Surveys as Means of Understanding User-behaviour with Respect to Energy Usage in Households, Prior to Decision-making to Promote Sustainability
Article Sidebar
Open full text
Issue Vol. 15 No. 1 (2020)
-
China’s Environmental Protection in the New Era from the Perspective of Eco-civilization Construction
Qingzhi Huan7-14
-
The Function and Perception of Urban Ecosystem Services in the Society
Fredrik Edlund15-23
-
Immigration and Social Aspects of Sustainable Development. The Case of Germany
Paweł Rydzewski25-31
-
Achieving Sustainable Competitive Advantage Through Intellectual Capital and Corporate Character: The Mediating Role of Innovation
Huan Xiao, Dengke Yu33-45
-
Ethics of Sustainable Development from the View of A. Badiou’s Critique of Contemporary Ethics
Andrzej Papuziński47-52
-
Ecological Performance: Ethnic Fragmentation versus Governance Quality and Sustainable Development
Viktor Koziuk, Yuryi Hayda, Oleksandr Dluhopolskyi, Serhii Kozlovskyi53-64
-
The Theoretical Foundations of Management in Terms of the Implementation of the Process of Globalization and Sustainable Development in the Real Sphere
Franciszek Piontek65-69
-
Does Appearance of the Migrants Change Citizens Perception of the Public Space? Case Study of Disturbed Sustainability, Belgrade, Serbia
Nataša Danilović Hristić, Nebojša Stefanović71-80
-
Consumption and Sustainable Development: Ethical Aspects
Maria Miczyńska-Kowalska81-88
-
The Role of Language in Sustainable Development: Multilingualism and Language Literacy in India
Neha Toppo, Mojibur Rahman89-93
-
Value Theory in the Economics of Sustainable Development
Małgorzata Pink95-102
-
Women’s Attitude Towards Environment Sustainability Through Natural Preservation
Jyoti Kumari, Ajit Kumar Behura, Sarita Kar103-107
-
The Impact of Selected Biotechnology Processes for Sustainable Development of the Environment and Human Life
Aleksandra Badora, Magdalena Celińska109-117
-
Surveys as Means of Understanding User-behaviour with Respect to Energy Usage in Households, Prior to Decision-making to Promote Sustainability
G Venkatesh, Are Kjeang119-134
-
Sustainable Habitat as the Main Factor of Urbanization Development: 19th-20th Centuries
Azizov Aghasalim135-148
-
A Comprehensive Approach: Inclusive, Smart and Green Urban Development
Justyna Przywojska, Aldona Podgórniak-Krzykacz149-160
-
Corporate Sustainability Practices in Polluting Industries: Evidence from India, China and USA
Prem Sagar Mishra, Ajay Kumar, Niladri Das161-168
-
The Possibility of Using Winter Oilseed Rape (Brassica napus L. var. Napus) for Energy Purposes
Jakub Siemek, Jan Macuda, Łukasz Łukańko, Jakub Nowak, Tadeusz Zając167-177
-
Reconsidering Land System Changes in Borderlands: Insights from the China-ASEAN Borderland
Xiaobo Hua, Yasuyuki Kono179-187
-
NER300: Success or Failure of Public Support for Low-emission Technologies?
Grażyna Borys189-196
-
The Identification of the Luhansk Region and the Region Act’s According to the Qualification of Their Sustainable Development in the Conditions of the Joint Forces Operation
Inna Zablodska, Svitlana Hrechana, Daria Zablodska197-210
-
Sustainable Development Goals in Arab Region – United Arab Emirates’ Case Study
Adam Krzymowski211-220
-
Theatre for Sustainable Development: Jana Sanskriti’s Participatory Ideologue and Practice
Shubhra Ghoshal, Nirban Manna221-227
-
Risk and Uncertainty in Sustainable Development: Undertaking Politics of the Climate Change in the United States
Olena Ovchynnikova229-235
Archives
-
Vol. 17 No. 2
2022-07-04 26
-
Vol. 17 No. 1
2022-01-03 28
-
Vol. 16 No. 2
2021-07-01 26
-
Vol. 16 No. 1
2021-01-04 24
-
Vol. 15 No. 2
2020-07-01 24
-
Vol. 15 No. 1
2020-01-02 24
-
Vol. 14 No. 2
2019-07-01 20
-
Vol. 14 No. 1
2019-01-02 20
-
Vol. 13 No. 2
2023-10-15 22
-
Vol. 13 No. 1
2018-01-02 23
Main Article Content
DOI
Authors
Abstract
Households account for varying shares of total energy usage in countries, depending on the degree of industrialization. In order to design effective policy instruments and set appropriate levels for subsidies, knowing the attitudes and perceptions of users with respect to energy usage and energy saving is always the first step. In this article, the authors have first presented a comparative analysis and critique of selected recently-published surveys (2018) related to energy use in households, from around the world, before applying the sustainability-thinking paradigm to their own regional survey of close to 300 single-family households (detached houses and row houses) carried out in Karlstad (south-central Sweden), to obtain insights into user attitudes and preferences – categorised into the three dimensions of sustainability – when it comes to energy usage or decision-making with regard to retrofits or new energy-using / energy-saving installations in households. Each of the dimensions is characterised by three criteria which respondents have rated on a Likert’s scale of 0 to 4 (not important to very important). The findings from this survey will open up a new way of thinking about the heterogeniety of energy users (which needs to be respected), for decision-makers and energy-advisers, who could subsquently strengthen their interaction and communication with them.
Keywords:
References
AL QADI S., SODAGAR B. ELNOKALY A., 2018, Estimating the heating energy consumption of the residential buildings in Hebron, in: Palestine Journal of Cleaner Production, 196, p. 1292-1305. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.059
ALLCOTT H., 2011, Social norms and energy conservation, in: Journal of Public Economics, 95(9), p. 1082-1095. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2011.03.003
AMOAH A., HUGHES G. POMEYIE P., 2018, Environmental consciousness and choice of bulb for lighting in a developing country, in: Energy, Sustainability and Society, 8, p. 17, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-018-0159-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-018-0159-y
AUNE M., 2007, Energy comes home, in: Energy Policy, 35(11), p. 5457-5465. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2007.05.007
BARTHELMES V.M., LI R., ANDERSEN R., BAHNFLETH W., CORNGNATI S.P., RODEA C., 2018, Profiling occupant behaviour in Danish dwellings using time use survey data, in: Energy and Buildings, 177, p. 329-340. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.07.044
BENKA-COKER M.L., TADELE W., MILANO A., GETENEH D., STOKES H., 2018, A case study of the ethanol CleanCook stove intervention and potential scale-up in Ethiopia, in: Energy for Sustainable Development, 46: p. 53-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2018.06.009
BURCHELL K., RETTIE R., ROBERTS T.C., 2016, Householder engagement with energy consumption feedback: the role of community action and communications, in: Energy Policy, 88, p. 178-186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.10.019
DARBY S., 1999, Energy advice – what is it worth, in: Proceedings, European Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy Summer Study, paper III, 5 , p. 3-05.
ELLEGÄRD K., PALM J., 2011, Visualizing energy consumption activities as a tool for making everyday life more sustainable, in: Applied Energy, 88(5), p. 1920-1926. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.11.019
GANROT I., and EMANUELSSON C., 2017, Personal communication over the e-mail in 2017, Karlstad University.
GOULD C.F., URPELAINEN J., 2018, LPG as a clean cooking fuel: Adoption, use, and impact in rural India, in: Energy Policy, 122, p. 395-408. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.07.042
JIA J-J., XU J-H., FAN Y., JI Q., 2018, Willingness to accept energy-saving measures and adoption barriers in the residential sector: An empirical analysis in Beijing, Chin, in: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 95, p. 56-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.07.015
KARYTSAS S., 2018, An empirical analysis on awareness and intention adoption of residential ground source heat pump systems in Greece, in: Energy Policy, 123, p. 167-179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.08.001
KIM M.-J., 2018, Characteristics and determinants by electricity consumption level of households in Korea, in: Energy Reports, 4, p. 70-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2017.12.001
KJEANG A., G VENKATESH, STÄHL M., PALM J., 2017, Energy consulting services in the information age – literature review, in: Energy, Sustainability and Society, 7(30), https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-017-0132-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-017-0132-1
KLEPACKA A.M., FLORKOWSKI W.J., MENGA T., 2018, Clean, accessible, and cost-saving: Reasons for rural household investment in solar panels in Poland, in: Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 139, p. 338-350. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.09.004
KLÖCKNER C. A., 2015, The Psychology of ProEnvironmental Communication. Beyond Standard Information Strategies, Palgrave MacMillan.
MATOS C., BENTES I., PEREIRA S., GONĆALVES A.M., FARIA D., BRIGA-SÁ A., 2018, What are the factors that may explain the differences in water and energy consumption in urban and rural environments?, in: Science of the Total Environment, 642, p. 421-435. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.062
MATOSOVIC M., TOMSIC Z., 2018, Modelling energy efficiency investment choice – a case study on Croatia’s residential sector, in: Energy Sources, Part B: Economic, Planning and Policy, 13(7), p. 311-319. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15567249.2018.1488899
NAKANO R., ZUSMAN E., NUGROHO S., KASWANTO R.L., ARIFIN N., MUNANDAR A., ARIFIN H.S., MUCHTAR M., GOMI K., FUJITA T., 2018, Determinants of energy savings in Indonesia: The case of LED lighting in Bogo, in: Sustainable Cities and Society, 42, p. 184-193. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.06.025
NAKANO S., WASHIZU A., 2018, Acceptance of energy efficient homes in large Japanese cities: Understanding the inner process of home choice and residence satisfaction, in: Journal of Environmental Management, 225, p. 84-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.07.082
OECD Better Life Index, 2018, Sweden, http://www.oecdbetterlifeindex.org/countries/sweden/(25.09.2018).
PALM J., 2018, Household installation of solar panels – Motives and barriers in a 10-year perspective, in: Energy Policy, 113, p. 1-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.10.047
SCHULTZ P. et al., 2007, The Constructive, Destructive, and Reconstructive Power of Social Norms, in: Psychological Science, 18(5). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01917.x
SHAHMOHAMMADI S., STEINMANN Z., CLAVREUL J., HENDRICK H., KING H., HUJIBREGTS M., 2018, Quantifying drivers of variability in life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of consumer products – a case study on laundry washing in Europe, in: International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 23, p. 1940-1949. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-017-1426-4
STEG L., 2008, Promoting household energy conservation, Energy Policy, 36, p. 4449-4453. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.09.027
STERN P.C., 1992, What psychology knows about energy conservation, in: American Psychologist, 47 (10), p. 1224. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.47.10.1224
THØGERSEN J., 2018, Frugal or green – Basic drivers of energy saving in European households, in: Journal of Cleaner Production, 197, p. 1521-1530. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.282
TJØRRING L., GAUSSET Q., 2015, 6 Energy renovation models in private households in Denmark, in: Community Governance and Citizen-Driven Initiatives in Climate Change Mitigation, 89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315700298-6
UN, 2018, Statistics – Population by sex and urban/rural residence, Demographic Statistics Database, United Nations Statistics Division.
WEMYSS D., CELLINAC F., LOBSIGER-KÄGIB E., de LUCAD V., CASTRIC R., 2018, Does it last? Long-term impacts of an app-based behaviour change intervention on household electricity savings in Switzerland, in: Energy Research and Social Science, 47, p. 16-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.08.018
Article Details
Abstract views: 104
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
