Humanistic Perspectives of Biocultural Diversity
Article Sidebar
Open full text
Issue Vol. 14 No. 1 (2019)
-
An Updated Assessment of the OECD’s Quality of Life Index
Mehmet Nar, Mehmet Şükrü Nar7-18
-
Environmental Welfare: Quality of Policy vs. Society’s Values
Oleksandr Dluhopolskyi, Victor Koziuk, Yuryi Ivashuk, Yuryi Klapkiv19-28
-
Sustainable Development in Asian Countries – Indicator-based Approach
Bartosz Bartniczak, Andrzej Raszkowski29-42
-
Age Structures and Air Pollution: What Role Does Gender Play?
Jiliang Liu, Wei Wang, Yin E Chen, Chun-Ping Chang43-52
-
Social Dimensions of Sustainable Development in International Public Opinion
Paweł Rydzewski53-62
-
Mechanism of Strengthening Social and Labor Potential of Sustainable Development
Olga Novikova, Yaroslav Ostafiichuk, Olena Khandiі63-72
-
Education in Defence of Biodiversity. Will the Ecological and Ethical Footprint Counteract Environmental Changes?
Ignacy S. Fiut, Marcin Urbaniak73-78
-
Environmental Life-Cycle Analysis as a Tool for Sustainability Studies: A Complete Learning Experience
G Venkatesh79-85
-
Landscape and Health in Sustainable Development
Sebastian Bernat87-96
-
Sustainable Creative Economy in Cities: Comparative Analysis of Capital Cities in the EU
Barbara Bradač Hojnik97-107
-
Neuroscience in Linguistic Patterns of Communication Campaigns for Environmental Sustainability
Magdalena Saczyna109-118
-
Media Discourses of Mekong Dams: A Thematic Analysis
Claudio O. Delang119-130
-
The Idea of ‘Landscape Cultivation’ by Adam Wodziczko
Leszek Gawor131-137
-
Formation of Theoretical and Methodological Assumptions in the Assessment of Significance of the Bioeconomy in the Country Economy
Kęstutis Biekša, Tomas Baležentis139-148
-
Humanistic Perspectives of Biocultural Diversity
Ryszard F. Sadowski149-158
-
Decoupling Analysis of Energy Consumption and Economic Growth of V4 Countries
Jana Chovancová, Roman Vavrek159-165
-
Theoretical Foundations of Human Capital Education in Economic Growth and Development Management
Franciszek Piontek, Barbara Piontek167-173
-
Environmental Crimes of Early Romanian Communism: Focus on the Enemies of Agriculture
Alexandru-Ionuţ Petrişor, Elena Tîrzman175-184
-
Is the Economic Mechanism of Quantity-Quality Tradeoff Sustainable?
Dariusz Pieńkowski185-198
-
Education for All and Sustainable Development: An Empirical Study on Family Cognition and Household Resource Using in China
Shuxing Chen, Yuxiang Gao199-208
Archives
-
Vol. 16 No. 2
2021-07-01 26
-
Vol. 16 No. 1
2021-01-04 24
-
Vol. 15 No. 2
2020-07-01 24
-
Vol. 15 No. 1
2020-01-02 24
-
Vol. 14 No. 2
2019-07-01 20
-
Vol. 14 No. 1
2019-01-02 20
-
Vol. 13 No. 2
2023-10-15 22
-
Vol. 13 No. 1
2018-01-02 23
-
Vol. 12 No. 2
2017-07-03 18
-
Vol. 12 No. 1
2017-01-02 16
Main Article Content
Authors
Abstract
It is widely recognised that biocultural diversity is an important element of world heritage. Until recently, the focus was mainly on biodiversity, but since the 1980s, attention has also been drawn to the importance of cultural and linguistic diversity. Konrad Lorenz suggests that civilisational processes are threatening not only the diversity of Earth’s heritage, but also humanity itself. This study aims at showing the interrelationships between biocultural diversity and the biological and cultural layers of humans. This study draws on Luisa Maffi’s concept of biocultural diversity and Lorenz’s layered concept of humans. The research conducted confirms the existence of mutual dependencies between various forms of terrestrial heritage and human layers. It also suggests that strong biocultural diversity positively affects the human condition and, vice versa, the good condition of humans positively affects the quality of the Earth’s diversity. The research leads to the conclusion that research teams analysing civilisational processes cannot be limited only to representatives of natural, technical, economic or legal sciences, but should also include humanists. This will allow a better understanding of the complexity characterising civilisational processes and find more adequate solutions.
Keywords:
References
BACON F., 2009, The New Organon: or True Directions Concerning the Interpretation of Nature, Dodo Press, Gloucestershire 2009.
BROSIUS J.P.; HITCHNER S.L., 2010, Reconceptualising the link between cultural diversity and biodiversity: beyond the biocultural perspective, in: International Social Science Journal, 61(199), p. 141-168.
CAILLON S., DEGEORGES P., 2007, Biodiversity: negotiating the border between nature and culture, in: Biodiversity and Conservation, 16(10), p. 2919-2931.
CARDINALE B.J., et al., 2012, Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity, in: Nature, 486(7401), p. 59-67.
DESCARTES R., 2015, Meditations on First Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
DESCARTES R., 2008, Principles of Philosophy, Barnes & Noble, New York.
DÍAZ S., et al., 2006, Biodiversity Loss Threatens Human Well-Being, in: PLOS Biology, 4(8),
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0040277.
ELDER J.; FINCH R., 2002, Nature Writing: the Tradition in English, W W Norton & Company, New York.
FRANCIS (pope), 2015, Praise be to You - Laudato Si: On Care for our Common Home, Ignatius Press, San Francisco.
HARMON D., LOH J., 2010, The Index of Linguistic Diversity: A New Quantitative Measure of Trends in the Status of the World's Languages, in: Language Documentation & Conservation, 4, p. 97-151.
HORKHEIMER M., ADORNO Th.W., 2002, Dialectic of Enlightenment. Philosophical Fragments, Stanford University Press, Stanford.
KOLBERT E., 2014,The Sixth Extinction: An Unnatural History, Henry Holt and Company, New York.
LEWIS M.P., et al., 2016, Ethnologue: Languages of the World, SIL International, Dalla.
LORENZ K., 1978, Behind the Mirror. A Search for a Natural History of Human Knowledge, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York.
LORENZ K., 1974, Civilized Man’s Eight Deadly Sins, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York.
LORENZ K., 1989, The Waning of Humaneness, UNIWIN Paperbacks, London.
MAFFI L., 2007, Biocultural Diversity and Sustainability, in: The SAGE Handbook of Environment and Society; ed. Pretty J., et. al., SAGE, London, p. 267-277.
McKIBBEN B., 1989, The End of Nature, Random House, New York.
SADOWSKI R., 2016, Genetic Engineering in the Light of Dialectic of Enlightenment, in: Return to the Oikos. Ways to Recover our Common Home, ed. Kureethadam J.I., et. al., LAS, Rome, p. 194-212.
SADOWSKI R.F., 2017, Call for Integral Protection of Biocultural Diversity, in: ProblemyEkorozwoju/ Problems of Sustainable Development, 12(2), p. 37-45.
SCHUMACHER E.F., 2014, Small is Beautiful. Economics as if People Mattered, Harper Perennial, New York.
SKUTNABB-KANGAS T., 2002, Why Should Linguistic Diversity be Maintained and Supported in Europe? Some Arguments, Council of Europe, Strasbourg.
STEPHENS C., 2015, The indigenous experience of urbanization, in: State of the World’s Minorities and Indigenous Peoples 2015, ed. Grant P., Minority Rights Group, London, p. 54-61.
STERLING E.J., et al., 2017, Biocultural approaches to well-being and sustainability indicators across scales, in: Nature ecology & evolution, 1(1), p. 1798-1806.
UNFPA,2007, State of the World Population 2007. Unleashing the Potential of Urban Growth, UNFPA, New York.
UNITED NATIONS, 1986, Proclamation of the World Decade for Cultural Development, UN, New York.
WORLD BANK, 2015, Indigenous Latin America in the Twenty-First Century. The First Decade, World Bank Group, Washington.
Article Details
Abstract views: 85
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
