Humanistic Perspectives of Biocultural Diversity
Ryszard F. Sadowski
Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski University in Warsaw, Institute of Ecology and Bioethics, Wóycickiego 1/3, building 23, 01-938 Warsaw, Poland (Poland)
Abstract
It is widely recognised that biocultural diversity is an important element of world heritage. Until recently, the focus was mainly on biodiversity, but since the 1980s, attention has also been drawn to the importance of cultural and linguistic diversity. Konrad Lorenz suggests that civilisational processes are threatening not only the diversity of Earth’s heritage, but also humanity itself. This study aims at showing the interrelationships between biocultural diversity and the biological and cultural layers of humans. This study draws on Luisa Maffi’s concept of biocultural diversity and Lorenz’s layered concept of humans. The research conducted confirms the existence of mutual dependencies between various forms of terrestrial heritage and human layers. It also suggests that strong biocultural diversity positively affects the human condition and, vice versa, the good condition of humans positively affects the quality of the Earth’s diversity. The research leads to the conclusion that research teams analysing civilisational processes cannot be limited only to representatives of natural, technical, economic or legal sciences, but should also include humanists. This will allow a better understanding of the complexity characterising civilisational processes and find more adequate solutions.
Keywords:
biocultural diversity, biodiversity, cultural diversity, linguistic diversity, waning of humaneness, Konrad LorenzReferences
BACON F., 2009, The New Organon: or True Directions Concerning the Interpretation of Nature, Dodo Press, Gloucestershire 2009.
Google Scholar
BROSIUS J.P.; HITCHNER S.L., 2010, Reconceptualising the link between cultural diversity and biodiversity: beyond the biocultural perspective, in: International Social Science Journal, 61(199), p. 141-168.
Google Scholar
CAILLON S., DEGEORGES P., 2007, Biodiversity: negotiating the border between nature and culture, in: Biodiversity and Conservation, 16(10), p. 2919-2931.
Google Scholar
CARDINALE B.J., et al., 2012, Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity, in: Nature, 486(7401), p. 59-67.
Google Scholar
DESCARTES R., 2015, Meditations on First Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Google Scholar
DESCARTES R., 2008, Principles of Philosophy, Barnes & Noble, New York.
Google Scholar
DÍAZ S., et al., 2006, Biodiversity Loss Threatens Human Well-Being, in: PLOS Biology, 4(8),
Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0040277.
Google Scholar
ELDER J.; FINCH R., 2002, Nature Writing: the Tradition in English, W W Norton & Company, New York.
Google Scholar
FRANCIS (pope), 2015, Praise be to You - Laudato Si: On Care for our Common Home, Ignatius Press, San Francisco.
Google Scholar
HARMON D., LOH J., 2010, The Index of Linguistic Diversity: A New Quantitative Measure of Trends in the Status of the World's Languages, in: Language Documentation & Conservation, 4, p. 97-151.
Google Scholar
HORKHEIMER M., ADORNO Th.W., 2002, Dialectic of Enlightenment. Philosophical Fragments, Stanford University Press, Stanford.
Google Scholar
KOLBERT E., 2014,The Sixth Extinction: An Unnatural History, Henry Holt and Company, New York.
Google Scholar
LEWIS M.P., et al., 2016, Ethnologue: Languages of the World, SIL International, Dalla.
Google Scholar
LORENZ K., 1978, Behind the Mirror. A Search for a Natural History of Human Knowledge, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York.
Google Scholar
LORENZ K., 1974, Civilized Man’s Eight Deadly Sins, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York.
Google Scholar
LORENZ K., 1989, The Waning of Humaneness, UNIWIN Paperbacks, London.
Google Scholar
MAFFI L., 2007, Biocultural Diversity and Sustainability, in: The SAGE Handbook of Environment and Society; ed. Pretty J., et. al., SAGE, London, p. 267-277.
Google Scholar
McKIBBEN B., 1989, The End of Nature, Random House, New York.
Google Scholar
SADOWSKI R., 2016, Genetic Engineering in the Light of Dialectic of Enlightenment, in: Return to the Oikos. Ways to Recover our Common Home, ed. Kureethadam J.I., et. al., LAS, Rome, p. 194-212.
Google Scholar
SADOWSKI R.F., 2017, Call for Integral Protection of Biocultural Diversity, in: ProblemyEkorozwoju/ Problems of Sustainable Development, 12(2), p. 37-45.
Google Scholar
SCHUMACHER E.F., 2014, Small is Beautiful. Economics as if People Mattered, Harper Perennial, New York.
Google Scholar
SKUTNABB-KANGAS T., 2002, Why Should Linguistic Diversity be Maintained and Supported in Europe? Some Arguments, Council of Europe, Strasbourg.
Google Scholar
STEPHENS C., 2015, The indigenous experience of urbanization, in: State of the World’s Minorities and Indigenous Peoples 2015, ed. Grant P., Minority Rights Group, London, p. 54-61.
Google Scholar
STERLING E.J., et al., 2017, Biocultural approaches to well-being and sustainability indicators across scales, in: Nature ecology & evolution, 1(1), p. 1798-1806.
Google Scholar
UNFPA,2007, State of the World Population 2007. Unleashing the Potential of Urban Growth, UNFPA, New York.
Google Scholar
UNITED NATIONS, 1986, Proclamation of the World Decade for Cultural Development, UN, New York.
Google Scholar
WORLD BANK, 2015, Indigenous Latin America in the Twenty-First Century. The First Decade, World Bank Group, Washington.
Google Scholar
Authors
Ryszard F. SadowskiCardinal Stefan Wyszynski University in Warsaw, Institute of Ecology and Bioethics, Wóycickiego 1/3, building 23, 01-938 Warsaw, Poland Poland
Statistics
Abstract views: 25PDF downloads: 11
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
