTĖ A., 2014, Romantizmo transformacijos postmodernizmo estetikoje: tapatumo požymiai ir ribos [The transformations of romanticism in postmodern aesthetics: The signs and limits of identity], in: Logos, vol. 78, p. 170-179 (in Lithuanian).
  Google Scholar

LANGE B., KALANDIDES A., STOEBER B. et al., 2008, Berlin's creative industries: Governing creativity?, in: Industry and Innovation, vol. 15, no 5, p. 531-548.
  Google Scholar

LEE D. S., LEE K. C., SEO Y.W. et al., 2015, An analysis of shared leadership, diversity, and team creativity in an e-learning environment, in: Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 42, no SI, p. 47-56.
  Google Scholar

MITCHELL W. J. T., 1994, Picture Theory, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  Google Scholar

NEWELL J. P., COUSINS J.J., 2014, The boundaries of urban metabolism: Towards a political-industrial ecology, in: Progress in Human Geography, vol. 12, p. 1-27.
  Google Scholar

PADEN R., HARMON L. K., MILLING C. R., 2013, Philosophical histories of the aesthetics of nature, in: Environmental Ethics, vol. 35, no 1, p. 57-77.
  Google Scholar

PENNINGTON M.C., HOEKJE B.J., 2014, Framing English language teaching, in: System, vol. 46, p. 163-175.
  Google Scholar

PETERSEN T., KLAUER B., MANSTETTEN R., 2009, The environment as a challenge for governmental responsibility – The case of the European Water Framework Directive, in: Ecological Economics, vol. 68, no 7, p. 2058–2065.
  Google Scholar

PLATO, Lysis http://www.gutenberg.org/files/1579/1579-h/1579-h.htm (19.05.2015).
  Google Scholar

PLATO, The Laws, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press.
  Google Scholar

RUNCO M. A., 2004, Creativity, in: Annual Review of Psychology, vol. 55, p. 657-687.
  Google Scholar

RUNCO M. A., ILLIES J. J., EISENMAN R., 2005, Creativity, originality, and appropriateness: What do explicit instructions tell us about their relationships?, in: Journal of Creative Behavior, vol. 39, no 2, p. 137-148.
  Google Scholar

RUSBY J. C., JONES L. B., CROWLEY R. et al., 2013, The child care ecology inventory: A domain-specific measure of home-based child care quality to promote social competence for school readiness, in: Early Childhood Research Quarterly, vol. 28, no 4, p. 947-959.
  Google Scholar

SKORUPA P., 2014, Shocking contents in social and commercial advertising , in: Creativity Studies, vol. 7, no 2, p. 69-81.
  Google Scholar

STEEN M., 2015, Upon opening the black box and finding it full: Exploring the ethics in design practices, in: Science Technology & Human Values, vol. 40, no 3, p. 389-420.
  Google Scholar

SUNLEY P., PINCH S., REIMER S. et al., 2008, Innovation in a creative production system: the case of design, in: Journal of Economic Geography, vol. 8, no 5, p. 675-698.
  Google Scholar

TAELMAN S. E., DE MEESTER S.;,SCHAUBROECK T., et al., 2014, Accounting for the occupation of the marine environment as a natural resource in life cycle assessment: An exergy based approach, in: Resources Conservation and Recycling, vol. 91, p. 1-10.
  Google Scholar

TORRANCE E. P., 1966, The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking, Personnel Press, Lexington, MA.
  Google Scholar

TSCHAKERT P., 2012, From impacts to embodied experiences: tracing political ecology in climate change research, in: Geografisk Tidsskrift-Danish Journal of Geography, vol. 112, no 2, p. 144-158.
  Google Scholar

VALIVONYTĖ I. M., 2013, Plagijavimas reklamoje: kūrybinio mąstymo trūkumas ar perpildytos rinkos pasekmė? [Plagiarism in advertising: Lack of the creative thinking or result of saturated market?], in: Santalka: filosofija, komunikacija, vol. 21, no 2, p. 128-139 (in Lithuanian).
  Google Scholar

WANG Y.; FANG Y.; ZHANG J. et al., 2013, Dezert-Smarandache theory for multiple targets tracking in natural environment, in: Iet Computer Vision, vol. 7, no 6, p. 456-466.
  Google Scholar

ZHAO SH., QIN Q., ZHANG F. et al., 2011, Research on using a mono-window algorithm for land surface temperature retrieval from Chinese satellite for environment and natural disaster monitoring (HJ-1B), in: Data, Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, vol. 31, no 6, p. 1552-1556.
  Google Scholar

ZIMMERMAN M. E., 1993, Rethinking the Heidegger – Deep ecology relationship, in: Environmental Ethics, vol. 15, no 3, p. 195-224.
  Google Scholar

YANG H., CHATTOPADHYAY A., ZHANG K., 2012, Unconscious creativity: When can unconscious thought outperform conscious thought?, in: Journal of Consumer Psychology, vol. 22, no 4, p. 573-581.
  Google Scholar

Download


Published
2016-01-04

Cited by

Kačerauskas, T. (2016). Discourses of Ecology and the Sketches of Creative Ecology in the Context of Sustainable Development. Problemy Ekorozwoju, 11(1), 31–39. Retrieved from https://ph.pollub.pl/index.php/preko/article/view/4957

Authors

Tomas Kačerauskas 

Department of Philosophy and Communication, Vilnius Gedimino Technical University Saulėtekio al. 11, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania Lithuania

Statistics

Abstract views: 25
PDF downloads: 8