Income Inequality and its Consequences within the Framework of Social Justice
Halyna Mishchuk
Labour Resources and Entrepreneurship Department, National University of Water and Environmental Engineering, Soborna str., 11, 33028, Rivne (Ukraine)
Natalia Samoliuk
Labour Resources and Entrepreneurship Department, National University of Water and Environmental Engineering, Soborna str., 11, 33028, Rivne (Ukraine)
Yuriy Bilan
Centre of Applied Economic Research, Faculty of Management and Economics, Tomas Bata University in Zlin, nam. T. G. Masaryka 5555, 760 01 Zlin, Czech Republic (Czechia)
Dalia Streimikiene
dalia@mail.lei.ltInstitute of Economics and Finance management, Vilnius University, Kaunas Faculty, Muitines 8, Kaunas, LT-44280 (Lithuania)
Abstract
The paper deals with important social-political issues of sustainable development. Basing on the case study of income inequality indicators in the EU the paper reveals that there is a close relationship between inequality and unemployment; furthermore it confirms that inequality has a significant impact on migration and GNI per capita. The authors detected the differences in national models of inequality regulation by grouping the countries and highlighting those in which the relationship is most clearly and explicitly manifested. A more detailed analysis of these two groups (17 countries) suggests that the relationship between inequality and GNI actually reproduces the distribution of the countries according to the GNI to tax burden ratio (in 2015 the correlation coefficients are – 0.702 and 0.718 respectively). Since there is almost no relationship between inequality and tax rates for public and corporations, apparently, the impact on public performance is formed within the processes of income redistribution. Conversely, based on the country grouping according to income distribution, GNI and tax burden, the authors revealed a pattern: the countries with low income inequality have the highest GNI rates even in case of tax burden which is significantly higher than average European values. Basing on discovered relations between income inequality and other factors, the research demonstrated the importance of the state regulation of distribution processes directed towards achieving positive social and economic consequences.
Keywords:
inequality, income distribution, justice, migration, human developmentReferences
AMBROZIAK A., 2016, Income Tax Exemption as a Regional State Aid in Special Economic Zones and Its Impact upon Development of Polish Districts, in: Oeconomia Copernicana, 7(2), p. 245-267.
Google Scholar
BERG A., OSTRY J., ZETTELMEYER J., 2012, What makes growth sustained?, in: Journal of Development Economics 98, no. 2, p. 149-166.
Google Scholar
COOK K.S., HEGTVEDT K.A., 1983, Distributive justice, equity, and equality, in: Annual review of sociology, 9(1), p. 217-241.
Google Scholar
DIRŽYTẸ A., RAKAUSKIENẸ O. G., SERVETKIENẸ V., 2016, Household income and satisfaction with life: cognitive emotional impact paradox, in: Entrepreneurship and sustainability issues, 4(2), p. 198-210.
Google Scholar
DOYLE M. W., STIGLITZ J. E., 2014, Eliminating extreme inequality: A sustainable development goal, 2015-2030, in: Ethics & International Affairs, 28(01), p. 5-13.
Google Scholar
GIRIGŪNIENẸ G., GIRIŪNAS L., 2015, Sustainable Development and Tax System: It's Impact on Entrepreneurship, in: Journal of Security & Sustainability Issues, 4(3), p. 233-240.
Google Scholar
IEF, 2015, Index of Economic Freedom, http://www.heritage.org/index/pdf/2015/book/index_2015.pdf (1.02.2018).
Google Scholar
KOTULIC R., ADAMISIN P., 2012, Migration trends of the labour force in the Slovak Republic at the beginning of the second millennium, in: Polish Journal of Management Studies, 6, p. 81-88.
Google Scholar
KRAJEWSKI P., 2015, Effectiveness of the Fiscal Policy in Stimulating Economy: the Case of Poland, in: Transformation in Business & Economics, 14(2), p. 53-67.
Google Scholar
LEVENTHAL G.S., 1980, What should be done with equity theory?, in: Social exchange, Springer, USA, p. 27-55.
Google Scholar
LISAUSKAITẸ V., 2010, Differentiation of Income and Consumption of the Lithuanian Population, in: Business: Theory and Practice/Verslas: Teorija ir Praktika, 11(3), p. 266-278.
Google Scholar
OBADIĆ A., ŠIMURINA N., SONORA R., 2014, The Effects of Tax Policy and Labour Market Institutions on Income Inequality, in: Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta u Rijeci: časopis za ekonomsku teoriju i praksu, 32(1), p. 121-140.
Google Scholar
OUARDIGHI J. E., SOMUN-KAPETANOVIC R., 2011, Income Mobility in the SEE Region: A Comparative Analysis with the EU Countries, in: Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 24(3), p. 1-14.
Google Scholar
PALMA J. G., 2011, Homogenous middles vs. heterogeneous tails, and the end of the ‘Inverted-U’: the share of the rich is what it’s all about, in: Cambridge Working Papers in Economics, http://www.econ.cam.ac.uk/dae/repec/cam/pdf/cwpe1111.pdf.
Google Scholar
RAKAUSKIENE O.G., STRUNZ H., 2016, Approach to Reduction of Socioeconomic Inequality: Decrease of Vulnerability and Strengthening Resilience, in: Economics and Sociology, 9(4), p. 243-258. https://www.doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2016/9-4/15.
Google Scholar
SIMIONESCU M., CIUIU D., BILAN Y., STRIELKOWSKI W., 2016, GDP and Net Migration in Some Eastern and South-Eastern Countries of Europe. A Panel Data and Bayesian Approach, in: Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 12(2), p. 161-175.
Google Scholar
ŠIMKOVÁ N., 2015, The Hierarchical Clustering of Tax Burden in the EU27, in: Journal of Competitiveness, 7 (3), p. 95-109.
Google Scholar
STIGLITZ J. E., 2012, Macroeconomic fluctuations, inequality, and human development, in: Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 13(1), p. 31-58.
Google Scholar
TUREČKOVÁ K., 2015, Income Inequality by Method of Non-Weighted Average Absolute Deviation: Case Study of Central and Eastern European Countries, in: Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 10(4), p. 99-110.
Google Scholar
UN, 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N15/2 91/89/PDF/N1529189.pdf?OpenElement(1.02.2018).
Google Scholar
UNDP, 2010, Human Development Report, http://hddr.undp.org/en/content/human-development-report-2010 (1.02.2018).
Google Scholar
UNDP, 2016, Human Development Report, http://hd r.undp.org/sites/default/files/2016_human_development_report.pdf (1.02.2018).
Google Scholar
USHAKOV D., BANDURINA N., SHKODINSKY S., 2017, Country’s Welfare as an Efficiency Factor in Fiscal Policy Promoting Economic Growth, in: Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 13(2), p. 121-127.
Google Scholar
VILLANI S., FERRARA L., LIOTTI G., 2016, How Internal Immigration Can Affect Income Inequality: The Italian Case from an Economic and Juridical Perspective, in: Društvena istraživanja: časopis za opća društvena pitanja, 25(4), p. 455-480.
Google Scholar
WEF, 2014, Top 10 Risks for the Decade Ahead, https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2014/01/top-10-risks-decade-ahead/ (1.02.2018).
Google Scholar
ZIRGULIS A., ŠARAPOVAS T., 2017, Impact of corporate taxation on unemployment, in: Journal of Business Economics and Management, 18(3), p. 412-426.
Google Scholar
Authors
Halyna MishchukLabour Resources and Entrepreneurship Department, National University of Water and Environmental Engineering, Soborna str., 11, 33028, Rivne Ukraine
Authors
Natalia SamoliukLabour Resources and Entrepreneurship Department, National University of Water and Environmental Engineering, Soborna str., 11, 33028, Rivne Ukraine
Authors
Yuriy BilanCentre of Applied Economic Research, Faculty of Management and Economics, Tomas Bata University in Zlin, nam. T. G. Masaryka 5555, 760 01 Zlin, Czech Republic Czechia
Authors
Dalia Streimikienedalia@mail.lei.lt
Institute of Economics and Finance management, Vilnius University, Kaunas Faculty, Muitines 8, Kaunas, LT-44280 Lithuania
Statistics
Abstract views: 220PDF downloads: 133
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
