Sustainability Reporting Practices in Emerging Economies: A Cross-Country Study of BRICS Nations
Article Sidebar
Open full text
Issue Vol. 13 No. 2 (2018)
-
Environmental Regulation and Employment: Evaluating the Role of Water Pollution Prevention and Control Law in China
Wei Yu, Xiao Liu7-16
-
Sustainability Reporting Practices in Emerging Economies: A Cross-Country Study of BRICS Nations
Ajay Kumar, Niladri Das17-25
-
New Approach to Environmental Protection and Human Rights from the Perspective of Human Needs
Piotr Krajewski27-32
-
Legal Peculiarities of Implementing the Concept of Sustainable Development in the National Forest Legislation (in Terms of Russia)
Aleksey Anisimov, Anatoly Ryzhenkov, Anna Shulga33-42
-
Can Sustainable Human Manage to Prevent Imbalances in the Natural and Social Environment?
Wiesław Sztumski45-55
-
Trade Openness, Political Stability and Environmental Performance: What Kind of Long-Run Relationship?
Jing Niu, Jun Wen, Xiu-Yun Yang, Chun-Ping Chang57-66
-
Green Entrepreneurship as a Connector among Social, Environmental and Economic Pillars of Sustainable Development. Why Some Countries are More Agile?
Ada Domańska, Beata Żukowska, Robert Zajkowski67-76
-
The Moral Imperatives of Sustainable Development: A Kantian Overview
Pankojini Mulia, Dr. Ajit Kumar Behura, Dr. Sarita Kar77-82
-
Local Currencies as an Instrument for Implementing the Concept of Sustainable Development
Magdalena Miszczuk83-90
-
Estimation and Factor Decomposition of Carbon Emissions in China’s Tourism Sector
Jiandong Chen, Aifeng Zhao, Qiuping Zhao, Malin Song, Tomas Baležentis, Dalia Streimikiene91-101
-
The REKO System in Finland: a New Model of a Sustainable Marketing Channel
Barbara Szymoniuk, Heidi Valtari103-111
-
Pattern of Energy Productivity and Gross Domestic Product Among European Countries
Carmen Elena Stoenoiu113-123
-
Analysis of Environmental and Energetical Possibilities of Sustainable Development of Wind and Photovoltaic Power Plants
Izabela Piasecka, Andrzej Tomporowski125-130
-
Income Inequality and its Consequences within the Framework of Social Justice
Halyna Mishchuk, Natalia Samoliuk, Yuriy Bilan, Dalia Streimikiene131-138
-
Environmental Virtue Ethics and Sustainability
Dominika Dzwonkowska139-146
-
Some Legal Problems Concerning Implementation of Sustainable Use of Wildlife Concept in the Russian Federation
Svetlana Ivanova147-156
-
Food Waste in the Organic Recycling System and Sustainable Development
Joanna Kostecka, Mariola Garczyńska, Grzegorz Pączka157-164
-
Choice Behavior for Intelligent Vehicle: Factors and Relationships
Yuhong Cao, Wei Hu165-176
-
Bioregionalism: Practical Environmental Ethics with an Underlying Pragmatic Ideal
Ipsita Sarkar, Ajit Behura177-184
-
Equality of Resources, Ethical Principles and Sustainable Development
Mayavee Singh185-190
-
Monitoring of Organic Micropollutants in Effluents as Crucial Tool in Sustainable Development
Maria Włodarczyk-Makuła, Ewa Wiśniowska, Agnieszka Popenda191-198
-
The Paradigm of Social Consensus for Shaping the Structural Order in Development Management
Franciszek Piontek, Barbara Piontek199-209
Archives
-
Vol. 15 No. 2
2020-07-01 24
-
Vol. 15 No. 1
2020-01-02 24
-
Vol. 14 No. 2
2019-07-01 20
-
Vol. 14 No. 1
2019-01-02 20
-
Vol. 13 No. 2
2023-10-15 22
-
Vol. 13 No. 1
2018-01-02 23
-
Vol. 12 No. 2
2017-07-03 18
-
Vol. 12 No. 1
2017-01-02 16
-
Vol. 11 No. 2
2016-07-01 17
-
Vol. 11 No. 1
2016-01-04 20
Main Article Content
Authors
Abstract
In the backdrop of a growing geo-political and economic importance of emerging economies, the objective of this paper is to ascertain whether firms in emerging economy are willing to match their increased economic weight with greater social responsibility. Given the relative scarcity of research in Sustainability Reporting (SR) practices in BRICS, particular attention is to be given to firms from these countries. The research question is examined through the analysis of differences between firms from BRICS nations in terms of various indicators of sustainability reporting practices. This study aims to evaluate corporate sustainability reporting according to the GRI framework developed by the Global Reporting Initiative. The firms in the sample display clear evidence of a divide among emerging economies in SR practices. India, score the highest across all dimensions i.e. economic, environmental and social followed by China while Russian companies have poor score across all categories. The leading industry complying with GRI reporting practices in case of India is Computer Hardware & Software industry with sustainability score of 94.02% and in Brazil, it is Pulp & Paper with 87.97% sustainability disclosure score. In Russia, it is Oil & Gas with 60.84% and in the case of China it is Automobiles & Transport with 71.06% disclosure score and retail industry in South Africa with 62.84% disclosurescore.
Keywords:
References
ADAMS C. A., HILL W. Y., ROBERTS C. B., 1998, Corporate Social Reporting Practices in Western Europe: Legitimating Corporate Behavior?, in: The British Accounting Review, vol. 30, no. 1, p. 1-21.
AHMAD N. N. N., SULAIMAN M., SISWANTORO D., 2003, Corporate SocialResponsibility Disclosure in Malaysia: An Analysis of Annual Reports of KLSE Listed Companies, in: International Journal of Economics, Management and Accounting.
AMALDOSS M. X., MANOHAR H. L., 2013, Communicating Corporate Social Responsibility – A Case of CSR Communication in Emerging Economies, in: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental, vol. 20, p. 65-80.
AREVALO, J. A. AND ARAVIND, D., 2011, Corporate Social Responsibility Practices In India: Approach, Drivers, and Barriers, in: Corporate Governance, 11 (4), pp. 399-414.
BAJPAI N., SACHS J. D., 2011, India’s Decade of Development: Looking Back at the Last 10 Years and Looking Forward to the Next 20, in: Working Paper Series, no. 3, p. 1-31, http://globalcenters.columbia.edu/files/cgc/pictures/Indias_Decade_of_Development_II_CGCSA_working_paper_series_July2011.pdf (10.11.2016).
BANSAL P., 2002, The Corporate Challenges of Sustainable Development, in: Academy of Management Executive, vol.16, no. 2, 122-131.
BASKIN J, 2006, Corporate Responsibility in Emerging Markets, in: Journal of Corporate Citizenship, vol. 24, p. 29-47.
BEBBINGTON J., GRAY R., OWEN D., 1999, Seeing the Wood for the Trees: Taking the Pulse of Social and Environmental Accounting, in: Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, vol. 12, no. 1, p.47-52.
BLOWFIELD M., FRYNAS J.G., 2005, Editorial Setting New Agendas: Critical Perspectives on Corporate Social Responsibility in the Developing World, in: International Affairs, vol. 81, p. 499-513.
BROWN N., DEEGAN C, 1998, The public disclosure of environmental performance information – a dual test of media agenda setting theory and legitimacy theory, in: Accounting and Business Research, vol. 29, no. 1, p. 21-41.
CHAPMAN R., MILNE M.J., 2003, The Triple Bottom Line: How New Zealand Companies Measure up, Corporate Environmental Strategy, in: International Journal for Sustainable Business, vol. 11, no. 2, p. 2-37.
CHAPPLE W., MOON J., 2005, Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in Asia – A Seven country study of CSR web site reporting, in: Business & Society, vol. 44, no. 4, p. 415-441.
CHAUDRI V. WANG J., 2007, Communicating Corporate Social Responsibility on the Internet: A case study of the top 100 Information Technology companies in India, in: Management Communication Quarterly, vol. 21, no. 2, p. 232-248.
CHICHILNISKY G., 1996, An Axiomatic Approach to Sustainable Development, in: Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 13, p. 231-257.
DAIZY, DAS N., 2014, Sustainability Reporting Framework: Comparative Analysis of Global Reporting Initiatives and Dow Jones Sustainability Index, in: International Journal of Science, Environment and Technology, vol. 3 no.1, p. 55-66.
DEEGAN C., 2002, Introduction: The Legitimising Effect of Social and Environmental Disclosures – A Theoretical Foundation, in: Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 15 no. 3, p. 282-311.
DURIAU V.J., REGER R.K., PFARRER M.D., 2007, A Content Analysis of the Content Analysis Literature in Organization Studies: Research Themes, Data Sources, and Methodological Refinements, in: Organizational Research Methods, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 5-34.
DYLLICK T, HOCKERTS K., 2002, Beyond the Business Case for Corporate Sustainability, in: Bus. Strat. Env., vol. 11, p. 130-141.
ECCLES R.G., KRZUS M.P., One Report: Integrated Reporting for a Sustainable Strategy, John Wiley & Sons 2010.
ELKINGTON J., Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21stCentury Business, Capstone 1999.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION, 2011, http://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2009_2014/documents/com/com_com(2011)0681_/com_com(2011)0681_en. pdf (29.01.2017).
FIASCHI D., GIULIANI E., NIERI F., 2015, BRIC Companies Seeking Legitimacy through Corporate Social Responsibility, in: SSRN, https://ssrn.com/abstract=2559110 (2.02.2017).
GARCIA-JOHNSON R., 2000, Exporting Environmentalism U.S.MultinationalChemical Corporations in Brazil and Mexico, The MIT Press.
GIMENEZ C., SIERRA V., RODON J., 2012, Sustainable operations: Their impact on the triple bottom line, in: International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 140, no. 1, p. 149- 159.
GRI, 2006, https://www.globalreporting.org/resource library/G3-Guidelines-Incl-Technical-Protocol.pdf
(25.08.2016).
GRI, 2009, https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/GRI-Sustainability-Report-2009-2010.pdf
(30.03.2017).
GRI, 2011, https://www.globalreporting.org/information/news-and-press-center/Pages/India-produces-most-complete-sustainability-reports.aspx (8.10.2016).
GRI, 2012, https://www.globalreporting.org/information/news-and-press-center/Pages/Brazil-and-India-
stock-up-on-sustainability.aspx (29.01.2017).
GRI, 2013, https://www.globalreporting.org/information/news-and-press-center/Pages/GRI-Among-the-most-popular-CSR-instruments.asp x (30.01.2017).
GRIESSE M.A.S, 2007, The Geographic, Political, and Economic Context for Corporate Social Responsibility in Brazil, in: Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 73, p. 21-37.
HEDBERG C.J., MALMBORG F.V., 2003, The Global Reporting Initiative and Corporate Sustainability Reporting in Swedish Companies, in: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, vol. 10, no. 3, p. 153-164.
INTOSAI-WGEA, 2013, Sustainability Reporting: Concepts, Frameworks and the Role of Supreme Audit Institutions, http://www.environmentalauditing.org (22.02.2017).
IOANNOU I.A, SERAFEIM G.B., 2012, What drives corporate social performance the role of nationlevel institutions, in: Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 43, no9, p. 834- 864.
KOLK A., 2011, Trajectories of sustainability reporting by MNCs, in: Journal of World Business, vol. 45, no.4, p. 367-374.
KRAJNC D., GLAVIC P., 2005, How to Compare Companies on Relevant Dimensions of Sustainability, in: Ecological Economics, vol. 55, p. 551-563.
LEHMAN G., 1999, Disclosing new worlds: a role for social and environmental accounting and auditing, in: Accounting, Organizations and Society, vol. 24, no. 3, p. 217-241.
LOZANO R., 2008, Envisioning Sustainability Three-Dimensionally, in: Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 16, p. 1838-1846.
MITCHELL C.G., HILL T, 2009, Corporate Social and Environmental Reporting and the Impact of Internal Environmental Policy in South Africa, in: Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Mgmt, vol. 16, p. 48-60.
MORHARDT J. E., BAIRD S., FREEMAN K., 2002, Scoring corporate environmental and sustainability reports using GRI 2000, ISO 14031 and other criteria, in: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, vol. 9, no. 4, p. 215-233.
MULIA P., BEHURA A. K., KAR S., 2017, Corporate Environmental Responsibility for a Sustainable Future, in: Problemy Ekorozwoju/Problems of Sustainable Development, vol. 12, no 2, p. 69-77.
MURTHY V, 2008, Corporate Social Disclosure Practices of Top Software Firms in India, in:Global Business Review, vol. 9, no. 2, p. 173-188.
NEUA D., WARSAMEB W., PEDWELLC K., 1998, Managing Public Impressions: Environmental Disclosures in Annual Reports, in: Accounting, Organizations and Society, vol. 23, no. 3, p. 265-282.
PREUSS L., BARKEMEYER R., 2011, CSR priorities of emerging economy firms: is Russia a different shape of BRIC?, in: Corporate Governance, vol. 11, no. 4, p. 371-385.
PRIETO M.C., LUND P.T., CHAN A., MURO A, BHUSHAN C, 2006, Critical Perspectiveson CSR and Development: What We Know, What We Don’t and What We Need to Know, in: International Affairs, Vol. 82, No. 5, p. 977-987.
QUICK R., 2008, Voluntary sustainability reporting practices in Germany: a study on reporting quality, in: Portuguese Journal of Accounting and Management, vol. 5, p. 7-35.
RATANAJONGKOL S., DAVEY H., LOW M., 2006, Corporate Social Reporting in Thailand: The News is All Good and Increasing, in: Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 67-83.
RAUFFLET E., 2008, Creating the Context for Corporate Responsibility, in: Journal of Corporate Citizenship, vol. 30, p. 95-106.
ROBERTS D.H., KOEPLIN J.P., 2007, Sustainability Reporting Practices In Portugal: Greenwashing or Triple Bottom Line, in: International Business & Economics Research Journal, vol. 6, no. 9, p. 29-40.
SAHAY A., 2004, Environmental Reporting by Indian Corporations, in: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 12-22.
SCHALTEGGER S., BECKMANN M., HANSEN E.G., 2013. Transdisciplinarity in Corporate Sustainability: Mapping the Field, in: Business Strategy Environment, Vol. 22, p. 219-229.
STAVINS R.N., WAGNER A.F., WAGNER G., 2003, Interpreting Sustainability in Economic Terms: Dynamic Efficiency Plus Inter-generational Equity, in: Economics Letters, vol. 79, no. 3, p. 339-343.
SUGGETT D., GOODSIR B., 2002, Triple bottom line measurement and reporting in Australia: Making it tangible. Melbourne, Allen Consulting Group.
WADDOCK S., 2007, On Ceres, the GRI and Corporation 20/20, in: The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, vol. 26, p. 38-42.
YADAVA R.N., SINHA B., 2016, Scoring Sustainability Reports Using GRI 2011 Guidelines for Assessing Environmental, Economic, and Social Dimensions of Leading Public and Private Indian Companies, in: Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 138, no. 3, p. 549-558.
ZWETSLOOT G. I. J. M., MARREWIJK M. N. A. V., 2004, From Quality to Sustainability, in: Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 55, p. 79-82.
Article Details
Abstract views: 224
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
