Multi-criteria Evaluation of the Eco-innovation Level in the European Union Countries
Article Sidebar
Open full text
Issue Vol. 12 No. 2 (2017)
-
Troublesome Evaluation of Technological Innovations. Balancing Between a Blessing and a Bane of the Technological Progress
Wiesław Sztumski7-13
-
Multi-criteria Evaluation of the Eco-innovation Level in the European Union Countries
Andrzej Kobryń, Joanna Prystrom15-26
-
Decomposition Analysis of the Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the European Union
Magdaléna Drastichová27-35
-
Call for Integral Protection of Biocultural Diversity
Ryszard F. Sadowski37-45
-
Modern Issues of Development of the System of Specially Protected Natural Areas in the Context of the Concept of Sustainable Development
Aleksey Anisimov, Kermen Lidzheeva, Anatoliy Ryzhenkov47-57
-
Sustainability, Corporate Community Engagement and Enterprise Development – Lessons from a Case Study in Emu-Ebendo Niger-Delta, Nigeria
O.E. Ajide, P.A. Strachan, A. Russell, D.R. Jones59-68
-
Corporate Environmental Responsibility for a Sustainable Future
Pankojini Mulia, Ajit Kumar Behura, Sarita Kar69-77
-
Environmental Impact of Application on the Concept of Corporate Social Responsibility in Selected EU Countries
Jana Hroncová Vicianová, Štefan Hronec79-88
-
Wellbeing versus Sustainable Development – Conceptual Framework and Application Challenges
Anna Dłużewska89-97
-
Understanding Farmers’ Adoption Decisions for New Cash Crops: Evidence from Xishuangbanna in Tropical China
Le Zhang, Yasuyuki Kono, Xiaobo Hua, Lin Zheng, Rui Zhou99-108
-
Development Aid as a Gift of Love: Re-inventing Aid on a Spiritual Foundation
Rohana Ulluwishewa109-118
-
Where Science Fails, Outdated Religion Provides Clues
Venkatesh G.119-122
-
The Shaping of Sustainable Landscape in the Context of the European Landscape Convention and the Encyclical Laudato Si’
Sebastian Bernat, Małgorzata Flaga, Wioletta Kałamucka123-131
-
Sustainable Development in the Russian Federation – Indicator-based Approach
Bartosz Bartniczak, Andrzej Raszkowski133-142
-
Twenty-five Years of Independent Ukraine: Is there a Way to Sustainable Healthy Development?
Viktoriya Pantyley, Roman Lozynskyy, Roman Slyvka143-160
-
Youth Attitudes Towards Goals of a New Sustainable Development Agenda
Tatjana Borojević, Matjaž Maletič, Nataša Petrović, Jelena Andreja Radaković, Marjan Senegačnik, Damjan Maletič161-172
-
Utilitarian Technological Solutions to Reduce CO2 Emission in the Aspect of Sustainable Development
Tomasz P. Olejnik, Elżbieta Sobiecka173-179
-
Environmental Risks Related to the Recovery and Recycling Processes of Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE)
Agnieszka Generowicz, Ryszarda Iwanejko181-192
Archives
-
Vol. 14 No. 2
2019-07-01 20
-
Vol. 14 No. 1
2019-01-02 20
-
Vol. 13 No. 2
2023-10-15 22
-
Vol. 13 No. 1
2018-01-02 23
-
Vol. 12 No. 2
2017-07-03 18
-
Vol. 12 No. 1
2017-01-02 16
-
Vol. 11 No. 2
2016-07-01 17
-
Vol. 11 No. 1
2016-01-04 20
-
Vol. 10 No. 2
2015-07-01 17
-
Vol. 10 No. 1
2015-01-05 16
Main Article Content
Authors
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to analyze and evaluate the level of eco-innovations in the European Union countries. For this purpose, a new method of multi-criteria analysis were used, i.e. PROTERRA method, which was developed by the authors of this article. Analysis concerns a data from the year 2015. There have been determined aggregate ratings, which characterized the eco-innovation level of particular European Union countries. Four classes of innovation level were defined: eco-innovation leaders, good eco-innovators, week eco-innovators and eco-innovation outsiders. Then, based on the calculated global ratings, European Union countries were assigned to the appropriate classes.
Keywords:
References
ARUNDEL A., KEMP R., PARTO S., 2006, Indicators for environmental innovation: What and how to measure, in: The international handbook on environmental technology management, ed. Marinova D., Annandale D. and Phillimore J., Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
ASHFORD N.A., AYERS C., STONE, R.F., 1985, Using regulation to change the market for innovation, in: Harvard Environmental Law Review, vol. 9, p. 419-466.
BEHZADIAN M., KAZEMZADEH R.B., ALBADVI A., AGHDASI, M., 2010, PROMETHEE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications, in: European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 200, p. 198-215.
BOSSINK B., 2013, Eco-Innovation and Sustainability Management. Routledge – Taylor & Francis Group, New York.
BRANS J.P., MARESCHAL B., VINCKE PH., 1984, PROMETHEE: A new family of outranking methods in multicriteria analysis, in: Operational Research’84, North-Holland, Amsterdam.
BRANS J.P., MARESCHAL B., 2005, PROMETHEE methods, in: Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys, ed. Figueira J., Greco S., Ehrgott M., Springer, New York.
DÍAZ-GARCÍA C., GONZÁLEZ-MORENO Á., SÁEZ-MARTÍNEZ F.J., 2015, Eco-innovation: insights from a literature review, Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice, vol.17, p. 6-23.
DIME.EU, http://www.dime-eu.org/files/active/0/Foxon_Speirs_Pearson_final.pdf, (09.12.2016).
DOUMPOS M., GRIGOROUDIS E. (eds.), 2013, Multicriteria decision aid and artificial intelligence. Links, theory and applications,. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Chichester.
FIGUEIRA J., SALVATORE G., EHRGOTT M. (eds.), 2005, Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys. Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York.
FUKASAKU Y., 2005, The need for environmental innovation indicators and data from a policy perspective, in: Towards environmental innovation systems, ed. Weber M. and Hemmelskamp J., Springer, Berlin.
FUSSLER C., JAMES P., 1996, Driving eco-innovation: A breakthrough discipline for innovation and sustainability. Pitman Publishing, London.
JAFFE A.B., NEWELL R.G., STAVINS R.N., 2002, Environmental policy and technological change, in: Environmental and Resource Economics, vol. 22, p. 41-69.
JANASZ W., KOZIOŁ K., 2007, Determinanty działalności innowacyjnej przedsiębiorstw. PWE, Warszawa.
KANERVA M., ARUNDEL A., KEMP R., 2009, Environmental innovation: Using qualitative models to identify indicators for policy. United Nations University – MERIT, Maastricht.
KEMP R., PEARSON P., 2008, Measuring eco-innovation (Final Report MEI project), UNU-MERIT, Maastricht.
KEMP R., PONTOGLIO S., 2008, The innovation effects of environmental policy instruments – A typical case of the blind men and the elephant. Paper for DIME WP 2.5 Workshop on Empirical Analyses of Environmental Innovations, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI), 17-18 January, Karlsruhe.
KEMP R., 2011, Ten themes for eco-innovation policies in Europe. S.A.P.I.E.N.S., vol. 4, p. 1-20.
LEGLER H., SCHMOCH U., GEHRKE B., KRAWCZYK O., 2003, Innovationsindikatoren zur Umweltwirtschaft, Studien zum deutschen Innovationssytem, Nr. 2., NIW and Karlsruhe: Fraunhofer Institut, Hannover.
LEITNER A., WEHRMEYER W., FRANCE CH., 2010, The impact of regulation and policy on radical eco-innovation: The need for a new understanding, in: Management Research Review, vol. 33, p. 1022-1041.
MATEO J.R., 2012, Multi-criteria analysis in the renewable energy industry. Springer-Verlag, London.
OLTRA V., KEMP R., DE VRIES F., 2007, Patents as a measure for eco-innovation. Report for the MEI project. University of Bordeaux, UNU-MERIT and University of Stirling, Bordeaux.
RENNINGS K., 2000, Redefining innovation – eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics, in: Ecological Economics, vol. 32, p. 319-332.
SARKAR A.N., 2013, Promoting eco-innovations to leverage sustainable development of eco-industry and green growth, in: European Journal of Sustainable Development, vol. 2, p. 171-224.
SPEIRS J., PEARSON P., FOXON T., 2008, Adapting Innovation Systems Indicators to assess Eco-Innovation, in: DIME working paper, Brussels.
TZENG G.H., HUANG J.J., 2011, Multiple attribute decision making. Methods and applications. CRC Press, Taylor&Francis Group, Boca Raton.
VAN DER VOET E., VAN OERS L., MOLL S., SCHUTZ H., BRINGEZU S., DE BRUYN S., SEVENSTER M., WARRINGA G., 2005, Policy review on decoupling: Development of indicators to assess decoupling of economic development and environmental pressure in the EU-25 and AC-3 countries. Report commissioned by the European Commission, Leiden.
WIJEN F., ZOETEMAN K., PIETERS J., VAN SETERS P. (eds.), 2012, A Handbook of globalisation and environmental policy, Second edition. National government interventions in a global arena. Edward Elgar Publishing, Northampton.
ZOPOUNIDIS C., PARDALOS P.M. (eds.), 2010, Handbook of multicriteria analysis. Springer Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg.
Article Details
Abstract views: 66
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
