Formation of Theoretical and Methodological Assumptions in the Assessment of Significance of the Bioeconomy in the Country Economy
Kęstutis Biekša
Lithuanian Institute of Agrarian Economics, Kudirkos 18-2, LT 03105 Vilnius, Lithuania (Lithuania)
Tomas Baležentis
Lithuanian Institute of Agrarian Economics, Kudirkos 18-2, LT 03105 Vilnius, Lithuania (Lithuania)
Abstract
In order to ensure sustainable development of the modern economies, there is a need for transforming the linear economy model to circular or green economy model. Bioeconomy can contribute to this goal by ensuring the use of bioproducts and biotechnologies. The flow of material and energy in the bioeconomy is based on the use of biomass and renewable sources for food, feed, and materials production. Circulation principle reduces the amount of waste and increases the efficiency of resources use. It is important to discuss the notions of bioeconomy as described in the strategical and legal documents for bioeconomy development. This research mainly focuses on the theoretical and methodological assumptions of bioeconomy, the main measures for stimulating the development of bioeconomy. We also review the trends of the development of bioeconomy across different countries.
Keywords:
bio economy, sustainable development, renewable resources, bio based resourcesReferences
BEHRENS A., 2016, Time to connect the dots: What is the link between, in: CEPS Policy Brief, Climate change policy and the circular economy? 33(7).
Google Scholar
EUROPEAN Commission, 2009, Directive 2009/28/EC of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of the
Google Scholar
use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC, 5.6.2009, L 140/16.
Google Scholar
FAHLÉN E., AHLGREN E.O., 2012, Accounting for external environmental costs in a study of a Swedish district-heating system – an assessment of simplified approaches, in: Journal of Cleaner Production, 27, p. 165-176.
Google Scholar
HALSZ L., POVODEN M., NARODOSLAWSKY M., 2005, Sustainable processes synthesis for renewable resources, in: Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 44, p. 293-307.
Google Scholar
JACKSON T., 2009, Prosperity without growth. The transition to a sustainable economy, Sustainable development Commission, 134 p.
Google Scholar
JORDAN A., 2008, The governance of sustainable development: taking stock and looking forwards, in: Journal of Environment and Planning: Government and Policy, 26, p. 17-33.
Google Scholar
FIDGE F., HAHN T., 2004, Sustainable value added- measuring corporate contributions to sustainability beyond eco-efficiency, in: Ecological economics, 48, p. 173-187.
Google Scholar
KLEVAS V., 2010, Regional approach for policies and measures aiming to sustainable energy development, in: Paths to sustainable energy, InTech, Croatia, p. 117-132.
Google Scholar
KLEVAS V., BIEKŠA K., KLEVIENĖ A., BUBELIENĖ J., STANKEVIČIUS M., 2010, Principles of energy development sustainability evaluation, in: Journal of Power Engineering, 56, p. 92-102.
Google Scholar
KLEVAS V., ŠTREIMIKIENĖ D., KLEVIENĖ A., 2009, Sustainability assessment of the energy projects implementation in regional scale, in: Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13, p. 155-166.
Google Scholar
KLEVAS V., ANTINUCCI M., 2004, Integration of national and regional energy development programs in Baltic States, in: Energy Policy, 32, p. 345-355.
Google Scholar
KNAPEK J., 2010, Effectiveness of feed-in tariff scheme- a lessons learned from Czech Republic. 11th IAEE European conference on energy economy, policies and supply security: surviving the global economic crisis, Vilnius, Lithuania, International Association for Energy Economics, p. 1-10.
Google Scholar
STATISTICS Lithuania, 2011, Energy consumption in households 2009, Vilnius.
Google Scholar
STOEGLEHER G., NARODOSLAWSKY M., 2009,
Google Scholar
How sustainable are biofuels? Answers and further questions arising from an ecological footprint perspective, in: Journal of Bioresource Technology, 100(16), p. 3825-2830.
Google Scholar
REVIEW of the 2012 European Bioeconomy Strategy. European Commission, p. 88.
Google Scholar
SILVERA S., 2015, Opportunities for bioenergy in the Baltic Sea Region. Security of energy supply, promotion of the bio-economy, nutrient recycling, and innovation are prioritized policy areas in the EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region, EU Commission Staff Working Document.
Google Scholar
Bioeconomy Information System and Observatory (BISO) – Environmental sustainability assessement. Explanatory note and agenda. EC, JRC- Institute for environment and sustainability. 2014.
Google Scholar
BIEKSA K. 2015, Energy economic model of green settlements, Doctoral dissertation, Kaunas.
Google Scholar
PIOTROWSKI S., Carus M., Carrez D., 2018, European Bioeconomy in Figures 2008-2015, Nova-Institute for Ecology and Innovation, Hurth, Germany, 2018. p. 18.
Google Scholar
VIRGINIA H. DALE K.L., 2016, Klein and et al. Incorporating bioenergy into sustainable landscape designs, in: Renewable and sustainable energy review, 56, p. 1158-1171).
Google Scholar
Authors
Kęstutis BiekšaLithuanian Institute of Agrarian Economics, Kudirkos 18-2, LT 03105 Vilnius, Lithuania Lithuania
Authors
Tomas BaležentisLithuanian Institute of Agrarian Economics, Kudirkos 18-2, LT 03105 Vilnius, Lithuania Lithuania
Statistics
Abstract views: 18PDF downloads: 7
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.