Sustainability Reporting Practices in Emerging Economies: A Cross-Country Study of BRICS Nations
Ajay Kumar
Department of Management Studies, Indian Institute of Technology (ISM), Dhanbad, Jharkhand-826004 (India)
Niladri Das
Department of Management Studies, Indian Institute of Technology (ISM), Dhanbad, Jharkhand-826004 (India)
Abstract
In the backdrop of a growing geo-political and economic importance of emerging economies, the objective of this paper is to ascertain whether firms in emerging economy are willing to match their increased economic weight with greater social responsibility. Given the relative scarcity of research in Sustainability Reporting (SR) practices in BRICS, particular attention is to be given to firms from these countries. The research question is examined through the analysis of differences between firms from BRICS nations in terms of various indicators of sustainability reporting practices. This study aims to evaluate corporate sustainability reporting according to the GRI framework developed by the Global Reporting Initiative. The firms in the sample display clear evidence of a divide among emerging economies in SR practices. India, score the highest across all dimensions i.e. economic, environmental and social followed by China while Russian companies have poor score across all categories. The leading industry complying with GRI reporting practices in case of India is Computer Hardware & Software industry with sustainability score of 94.02% and in Brazil, it is Pulp & Paper with 87.97% sustainability disclosure score. In Russia, it is Oil & Gas with 60.84% and in the case of China it is Automobiles & Transport with 71.06% disclosure score and retail industry in South Africa with 62.84% disclosurescore.
Keywords:
sustainability reporting, GRI indicators, BRICS, emerging economiesReferences
ADAMS C. A., HILL W. Y., ROBERTS C. B., 1998, Corporate Social Reporting Practices in Western Europe: Legitimating Corporate Behavior?, in: The British Accounting Review, vol. 30, no. 1, p. 1-21.
Google Scholar
AHMAD N. N. N., SULAIMAN M., SISWANTORO D., 2003, Corporate SocialResponsibility Disclosure in Malaysia: An Analysis of Annual Reports of KLSE Listed Companies, in: International Journal of Economics, Management and Accounting.
Google Scholar
AMALDOSS M. X., MANOHAR H. L., 2013, Communicating Corporate Social Responsibility – A Case of CSR Communication in Emerging Economies, in: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental, vol. 20, p. 65-80.
Google Scholar
AREVALO, J. A. AND ARAVIND, D., 2011, Corporate Social Responsibility Practices In India: Approach, Drivers, and Barriers, in: Corporate Governance, 11 (4), pp. 399-414.
Google Scholar
BAJPAI N., SACHS J. D., 2011, India’s Decade of Development: Looking Back at the Last 10 Years and Looking Forward to the Next 20, in: Working Paper Series, no. 3, p. 1-31, http://globalcenters.columbia.edu/files/cgc/pictures/Indias_Decade_of_Development_II_CGCSA_working_paper_series_July2011.pdf (10.11.2016).
Google Scholar
BANSAL P., 2002, The Corporate Challenges of Sustainable Development, in: Academy of Management Executive, vol.16, no. 2, 122-131.
Google Scholar
BASKIN J, 2006, Corporate Responsibility in Emerging Markets, in: Journal of Corporate Citizenship, vol. 24, p. 29-47.
Google Scholar
BEBBINGTON J., GRAY R., OWEN D., 1999, Seeing the Wood for the Trees: Taking the Pulse of Social and Environmental Accounting, in: Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, vol. 12, no. 1, p.47-52.
Google Scholar
BLOWFIELD M., FRYNAS J.G., 2005, Editorial Setting New Agendas: Critical Perspectives on Corporate Social Responsibility in the Developing World, in: International Affairs, vol. 81, p. 499-513.
Google Scholar
BROWN N., DEEGAN C, 1998, The public disclosure of environmental performance information – a dual test of media agenda setting theory and legitimacy theory, in: Accounting and Business Research, vol. 29, no. 1, p. 21-41.
Google Scholar
CHAPMAN R., MILNE M.J., 2003, The Triple Bottom Line: How New Zealand Companies Measure up, Corporate Environmental Strategy, in: International Journal for Sustainable Business, vol. 11, no. 2, p. 2-37.
Google Scholar
CHAPPLE W., MOON J., 2005, Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in Asia – A Seven country study of CSR web site reporting, in: Business & Society, vol. 44, no. 4, p. 415-441.
Google Scholar
CHAUDRI V. WANG J., 2007, Communicating Corporate Social Responsibility on the Internet: A case study of the top 100 Information Technology companies in India, in: Management Communication Quarterly, vol. 21, no. 2, p. 232-248.
Google Scholar
CHICHILNISKY G., 1996, An Axiomatic Approach to Sustainable Development, in: Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 13, p. 231-257.
Google Scholar
DAIZY, DAS N., 2014, Sustainability Reporting Framework: Comparative Analysis of Global Reporting Initiatives and Dow Jones Sustainability Index, in: International Journal of Science, Environment and Technology, vol. 3 no.1, p. 55-66.
Google Scholar
DEEGAN C., 2002, Introduction: The Legitimising Effect of Social and Environmental Disclosures – A Theoretical Foundation, in: Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 15 no. 3, p. 282-311.
Google Scholar
DURIAU V.J., REGER R.K., PFARRER M.D., 2007, A Content Analysis of the Content Analysis Literature in Organization Studies: Research Themes, Data Sources, and Methodological Refinements, in: Organizational Research Methods, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 5-34.
Google Scholar
DYLLICK T, HOCKERTS K., 2002, Beyond the Business Case for Corporate Sustainability, in: Bus. Strat. Env., vol. 11, p. 130-141.
Google Scholar
ECCLES R.G., KRZUS M.P., One Report: Integrated Reporting for a Sustainable Strategy, John Wiley & Sons 2010.
Google Scholar
ELKINGTON J., Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21stCentury Business, Capstone 1999.
Google Scholar
EUROPEAN COMMISSION, 2011, http://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2009_2014/documents/com/com_com(2011)0681_/com_com(2011)0681_en. pdf (29.01.2017).
Google Scholar
FIASCHI D., GIULIANI E., NIERI F., 2015, BRIC Companies Seeking Legitimacy through Corporate Social Responsibility, in: SSRN, https://ssrn.com/abstract=2559110 (2.02.2017).
Google Scholar
GARCIA-JOHNSON R., 2000, Exporting Environmentalism U.S.MultinationalChemical Corporations in Brazil and Mexico, The MIT Press.
Google Scholar
GIMENEZ C., SIERRA V., RODON J., 2012, Sustainable operations: Their impact on the triple bottom line, in: International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 140, no. 1, p. 149- 159.
Google Scholar
GRI, 2006, https://www.globalreporting.org/resource library/G3-Guidelines-Incl-Technical-Protocol.pdf
Google Scholar
(25.08.2016).
Google Scholar
GRI, 2009, https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/GRI-Sustainability-Report-2009-2010.pdf
Google Scholar
(30.03.2017).
Google Scholar
GRI, 2011, https://www.globalreporting.org/information/news-and-press-center/Pages/India-produces-most-complete-sustainability-reports.aspx (8.10.2016).
Google Scholar
GRI, 2012, https://www.globalreporting.org/information/news-and-press-center/Pages/Brazil-and-India-
Google Scholar
stock-up-on-sustainability.aspx (29.01.2017).
Google Scholar
GRI, 2013, https://www.globalreporting.org/information/news-and-press-center/Pages/GRI-Among-the-most-popular-CSR-instruments.asp x (30.01.2017).
Google Scholar
GRIESSE M.A.S, 2007, The Geographic, Political, and Economic Context for Corporate Social Responsibility in Brazil, in: Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 73, p. 21-37.
Google Scholar
HEDBERG C.J., MALMBORG F.V., 2003, The Global Reporting Initiative and Corporate Sustainability Reporting in Swedish Companies, in: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, vol. 10, no. 3, p. 153-164.
Google Scholar
INTOSAI-WGEA, 2013, Sustainability Reporting: Concepts, Frameworks and the Role of Supreme Audit Institutions, http://www.environmentalauditing.org (22.02.2017).
Google Scholar
IOANNOU I.A, SERAFEIM G.B., 2012, What drives corporate social performance the role of nationlevel institutions, in: Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 43, no9, p. 834- 864.
Google Scholar
KOLK A., 2011, Trajectories of sustainability reporting by MNCs, in: Journal of World Business, vol. 45, no.4, p. 367-374.
Google Scholar
KRAJNC D., GLAVIC P., 2005, How to Compare Companies on Relevant Dimensions of Sustainability, in: Ecological Economics, vol. 55, p. 551-563.
Google Scholar
LEHMAN G., 1999, Disclosing new worlds: a role for social and environmental accounting and auditing, in: Accounting, Organizations and Society, vol. 24, no. 3, p. 217-241.
Google Scholar
LOZANO R., 2008, Envisioning Sustainability Three-Dimensionally, in: Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 16, p. 1838-1846.
Google Scholar
MITCHELL C.G., HILL T, 2009, Corporate Social and Environmental Reporting and the Impact of Internal Environmental Policy in South Africa, in: Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Mgmt, vol. 16, p. 48-60.
Google Scholar
MORHARDT J. E., BAIRD S., FREEMAN K., 2002, Scoring corporate environmental and sustainability reports using GRI 2000, ISO 14031 and other criteria, in: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, vol. 9, no. 4, p. 215-233.
Google Scholar
MULIA P., BEHURA A. K., KAR S., 2017, Corporate Environmental Responsibility for a Sustainable Future, in: Problemy Ekorozwoju/Problems of Sustainable Development, vol. 12, no 2, p. 69-77.
Google Scholar
MURTHY V, 2008, Corporate Social Disclosure Practices of Top Software Firms in India, in:Global Business Review, vol. 9, no. 2, p. 173-188.
Google Scholar
NEUA D., WARSAMEB W., PEDWELLC K., 1998, Managing Public Impressions: Environmental Disclosures in Annual Reports, in: Accounting, Organizations and Society, vol. 23, no. 3, p. 265-282.
Google Scholar
PREUSS L., BARKEMEYER R., 2011, CSR priorities of emerging economy firms: is Russia a different shape of BRIC?, in: Corporate Governance, vol. 11, no. 4, p. 371-385.
Google Scholar
PRIETO M.C., LUND P.T., CHAN A., MURO A, BHUSHAN C, 2006, Critical Perspectiveson CSR and Development: What We Know, What We Don’t and What We Need to Know, in: International Affairs, Vol. 82, No. 5, p. 977-987.
Google Scholar
QUICK R., 2008, Voluntary sustainability reporting practices in Germany: a study on reporting quality, in: Portuguese Journal of Accounting and Management, vol. 5, p. 7-35.
Google Scholar
RATANAJONGKOL S., DAVEY H., LOW M., 2006, Corporate Social Reporting in Thailand: The News is All Good and Increasing, in: Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 67-83.
Google Scholar
RAUFFLET E., 2008, Creating the Context for Corporate Responsibility, in: Journal of Corporate Citizenship, vol. 30, p. 95-106.
Google Scholar
ROBERTS D.H., KOEPLIN J.P., 2007, Sustainability Reporting Practices In Portugal: Greenwashing or Triple Bottom Line, in: International Business & Economics Research Journal, vol. 6, no. 9, p. 29-40.
Google Scholar
SAHAY A., 2004, Environmental Reporting by Indian Corporations, in: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 12-22.
Google Scholar
SCHALTEGGER S., BECKMANN M., HANSEN E.G., 2013. Transdisciplinarity in Corporate Sustainability: Mapping the Field, in: Business Strategy Environment, Vol. 22, p. 219-229.
Google Scholar
STAVINS R.N., WAGNER A.F., WAGNER G., 2003, Interpreting Sustainability in Economic Terms: Dynamic Efficiency Plus Inter-generational Equity, in: Economics Letters, vol. 79, no. 3, p. 339-343.
Google Scholar
SUGGETT D., GOODSIR B., 2002, Triple bottom line measurement and reporting in Australia: Making it tangible. Melbourne, Allen Consulting Group.
Google Scholar
WADDOCK S., 2007, On Ceres, the GRI and Corporation 20/20, in: The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, vol. 26, p. 38-42.
Google Scholar
YADAVA R.N., SINHA B., 2016, Scoring Sustainability Reports Using GRI 2011 Guidelines for Assessing Environmental, Economic, and Social Dimensions of Leading Public and Private Indian Companies, in: Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 138, no. 3, p. 549-558.
Google Scholar
ZWETSLOOT G. I. J. M., MARREWIJK M. N. A. V., 2004, From Quality to Sustainability, in: Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 55, p. 79-82.
Google Scholar
Authors
Ajay KumarDepartment of Management Studies, Indian Institute of Technology (ISM), Dhanbad, Jharkhand-826004 India
Authors
Niladri DasDepartment of Management Studies, Indian Institute of Technology (ISM), Dhanbad, Jharkhand-826004 India
Statistics
Abstract views: 117PDF downloads: 60
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.