Environmental Impact of Application on the Concept of Corporate Social Responsibility in Selected EU Countries
Article Sidebar
Open full text
Issue Vol. 12 No. 2 (2017)
-
Troublesome Evaluation of Technological Innovations. Balancing Between a Blessing and a Bane of the Technological Progress
Wiesław Sztumski7-13
-
Multi-criteria Evaluation of the Eco-innovation Level in the European Union Countries
Andrzej Kobryń, Joanna Prystrom15-26
-
Decomposition Analysis of the Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the European Union
Magdaléna Drastichová27-35
-
Call for Integral Protection of Biocultural Diversity
Ryszard F. Sadowski37-45
-
Modern Issues of Development of the System of Specially Protected Natural Areas in the Context of the Concept of Sustainable Development
Aleksey Anisimov, Kermen Lidzheeva, Anatoliy Ryzhenkov47-57
-
Sustainability, Corporate Community Engagement and Enterprise Development – Lessons from a Case Study in Emu-Ebendo Niger-Delta, Nigeria
O.E. Ajide, P.A. Strachan, A. Russell, D.R. Jones59-68
-
Corporate Environmental Responsibility for a Sustainable Future
Pankojini Mulia, Ajit Kumar Behura, Sarita Kar69-77
-
Environmental Impact of Application on the Concept of Corporate Social Responsibility in Selected EU Countries
Jana Hroncová Vicianová, Štefan Hronec79-88
-
Wellbeing versus Sustainable Development – Conceptual Framework and Application Challenges
Anna Dłużewska89-97
-
Understanding Farmers’ Adoption Decisions for New Cash Crops: Evidence from Xishuangbanna in Tropical China
Le Zhang, Yasuyuki Kono, Xiaobo Hua, Lin Zheng, Rui Zhou99-108
-
Development Aid as a Gift of Love: Re-inventing Aid on a Spiritual Foundation
Rohana Ulluwishewa109-118
-
Where Science Fails, Outdated Religion Provides Clues
Venkatesh G.119-122
-
The Shaping of Sustainable Landscape in the Context of the European Landscape Convention and the Encyclical Laudato Si’
Sebastian Bernat, Małgorzata Flaga, Wioletta Kałamucka123-131
-
Sustainable Development in the Russian Federation – Indicator-based Approach
Bartosz Bartniczak, Andrzej Raszkowski133-142
-
Twenty-five Years of Independent Ukraine: Is there a Way to Sustainable Healthy Development?
Viktoriya Pantyley, Roman Lozynskyy, Roman Slyvka143-160
-
Youth Attitudes Towards Goals of a New Sustainable Development Agenda
Tatjana Borojević, Matjaž Maletič, Nataša Petrović, Jelena Andreja Radaković, Marjan Senegačnik, Damjan Maletič161-172
-
Utilitarian Technological Solutions to Reduce CO2 Emission in the Aspect of Sustainable Development
Tomasz P. Olejnik, Elżbieta Sobiecka173-179
-
Environmental Risks Related to the Recovery and Recycling Processes of Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE)
Agnieszka Generowicz, Ryszarda Iwanejko181-192
Archives
-
Vol. 14 No. 2
2019-07-01 20
-
Vol. 14 No. 1
2019-01-02 20
-
Vol. 13 No. 2
2023-10-15 22
-
Vol. 13 No. 1
2018-01-02 23
-
Vol. 12 No. 2
2017-07-03 18
-
Vol. 12 No. 1
2017-01-02 16
-
Vol. 11 No. 2
2016-07-01 17
-
Vol. 11 No. 1
2016-01-04 20
-
Vol. 10 No. 2
2015-07-01 17
-
Vol. 10 No. 1
2015-01-05 16
Main Article Content
Authors
Abstract
By now, does not suffice to evaluate companies only from an economic point of view, but it is necessary to look at the business and the social and environmental context. Environmental degradation and depletion of natural resources is also reflected in the growth of interest in the area of environmental and social research in the industry. This fact highlights the concept of corporate social responsibility (CSR), according to which the environmental area, the concept of the same weight as economic and social level. The environmental consequences of the company are in advanced economies communicated not only with experts but becomes of interest to the whole society and an integral part of evaluating the success of socio-economic development. The study aims to quantitatively analyse and confirm the existence of a direct and indirect dependence on the number of businesses in individual EU countries to voluntarily implement environmental concepts of social responsibility in the form of environmental management and audit, EMAS. The object of quantitative analysis are selected EU countries.
Keywords:
References
A Renewed EU Strategy for Corporate Social Responsibility for the period 2011-2014, 2011, European Commission, Brussels.
ADA A. A., 2014, Environmental protection Expenditure and Economic growth: A panel Data Analysis for the EU and Turkey, in: British Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences, vol. 9, no 2, p. 11-23.
BARMAN T. R., GUPTA M. R., 2010, Public Expenditure, Environment, and Economic Growth, in: Journal of Public Economic Theory, vol. 12, no 6, p. 1109-1134.
CARROLL A. B., SCHWARTZ M. S., 2003, Corporate Social Responsibility A Three-Domain Approach, in: Business Ethics Quarterly, vol. 13, no 4, p. 503-550.
CARROLL A. B., BUCHHOLTZ A. K., 2012, Ethics, Sustainability and Stakeholder Management, in: Business and Society, p. 691.
DAHLSRUD A., 2008. How CSR is defined: an Analysis of 37 definition, in: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environment Management, vol. 15, p. 1-13.
Green Paper, 2001, Promoting a European framework for corporate social responsibility, European Commission, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.
HOPKINS M. 1998. The Planetary Bargain: Corporate Social Responsibility Comes of Age. Macmillan, London.
HRONCOVÁ VICIANOVÁ J., 2014, Uplatňovanie koncepcie spoločensky zodpovedného podnikania vo vybraných odvetviach národného hospodárstva na Slovensku, Belianum, Ekonomická fakulta UMB v B. Bystrici, Banská Bystrica, p. 168.
Innovation for a sustainable Future – The Eco-innovation Action Plan (Eco-AP), 2011, European Commission, http://eurlex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:52011DC0899 (21.6.2016).
JECK T. 2012. Ekologické inovácie: Teoretické a hospodársko-politické súvislosti, Ekonomický ústav SAV, http://ekonom.sav.sk/uploads/journals/216_wp42_tomas_jeck_2012.pdf (20.3.2016).
JONES T.M., 1980, Corporate Social Responsibility revisited, in: California Management Review.
MARÁKOVÁ V., LAMENT M., WOLAK-TUZIMEK A, 2015, Reporting standards in socially responsible enterprises, in: Ekonomičnij časopis-XXI, vol. 20, no 9-10, p. 56-59.
MARKOVÁ I., ZELENÝ J., DRIMAL M., JAĎUĎOVÁ J., 2015, Environmental assessment of technologies applying powder fire extinguishers. in: Production management and engineering sciences. Proceedings of the international conference on engineering science and production management (ESPM 2015), Taylor & Francis Group, CRC Press, London, p. 191-196.
MORGAN G., RYU K., MIRVIS P., 2009, Leading corporate citizenship: governance, structure, systems, in: Corporate Governance, vol. 9, no 1, p. 39-49.
MUSOVÁ Z., 2013, Spoločenská zodpovednosť v marketingovej praxi podnikov, Univerzita Mateja Bela, Ekonomická fakulta, Banská Bystrica, p. 228.
NELSON J. 2008. CSR and Public Police. New forms of Engagement between Business and Government, in: Working paper 45, http://www.hks.harvard.edu/mrcbg/CSRI/publications/workingpaper_45_nelson.pdf (20.5.2016).
PAWŁOWSKI A., 2008, How many dimensions does sustainable development have?, in: Sustainable Development, vol. 16, no 2, p. 81-92.
TRNKOVÁ J., 2004, Spoločenská odpovědnost firem – Kompletní pruvodce témata a závěry z pruskumu v ČR, Business Leaders Forum, Praha.
VAN MARREWIJK M., 2003, Concepts and definitions of CSR and corporate sustainability: between agency and communion, in: Journal of Business Ethics., vol. 44, p. 95-105.
WADDOCK, S., 2004, Parallel universes: companies, academics, and the progress of corporate citizenship, in: Business and Society Review, vol. 109, no 1, p. 5-24.
WOOD, D., 1991, Toward improving corporate social performance – building ‘the good society’, in: Business Horizons, Vol. 34, no 4, p. 66-73.
Article Details
Abstract views: 70
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
