Discourses of Ecology and the Sketches of Creative Ecology in the Context of Sustainable Development
Article Sidebar
Open full text
Issue Vol. 11 No. 1 (2016)
-
Education and the Problems of Sustainable Development
Delyse Springett7-14
-
Ecophilosophy in Modern East Asia: The Case of Hansalim in South Korea
Michael S. Pak, Jeehyun Kim15-22
-
The Concept of Nobilis Barbarus in the Light of Contemporary Ecological Challenges
Ryszard F. Sadowski23-30
-
Discourses of Ecology and the Sketches of Creative Ecology in the Context of Sustainable Development
Tomas Kačerauskas31-39
-
The Impact of Sustainable Development on the Homeostasis of the Social Environment and the Matter of Survival
Wiesław Sztumski41-47
-
The Anthropocentric Sozology of Julian Aleksandrowicz
Leszek Gawor49-58
-
Tax Payment, Social Contribution for Pollution Prevention and Happiness
Jing Xu, Jianjun Li59-64
-
Changes in Environmental Attitudes in Selected Countries of Central and Eastern Europe
Paweł Rydzewski65-72
-
Designing a Mixed Evaluating System for Green Manufacturing of Automotive Industry
Yuhong Cao, Jianxin You, Rui Wang, Yongjiang Shi73-86
-
Comparative Evaluation of Experience in Environmental Tax Reforms in Chosen EU States
Astrida Miceikiene, Valdemaras Makutenas, Jan Zukovskis, Artur J. Kożuch87-99
-
Cultural Ecosystem Services – Framework, Theories and Practices
Anna Dłużewska101-110
-
Joseph Kozielecki’s Project of Temporal Transgression and the Philosophy of Sustainable Development
Marek Tański111-116
-
Sustainable Development in the World from the Aspect of Environmental Health and Human Development Index: Regional Variations and Patterns
Slavomir Bucher117-124
-
Rebuilding the Pillars of Sustainable Society Index: a Multivariate Post Hoc I-distance Approach
Dejan Savić, Veljko Jeremić, Nataša Petrović125-134
-
Agricultural Biodiversity for Sustainable Development
Piotr Krajewski135-141
-
Factory Farming Versus Environment and Society. The Analysis of Selected Problems
Ignacy S. Fiut, Marcin Urbaniak143-156
-
Urbanization, Food Insecurity and Agriculture – Challenges for Social Sustainable Development
Karthika Palanisamy, Karthikeyan Parthasarathy157-162
-
Ecological Entrepreneurship and Sustainable Development
Elena Mieszajkina163-171
-
Sustainable Mitigation of Greenhouse Gases Emissions
Wojciech Cel, Aneta Czechowska-Kosacka, Tao Zhang173-176
-
Sustainable Development versus Prospecting and Extraction of Shale Gas
Aneta Duda, Justyna Gołębiowska, Agnieszka Żelazna177-180
Archives
-
Vol. 13 No. 2
2023-10-15 22
-
Vol. 13 No. 1
2018-01-02 23
-
Vol. 12 No. 2
2017-07-03 18
-
Vol. 12 No. 1
2017-01-02 16
-
Vol. 11 No. 2
2016-07-01 17
-
Vol. 11 No. 1
2016-01-04 20
-
Vol. 10 No. 2
2015-07-01 17
-
Vol. 10 No. 1
2015-01-05 16
-
Vol. 9 No. 2
2014-07-01 16
-
Vol. 9 No. 1
2014-01-02 19
Main Article Content
Authors
Abstract
The paper deals with the different discourses of ecology, including creative ecology, in the context of sustainable development. The author presents a classification of the ecological discourses as follows: meta-ecology, area ecology, educational ecology, linguistic ecology, ecology of novelty, technological ecology, epistemological ecology, approach ecology, political ecology, and ecology of visuality. Additionally, every branch of ecology has been divided into 3 sub-branches. According to the author, ecology has become a problem only after human activity has started to threaten for the very human environment including natural and ipso facto for human being, i.e. for social sustainable development. The extension of ecology discourse could be treated as the result for both of the mania of nature protection and of invasion of cultural area into natural one. The ecological discourses are also often incommensurable, since they stem from very different scientific rims despite analogous terms (ecology) and approaches (environmental). Even in the cases when they do not deal with the nature and natural environment, the laws of nature and the relationships between the organisms within it, serve as a model for an ecological discourse. Some features are characteristic for different discourses of ecology: 1) reference to certain environment; 2) suggested protection of a natural or cultural area; 3) systematic approach; 4) the attitude that the parts of a system are fighting for their survival like the organisms in the nature; 5) dynamic approach towards both the system and its parts under the evolution; 6) conviction that the human activity should be regulated and limited. Creative ecology could be treated both: as a branch in ecology of novelty and as a kind of meta-discourse, since every discourse requires creative thinking.
Keywords:
References
ADKINS B., FOTH M., SUMMERVILLE J., HIGGS P., 2007, Ecologies of innovation – Symbolic aspects of cross-organizational linkages in the design sector in an Australian inner-city area, in: American Behavioral Scientist, vol. 50, no 7, p. 922-934.
BALTRĖNAS P., BALTRĖNAITĖ E., KAČERAUSKAS T., 2015, Social environment of creativity, in: Filosofija. Sociologija, vol. 26, no 1, p. 46-54.
BAZIUKE D., JUSCENKO N., SIAULYS A., 2014, Switching to numerical scale in marine environmental decision support systems: Fuzzy logic approach, in: Ocean & Coastal Management, vol. 101, no SI, p. 35-41.
BOTHA C. F., 2003, Heidegger, technology and ecology, in: South African Journal of Philosophy, vol. 22, no 2, p. 157-172.
BOURDIEU P., 1998, On Television, The New Press, New York.
BOURDIEU P., 1993, The Field of Cultural Production, Polity, Cambridge.
BRUNI L. E., 2015, Sustainability, cognitive technologies and the digital semiosphere, in: International Journal of Cultural Studies, vol. 18, no 1, p. 103-117.
CETINDAMAR D., GUNSEL A., 2012, Measuring the creativity of a city: a proposal and an application, in: European Planning Studies, vol. 20, no 8, p. 1301-1318.
COHEN-ROSENTHAL E., 2004, Making sense out of industrial ecology: a framework for analysis and action, in: Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 12, no 8-10, p. 1111-1123.
COKADAR H., YILMAZ G. C., 2010, Teaching ecosystems and matter cycles with creative drama activities, in: Journal of Science Education and Technology, vol. 19, no 1, p. 80-
COLYVAN M., LINQUIST S., GREY W. et al., 2009, Philosophical issues in ecology: Recent trends and future directions, in: Ecology and Society, vol. 14, no 2, p. 1-12.
CARUSO C., COLORNI A., PARUCINI M., 1993, The regional Urban Solid Waste management System: A Modeling Approach, in: European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 70, p. 16-30.
CHRISTENSEN C. B., 2014, Human ecology as philosophy, in: Human Ecology Review, vol. 20, no 2, p. 31-49.
COTTLE S., 2004, Producing nature(s): on the changing production ecology of natural history TV, in: Media Culture & Society, vol. 26, no 1, p. 81-101.
CRANWELL C., 2010, Embracing Thanatos-in-Eros: Evolutionary ecology and pantheism, in: Sophia, vol. 49, no 2, p. 271-283.
DUL J., CEYLAN C., 2014, The impact of a creativity-supporting work environment on a firm’s product innovation performance, in: Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol. 31, no 6, p. 1254-1267.
FEIST G. J., 1998, A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity, in: Personality and Social Psychology Review, vol. 2, no 4, p. 290-309.
FITZHUGH B., 2001, Risk and invention in human technological evolution, in: Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, vol. 20, no 2, p. 125-167.
FLORIDA R., 2002, The Rise of Creative Class. And how it’s transforming work, leisure, communitiy and everyday life, Basic, New York.
FLORIDA R., 2005, Cities and Creative Class, Routledge, New York.
FLORIDA R., TINAGLI I., 2004, Europe in the creative age, Europe, Demos.
FOWLER C. A., HODGES B. H., 2011, Dynamics and languaging: Toward an ecology of language, in: Ecological Psychology, vol. 23, no 3, p. 147-156.
GABORA L., ROSCH E., AERTS D., 2008, Toward an ecological theory of concepts, in: Ecological Psychology, vol. 20, no 1, p. 84-116.
GIBSON J. J., 1979,The ecological approach to visual perception, Houghton-Mifflin, Boston.
GINO F., WILTERMUTH S.S., 2014, Evil genius? How dishonesty can lead to greater creativity, in: Psychological Science, vol. 25, no 4, p. 973-981.
GONG X., 2013, The Modeling of China City Creativity Index and an Empirical Research, in: 20th International Annual Conference on Management Science and Engineering (ICMSE), p. 2289-2295.
HEILIG G. K., 1997, Sustainable development – ten arguments against a biologistic ‘slow-down’ philosophy of social and economic development, in International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, vol. 4 (1), p. 1-16.
HIRONAKA A., SCHOFER E., 2000, The nation-state and the natural environment over the twentieth century, in: American Sociological Review, vol. 65, p. 96-116.
HOWKINS J., 2009, Creative ecologies: where thinking is a proper job, New Brunswick and London, Transaction Publishers.
HOWKINS J., 2013, The Creative Economy: How People Make Monet from Ideas, Penguin, London.
HULL Z., 2008, The philosophical and social conditioning of sustainable development, in: Problemy Ekorozwoju/Problems of Sustainable Development, vol. 3, no 1, p. 27-31.
IVAKHIV A., 2007, Green film criticism and its futures, in: Foreign Literature Studies, vol. 29, no 1, p. 46-65.
JOHRI A., TEO H. J., LO J. et al., 2014, Millennial engineers: Digital media and information ecology of engineering students, in: Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 33, p. 286-301.
KAČERAUSKAS T., TAMOŠAUSKAS P., 2015, Sport as factor of creativity, in: Filosofija. Sociologija, vol. 26, no 1, p. 64–71.
KORNILOVA T. V., KORNILOV S. A., 2012, Is it possible to create a model of creativity without psychology of creativity?, in: Psikhologicheskii zhurnal, vol. 33, no 6, p. 76-83.
KULBYTĖ A., 2014, Romantizmo transformacijos postmodernizmo estetikoje: tapatumo požymiai ir ribos [The transformations of romanticism in postmodern aesthetics: The signs and limits of identity], in: Logos, vol. 78, p. 170-179 (in Lithuanian).
LANGE B., KALANDIDES A., STOEBER B. et al., 2008, Berlin's creative industries: Governing creativity?, in: Industry and Innovation, vol. 15, no 5, p. 531-548.
LEE D. S., LEE K. C., SEO Y.W. et al., 2015, An analysis of shared leadership, diversity, and team creativity in an e-learning environment, in: Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 42, no SI, p. 47-56.
MITCHELL W. J. T., 1994, Picture Theory, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
NEWELL J. P., COUSINS J.J., 2014, The boundaries of urban metabolism: Towards a political-industrial ecology, in: Progress in Human Geography, vol. 12, p. 1-27.
PADEN R., HARMON L. K., MILLING C. R., 2013, Philosophical histories of the aesthetics of nature, in: Environmental Ethics, vol. 35, no 1, p. 57-77.
PENNINGTON M.C., HOEKJE B.J., 2014, Framing English language teaching, in: System, vol. 46, p. 163-175.
PETERSEN T., KLAUER B., MANSTETTEN R., 2009, The environment as a challenge for governmental responsibility – The case of the European Water Framework Directive, in: Ecological Economics, vol. 68, no 7, p. 2058–2065.
PLATO, Lysis http://www.gutenberg.org/files/1579/1579-h/1579-h.htm (19.05.2015).
PLATO, The Laws, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press.
RUNCO M. A., 2004, Creativity, in: Annual Review of Psychology, vol. 55, p. 657-687.
RUNCO M. A., ILLIES J. J., EISENMAN R., 2005, Creativity, originality, and appropriateness: What do explicit instructions tell us about their relationships?, in: Journal of Creative Behavior, vol. 39, no 2, p. 137-148.
RUSBY J. C., JONES L. B., CROWLEY R. et al., 2013, The child care ecology inventory: A domain-specific measure of home-based child care quality to promote social competence for school readiness, in: Early Childhood Research Quarterly, vol. 28, no 4, p. 947-959.
SKORUPA P., 2014, Shocking contents in social and commercial advertising , in: Creativity Studies, vol. 7, no 2, p. 69-81.
STEEN M., 2015, Upon opening the black box and finding it full: Exploring the ethics in design practices, in: Science Technology & Human Values, vol. 40, no 3, p. 389-420.
SUNLEY P., PINCH S., REIMER S. et al., 2008, Innovation in a creative production system: the case of design, in: Journal of Economic Geography, vol. 8, no 5, p. 675-698.
TAELMAN S. E., DE MEESTER S.;,SCHAUBROECK T., et al., 2014, Accounting for the occupation of the marine environment as a natural resource in life cycle assessment: An exergy based approach, in: Resources Conservation and Recycling, vol. 91, p. 1-10.
TORRANCE E. P., 1966, The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking, Personnel Press, Lexington, MA.
TSCHAKERT P., 2012, From impacts to embodied experiences: tracing political ecology in climate change research, in: Geografisk Tidsskrift-Danish Journal of Geography, vol. 112, no 2, p. 144-158.
VALIVONYTĖ I. M., 2013, Plagijavimas reklamoje: kūrybinio mąstymo trūkumas ar perpildytos rinkos pasekmė? [Plagiarism in advertising: Lack of the creative thinking or result of saturated market?], in: Santalka: filosofija, komunikacija, vol. 21, no 2, p. 128-139 (in Lithuanian).
WANG Y.; FANG Y.; ZHANG J. et al., 2013, Dezert-Smarandache theory for multiple targets tracking in natural environment, in: Iet Computer Vision, vol. 7, no 6, p. 456-466.
ZHAO SH., QIN Q., ZHANG F. et al., 2011, Research on using a mono-window algorithm for land surface temperature retrieval from Chinese satellite for environment and natural disaster monitoring (HJ-1B), in: Data, Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, vol. 31, no 6, p. 1552-1556.
ZIMMERMAN M. E., 1993, Rethinking the Heidegger – Deep ecology relationship, in: Environmental Ethics, vol. 15, no 3, p. 195-224.
YANG H., CHATTOPADHYAY A., ZHANG K., 2012, Unconscious creativity: When can unconscious thought outperform conscious thought?, in: Journal of Consumer Psychology, vol. 22, no 4, p. 573-581.
Article Details
Abstract views: 61
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
