Reconsidering Land System Changes in Borderlands: Insights from the China-ASEAN Borderland
Article Sidebar
Open full text
Issue Vol. 15 No. 1 (2020)
-
China’s Environmental Protection in the New Era from the Perspective of Eco-civilization Construction
Qingzhi Huan7-14
-
The Function and Perception of Urban Ecosystem Services in the Society
Fredrik Edlund15-23
-
Immigration and Social Aspects of Sustainable Development. The Case of Germany
Paweł Rydzewski25-31
-
Achieving Sustainable Competitive Advantage Through Intellectual Capital and Corporate Character: The Mediating Role of Innovation
Huan Xiao, Dengke Yu33-45
-
Ethics of Sustainable Development from the View of A. Badiou’s Critique of Contemporary Ethics
Andrzej Papuziński47-52
-
Ecological Performance: Ethnic Fragmentation versus Governance Quality and Sustainable Development
Viktor Koziuk, Yuryi Hayda, Oleksandr Dluhopolskyi, Serhii Kozlovskyi53-64
-
The Theoretical Foundations of Management in Terms of the Implementation of the Process of Globalization and Sustainable Development in the Real Sphere
Franciszek Piontek65-69
-
Does Appearance of the Migrants Change Citizens Perception of the Public Space? Case Study of Disturbed Sustainability, Belgrade, Serbia
Nataša Danilović Hristić, Nebojša Stefanović71-80
-
Consumption and Sustainable Development: Ethical Aspects
Maria Miczyńska-Kowalska81-88
-
The Role of Language in Sustainable Development: Multilingualism and Language Literacy in India
Neha Toppo, Mojibur Rahman89-93
-
Value Theory in the Economics of Sustainable Development
Małgorzata Pink95-102
-
Women’s Attitude Towards Environment Sustainability Through Natural Preservation
Jyoti Kumari, Ajit Kumar Behura, Sarita Kar103-107
-
The Impact of Selected Biotechnology Processes for Sustainable Development of the Environment and Human Life
Aleksandra Badora, Magdalena Celińska109-117
-
Surveys as Means of Understanding User-behaviour with Respect to Energy Usage in Households, Prior to Decision-making to Promote Sustainability
G Venkatesh, Are Kjeang119-134
-
Sustainable Habitat as the Main Factor of Urbanization Development: 19th-20th Centuries
Azizov Aghasalim135-148
-
A Comprehensive Approach: Inclusive, Smart and Green Urban Development
Justyna Przywojska, Aldona Podgórniak-Krzykacz149-160
-
Corporate Sustainability Practices in Polluting Industries: Evidence from India, China and USA
Prem Sagar Mishra, Ajay Kumar, Niladri Das161-168
-
The Possibility of Using Winter Oilseed Rape (Brassica napus L. var. Napus) for Energy Purposes
Jakub Siemek, Jan Macuda, Łukasz Łukańko, Jakub Nowak, Tadeusz Zając167-177
-
Reconsidering Land System Changes in Borderlands: Insights from the China-ASEAN Borderland
Xiaobo Hua, Yasuyuki Kono179-187
-
NER300: Success or Failure of Public Support for Low-emission Technologies?
Grażyna Borys189-196
-
The Identification of the Luhansk Region and the Region Act’s According to the Qualification of Their Sustainable Development in the Conditions of the Joint Forces Operation
Inna Zablodska, Svitlana Hrechana, Daria Zablodska197-210
-
Sustainable Development Goals in Arab Region – United Arab Emirates’ Case Study
Adam Krzymowski211-220
-
Theatre for Sustainable Development: Jana Sanskriti’s Participatory Ideologue and Practice
Shubhra Ghoshal, Nirban Manna221-227
-
Risk and Uncertainty in Sustainable Development: Undertaking Politics of the Climate Change in the United States
Olena Ovchynnikova229-235
Archives
-
Vol. 17 No. 2
2022-07-04 26
-
Vol. 17 No. 1
2022-01-03 28
-
Vol. 16 No. 2
2021-07-01 26
-
Vol. 16 No. 1
2021-01-04 24
-
Vol. 15 No. 2
2020-07-01 24
-
Vol. 15 No. 1
2020-01-02 24
-
Vol. 14 No. 2
2019-07-01 20
-
Vol. 14 No. 1
2019-01-02 20
-
Vol. 13 No. 2
2023-10-15 22
-
Vol. 13 No. 1
2018-01-02 23
Main Article Content
DOI
Authors
Abstract
This study contributes to the literature on how to explicitly describe, track, and interpret the structure and dynamics of land systems in borderlands. The shift in land system science analytics from place-based toward larger-scale analysis of interactions and connections in a globalized context provides an opportunity to synthesize the knowledge about borderlands. This paper argues that studies on land system changes in borderlands need to thoroughly link the features of borderland regions with multiple interactions – on either or both sides of a border – rather than simply focusing on shifts within closed national boundaries. Furthermore, this paper provides important insights that can advance existing approaches to track and interpret changes in the land systems of borderlands.
Keywords:
References
ANDERSEN K. E., 2017, Codification of customary communal tenure of upland shifting cultivation communities in Myanmar, in: Shifting cultivation policies: Balancing environmental and social sustainability, ed. Cairns M., Cabi, Boston, p. 917-941. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1079/9781786391797.0917
ARNOLD D., PICKLES J., 2011, Global work, surplus labour, and the precarious economies of the border, in: Antipode, 43(5), p. 1598-1624. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2011.00899.x
BAIRD I. G., FOX J., 2015, How land concessions affect places elsewhere: Telecoupling, political ecology, and large-scale plantations in Southern Laos and Northeastern Cambodia, in: Land, 4(2), p. 436-453. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/land4020436
BAIRD I. G., LI, C. 2017, Variegated borderlands governance in Dehong Dai-Jingpo Autonomous Prefecture along the China-Myanmar border, in: Geoforum, 85, p. 214-224. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.07.026
BAIRD I. G., NOSEWORTHY W., TUYEN N. P., HA L. T., FOX J., 2019, Land grabs and labour: Vietnamese workers on rubber plantations in southern Laos, in: Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 40(1), p. 50-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/sjtg.12261
BORRAS JR, S. M., LIU J., HU, Z., LI H., WANG C., XU Y., FRANCO J. C., YE J., 2018, Land control and crop booms inside China: implications for how we think about the global land rush, in: Globalizations, 15(1), p. 134-151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2017.1408287
DEVENDRA C., THOMAS D., 2002, Smallholder farming systems in Asia, in: Agricultural systems, 71(1-2), p. 17-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-521X(01)00033-6
DIANA A., 2013, The experimental governing of mobility and trade on the China-Laos frontier: The Tai Lue case, in: Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 34(1), p. 25-39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/sjtg.12011
DIENER A. C., HAGEN J., 2012, Borders: A very short introduction, Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780199731503.001.0001
DONNAN H., WILSOM T. M., 2001, Borders: Frontiers of identity, nation and state, Berg, Oxford.
DONG J., XIAO X., SHELDON S., BIRADAR C., XIE G., 2012, Mapping tropical forests and rubber plantations in complex landscapes by integrating PALSAR and MODIS imagery, in: ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 74, p. 20-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2012.07.004
EAKIN H., DEFRIES R., KERR S., LAMBIN E. F., LIU J., MARCOTULLIO P. J., MESSERLI P., REENBERG A., RUEDA X., SWAFFIELD S.R., WICKE B., ZIMMERER K., 2014, Significance of telecoupling for exploration of land-use change, in: Rethinking global land use in an urban era, eds Seto K. C., ReenbergA., MIT Press, p. 141-161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262026901.003.0008
EIA/TELEPAK, 2008, Borderlines: Vietnam‘s booming furniture industry and timber smuggling in the Mekong Region, EIA and Telepak, London.
FOX J., 2009, Crossing borders, changing landscapes: land-use dynamics in the Golden Triangle, Honolulu.
FRIIS C., NIELSEN J. Ø., 2016, Small-scale land acquisitions, large-scale implications: Exploring the case of Chinese banana investments in Northern Laos, in: Land Use Policy, 57, p. 117-129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.05.028
FRIIS C. NIELSEN J. Ø. 2017a, Land-use change in a telecoupled world: the relevance and applicability of the telecoupling framework in the case of banana DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09480-220430
plantation expansion in Laos, in: Ecology and Society, 22(4), p. 30.
FRIIS C., NIELSEN J. Ø., 2017b, On the system. Boundary choices, implications, and solutions in telecoupling land use change research, in: Sustainability, 9(6), p. 974. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su9060974
GAINSBOROUGH M., 2008, On the borders of state power: frontiers in the greater Mekong subregion, Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203934708
GALLAHER C., DAHLMAN C., GILMARTIN M., MOUNTZ A., SHIRLOW P., 2009, Key concepts in political geography, Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446279496
GREGORY D., JOHNSTON R., PRATT G., WATTS M., WHATMORE S., 2011, The dictionary of human geography, John Wiley & Sons.
HALL D., 2013, Land, Polity Press, Cambridge.
HUA X., KONO Y., ZHANG L., XU E., LUO R., 2019, How transnational labour migration affects upland land use practices in the receiving country: Findings from the China-Myanmar borderland, in: Land Use Policy, 84, p. 163-176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.03.012
HUA X., YAN J., LI H., HE W., LI X., 2016, Wildlife damage and cultivated land abandonment: Findings from the mountainous areas of Chongqing, China, in: Crop Protection, 84, p. 141-149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2016.03.005
KOJIMA T., BADENOCH N., 2013, From tea to temples and texts: transformation of the interfaces of upland-lowland interaction on the China-Myanmar Border, in: Southeast Asian Studies, 2(1), p. 95-131.
KOLOSSOV V., SCOTT J., 2013, Selected conceptual issues in border studies, in: Belgeo. Revue belge de géographie, (1), p. 1-19.
KONO Y., SATO T., WATANABE K., TOMITA S., ZHANG L., 2018, Reconsidering development Mechanisms of tropical agriculture: Focusing on micro-development in Mainland Southeast Asia, in: Environmental Resources Use and Challenges in Contemporary Southeast Asia, Springer, Singapore, p. 21-39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8881-0_2
KUBO K., 2016, Myanmar's cross-border trade with China: beyond informal trade, Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization (JETRO).
KUBO K., 2018, Myanmar’s fresh fruit export to China via cross-border trade, in: Impact of China's Increasing Demand for Agro Produce on Agricultural Production in the Mekong Region, eds. Kubo K., Sakata S., Bangkok, Report No. 21.
LAHIRI-DUTT K., BROWN H., 2017, Governing the ungovernable? Reflections on informal gemstone mining in high-altitude borderlands of GilgitBaltistan, Pakistan, in: Local Environment, 22(11), p. 1428-1443. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2017.1357688
LAMBIN E. F., GEIST H. J., 2008, Land-use and land-cover change: local processes and global impacts,: Springer Science & Business Media.
LEISZ S. J., ROUNDS E., THI BICH YEN N., NGUYEN BANG T., DOUANFPHACHANH S., NINCHALEUNE B., 2016, Telecouplings in the east–west economic corridor within borders and across, in: Remote Sensing, 8(12), p. 1012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8121012
LESSER C., MOISE-LEEMAN E., 2009, Informal cross-border trade and trade facilitation reform in Sub-Saharan Africa, OECD Publishing, Paris.
LIU J., 2017, Integration across a metacoupled world, in: Ecology and Society, 22(4), p. 29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09830-220429
LIU J., 2018, An integrated framework for achieving Sustainable Development Goals around the world, in: Ecology, Economy and Society: the INSEE Journal, 1(2), p. 11-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37773/ees.v1i2.32
LIU J., HULL V., BATISTELLA M., DEFRIES R., DIETZ T., FU F., HERTEL T. W., IZAURRALDE R. C., 2013, Framing sustainability in a telecoupled world, in: Ecology and Society, 18(2), p. 26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05873-180226
LIU J., HULL V., MORAN E., NAGENDRA H., SWAFFIELD S. R., TURNER B., 2014, Applications of the telecoupling framework to landchange science, in: Rethinking global land use in an urban era, eds Seto K., Reenberg A., MIT Press, p. 119-139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/10011.003.0012
LIU M., QI Q., LIU J., ZOU X., LI J., 2006, Spatialtemporal changes of the land use/cover and its ecological effect analysis in trans boundary Yunnan Province, in: Yunnan Geographic Environment Research, 18(2), p. 1-5.
LU J. N., 2017, Tapping into rubber: China’s opium
replacement program and rubber production in Laos, in: The Journal of Peasant Studies, 44(4), p. 726-747.
MEYFROIDT P., 2016, Approaches and terminology for causal analysis in land systems science, in: Journal of Land Use Science, 11(5), p. 501-522. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1747423X.2015.1117530
MEYFROIDT P., CHOWDHURY R. R., DE BREMOND A., ELLIS E., ERB K.-H., FILATOVA T., GARRETT R., GROVE J. et al., 2018, Middlerange theories of land system change, in: Global Environmental Change, 53, p. 52-67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.08.006
MINGHI J. V., 1991, From conflict to harmony in border landscapes, in: The geography of border landscapes, eds Rumley D., Minghi J.V., Routledge, London, New York, p. 15-30.
NEWMAN D., 2006, The lines that continue to separate us: borders in ourborderless' world, in: Progress in Human geography 30(2), p. 143-161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132506ph599xx
PARKER B. J., 2006, Toward an understanding of borderland processes, in: American Antiquity 71(1), p. 77-100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/40035322
PRESCOTT G. W., SUTHERLAND W. J., AGUIRRE D., BAIRD M., BOWMAN V.,BRUNNER J., CONNETTE G. M., COSIER M. et al., 2017, Political transition and emergent forest‐
conservation issues in Myanmar, in: Conservation Biology, 31(6), p. 1257-1270.
ROUSSEAU J. F., 2018, A failed market experiment and ignored livelihoods: Jatropha expansion in the Sino-Vietnamese borderlands, in: Routledge handbook of Asian borderlands, eds Horstmann A., Saxer M., Routledge, Abingon, New York, p. 202-211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315688978-21
ROUSSEAU J. F., STURGEON J., 2019, The disappearance of water buffalo from agrarian landscapes in Western China, in: Journal of Agrarian Change, 19(2), p. 319-336. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/joac.12289
STEINBERG D. I., FAN H., 2012, Modern ChinaMyanmar relations: dilemmas of mutual dependence, Nias press.
STURGEON J. C., 2007, Border landscapes: the politics of Akha land use in China and Thailand, University of Washington Press, Seattle and London.
STURGEON J. C., 2010, Governing minorities and development in Xishuangbanna, China: Akha and Dai rubber farmers as entrepreneurs. In, Geoforum, 41(2), p. 318-328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2009.10.010
STURGEON J. C., 2013, Cross‐border rubber cultivation between China and Laos: Regionalization by Akha and Tai rubber farmers, in: Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 34(1), p. 70-85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/sjtg.12014
TRINCSI K., TURNER S., 2014, Mapping mountain diversity: Ethnic minorities and land use land cover change in Vietnam's borderlands, in: Land Use Policy, 41, p. 484-497. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.06.022
TURNER S., 2013, Under the state's gaze: Upland trading-scapes on the Sino-Vietnamese border. in: Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 34(1), p. 9-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/sjtg.12010
VAN SCHENDEL W., 2005, The Bengal borderland: Beyond state and nation in South Asia, Anthem Press.
VERBURG P. H., HRB K. H., MERTZ O., ESPINDOLA G., 2013, Land system science: between global challenges and local realities. in: Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainbility, 5, p. 433-437. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2013.08.001
WOODS K., 2012, The political ecology of rubber production in Myanmar: an overview, Global Witness, Yangon, Myanmar.
WOODS K., 2019, Rubber out of the ashes: locating Chinese agribusiness investments in ‘armed sovereignties’ in the Myanmar-China borderlands, in: Territory, Politics, Governance, 7(1), p. 79-95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2018.1460276
YAN J., YANG Z., LI Z., LI X., XIN L., SUN L., 2016, Drivers of cropland abandonment in mountainous areas: A household decision model on farming scale in Southwest China, in: Land Use Policy, 57, p. 459-469. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.06.014
ZHANG L., KONO Y., KOBAYASHI S., 2014, The process of expansion in commercial banana cropping in tropical China: A case study at a Dai village, Mengla County, in: Agricultural Systems, 124, p. 32-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2013.10.006
ZIMMERER K., LAMBIN E., VANEK S., 2018, Smallholder telecoupling and potential sustainability, in: Ecology and Society, 23(1), p. 30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09935-230130
Article Details
Abstract views: 165
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
