Sustainability Reporting Practices in Emerging Economies: A Cross-Country Study of BRICS Nations

Ajay Kumar


Department of Management Studies, Indian Institute of Technology (ISM), Dhanbad, Jharkhand-826004 (India)

Niladri Das


Department of Management Studies, Indian Institute of Technology (ISM), Dhanbad, Jharkhand-826004 (India)


Abstract

In the backdrop of a growing geo-political and economic importance of emerging economies, the objective of this paper is to ascertain whether firms in emerging economy are willing to match their increased economic weight with greater social responsibility. Given the relative scarcity of research in Sustainability Reporting (SR) practices in BRICS, particular attention is to be given to firms from these countries. The research question is examined through the analysis of differences between firms from BRICS nations in terms of various indicators of sustainability reporting practices. This study aims to evaluate corporate sustainability reporting according to the GRI framework developed by the Global Reporting Initiative. The firms in the sample display clear evidence of a divide among emerging economies in SR practices. India, score the highest across all dimensions i.e. economic, environmental and social followed by China while Russian companies have poor score across all categories. The leading industry complying with GRI reporting practices in case of India is Computer Hardware & Software industry with sustainability score of 94.02% and in Brazil, it is Pulp & Paper with 87.97% sustainability disclosure score. In Russia, it is Oil & Gas with 60.84% and in the case of China it is Automobiles & Transport with 71.06% disclosure score and retail industry in South Africa with 62.84% disclosurescore.


Keywords:

sustainability reporting, GRI indicators, BRICS, emerging economies

ADAMS C. A., HILL W. Y., ROBERTS C. B., 1998, Corporate Social Reporting Practices in Western Europe: Legitimating Corporate Behavior?, in: The British Accounting Review, vol. 30, no. 1, p. 1-21.
  Google Scholar

AHMAD N. N. N., SULAIMAN M., SISWANTORO D., 2003, Corporate SocialResponsibility Disclosure in Malaysia: An Analysis of Annual Reports of KLSE Listed Companies, in: International Journal of Economics, Management and Accounting.
  Google Scholar

AMALDOSS M. X., MANOHAR H. L., 2013, Communicating Corporate Social Responsibility – A Case of CSR Communication in Emerging Economies, in: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental, vol. 20, p. 65-80.
  Google Scholar

AREVALO, J. A. AND ARAVIND, D., 2011, Corporate Social Responsibility Practices In India: Approach, Drivers, and Barriers, in: Corporate Governance, 11 (4), pp. 399-414.
  Google Scholar

BAJPAI N., SACHS J. D., 2011, India’s Decade of Development: Looking Back at the Last 10 Years and Looking Forward to the Next 20, in: Working Paper Series, no. 3, p. 1-31, http://globalcenters.columbia.edu/files/cgc/pictures/Indias_Decade_of_Development_II_CGCSA_working_paper_series_July2011.pdf (10.11.2016).
  Google Scholar

BANSAL P., 2002, The Corporate Challenges of Sustainable Development, in: Academy of Management Executive, vol.16, no. 2, 122-131.
  Google Scholar

BASKIN J, 2006, Corporate Responsibility in Emerging Markets, in: Journal of Corporate Citizenship, vol. 24, p. 29-47.
  Google Scholar

BEBBINGTON J., GRAY R., OWEN D., 1999, Seeing the Wood for the Trees: Taking the Pulse of Social and Environmental Accounting, in: Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, vol. 12, no. 1, p.47-52.
  Google Scholar

BLOWFIELD M., FRYNAS J.G., 2005, Editorial Setting New Agendas: Critical Perspectives on Corporate Social Responsibility in the Developing World, in: International Affairs, vol. 81, p. 499-513.
  Google Scholar

BROWN N., DEEGAN C, 1998, The public disclosure of environmental performance information – a dual test of media agenda setting theory and legitimacy theory, in: Accounting and Business Research, vol. 29, no. 1, p. 21-41.
  Google Scholar

CHAPMAN R., MILNE M.J., 2003, The Triple Bottom Line: How New Zealand Companies Measure up, Corporate Environmental Strategy, in: International Journal for Sustainable Business, vol. 11, no. 2, p. 2-37.
  Google Scholar

CHAPPLE W., MOON J., 2005, Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in Asia – A Seven country study of CSR web site reporting, in: Business & Society, vol. 44, no. 4, p. 415-441.
  Google Scholar

CHAUDRI V. WANG J., 2007, Communicating Corporate Social Responsibility on the Internet: A case study of the top 100 Information Technology companies in India, in: Management Communication Quarterly, vol. 21, no. 2, p. 232-248.
  Google Scholar

CHICHILNISKY G., 1996, An Axiomatic Approach to Sustainable Development, in: Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 13, p. 231-257.
  Google Scholar

DAIZY, DAS N., 2014, Sustainability Reporting Framework: Comparative Analysis of Global Reporting Initiatives and Dow Jones Sustainability Index, in: International Journal of Science, Environment and Technology, vol. 3 no.1, p. 55-66.
  Google Scholar

DEEGAN C., 2002, Introduction: The Legitimising Effect of Social and Environmental Disclosures – A Theoretical Foundation, in: Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 15 no. 3, p. 282-311.
  Google Scholar

DURIAU V.J., REGER R.K., PFARRER M.D., 2007, A Content Analysis of the Content Analysis Literature in Organization Studies: Research Themes, Data Sources, and Methodological Refinements, in: Organizational Research Methods, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 5-34.
  Google Scholar

DYLLICK T, HOCKERTS K., 2002, Beyond the Business Case for Corporate Sustainability, in: Bus. Strat. Env., vol. 11, p. 130-141.
  Google Scholar

ECCLES R.G., KRZUS M.P., One Report: Integrated Reporting for a Sustainable Strategy, John Wiley & Sons 2010.
  Google Scholar

ELKINGTON J., Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21stCentury Business, Capstone 1999.
  Google Scholar

EUROPEAN COMMISSION, 2011, http://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2009_2014/documents/com/com_com(2011)0681_/com_com(2011)0681_en. pdf (29.01.2017).
  Google Scholar

FIASCHI D., GIULIANI E., NIERI F., 2015, BRIC Companies Seeking Legitimacy through Corporate Social Responsibility, in: SSRN, https://ssrn.com/abstract=2559110 (2.02.2017).
  Google Scholar

GARCIA-JOHNSON R., 2000, Exporting Environmentalism U.S.MultinationalChemical Corporations in Brazil and Mexico, The MIT Press.
  Google Scholar

GIMENEZ C., SIERRA V., RODON J., 2012, Sustainable operations: Their impact on the triple bottom line, in: International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 140, no. 1, p. 149- 159.
  Google Scholar

GRI, 2006, https://www.globalreporting.org/resource library/G3-Guidelines-Incl-Technical-Protocol.pdf
  Google Scholar

(25.08.2016).
  Google Scholar

GRI, 2009, https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/GRI-Sustainability-Report-2009-2010.pdf
  Google Scholar

(30.03.2017).
  Google Scholar

GRI, 2011, https://www.globalreporting.org/information/news-and-press-center/Pages/India-produces-most-complete-sustainability-reports.aspx (8.10.2016).
  Google Scholar

GRI, 2012, https://www.globalreporting.org/information/news-and-press-center/Pages/Brazil-and-India-
  Google Scholar

stock-up-on-sustainability.aspx (29.01.2017).
  Google Scholar

GRI, 2013, https://www.globalreporting.org/information/news-and-press-center/Pages/GRI-Among-the-most-popular-CSR-instruments.asp x (30.01.2017).
  Google Scholar

GRIESSE M.A.S, 2007, The Geographic, Political, and Economic Context for Corporate Social Responsibility in Brazil, in: Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 73, p. 21-37.
  Google Scholar

HEDBERG C.J., MALMBORG F.V., 2003, The Global Reporting Initiative and Corporate Sustainability Reporting in Swedish Companies, in: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, vol. 10, no. 3, p. 153-164.
  Google Scholar

INTOSAI-WGEA, 2013, Sustainability Reporting: Concepts, Frameworks and the Role of Supreme Audit Institutions, http://www.environmentalauditing.org (22.02.2017).
  Google Scholar

IOANNOU I.A, SERAFEIM G.B., 2012, What drives corporate social performance the role of nationlevel institutions, in: Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 43, no9, p. 834- 864.
  Google Scholar

KOLK A., 2011, Trajectories of sustainability reporting by MNCs, in: Journal of World Business, vol. 45, no.4, p. 367-374.
  Google Scholar

KRAJNC D., GLAVIC P., 2005, How to Compare Companies on Relevant Dimensions of Sustainability, in: Ecological Economics, vol. 55, p. 551-563.
  Google Scholar

LEHMAN G., 1999, Disclosing new worlds: a role for social and environmental accounting and auditing, in: Accounting, Organizations and Society, vol. 24, no. 3, p. 217-241.
  Google Scholar

LOZANO R., 2008, Envisioning Sustainability Three-Dimensionally, in: Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 16, p. 1838-1846.
  Google Scholar

MITCHELL C.G., HILL T, 2009, Corporate Social and Environmental Reporting and the Impact of Internal Environmental Policy in South Africa, in: Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Mgmt, vol. 16, p. 48-60.
  Google Scholar

MORHARDT J. E., BAIRD S., FREEMAN K., 2002, Scoring corporate environmental and sustainability reports using GRI 2000, ISO 14031 and other criteria, in: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, vol. 9, no. 4, p. 215-233.
  Google Scholar

MULIA P., BEHURA A. K., KAR S., 2017, Corporate Environmental Responsibility for a Sustainable Future, in: Problemy Ekorozwoju/Problems of Sustainable Development, vol. 12, no 2, p. 69-77.
  Google Scholar

MURTHY V, 2008, Corporate Social Disclosure Practices of Top Software Firms in India, in:Global Business Review, vol. 9, no. 2, p. 173-188.
  Google Scholar

NEUA D., WARSAMEB W., PEDWELLC K., 1998, Managing Public Impressions: Environmental Disclosures in Annual Reports, in: Accounting, Organizations and Society, vol. 23, no. 3, p. 265-282.
  Google Scholar

PREUSS L., BARKEMEYER R., 2011, CSR priorities of emerging economy firms: is Russia a different shape of BRIC?, in: Corporate Governance, vol. 11, no. 4, p. 371-385.
  Google Scholar

PRIETO M.C., LUND P.T., CHAN A., MURO A, BHUSHAN C, 2006, Critical Perspectiveson CSR and Development: What We Know, What We Don’t and What We Need to Know, in: International Affairs, Vol. 82, No. 5, p. 977-987.
  Google Scholar

QUICK R., 2008, Voluntary sustainability reporting practices in Germany: a study on reporting quality, in: Portuguese Journal of Accounting and Management, vol. 5, p. 7-35.
  Google Scholar

RATANAJONGKOL S., DAVEY H., LOW M., 2006, Corporate Social Reporting in Thailand: The News is All Good and Increasing, in: Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 67-83.
  Google Scholar

RAUFFLET E., 2008, Creating the Context for Corporate Responsibility, in: Journal of Corporate Citizenship, vol. 30, p. 95-106.
  Google Scholar

ROBERTS D.H., KOEPLIN J.P., 2007, Sustainability Reporting Practices In Portugal: Greenwashing or Triple Bottom Line, in: International Business & Economics Research Journal, vol. 6, no. 9, p. 29-40.
  Google Scholar

SAHAY A., 2004, Environmental Reporting by Indian Corporations, in: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 12-22.
  Google Scholar

SCHALTEGGER S., BECKMANN M., HANSEN E.G., 2013. Transdisciplinarity in Corporate Sustainability: Mapping the Field, in: Business Strategy Environment, Vol. 22, p. 219-229.
  Google Scholar

STAVINS R.N., WAGNER A.F., WAGNER G., 2003, Interpreting Sustainability in Economic Terms: Dynamic Efficiency Plus Inter-generational Equity, in: Economics Letters, vol. 79, no. 3, p. 339-343.
  Google Scholar

SUGGETT D., GOODSIR B., 2002, Triple bottom line measurement and reporting in Australia: Making it tangible. Melbourne, Allen Consulting Group.
  Google Scholar

WADDOCK S., 2007, On Ceres, the GRI and Corporation 20/20, in: The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, vol. 26, p. 38-42.
  Google Scholar

YADAVA R.N., SINHA B., 2016, Scoring Sustainability Reports Using GRI 2011 Guidelines for Assessing Environmental, Economic, and Social Dimensions of Leading Public and Private Indian Companies, in: Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 138, no. 3, p. 549-558.
  Google Scholar

ZWETSLOOT G. I. J. M., MARREWIJK M. N. A. V., 2004, From Quality to Sustainability, in: Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 55, p. 79-82.
  Google Scholar

Download


Published
2018-07-02

Cited by

Kumar, A., & Das, N. (2018). Sustainability Reporting Practices in Emerging Economies: A Cross-Country Study of BRICS Nations. Problemy Ekorozwoju, 13(2), 17–25. Retrieved from https://ph.pollub.pl/index.php/preko/article/view/5009

Authors

Ajay Kumar 

Department of Management Studies, Indian Institute of Technology (ISM), Dhanbad, Jharkhand-826004 India

Authors

Niladri Das 

Department of Management Studies, Indian Institute of Technology (ISM), Dhanbad, Jharkhand-826004 India

Statistics

Abstract views: 117
PDF downloads: 60