Surveys as Means of Understanding User-behaviour with Respect to Energy Usage in Households, Prior to Decision-making to Promote Sustainability

G Venkatesh

venkatesh.govindarajan@kau.se
Department of Engineering and Chemical Sciences of Karlstad University, Karlstad (Sweden)

Are Kjeang


Department of Engineering and Chemical Sciences of Karlstad University, Karlstad (Sweden)

Abstract

Households account for varying shares of total energy usage in countries, depending on the degree of industrialization. In order to design effective policy instruments and set appropriate levels for subsidies, knowing the attitudes and perceptions of users with respect to energy usage and energy saving is always the first step. In this article, the authors have first presented a comparative analysis and critique of selected recently-published surveys (2018) related to energy use in households, from around the world, before applying the  sustainability-thinking paradigm to their own regional survey of close to 300 single-family households (detached houses and row houses) carried out in Karlstad (south-central Sweden), to obtain insights into user attitudes and preferences – categorised into the three dimensions of sustainability – when it comes  to energy usage or decision-making with regard to retrofits or new energy-using / energy-saving installations in households. Each of the dimensions is characterised by three criteria which respondents have rated on a Likert’s scale of 0 to 4 (not important to very important). The findings from this survey will open up a new way of thinking about the heterogeniety of energy users (which needs to be respected), for decision-makers and energy-advisers, who could subsquently strengthen their interaction and communication with them. 


Keywords:

energy saving, energy use, households, surveys, Sweden, sustainability

AL QADI S., SODAGAR B. ELNOKALY A., 2018, Estimating the heating energy consumption of the residential buildings in Hebron, in: Palestine Journal of Cleaner Production, 196, p. 1292-1305.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.059   Google Scholar

ALLCOTT H., 2011, Social norms and energy conservation, in: Journal of Public Economics, 95(9), p. 1082-1095.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2011.03.003   Google Scholar

AMOAH A., HUGHES G. POMEYIE P., 2018, Environmental consciousness and choice of bulb for lighting in a developing country, in: Energy, Sustainability and Society, 8, p. 17, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-018-0159-y.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-018-0159-y   Google Scholar

AUNE M., 2007, Energy comes home, in: Energy Policy, 35(11), p. 5457-5465.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2007.05.007   Google Scholar

BARTHELMES V.M., LI R., ANDERSEN R., BAHNFLETH W., CORNGNATI S.P., RODEA C., 2018, Profiling occupant behaviour in Danish dwellings using time use survey data, in: Energy and Buildings, 177, p. 329-340.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.07.044   Google Scholar

BENKA-COKER M.L., TADELE W., MILANO A., GETENEH D., STOKES H., 2018, A case study of the ethanol CleanCook stove intervention and potential scale-up in Ethiopia, in: Energy for Sustainable Development, 46: p. 53-64.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2018.06.009   Google Scholar

BURCHELL K., RETTIE R., ROBERTS T.C., 2016, Householder engagement with energy consumption feedback: the role of community action and communications, in: Energy Policy, 88, p. 178-186.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.10.019   Google Scholar

DARBY S., 1999, Energy advice – what is it worth, in: Proceedings, European Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy Summer Study, paper III, 5 , p. 3-05.
  Google Scholar

ELLEGÄRD K., PALM J., 2011, Visualizing energy consumption activities as a tool for making everyday life more sustainable, in: Applied Energy, 88(5), p. 1920-1926.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.11.019   Google Scholar

GANROT I., and EMANUELSSON C., 2017, Personal communication over the e-mail in 2017, Karlstad University.
  Google Scholar

GOULD C.F., URPELAINEN J., 2018, LPG as a clean cooking fuel: Adoption, use, and impact in rural India, in: Energy Policy, 122, p. 395-408.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.07.042   Google Scholar

JIA J-J., XU J-H., FAN Y., JI Q., 2018, Willingness to accept energy-saving measures and adoption barriers in the residential sector: An empirical analysis in Beijing, Chin, in: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 95, p. 56-73.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.07.015   Google Scholar

KARYTSAS S., 2018, An empirical analysis on awareness and intention adoption of residential ground source heat pump systems in Greece, in: Energy Policy, 123, p. 167-179.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.08.001   Google Scholar

KIM M.-J., 2018, Characteristics and determinants by electricity consumption level of households in Korea, in: Energy Reports, 4, p. 70-76.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2017.12.001   Google Scholar

KJEANG A., G VENKATESH, STÄHL M., PALM J., 2017, Energy consulting services in the information age – literature review, in: Energy, Sustainability and Society, 7(30), https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-017-0132-1.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-017-0132-1   Google Scholar

KLEPACKA A.M., FLORKOWSKI W.J., MENGA T., 2018, Clean, accessible, and cost-saving: Reasons for rural household investment in solar panels in Poland, in: Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 139, p. 338-350.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.09.004   Google Scholar

KLÖCKNER C. A., 2015, The Psychology of ProEnvironmental Communication. Beyond Standard Information Strategies, Palgrave MacMillan.
  Google Scholar

MATOS C., BENTES I., PEREIRA S., GONĆALVES A.M., FARIA D., BRIGA-SÁ A., 2018, What are the factors that may explain the differences in water and energy consumption in urban and rural environments?, in: Science of the Total Environment, 642, p. 421-435.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.062   Google Scholar

MATOSOVIC M., TOMSIC Z., 2018, Modelling energy efficiency investment choice – a case study on Croatia’s residential sector, in: Energy Sources, Part B: Economic, Planning and Policy, 13(7), p. 311-319.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15567249.2018.1488899   Google Scholar

NAKANO R., ZUSMAN E., NUGROHO S., KASWANTO R.L., ARIFIN N., MUNANDAR A., ARIFIN H.S., MUCHTAR M., GOMI K., FUJITA T., 2018, Determinants of energy savings in Indonesia: The case of LED lighting in Bogo, in: Sustainable Cities and Society, 42, p. 184-193.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.06.025   Google Scholar

NAKANO S., WASHIZU A., 2018, Acceptance of energy efficient homes in large Japanese cities: Understanding the inner process of home choice and residence satisfaction, in: Journal of Environmental Management, 225, p. 84-92.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.07.082   Google Scholar

OECD Better Life Index, 2018, Sweden, http://www.oecdbetterlifeindex.org/countries/sweden/(25.09.2018).
  Google Scholar

PALM J., 2018, Household installation of solar panels – Motives and barriers in a 10-year perspective, in: Energy Policy, 113, p. 1-8.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.10.047   Google Scholar

SCHULTZ P. et al., 2007, The Constructive, Destructive, and Reconstructive Power of Social Norms, in: Psychological Science, 18(5).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01917.x   Google Scholar

SHAHMOHAMMADI S., STEINMANN Z., CLAVREUL J., HENDRICK H., KING H., HUJIBREGTS M., 2018, Quantifying drivers of variability in life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of consumer products – a case study on laundry washing in Europe, in: International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 23, p. 1940-1949.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-017-1426-4   Google Scholar

STEG L., 2008, Promoting household energy conservation, Energy Policy, 36, p. 4449-4453.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.09.027   Google Scholar

STERN P.C., 1992, What psychology knows about energy conservation, in: American Psychologist, 47 (10), p. 1224.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.47.10.1224   Google Scholar

THØGERSEN J., 2018, Frugal or green – Basic drivers of energy saving in European households, in: Journal of Cleaner Production, 197, p. 1521-1530.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.282   Google Scholar

TJØRRING L., GAUSSET Q., 2015, 6 Energy renovation models in private households in Denmark, in: Community Governance and Citizen-Driven Initiatives in Climate Change Mitigation, 89.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315700298-6   Google Scholar

UN, 2018, Statistics – Population by sex and urban/rural residence, Demographic Statistics Database, United Nations Statistics Division.
  Google Scholar

WEMYSS D., CELLINAC F., LOBSIGER-KÄGIB E., de LUCAD V., CASTRIC R., 2018, Does it last? Long-term impacts of an app-based behaviour change intervention on household electricity savings in Switzerland, in: Energy Research and Social Science, 47, p. 16-27.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.08.018   Google Scholar

Download


Published
2020-01-02

Cited by

Venkatesh, G., & Kjeang, A. (2020). Surveys as Means of Understanding User-behaviour with Respect to Energy Usage in Households, Prior to Decision-making to Promote Sustainability. Problemy Ekorozwoju, 15(1), 119–134. https://doi.org/10.35784/pe.2020.1.14

Authors

G Venkatesh 
venkatesh.govindarajan@kau.se
Department of Engineering and Chemical Sciences of Karlstad University, Karlstad Sweden

Authors

Are Kjeang 

Department of Engineering and Chemical Sciences of Karlstad University, Karlstad Sweden

Statistics

Abstract views: 41
PDF downloads: 14