Evaluation of Perceived Environmental Risks of Residents' Life under the Perspective of Environmental Public Opinion
Article Sidebar
Open full text
Issue Vol. 19 No. 1 (2024)
-
SWOT Analysis of the Sustainable Development Concept
Magdaléna Drastichová6-30
-
The Influence of the World Grain Market on Prevalence of Mankind’s Undernourishment in the Times of War on the Ukraine
Serhii Kozlovskyi, Allam Yousuf, Vira Butenko, Tetiana Kulinich, Olena Bohdaniuk, Liudmyla Nikolenko, Ruslan Lavrov31-42
-
Environmental Sustainability in Developing Countries: Does Democracy Matter?
Neslihan Ursavaş, Şükrü Apaydın43-52
-
The Role of Corruption in the Implementation of Environmental Regulations
Asli Özpolat, Ferda Nakipoglu Ozsoy53-66
-
Attitudes Towards Environmental Protection in International Comparative Research
Pawel Rydzewski67-77
-
Using the Composite EEPSE Green Economy Index to Assess the Progress of Emerging Economies in Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals
Sunčica Stanković, Biljana Ilić, Mihajlo Rabrenović78-88
-
Digital Transformation in the Context of Sustainable Development of European Countries
Irina Kolupaieva, Iryna Sheiko, Tetiana Polozova89-102
-
Impact of Digitalization on International Financial Security in Conditions of Sustainable Development
Oksana Desyatnyuk, Mariya Naumenko, Iryna Lytovchenko, Oleksandr Beketov104-114
-
Evaluation and Deconstruction of the Impact of Digital Finance on the Synergy of Enterprise Economic Development and Ecological Environment
Shining Zhang115-121
-
Assessing Forest Conservation Strategies for Biodiversity Restoration and Sustainable Development: A Comparative Analysis of Global Income Groups
Rima H. Binsaeed, Abdelmohsen A. Nassani, Khalid Zaman, Zeeshan Arshad, Mohamed Haffar, Dadang Yunus Lutfiansyah, Kamalularifin Subari, Hailan Salamun122-147
-
Interculturality as Paradigm to Promote Social and Environmental Sustainability
Anthony Le Duc148-158
-
Role of Ethics in Nature-Human Relationship: a Pragmatic Inquiry
Anita Jena159-166
-
The Concept of Inclusive Economy as a Component of Sustainable Development
Andriy Krysovatyy, Olena Ptashchenko, Oleksii Kurtsev, Arutyunyan Ovagim164-172
-
The Evolution Path and Impact Mechanism of the Vulnerability of Rural Human Settlements in China under the Background of Globalization
Fulong Liu, Baogang Lin, Kun Meng173-179
-
Spatial and Temporal Distribution of the Impact of Socio-economic Factors on Water Pollution
Bizhen Chen, Shanshan Xie, Dehong Sun180-192
-
Global Country Classification of Sustainable Startups Levels
Barbara Bradač Hojnik193-200
-
Progress in the Field of Sustainable Development as a Result of Implementing the Potential of Social Cohesion: Regional Context
Daria Mykhailenko, Olena Havrylchenko, Lidiia Bezkorovaina, Nataliia Gliebova, Viktoriia Kovalova201-212
-
Construction of China’s Carbon Financial Accounting System from the Perspective of Sustainable Development
Shuwen Li213-220
-
Entrepreneurship and Carbon Footprints in Sub-Saharan Africa
Linjing Zhu, Yuefen Wang221-231
-
Achieving Sustainable Development Goals in Conditions of Rational Expectations by Achieving a Balance of Interests of Education and Production in the Field of Light Industry During Troubled Times of Pandemic and War
Galyna Ripka, Yaroslav Bielousov, Ievgen Maznev232-250
-
A Few Remarks on Sustainable Development of the Education Sphere. Postulated and Factual Improving of Education
Wieslaw Sztumski251-260
-
Measuring the Impact of Higher Education in Promoting Sustainable Development Goals: Analysis of the Arab universities’ performance
Saleh A. K. Saleh, Heba M. Adly261-274
-
A Homogeneity of European Union and Western Balkan Countries According to Travel and Tourism Sustainability
Sonja Jovanović, Vesna Janković-Milić, Marija Petrović-Ranđelović275-284
-
Analysis of the Decisive Factors of Government Attracting Tourists in Public Management from the Perspective of Environmental Protection
Zhicheng Guo, Yan Li285-295
-
Assessing International Tourism's Global Environmental Impact of Food and Beverages
Josef Lochman, Jiří Vagner296-307
-
Evaluation of Perceived Environmental Risks of Residents' Life under the Perspective of Environmental Public Opinion
Fengjiao Ye, Xueru Wang, Jun Lin308-324
-
Re-evaluating the Alignment of Omnivorous Choice and Animal Farming with Sustainable Development: Insights from Care Ethics
Upamita Mukherjee, Prabhu Venkataraman325-329
Archives
-
Vol. 20 No. 2
2025-09-16 20
-
Vol. 20 No. 1
2025-01-10 22
-
Vol. 19 No. 2
2024-07-01 23
-
Vol. 19 No. 1
2024-01-08 27
-
Vol. 18 No. 2
2023-07-10 25
-
Vol. 18 No. 1
2023-01-01 25
-
Vol. 17 No. 2
2022-07-04 26
-
Vol. 17 No. 1
2022-01-03 28
-
Vol. 15 No. 2
2020-07-01 24
-
Vol. 15 No. 1
2020-01-02 24
Main Article Content
DOI
Authors
Abstract
Population health, social development and the environment are important elements of sustainable development. This article uses the China People's Daily message board to collect environmental public opinion data, visualizes the public opinion hotspots of environmental based on word frequency statistics, and applies the Latent Dirichlet Allocations (LDA) topic model to analyze the spatial distribution of environmental risk perception dimensions. The conclusions are as follows: (1) in terms of the hotspots of environmental public opinion, the most frequent occurrences are the living environment, interest demands and noise pollution. (2) There is heterogeneity in the topic of environmental risk perception. The perception of pollution source types has the highest weight in environmental risk perception in the eastern, central, and western regions. Specifically, the types of pollution sources in the eastern that receive the most attention are garbage and noise pollution. In addition to paying attention to noise pollution, the central and western also have a higher perceived weight on the polluters. Residents in northeast are most concerned about changes in residents' health and living environment quality. (3) From the perspective of environmental risk perception, health perception has the highest proportion in northeast, followed by the eastern, and finally the central and western. Proportion of perception of interest demands is highest in the central region, perception of residential environment quality is highest in the northeast region, perception of pollution source types is highest in the eastern, central, and western regions, and lowest in the northeast region. Finally, some practical and feasible policy recommendations were proposed for different regions.
Keywords:
References
AZADI H., PETRESCU D. C., PETRESCU-MAG R. M., OZUNU, A., 2020, Special issue: Environmental risk mitigation for sustainable land use development, Land Use Policy, 95, 104488. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104488
BALŽEKIENĖ A., TELEŠIENĖ A., MORKEVIČIUS V., 2022, Spatial dependencies and the relationship between sub-jective perception and objective environmental risks in Lithuania, Sustainability, 14(7): 3716. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14073716
BERARDO R., HOLM F., HEIKKILA T., WEIBLE C. M., YI H., KAGAN J., CHEN C., YORDY J., 2020, Hydraulic fracturing and political conflict: News media coverage of topics and themes across nine states, Energy Research & Social Science, 70: 101660. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101660
CHEN Y., LIU X., 2021, How do environmental news and the under the dome documentary influence air-pollution knowledge and risk perception among Beijing residents?, SAGE Open, 11(2): 215824402110157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211015712
CHENG H., BIAN Q., MAO Q., 2022, How can internet use and environmental risk perception encourage pro-environmental behaviors? The mediating role of governmentperformance perception, Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 31(6): 5621-5631. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/152225
CHOON S.-W., ONG H.-B., TAN S.-H., 2019, Does risk perception limit the climate change mitigation behaviors?, Environment, Development and Sustainability, 21(4): 1891-1917. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-018-0108-0
FERGUSON P., WOLLERSHEIM L., 2023, From sustainable development to resilience? (Dis) continuities in climate and development policy governance discourse, Sustainable Development, 31(1): 67-77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2374
GAO S., LI W., LING S., DOU X., LIU X., 2019, An empirical study on the influence path of environmental risk per-ception on behavioral responses in China, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(16): 2856. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16162856
GUNJYAL N., RANI S., ASGARI LAJAYER B., SENAPATHI V., ASTATKIE T., 2023, A review of the effects of environmental hazards on humans, their remediation for sustainable development, and risk assessment, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 195(6): 795. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-023-11353-z
HUANG H., LONG R., CHEN H., SUN K., LI Q., 2022, Exploring public attention about green consumption on Sina Weibo: using text mining and deep learning, Sustainable Production and Consumption, 30: 674-685. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.12.017
HUANG J., YANG J. Z., 2020, Beyond under the dome: An environmental documentary amplified public risk perception about air pollution in China, Journal of Risk Research, 23(2): 227-241. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2019.1569090
KANG H. J., KIM C., KIM S., KIM C., 2023, A study on environmental trends and sustainability in the ocean economy using topic modeling: south Korean news articles, Processes, 11(8): 2253. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11082253
KENNY J., 2020, Economic conditions and support for the prioritisation of environmental protection during the Great Recession, Environmental Politics, 29(6) 937-958. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2019.1680074
MA Y., MA Y., CAO Z., LI S., LV B., RUAN Z., WANG L., YU H., LU Z., 2021, Residents’ cognition and behavior related to eco-environmental risks from the development of large coal power plants: a case study in Xilinhot, Inner Mon-golia, Sustainability, 13(14): 7813. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13147813
OLOWOPOROKU O., DARAMOLA O., ODUNSI O., 2021, Determinants of residents’ perceived environmental hazards and risks in coastal towns of Delta State, Nigeria, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 56: 102094. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102094
QIN M., SUN M., LI J., 2021, Impact of environmental regulation policy on ecological efficiency in four major urban agglomerations in eastern China, Ecological Indicators, 130: 108002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108002
SIERRA-BARÓN W., NAVARRO O., AMÉZQUITA NARANJO D. K., TERES SIERRA E. D., NARVÁEZ GON-ZÁLEZ C. M., 2021, Beliefs about Climate Change and Their Relationship with Environmental Beliefs and Sustainable Behavior: A View from Rural Communities, Sustainability, 13(9): 5326. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13095326
SONI A., MISTUR E. M., 2022, Flirting with disaster: Impacts of natural disasters on public support for environmental spending, Global Environmental Change, 75: 102552. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2022.102552
SULDOVSKY B., B. FRANK L., 2022, Strengthening public engagement on environmental hazards: Insights from cross-disciplinary air pollution research, Environmental Hazards, 21(3): 218-234. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17477891.2021.1938506
SUN Z., ZHU D., 2023, Surveillance of public risk perceptions on outdoor air pollution: Evidence from online search behaviours in China, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management,
https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2023.2183822. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2023.2183822
TEH P. L., PIAO S., ALMANSOUR M., ONG H. F., AHAD A., 2022, Analysis of popular social media topics regard-ing plastic pollution, Sustainability, 14(3): 1709. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031709
VERNER M., 2023, Political trust and ecological crisis perceptions in developing economies: Evidence from Ecuador, Latin American Politics and Society, https://doi.org/10.1017/lap.2023.14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/lap.2023.14
WANG B., HAN S., AO Y., LIAO F., WANG T., CHEN Y., 2022, The impact of public opinion pressure on construc-tion company green innovations: The mediating effect of leaders’ environmental intention and the moderating effect of en-vironmental regulation, Frontiers in Psychology, 13: 936058. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.936058
WANG B., LIU B., LI Y., 2023, A dark side of trust: examining the influence of environmental risk perception on citi-zens’ plastic-avoiding behavior, IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems,
https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSS.2023.3297747. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSS.2023.3297747
WANG N., GUO J., ZHANG J., FAN Y, 2022, Comparing eco-civilization theory and practice: Big-data evidence from China, Journal of Cleaner Production, 380: 134754. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134754
ANG S., JIANG J., ZHOU, Y., LI J., ZHAO D., LIN S., 2020, Climate-change information, health-risk perception and residents’ environmental complaint behavior: An empirical study in China, Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 42(3): 719-732. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-018-0235-4
XIONG J., HSWEN Y., NASLUND J. A., 2020, Digital surveillance for monitoring environmental health threats: A case study capturing public opinion from twitter about the 2019 Chennai water crisis, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(14): 5077. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17145077
XU S., SUN K., YANG B., ZHAO L., WANG B., ZHAO W., WANG Z., SU M., 2021, Can public participation in haze governance be guided by government? – Evidence from large-scale social media content data mining, Journal of Cleaner Production, 318: 128401. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128401
YANG X., 2023, The influence of trust on the public’s environmental risk perception: Evidence from China, Local Envi-ronment, 28(6): 728-738. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2023.2173730
YAO L., SHEN J., ZHANG F., GU X., JIANG S., 2021, Influence of environmental values on the typhoon risk percep-tions of high school students: A case study in Ningbo, China. Sustainability, 13(8): 4145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084145
YOO E., BAEK K., 2019, Gender differences in environmental and health-related risk perception in Korea, Asian Wom-en, 35(4): 47-67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14431/aw.2019.12.35.4.47
ZENG J., JIANG M., YUAN M., 2020, Environmental risk perception, risk culture, and pro-environmental behavior, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(5): 1750. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17051750
ZHOU Z., LIU J., ZENG H., ZHANG T., CHEN X., 2020, How does soil pollution risk perception affect farmers’ pro-environmental behavior? The role of income level, Journal of Environmental Management, 270: 110806. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110806
Article Details
Abstract views: 264

