Assessment of Sustainable Development Using Cluster Analysis and Principal Component Analysis

Magdaléna Drastichová


VŠB-Technical University of Ostrava, Faculty of Economics, Department of Regional and Environmental Economics, Sokolská 33, 701 21 Ostrava, Czech Republic (Czechia)

Peter Filzmoser


Vienna University of Technology, Institute of Statistics and Mathematical Methods in Economics, Wiedner Hauptstrasse 8-10, 1040 Vienna, Austria (Austria)


Abstract

The European Union (EU) Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) indicator set replaced the EU Sustainable Development Strategy (SDS) in 2017. The selected indicators of this set were chosen for the analysis to classify the sample of the 28 EU countries along with Norway according to their performance in sustainability. In the selection of indicators, priority was given to the indicators reflecting the social dimension of SD, along with important representatives of the economic, ecological and institutional dimensions of SD generally. Hierarchical Cluster Analysis (HCA) and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) were applied to the data of 12 indicators in the period 2012- 2016. By means of the HCA, four clusters were created in each year of the period 2012-2016 using the indicator values of particular years and then using all the indicator values in all the monitored years for the general assignment of countries to particular clusters. According to changes in the assignment to particular clusters over the years, the sustainability of development and the path of SD in the examined countries are assessed. As regards the core countries of each cluster, cluster 1 includes the most developed EU countries and is thus evaluated as the best performing cluster. Cluster 2 including the least developed EU countries is evaluated as the worst performing cluster. Cluster 3 predominantly includes the transitive economies and it is evaluated as the second best performing cluster according to the indicators applied. Cluster 4 containing the Southern countries is assessed as the second worst performing cluster. From the shifts of countries that occurred between the years, the shift of Ireland from cluster 3 to cluster 1 in 2013 must be emphasised as the move towards higher sustainability. The shift of Slovakia and Hungary from cluster 2 to cluster 3 in 2013 is also evaluated as progress towards higher sustainability.

JEL Classification: Q01, Q50, Q51, Q54, Q56


Keywords:

European Union (EU), Hierarchical Cluster Analysis (HCA), Principal Component Analysis (PCA), Sustainable Development (SD), Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

ADAMIŠIN P., VAVREK R., and PUKALA R., 2015, Cluster Analysis of Central and Southeast Europe via Selected Indicators of Sustainable Development, in: Environmental Economics, Education and Accreditation in Geosciences: Ecology, Economics, Education and Legislation.
  Google Scholar

(Conference Proceedings: 15th International Multidisciplinary Scientific Geoconference, Sofia (SGEM 2015), 3, p. 135-140.
  Google Scholar

ALDENDERFER M., BLASHFIELD R., 1984, Cluster analysis, Sage Publications, Beverly Hills.
  Google Scholar

ALLIEVI, F., LUUKKANEN, J., PANULAONTTO, J., VEHMAS, J., 2011, Grouping and Ranking the EU-27 Countries by their Sustainability Performance Measured by the Eurostat Sustainability Indicators, in: Proceedings of the Conference ‘Trends and Future of Sustainable Development. 9-10 June 2011, eds. Lakkala, H. and Vehmas, J., Tampere, Finland. Turku: Finland Futures Research Centre, pp. 9-20.
  Google Scholar

DREXHAGE J., MURPHY D., 2010, Sustainable Development: From Brundtland to Rio 2012, International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD), New York.
  Google Scholar

DRASTICHOVÁ M., 2018a, Sustainability of the EU Countries Measured by Selected Approaches, in: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on European Integration 2018.
  Google Scholar

DRASTICHOVÁ, M., 2018b. The Theory and Measurement of Sustainable Development, in: SAEI, 52, VSB-TU Ostrava, Ostrava.
  Google Scholar

DRASTICHOVÁ M., 2017, Measuring Sustainability of the EU Countries with the Selected Indices, in: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference INPROFORUM 2017: ‘Innovations, Enterprises, Regions and Management’, November 9, 2017, České Budějovice, p. 11-20, ISBN 978-80-7394-667-8.
  Google Scholar

DU PISANI J. A., 2006, Sustainable development – historical roots of the concept, in: Environmental Sciences 3(2), p. 83–96.
  Google Scholar

EUROPEAN UNION, 2012, Consolidated Version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. Official Journal of the European Union, C 326/132.
  Google Scholar

EUROPEAN COMMISSION, 2011, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Roadmap to a Resource Efficient Europe, COM(2011) 571 final, 20. 9. 2011, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri= CELEX:52011DC0571&from=EN (10.09.2018).
  Google Scholar

EUROPEAN COMMISSION, 2010, Communication from the Commission. Europe 2020. A Strategy for Smart, Sustainable and Inclusive Growth, COM(2010) 2020, 3. 3. 2010, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52010DC2020 (15.10.2018).
  Google Scholar

EUROSTAT, 2018a, Sustainable Development Indicators, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/sdi/indicators (10.09.2018).
  Google Scholar

EUROSTAT, 2018b, Europe 2020 Strategy, http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/europe-2020-indicators/europe-2020-strategy (11.09.2018).
  Google Scholar

EVERITT B. S., 1993. Cluster Analysis. 3rd ed., Arnold, London.
  Google Scholar

HALASKOVÁ M., 2015, Comparison of Expenditure on Research and Development in EU Countries by Means of Cluster Analysis, in: 17th International Scientific Conference Finance and Risk 2015 proceedings, vol. 1, November 23 – 24, 2015, Bratislava, p. 100-110.
  Google Scholar

HUTTMANOVÁ E., 2016. Sustainable Development and Sustainability Management in the European Union Countries, in: European Journal of Sustainable Development, 5(4), p. 475-482.
  Google Scholar

JENCOVA S., LITAVCOVA E., KOTULIC R., VAVREK R., KRAVCAKOVA VOZAROVA I., LITAVEC T., 2015, Phenomenon of Poverty and Economic Inequality in the Slovak Republic, in: Procedia Economics and Finance, 26, p. 737-741.
  Google Scholar

JOHNSON R. A., WICHERN D. W., 2007, Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis. 6th ed., Pearson Education, United States.
  Google Scholar

MELOUN M., MILITKÝ J., 2002, Kompendium statistického zpracování dat, Academia, Praha.
  Google Scholar

MOOI E., SARSTEDT M., 2011, Cluster Analysis, in: A Concise Guide to Market Research, eds. Mooi E. and Sarstedt M., Springer, Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, p. 237-284.
  Google Scholar

KATES R.W., PARRIS T. M., LEISEROWITZ A. A., 2005, What is sustainable development? Goals, indicators, values, and practice, in: Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 47(3), p. 8-21.
  Google Scholar

ŘEZANKOVÁ H., HÚSEK D., SNÁŠEL V., 2007, Shluková analýza dat, Professional Publishing, Praha.
  Google Scholar

SINGH R. K., MURTY H. R., GUPTA S. K., DIKSHIT, A. K., 2009, An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies, in: Ecological Indicators, 9(2), p. 189-212.
  Google Scholar

UNITED NATIONS, EUROPEAN COMMISSION, INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND, OECD, WORLD BANK, 2003, Handbook of national
  Google Scholar

accounting. Integrated environmental and economic accounting 2003, in: Studies in Methods, Series F, No. 61, Rev.1 (ST/ESA/STAT/SER.F/61/Rev.1).
  Google Scholar

OECD, 2002, Sustainable Development. Indi-cators to measure Decoupling of Environmental Pressure from Economic Growth, SG/SD (2002) 1/FINAL, OECD, Paris.
  Google Scholar

OECD, 2003, OECD Environmental Indicators. Development, Measurement and Use, Reference Paper, OECD, Paris.
  Google Scholar

WCED (World Comission on Environment and Development), 1987, Our common future, Oxford University Press, New York.
  Google Scholar

Download


Published
2019-07-01

Cited by

Drastichová, M., & Filzmoser, P. (2019). Assessment of Sustainable Development Using Cluster Analysis and Principal Component Analysis. Problemy Ekorozwoju, 14(2), 7–24. Retrieved from https://ph.pollub.pl/index.php/preko/article/view/5075

Authors

Magdaléna Drastichová 

VŠB-Technical University of Ostrava, Faculty of Economics, Department of Regional and Environmental Economics, Sokolská 33, 701 21 Ostrava, Czech Republic Czechia

Authors

Peter Filzmoser 

Vienna University of Technology, Institute of Statistics and Mathematical Methods in Economics, Wiedner Hauptstrasse 8-10, 1040 Vienna, Austria Austria

Statistics

Abstract views: 89
PDF downloads: 68