Cultural Ecosystem Services – Framework, Theories and Practices
Anna Dłużewska
Uniwersytet Marii Curie Skłodowskiej, Wydział Nauk o Ziemi i Gospodarki Przestrzennej, Al. Kraśnicka 2 cd, 20-718 Lublin, Poland (Poland)
Abstract
The article above is an attempt to present main issues of conceptual background and research practices for cultural ecosystem services, seen as an important part of sustainable development, for its practical implementation. The author begins with conceptual background of ecosystems services as whole, then goes to cultural ecosystem services conceptual background and finally to cultural ecosystem services research practice. The last part of the article gives an overview of participant disciplines (their methodologies and perspectives), main research topics, national/ geographical background of authors, and finally – main weaknesses of contemporary researches and main challenges for the future ones.
Keywords:
ecosystem services, cultural ecosystem services, wellbeingReferences
ADEKOLA O., MITCHEL G., 2011, The Niger Delta wetlands: threats to ecosystem services, their importance to dependent communities and possible management measures, in: Inter-national Journal of Biodiversity Science, Eco-system Services & Management, no 7, p. 50-68.
Google Scholar
ALESSA L., KLISKEY A., BROWN G., 2008, Social-ecological hotspots mapping: a spatial approach for identifying coupled social-ecological space, in: Landscape Urban Plan-ning, no 85, p. 27-39.
Google Scholar
BEAUMONT, N. J., AUSTEN M. C, MANGI S.C., TOWNSEND M., 2008, Economic valuation for the conservation of marine biodiversity, in: Marine Pollution Bulletin, no 56, p. 386-396.
Google Scholar
BENNETT E. M., PETERSON G. D., GORDON L. J., 2009, Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services, in: Ecology let-ters, vol. 12, no 12, p. 1394-1404.
Google Scholar
BOLUND P., HUNHAMMAR S. 1999. Ecosystem services in urban areas, in: Ecological economics, vol. 29, no 2, p. 293-301.
Google Scholar
BILLS, N., GROSS, D., 2005, Sustaining multi-functional agricultural landscapes: comparing stakeholder perspectives in New York (US) and England (UK), in: Land Use Policy, no 22, p. 313-321.
Google Scholar
BOYD, J., BANZHAF S., 2007, What are ecosys-tem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units, in: Ecological Economics, no 63, p. 616-626.
Google Scholar
BROWN, G., RAYMOND C., 2007, The relation-ship between place attachment and landscape values: toward mapping place attachment, in: Applied Geography, no 27, p. 89-111.
Google Scholar
CHAN, K.M.A., GOLDSTEIN, J., SATTERFIELD, T.,HANNAHS, N., KIKILOI, K., NAIDOO, R., VADEBONCOEUR, N.,WOODSIDE, U., 2011, Cul-tural services and non-use values, in: Natural Capital: Theory & Practice of Mapping Eco-system Services, eds. Kareiva et al., Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, p. 206-228.
Google Scholar
CHAN, K. M. A., RUCKELSHAUS M., 2010, Characterizing changes in marine ecosystem services, in: F1000 Biology Reports, 2, p. 54.
Google Scholar
CHAN K.M.A, SATTERFIELD T., GOLDSTEIN J., 2012, Rethinking ecosystem services to better address and navigate cultural values, in: Ecological economics, vol. 74, p. 8-18.
Google Scholar
CHARLES, H., DUKES J.S., 2007, Impacts of invasive species on ecosystem services, in: Biological invasions, ed. Nentwig W., Springer, Berlin, Germany, p. 217-237.
Google Scholar
CARPENTER, S. R., ET AL., 2009, Science for managing ecosystem services: Beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, in: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences no 106.5, p. 1305-1312.
Google Scholar
CHIESURA, A., DE GROOT, R., 2003, Critical natural capital: a socio-cultural perspective, in: Ecological Economics, no 44, p. 219-231.
Google Scholar
COSTANZA, R., D’ARGE, R., DE GROOT, R., FARBER, S., GRASSO, M., HANNON, B., LIM-BURG, K.,NAEEM, S., O’NEILL, R.V., PARUELO, J., RASKIN, R.G., SUTTON, P., VAN DEN BELT, M., 1997, The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital, in: Nature, no 387, p. 253-260.
Google Scholar
CONSTANZA, R., KUBISZEWSKI I, BLUFFSTONE D.E.R., BOYD J., BROWN D., CHANG H., DUJON V., GRANEK E., POLASKY S., SHANDAS V., YEAKLEY A., 2011, Valuing ecological systems and services, in: F1000 Biology Reports, p. 3-14.
Google Scholar
DAILY, G.C. (ED.), 1997, Nature’s Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Island Press, Washington, DC.
Google Scholar
DAILY, G. C. 1999, Developing a scientific basis for managing earth's life support systems, in: Conservation Ecology, vol. 3, no 2, p. 14.
Google Scholar
DAILY, G.C., MATSON, P.A., 2008, Ecosystem services: from theory to implementation, in: PNAS, no 105, p. 9455-9456.
Google Scholar
DAILY G.C., POLASKY S., GOLDSTEIN J., KA-REIVA P.M., MOONEY H.A., PEJCHAR L., RICKETTS, T.H., SALZMAN J., SHALLEN-BERGER R., 2009, Ecosystem services in deci-sion making: time to deliver, in: Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, no 7, p. 21-28.
Google Scholar
DAW T., BROWN K., ROSENDO S., POMEROY R., 2011, Applying the ecosystem services con-cept to poverty alleviation: the need to dis-aggregate human well-being, in: Environmental Conservation, no 38, p. 370-379.
Google Scholar
DE GROOT, R.S., 1992, Functions of Nature, Evaluation of Nature in Environmental Planning, Management and Decision Making. Wolters-Noordhoff, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Google Scholar
DE GROOT R.S., WILSON M.A., BOUMANS R.M.J., 2002, A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services, in: Ecological Economy, no 41, p. 393-408.
Google Scholar
DE GROOT R., RAMAKRISHNAN P.S., BERG A., KULENTHRAN T., MULLER S., PITT D., WASCHER D., WIJESURIYA G., AMELUNG B., ELIEZER N., GOPAL A.R., RÖSSLER M., 2005, Cultural and amenity services, in: Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Current Status and Trends. Island Press, Washington, DC, p. 455-476.
Google Scholar
DE GROOT R. S., ALKEMADE R., BRAAT L., HEIN L., WILLEMEN L., 2010, Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making, in: Ecological Complexity, vol. 7, no 3, p. 260-272.
Google Scholar
DIETZ T, ROSA EA, YORK R., 2008, Environ-mentally efficient well-being: Rethinking sus-tainability as the relationship between human well-being and environmental impacts, in: Human Ecology, no 16, p. 113-122.
Google Scholar
EGOH B., REYERS B., ROUGET M., RICHARD-SON D.M., LE MAITRE D.C., VAN JAARSVELD A.S., 2008, Mapping ecosystem services for planning and management, in: Agricultural Ecosystem Environment, no 127, p. 135-140.
Google Scholar
EICKEN, H., LOVECRAFT A.L., DRUCKENMIL-LER M.L., 2009, Sea-ice system services: a framework to help identify and meet information needs relevant for Arctic observing networks, in: Arctic, no 62, p.119-136.
Google Scholar
EIGENRAAM M., STRAPPAZZON L., LANSDELL N., BEVERLY C., STONEHAM G., 2007, Designing frameworks to deliver unknown information to support market-based instruments, in: Agricultural Economics, no 37, p. 261-269.
Google Scholar
ENGEL S., PAGIOLA S., WUNDER S., 2008, Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: an overview of the issues, in: Ecological Economics, no 65, p. 663-674.
Google Scholar
FAO, 1999, Cultivation our futures, FAO/Netherlands Conference on the Multi-functional Character of Agriculture and Land. FAO/LNV, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Google Scholar
FISHER B., TURNER K.R., MORLING P., 2009, Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making, in: Ecological Economics, vol. 68. no 3, p. 643-653.
Google Scholar
GASPARATOS A., STROMBERG P., TAKEUCHI K., 2011, Biofuels, ecosystem services and human well-being: putting biofuels in the eco-system services narrative, in: Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, no 142, p. 111-128.
Google Scholar
GEE K., BURKHARD B., 2010, Cultural ecosys-tem services in the context of offshore wind farming: a case study from the west coast of Schleswig-Holstein, in: Ecological Complexity, vol. 7, no 3 p. 349-358.
Google Scholar
HEIN L., VAN KOPPEN K., DE GROOT R.S., VAN IERLAND E.C., 2006, Spatial scales, stakehold-ers and the valuation of ecosystem services. Ecological Economics, vol. 57, no 2, p. 209-228.
Google Scholar
HEILIG G.K., 2003, Multifunctionality of land-scapes and ecosystem services with respect to rural development, in: Sustainable Develop-ment of Multifunctional Landscapes, eds. Helming K., Wiggering H., Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg.
Google Scholar
HOLLANDER G.M., 2004, Agricultural trade liberalization, multifunctionality, and sugar in the south Florida landscape, Geoforum, no 35, p. 299-312.
Google Scholar
ISCU, UNESCO, UNU, 2008, Ecosystem Change and Human Wellbeing. Research and Monitoring. Report, ICSU, UNESCO and UNU, Paris.
Google Scholar
JUNIPER, T., 2011, A Historic Move in the Bat-tle to Save Tropical Rainforests, in: The Guard-ian, London, UK, p. A1.
Google Scholar
KENTER J. O., HYDE T., CHRISTIE M., FAZEY I., 2011, The importance of deliberation in valuing ecosystem services in developing coun-tries – evidence from the Solomon Islands, Global Environmental Change, no 21, p. 505-521.
Google Scholar
KUMAR, P., ED., 2010, The economics of eco-systems and biodiversity: ecological and eco-nomic foundations. The Economics of Ecosys-tems and Biodiversity (TEEB), United Nations Environment Programme, Geneva, Switzerland.
Google Scholar
KUMAR, M., KUMAR, P., 2008, Valuation of the ecosystem services: a psycho-cultural perspective, in: Ecological economics, vol. 64, no 4, p. 808-819.
Google Scholar
LUDWIG, D., 2000, Limitations of economic valuation of ecosystems, in: Ecosystems, no 3, p. 31-35.
Google Scholar
MARCH, J.G., 1994, A Primer on Decision Making: How Decisions Happen, Free Press, New York.
Google Scholar
MARTÍN-LÓPEZ B., MONTES C., BENAYAS J., 2007, The non-economic motives behind the willingness to pay for biodiversity conservation, in: Biological Conservation no 139, p. 67-82.
Google Scholar
MARTÍN-LÓPEZ,B., GÓMEZ-BAGGETHUN E., LOMAS P.L., MONTES C., 2009, Effects of spatial and temporal scales on cultural services valuation, in: Journal of Environmental Management, no 90, p. 1050-1059.
Google Scholar
MCCAULEY D.J., 2006, Selling out on nature, in: Nature, no 443, p. 27-28.
Google Scholar
MEYER B.C., GRABAUM R., 2008, MULBO – model framework for multi critieria landscape assessment and optimisation. A support system for spatial landuse decisions, in: Land-scape Research, no 33, p. 155-179.
Google Scholar
MILCU A.I., HANSPACH J., ABSON D., FISCHER J., 2013, Cultural ecosystem services: a literature review and prospects for future research, in: Ecology and Society, vol. 18, no 3, p. 44.
Google Scholar
MILLENNIUM ECOSYSTEM ASSESSMENT, 2003, Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: A Framework for Assessment, Island Press, Washington, DC.
Google Scholar
MILLENNIUM ECOSYSTEM ASSESSMENT, 2005, Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis/ Current State and Trends/ Scenari-os/ Policy responses/ Multiscale Assesments, Island Press, Washington, DC.
Google Scholar
MUÑOZ-PIÑA, C., GUEVARA, A., TORRES, J.M., BRAÑA, J., 2008, Paying for the hydrological services of Mexico's forests: analysis, negotiations and results, in: Ecological Economics, no 65, p. 725-736.
Google Scholar
NORGAARD, R.B., 2010, Ecosystem services: from eye-opening metaphor to complexity Blinder, in: Ecological Economics, no 69, p. 1219-1227.
Google Scholar
NORTON B.G., NOONAN D., 2007, Ecology and valuation: big changes needed, in: Ecological Economics, no. 63, p. 664-675.
Google Scholar
OECD, 2001, Multifunctionality. Towards An Analytical Framework, Paris, p. 159.
Google Scholar
PINTO-CORREIA T., GUSTAVSSON R., PIRNAT J., 2006, Bridging the gap between centrally defined policies and local decisions – towards more sensitive and creative rural landscape management, in: Landscape Ecology, no 21, p. 333-346.
Google Scholar
PLIENINGER T., ET AL., 2013, Assessing, mapping, and quantifying cultural ecosystem services at community level, in: Land Use Policy, no 33, p. 118-129.
Google Scholar
PRESCOTT A. R., 2001, The wellbeing of nations. Island Press.
Google Scholar
RANDALL A., 2002, Benefit-cost considera-tions should be decisive when there is nothing more important at stake, in: Economics, eds. Bromley D., Paavola J., Blackwell Publishers, Oxford, Ethics and Environmental Policy, p. 53-68.
Google Scholar
RAYMOND C. M., BRYAN B.A, HATTON D., CAST A., STRATHEARN S., GRANDGIRARD A., KALIVAS T., 2009, Mapping community values for natural capital and ecosystem services, in: Ecological Economics, no 68, p. 1301-1315.
Google Scholar
REDFORD K.H., ADAMS W.M., 2009, Payment for ecosystem services and the challenge of saving nature, in: Conservation Biology, no 23, p. 785-787.
Google Scholar
REES, W.E., 1998, How should a parasite value its host? in: Ecological Economics, no 25, p. 49-52.
Google Scholar
ROBERTSON M.M., 2004, The neoliberalization of ecosystem services: wetland mitigation banking and problems in environmental governance, in: Geoforum, no 35, p. 361-373.
Google Scholar
S ARUKHÁN, J., WHYTE A., EDS., 2005, Ecosys-tems and human well-being: Synthesis (MA). Island Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
Google Scholar
SCHAICH H., BIELING C., PLIENINGER T., 2010, Linking ecosystem services with cultural landscape research, in: Gaia-Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, vol. 19, no 4, p. 269-277.
Google Scholar
SATTERFIELD T.,KALOF L., 2005, Environmen-tal values: an introduction, in: The Earthscan Reader in Environmental Values, eds. Kalof L., Satterfield T., Earthscan, Sterling, VA, p. xxi-xxxiii.
Google Scholar
SCULLION J., THOMAS C.W., VOGT K. A, PÉ-REZ-MAQUEO O., LOGSDON M. G., 2011, Evaluating the environmental impact of payments for ecosystem services in Coatepec (Mexico) using remote sensing and on-site interviews, in: Environmental Conservation, no 38, p. 426-434.
Google Scholar
SHERROUSE B. C., CLEMENT J.M, SEMMENS D.J., 2011, A GIS application for assessing, mapping, and quantifying the social values of ecosystem services, in: Applied Geography, no 31, p. 748-760.
Google Scholar
TALLIS, H., KAREIVA, P., MARVIER, M., CHANG, A., 2008, An ecosystem services framework to support both practical conservation and economic development, in: Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, no 105, p. 9457-9464.
Google Scholar
TENGBERG A., ET AL., 2012, Cultural ecosystem services provided by landscapes: assessment of heritage values and identity, in: Ecosystem Services no 2, p. 14-26.
Google Scholar
TURNER R.K., DAILY G.C., 2008, The ecosys-tem services framework and natural capital Conservation, in: Environmental and Resource Economics, no 39, p. 25-35.
Google Scholar
TURPIE J.K., MARAIS C., BLIGNAUT J.N., 2008, The working for water programme: evolution of a payments for ecosystem services mecha-nism that addresses both poverty and ecosys-tem service delivery in South Africa, in: Ecological Economics, no 65, p. 788-798.
Google Scholar
UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PRO-GRAM, 2003, Human Development Re-port, Oxford University Press, New York.
Google Scholar
VAN BERKEL D. B., VERBURG P.H., 2014, Spa-tial quantification and valuation of cultural ecosystem services in an agricultural landscape, in: Ecological indicators, no 37, p. 163-174.
Google Scholar
VEJRE H., ABILDTRUP J., ANDERSEN E., AN-DERSEN P., BRANDT J., BUSCK A., DALGAARD T., HASLER B., HUUSOM H., KRISTENSEN L., KRISTENSEN S., PRĆSTHOLM S., 2007, Multi-functional agriculture and multifunctional landscapes - land use as an interface, in: Multi-functional Land Use: Meeting Future Demands for Landscape Goods and Services, eds. Mander U., Helming K., Wiggering H., Springer, Heidelberg, Berlin, p. 93-104.
Google Scholar
VERBURG P.H., SCHOT P.P., DIJST M.J., VELDKAMP A., 2004, Land use change modelling: current practice and research priorities, in: GeoJournal, no 61, p. 309-324.
Google Scholar
WALLACE, K.J., 2007, Classification of ecosystem services: problems and solutions, in: Biological Conservation, no 139, p. 235-246.
Google Scholar
WILLEMEN L., VERBURG P.H., HEIN L., VAN MENSVOORT M.E.F., 2008, Spatial characteri-zation of landscape functions, in: Landscape Urban Planning, no 88, p. 34-43.
Google Scholar
WILSON, G.A., 2004, The Australian Landcare movement: towards ‘post-productivist’ rural governance?, in: Journal of Rural Studies, no 20, p. 461-484.
Google Scholar
Authors
Anna DłużewskaUniwersytet Marii Curie Skłodowskiej, Wydział Nauk o Ziemi i Gospodarki Przestrzennej, Al. Kraśnicka 2 cd, 20-718 Lublin, Poland Poland
Statistics
Abstract views: 17PDF downloads: 6
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.