Sustainability Challenges in Energy Use Behaviour in Households: Comparative Review of Selected Survey-based Publications from Developed and Developing Countries
Article Sidebar
Open full text
Issue Vol. 14 No. 2 (2019)
-
Assessment of Sustainable Development Using Cluster Analysis and Principal Component Analysis
Magdaléna Drastichová, Peter Filzmoser7-24
-
For Further Social Development, Peaceful, Safe and Useful for People
Wiesław Sztumski25-32
-
Sustainability Challenges in Energy Use Behaviour in Households: Comparative Review of Selected Survey-based Publications from Developed and Developing Countries
Tore Johansson, Pedram Pirouzfar33-44
-
Disadvantages Connected With the Development of Tourism in the Contemporary World and the Concept of Sustainable Tourism
Katarzyna Podhorodecka, Anna Dudek45-55
-
Social Justice and Sustainable Development
Mayavee Singh57-62
-
Looking at the Impacts of Income Inequality on Environmental Governance in China
Yao Bo Shi, Xin Xin Zhao, Chyi-Lu Jang, Qiang Fu, Chun-Ping Chang63-70
-
Bioeconomy – Opportunities and Dilemmas in the Context of Human Rights Protection and Environmental Resource Management
Piotr Krajewski71-79
-
Current Challenges of Sustainable Rural Development in Russia: Trends and Prospects
Aleksey Anisimov, Olga Popova, Valentina Ustyukova81-90
-
The Concept of Human Needs in Sustainable Development of Cities
Jolanta Rodzoś91-99
-
An Empirical Comparison of Environmental Behaviors in China’s Public and Private Sectors
Yu Yang, Shizhi Huang, Xingting Huang101-110
-
Sustainable Development – Utopia or Implementation Possibilities?
Paweł Bukrejewski, Anna Latawiec, Anna Matuszewska111-116
-
Implementing Sustainability in Global Supply Chain
Krishnendu Shaw117-127
-
Sustainable Development versus Gender Gap – Do Women Matter?
Ada Domańska, Beata Żukowska, Robert Zajkowski129-142
-
Deep Neural Networks for Curbing Climate Change-Induced Farmers-Herdsmen Clashes in a Sustainable Social Inclusion Initiative
Emmanuel Okewu, Sanjay Misra, Luis Fernandez Sanz, Foluso Ayeni, Victor Mbarika, Robertas Damaševičius143-155
-
Pro-environmental Behaviours in Hotels in the COntext of Sustainable Development of Tourism – Barriers to Shaping and Recommendations for Further Research
Marek Bugdol, Daniel Puciato, Tadeusz Borys157-170
-
Health Evaluation of R&D and Transformation Functional Platform
Yuhong Cao, Jianxin You, Yongjiang Shi, Wei Hu171-182
-
Violence on the Natural Environment
Joanna Kostecka, Kevin R. Butt183-189
-
Comparative Assessment and Obstacles in the Advancement of Renewable Energy in India and China
Pankaj Kumar, Himanshu Sharma, Nitai Pal, Pradip Kumar Sadhu183-189
-
Golden Age Population, Healthy Environment, Growth and Poverty: Are Malaysia Really in a Sustainable Condition?
Nanthakumar Loganathan, Lekha Kunju Pillai Laxman, Abbas Mardani, Dalia Streimikiene, Asan Ali Golam Hassan201-212
-
Pope Francis’s Proposition of Integral Ecology
Krzysztof Bochenek213-220
Archives
-
Vol. 16 No. 2
2021-07-01 26
-
Vol. 16 No. 1
2021-01-04 24
-
Vol. 15 No. 2
2020-07-01 24
-
Vol. 15 No. 1
2020-01-02 24
-
Vol. 14 No. 2
2019-07-01 20
-
Vol. 14 No. 1
2019-01-02 20
-
Vol. 13 No. 2
2023-10-15 22
-
Vol. 13 No. 1
2018-01-02 23
-
Vol. 12 No. 2
2017-07-03 18
-
Vol. 12 No. 1
2017-01-02 16
Main Article Content
Authors
Abstract
This review paper studies the differences in the energy use behaviour in households in developing and developed countries, by focus on a geographically diverse selection of publications. The study has been divided into sections in which energy use, socio-economic factors, policies and the methods used in the surveys have been investigated. The main motivation of the study was to understand user behavioural patterns influencing energy consumption (or reduction in use), and the effect of varying socio-demographic factors on the same. The methodologies adopted in the papers reviewed have been compared. Surveys were prioritized in the examined papers to see if there was an pattern in household energy use and which behaviours affected this. For the developing countries door knocking were the most used strategy to get hold of information. For the developed countries surveys online were the most effective strategy. In Japan and Norway clear differences could be seen due to the culture of the countries, which affected the households energy use. For the developing countries energy here is not predominantly electricity. Biofuels and kerosene were the most common fuels used for the daily life of the residents in the developing countries. A transition from these fuels to more modern energy is happening right now in the 21st century. The government have a big impact on the households energy use and the governments for the different countries prioritize differently as seen in Kuwait where they subsidy 90 % of the final electricity for the households thus increases the energy use significantly which have a negative sustainable development effect. While on the other hand the government in Zambia decided to shut down the whole electricity grid for eight hours per day during a two year period of time to save energy.
Effective strategies for reducing energy use, according to most of the publications, are tailor-made information and feedback to users, and clear outlining of goals by the decision-makers, for both the developed countries and the developing countries. Future research should focus on effective formulation of the feedback provided to users.
Keywords:
References
ABRAHAMSE W., STEG L., VIEK C. & ROTHENGATTER T., 2005, A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation, in: Journal of environmental psychology, 3, p. 273.
ABRAHAMSE W., STEG L., VIEK C. & ROTHENGATTER T., 2007, The effect of tailored information, goal setting, and tailored feedback on household energy use, energy-related behaviors, and behavioral antecedents, in: Journal of environmental psychology, 4, p. 265.
AITKEN R., 2017, Household energy use: a comparison of household energy consumption and expenditure across three provinces, in: Journal of Energy in Southern Africa, 18(1), p. 20-28.
AL MAMUN M., HOQUE M. A., HOSSAIN M. T. & YASMEEN F., 2016, Managing the future megacity: an appraisal of knowledge about energy challenges and energy-saving attitudes among households in Dhaka, in: International Journal of Sustainable Energy, 35(7), p. 701-721.
ALKON M., HARISH S. P. & URPELAINEN J., 2016, Household energy access and expenditure in developing countries: Evidence from India, 1987–2010, in: Energy for Sustainable Development, 35 p. 25-34.
BLOCKER T.J. & ECKBERG D.L., 1997, Gender and Environmentalism: Results from the 1993 General Social Survey, in: Social Science Quarterly, 4, p. 841.
CAMARA N., XU D. & BINYET E., 2018, Enhancing household energy consumption: How should it be done?, in: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 81, p. 669-681.
DE LAURETIS S., GHERSI F. & CAYLA J.M., 2017, Energy consumption and activity patterns: An analysis extended to total time and energy use for French households, in: Applied Energy, 206, p. 634-648.
DEMETRIOU D., POLATIDIS H. & HARALAMBOPOULOS D., 2014, Integrated Energy Planning for the Residential Sector: The Case Study of Cyprus, in: Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy, 9(2), p. 183-195.
FENG Z.-H., ZOU L.-L. & WEI Y.-M., 2011, The impact of household consumption on energy use and CO2 emissions in China, in: Energy, 36(1), p. 656-670.
FREDERIKS E. R., STENNER K. & HOBMAN E. V., 2015, Household energy use: Applying behavioural economics to understand consumer decision-making and behaviour, in: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 41, p. 1385-1394.
HUNTER L.M., HATCH A. & JOHNSON A., 2004, Cross-National Gender Variation in Environmental Behaviors, in: Social Science Quarterly, 3, p. 677.
JAFFAR B., ORESZCZYN T., RASLAN R. & SUMMERFIELD A., 2018, Understanding energy demand in Kuwaiti villas: Findings from a quantitative household survey, in: Energy & Buildings, 165, p. 379-389.
JIA J.-J., XU J.-H. & FAN Y., 2018, Public acceptance of household energy-saving measures in Beijing: Heterogeneous preferences and policy implications, in: Energy Policy, 113, p. 487-499.
KAYGUSUZ K., 2011, Energy services and energy poverty for sustainable rural development, in: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15, p. 936-947.
KAYGUSUZ K., 2012, Energy for sustainable development: A case of developing countries, in: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16, p. 1116-1126.
KLÖCKNER C. A., 2013, A comprehensive model of the psychology of environmental behaviour - A meta-analysis, in: Global Environmental Change, 23 p. 1028-1038.
LENZEN M., WIER M., COHEN C., HAYAMI H., PACHAURI, S. & SCHAEFFER, R., 2006, A comparative multivariate analysis of household energy requirements in Australia, Brazil, Denmark, India and Japan, in: Energy (Oxford), 2-3, p. 181.
LÜNING S. & VAHRENHOLT F., 2017, Paleoclimatological Context and Reference Level of the 2°C and 1.5°C Paris Agreement Long-Term Temperature Limits, in: Frontiers in Earth Science, 5.
LONG C., MILLS B. F., & SCHLEICH J., 2018, Characteristics or culture? Determinants of household energy use behavior in Germany and the USA, in: Energy Efficiency, 11(3), p. 777-798.
LÓPEZ-RODRÍGUEZ M. A., SANTIAGO I., TRILLO-MONTERO D., TORRITI J. & MORENO-MUNOZ A., 2013, Analysis and modeling of active occupancy of the residential sector in Spain: An indicator of residential electricity consumption, in: Energy Policy, 62, p. 742-751.
MARTINSSON J., LUNDQVIST L. J. & SUNDSTRÖM A., 2011, Energy saving in Swedish households. The (relative) importance of environmental attitudes, in: Energy Policy, 39, p. 5182-5191.
MORREN M. & GRINSTEIN A., 2016, Explaining environmental behavior across borders: A meta-analysis. in: Journal of Environmental Psychology, 47, p. 91-106.
NAUGES C. & WHEELER S. A., 2017, Analysis: The Complex Relationship Between Households’ Climate Change Concerns and Their Water and Energy Mitigation Behaviour, in: Ecological Economics, 141, p. 87-94.
NEJAT P., JOMEHZADEH F., TAHERI M. M., GOHARI M. & ABD MAJID, M. Z., 2015, A global review of energy consumption, CO2 emissions and policy in the residential sector (with an overview of the top ten CO2 emitting countries), in: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 43, p. 843-862.
NGOMA R., TAMBATAMBA A., OYOO B., MULONGOTI D., KUMWENDA B. & LOUIE H., 2018, How households adapted their energy use during the Zambian energy crisis, in: Energy for Sustainable Development, 44, p. 125-138.
OZAWA, A., KUDOH, Y. & YOSHIDA Y., 2018, A new method for household energy use modeling: A questionnaire-based approach, in: Energy and Buildings, 162, p. 32-41.
POTHITOU M., HANNA R. F. & CHALVATZIS K. J., 2016, Environmental knowledge, pro-environmental behaviour and energy savings in households: An empirical study, in: Applied Energy, 184, p. 1217-1229.
RAHUT D. B., BEHERA, B. & ALI A., 2016, Household energy choice and consumption intensity: Empirical evidence from Bhutan, in: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 53, p. 993-1009.
SUKARNO I., MATSUMOTO H. & SUSANTI L., 2017, Household lifestyle effect on residential electrical energy consumption in Indonesia: On-site measurement methods. Urban Climate, 20, p. 20-32.
UDALE H.I. & MAJID NOOR H.A., 2014, Human behaviour in household energy use and the implications of energy efficiency delivery: A case of Bauchi, Nigeria, in: International Journal of Energy Sector Management, 2, p. 230.
VICENTE-MOLINA M. A., FERNÁNDEZ-SAINZ A. & IZAGIRRE-OLAIZOLA J., 2018, Does gender make a difference in pro-environmental behavior? The case of the Basque Country University students, in: Journal of Cleaner Production, 176, p. 89-98.
WILHITE H., NAKAGAMI H., MASUDA T., YAMAGA Y. & HANEDA H., 1996, A cross-cultural analysis of household energy use behaviour in Japan and Norway, in: Energy policy, 9, p. 795.
ZHAO D., MCCOY A. P., DU J., AGEE P. & LU Y., 2017, Interaction effects of building technology and resident behavior on energy consumption in residential buildings, in: Energy & Buildings, 134, p. 223-233.
ZHOU K. & YANG S., 2016, Understanding household energy consumption behavior: The contribution of energy big data analytics, in: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 56, p. 810-819.
Article Details
Abstract views: 75
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
