Formation of Theoretical and Methodological Assumptions in the Assessment of Significance of the Bioeconomy in the Country Economy
Article Sidebar
Open full text
Issue Vol. 14 No. 1 (2019)
-
An Updated Assessment of the OECD’s Quality of Life Index
Mehmet Nar, Mehmet Şükrü Nar7-18
-
Environmental Welfare: Quality of Policy vs. Society’s Values
Oleksandr Dluhopolskyi, Victor Koziuk, Yuryi Ivashuk, Yuryi Klapkiv19-28
-
Sustainable Development in Asian Countries – Indicator-based Approach
Bartosz Bartniczak, Andrzej Raszkowski29-42
-
Age Structures and Air Pollution: What Role Does Gender Play?
Jiliang Liu, Wei Wang, Yin E Chen, Chun-Ping Chang43-52
-
Social Dimensions of Sustainable Development in International Public Opinion
Paweł Rydzewski53-62
-
Mechanism of Strengthening Social and Labor Potential of Sustainable Development
Olga Novikova, Yaroslav Ostafiichuk, Olena Khandiі63-72
-
Education in Defence of Biodiversity. Will the Ecological and Ethical Footprint Counteract Environmental Changes?
Ignacy S. Fiut, Marcin Urbaniak73-78
-
Environmental Life-Cycle Analysis as a Tool for Sustainability Studies: A Complete Learning Experience
G Venkatesh79-85
-
Landscape and Health in Sustainable Development
Sebastian Bernat87-96
-
Sustainable Creative Economy in Cities: Comparative Analysis of Capital Cities in the EU
Barbara Bradač Hojnik97-107
-
Neuroscience in Linguistic Patterns of Communication Campaigns for Environmental Sustainability
Magdalena Saczyna109-118
-
Media Discourses of Mekong Dams: A Thematic Analysis
Claudio O. Delang119-130
-
The Idea of ‘Landscape Cultivation’ by Adam Wodziczko
Leszek Gawor131-137
-
Formation of Theoretical and Methodological Assumptions in the Assessment of Significance of the Bioeconomy in the Country Economy
Kęstutis Biekša, Tomas Baležentis139-148
-
Humanistic Perspectives of Biocultural Diversity
Ryszard F. Sadowski149-158
-
Decoupling Analysis of Energy Consumption and Economic Growth of V4 Countries
Jana Chovancová, Roman Vavrek159-165
-
Theoretical Foundations of Human Capital Education in Economic Growth and Development Management
Franciszek Piontek, Barbara Piontek167-173
-
Environmental Crimes of Early Romanian Communism: Focus on the Enemies of Agriculture
Alexandru-Ionuţ Petrişor, Elena Tîrzman175-184
-
Is the Economic Mechanism of Quantity-Quality Tradeoff Sustainable?
Dariusz Pieńkowski185-198
-
Education for All and Sustainable Development: An Empirical Study on Family Cognition and Household Resource Using in China
Shuxing Chen, Yuxiang Gao199-208
Archives
-
Vol. 16 No. 2
2021-07-01 26
-
Vol. 16 No. 1
2021-01-04 24
-
Vol. 15 No. 2
2020-07-01 24
-
Vol. 15 No. 1
2020-01-02 24
-
Vol. 14 No. 2
2019-07-01 20
-
Vol. 14 No. 1
2019-01-02 20
-
Vol. 13 No. 2
2023-10-15 22
-
Vol. 13 No. 1
2018-01-02 23
-
Vol. 12 No. 2
2017-07-03 18
-
Vol. 12 No. 1
2017-01-02 16
Main Article Content
Authors
Abstract
In order to ensure sustainable development of the modern economies, there is a need for transforming the linear economy model to circular or green economy model. Bioeconomy can contribute to this goal by ensuring the use of bioproducts and biotechnologies. The flow of material and energy in the bioeconomy is based on the use of biomass and renewable sources for food, feed, and materials production. Circulation principle reduces the amount of waste and increases the efficiency of resources use. It is important to discuss the notions of bioeconomy as described in the strategical and legal documents for bioeconomy development. This research mainly focuses on the theoretical and methodological assumptions of bioeconomy, the main measures for stimulating the development of bioeconomy. We also review the trends of the development of bioeconomy across different countries.
Keywords:
References
BEHRENS A., 2016, Time to connect the dots: What is the link between, in: CEPS Policy Brief, Climate change policy and the circular economy? 33(7).
EUROPEAN Commission, 2009, Directive 2009/28/EC of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of the
use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC, 5.6.2009, L 140/16.
FAHLÉN E., AHLGREN E.O., 2012, Accounting for external environmental costs in a study of a Swedish district-heating system – an assessment of simplified approaches, in: Journal of Cleaner Production, 27, p. 165-176.
HALSZ L., POVODEN M., NARODOSLAWSKY M., 2005, Sustainable processes synthesis for renewable resources, in: Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 44, p. 293-307.
JACKSON T., 2009, Prosperity without growth. The transition to a sustainable economy, Sustainable development Commission, 134 p.
JORDAN A., 2008, The governance of sustainable development: taking stock and looking forwards, in: Journal of Environment and Planning: Government and Policy, 26, p. 17-33.
FIDGE F., HAHN T., 2004, Sustainable value added- measuring corporate contributions to sustainability beyond eco-efficiency, in: Ecological economics, 48, p. 173-187.
KLEVAS V., 2010, Regional approach for policies and measures aiming to sustainable energy development, in: Paths to sustainable energy, InTech, Croatia, p. 117-132.
KLEVAS V., BIEKŠA K., KLEVIENĖ A., BUBELIENĖ J., STANKEVIČIUS M., 2010, Principles of energy development sustainability evaluation, in: Journal of Power Engineering, 56, p. 92-102.
KLEVAS V., ŠTREIMIKIENĖ D., KLEVIENĖ A., 2009, Sustainability assessment of the energy projects implementation in regional scale, in: Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13, p. 155-166.
KLEVAS V., ANTINUCCI M., 2004, Integration of national and regional energy development programs in Baltic States, in: Energy Policy, 32, p. 345-355.
KNAPEK J., 2010, Effectiveness of feed-in tariff scheme- a lessons learned from Czech Republic. 11th IAEE European conference on energy economy, policies and supply security: surviving the global economic crisis, Vilnius, Lithuania, International Association for Energy Economics, p. 1-10.
STATISTICS Lithuania, 2011, Energy consumption in households 2009, Vilnius.
STOEGLEHER G., NARODOSLAWSKY M., 2009,
How sustainable are biofuels? Answers and further questions arising from an ecological footprint perspective, in: Journal of Bioresource Technology, 100(16), p. 3825-2830.
REVIEW of the 2012 European Bioeconomy Strategy. European Commission, p. 88.
SILVERA S., 2015, Opportunities for bioenergy in the Baltic Sea Region. Security of energy supply, promotion of the bio-economy, nutrient recycling, and innovation are prioritized policy areas in the EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region, EU Commission Staff Working Document.
Bioeconomy Information System and Observatory (BISO) – Environmental sustainability assessement. Explanatory note and agenda. EC, JRC- Institute for environment and sustainability. 2014.
BIEKSA K. 2015, Energy economic model of green settlements, Doctoral dissertation, Kaunas.
PIOTROWSKI S., Carus M., Carrez D., 2018, European Bioeconomy in Figures 2008-2015, Nova-Institute for Ecology and Innovation, Hurth, Germany, 2018. p. 18.
VIRGINIA H. DALE K.L., 2016, Klein and et al. Incorporating bioenergy into sustainable landscape designs, in: Renewable and sustainable energy review, 56, p. 1158-1171).
Article Details
Abstract views: 60
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
