Evaluation of Perceived Environmental Risks of Residents' Life under the Perspective of Environmental Public Opinion

Fengjiao Ye

1317438599@qq.com
School of Information Engineering, Quanzhou Ocean Institute (China)
https://orcid.org/0009-0000-1320-9450

Xueru Wang


School of Information Engineering, Quanzhou Ocean Institute (China)

Jun Lin


School of Information Engineering, Quanzhou Ocean Institute (China)

Abstract

Population health, social development and the environment are important elements of sustainable development. This article uses the China People's Daily message board to collect environmental public opinion data, visualizes the public opinion hotspots of environmental based on word frequency statistics, and applies the Latent Dirichlet Allocations (LDA) topic model to analyze the spatial distribution of environmental risk perception dimensions. The conclusions are as follows: (1) in terms of the hotspots of environmental public opinion, the most frequent occurrences are the living environment, interest demands and noise pollution. (2) There is heterogeneity in the topic of environmental risk perception. The perception of pollution source types has the highest weight in environmental risk perception in the eastern, central, and western regions. Specifically, the types of pollution sources in the eastern that receive the most attention are garbage and noise pollution. In addition to paying attention to noise pollution, the central and western also have a higher perceived weight on the polluters. Residents in northeast are most concerned about changes in residents' health and living environment quality. (3) From the perspective of environmental risk perception, health perception has the highest proportion in northeast, followed by the eastern, and finally the central and western. Proportion of perception of interest demands is highest in the central region, perception of residential environment quality is highest in the northeast region, perception of pollution source types is highest in the eastern, central, and western regions, and lowest in the northeast region. Finally, some practical and feasible policy recommendations were proposed for different regions.


Keywords:

environmental risk perception, environmental public opinion, Latent Dirichlet Allocations (LDA) topic model, natural language processing, text analysis, China

AZADI H., PETRESCU D. C., PETRESCU-MAG R. M., OZUNU, A., 2020, Special issue: Environmental risk mitigation for sustainable land use development, Land Use Policy, 95, 104488.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104488   Google Scholar

BALŽEKIENĖ A., TELEŠIENĖ A., MORKEVIČIUS V., 2022, Spatial dependencies and the relationship between sub-jective perception and objective environmental risks in Lithuania, Sustainability, 14(7): 3716.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14073716   Google Scholar

BERARDO R., HOLM F., HEIKKILA T., WEIBLE C. M., YI H., KAGAN J., CHEN C., YORDY J., 2020, Hydraulic fracturing and political conflict: News media coverage of topics and themes across nine states, Energy Research & Social Science, 70: 101660.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101660   Google Scholar

CHEN Y., LIU X., 2021, How do environmental news and the under the dome documentary influence air-pollution knowledge and risk perception among Beijing residents?, SAGE Open, 11(2): 215824402110157.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211015712   Google Scholar

CHENG H., BIAN Q., MAO Q., 2022, How can internet use and environmental risk perception encourage pro-environmental behaviors? The mediating role of governmentperformance perception, Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 31(6): 5621-5631.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/152225   Google Scholar

CHOON S.-W., ONG H.-B., TAN S.-H., 2019, Does risk perception limit the climate change mitigation behaviors?, Environment, Development and Sustainability, 21(4): 1891-1917.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-018-0108-0   Google Scholar

FERGUSON P., WOLLERSHEIM L., 2023, From sustainable development to resilience? (Dis) continuities in climate and development policy governance discourse, Sustainable Development, 31(1): 67-77.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2374   Google Scholar

GAO S., LI W., LING S., DOU X., LIU X., 2019, An empirical study on the influence path of environmental risk per-ception on behavioral responses in China, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(16): 2856.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16162856   Google Scholar

GUNJYAL N., RANI S., ASGARI LAJAYER B., SENAPATHI V., ASTATKIE T., 2023, A review of the effects of environmental hazards on humans, their remediation for sustainable development, and risk assessment, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 195(6): 795.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-023-11353-z   Google Scholar

HUANG H., LONG R., CHEN H., SUN K., LI Q., 2022, Exploring public attention about green consumption on Sina Weibo: using text mining and deep learning, Sustainable Production and Consumption, 30: 674-685.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.12.017   Google Scholar

HUANG J., YANG J. Z., 2020, Beyond under the dome: An environmental documentary amplified public risk perception about air pollution in China, Journal of Risk Research, 23(2): 227-241.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2019.1569090   Google Scholar

KANG H. J., KIM C., KIM S., KIM C., 2023, A study on environmental trends and sustainability in the ocean economy using topic modeling: south Korean news articles, Processes, 11(8): 2253.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11082253   Google Scholar

KENNY J., 2020, Economic conditions and support for the prioritisation of environmental protection during the Great Recession, Environmental Politics, 29(6) 937-958.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2019.1680074   Google Scholar

MA Y., MA Y., CAO Z., LI S., LV B., RUAN Z., WANG L., YU H., LU Z., 2021, Residents’ cognition and behavior related to eco-environmental risks from the development of large coal power plants: a case study in Xilinhot, Inner Mon-golia, Sustainability, 13(14): 7813.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13147813   Google Scholar

OLOWOPOROKU O., DARAMOLA O., ODUNSI O., 2021, Determinants of residents’ perceived environmental hazards and risks in coastal towns of Delta State, Nigeria, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 56: 102094.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102094   Google Scholar

QIN M., SUN M., LI J., 2021, Impact of environmental regulation policy on ecological efficiency in four major urban agglomerations in eastern China, Ecological Indicators, 130: 108002.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108002   Google Scholar

SIERRA-BARÓN W., NAVARRO O., AMÉZQUITA NARANJO D. K., TERES SIERRA E. D., NARVÁEZ GON-ZÁLEZ C. M., 2021, Beliefs about Climate Change and Their Relationship with Environmental Beliefs and Sustainable Behavior: A View from Rural Communities, Sustainability, 13(9): 5326.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13095326   Google Scholar

SONI A., MISTUR E. M., 2022, Flirting with disaster: Impacts of natural disasters on public support for environmental spending, Global Environmental Change, 75: 102552.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2022.102552   Google Scholar

SULDOVSKY B., B. FRANK L., 2022, Strengthening public engagement on environmental hazards: Insights from cross-disciplinary air pollution research, Environmental Hazards, 21(3): 218-234.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17477891.2021.1938506   Google Scholar

SUN Z., ZHU D., 2023, Surveillance of public risk perceptions on outdoor air pollution: Evidence from online search behaviours in China, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management,
  Google Scholar

https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2023.2183822.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2023.2183822   Google Scholar

TEH P. L., PIAO S., ALMANSOUR M., ONG H. F., AHAD A., 2022, Analysis of popular social media topics regard-ing plastic pollution, Sustainability, 14(3): 1709.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031709   Google Scholar

VERNER M., 2023, Political trust and ecological crisis perceptions in developing economies: Evidence from Ecuador, Latin American Politics and Society, https://doi.org/10.1017/lap.2023.14.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/lap.2023.14   Google Scholar

WANG B., HAN S., AO Y., LIAO F., WANG T., CHEN Y., 2022, The impact of public opinion pressure on construc-tion company green innovations: The mediating effect of leaders’ environmental intention and the moderating effect of en-vironmental regulation, Frontiers in Psychology, 13: 936058.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.936058   Google Scholar

WANG B., LIU B., LI Y., 2023, A dark side of trust: examining the influence of environmental risk perception on citi-zens’ plastic-avoiding behavior, IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems,
  Google Scholar

https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSS.2023.3297747.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSS.2023.3297747   Google Scholar

WANG N., GUO J., ZHANG J., FAN Y, 2022, Comparing eco-civilization theory and practice: Big-data evidence from China, Journal of Cleaner Production, 380: 134754.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134754   Google Scholar

ANG S., JIANG J., ZHOU, Y., LI J., ZHAO D., LIN S., 2020, Climate-change information, health-risk perception and residents’ environmental complaint behavior: An empirical study in China, Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 42(3): 719-732.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-018-0235-4   Google Scholar

XIONG J., HSWEN Y., NASLUND J. A., 2020, Digital surveillance for monitoring environmental health threats: A case study capturing public opinion from twitter about the 2019 Chennai water crisis, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(14): 5077.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17145077   Google Scholar

XU S., SUN K., YANG B., ZHAO L., WANG B., ZHAO W., WANG Z., SU M., 2021, Can public participation in haze governance be guided by government? – Evidence from large-scale social media content data mining, Journal of Cleaner Production, 318: 128401.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128401   Google Scholar

YANG X., 2023, The influence of trust on the public’s environmental risk perception: Evidence from China, Local Envi-ronment, 28(6): 728-738.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2023.2173730   Google Scholar

YAO L., SHEN J., ZHANG F., GU X., JIANG S., 2021, Influence of environmental values on the typhoon risk percep-tions of high school students: A case study in Ningbo, China. Sustainability, 13(8): 4145.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084145   Google Scholar

YOO E., BAEK K., 2019, Gender differences in environmental and health-related risk perception in Korea, Asian Wom-en, 35(4): 47-67.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14431/aw.2019.12.35.4.47   Google Scholar

ZENG J., JIANG M., YUAN M., 2020, Environmental risk perception, risk culture, and pro-environmental behavior, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(5): 1750.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17051750   Google Scholar

ZHOU Z., LIU J., ZENG H., ZHANG T., CHEN X., 2020, How does soil pollution risk perception affect farmers’ pro-environmental behavior? The role of income level, Journal of Environmental Management, 270: 110806.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110806   Google Scholar

Download


Published
2024-01-08

Cited by

Ye, F., Wang, X., & Lin, J. (2024). Evaluation of Perceived Environmental Risks of Residents’ Life under the Perspective of Environmental Public Opinion. Problemy Ekorozwoju, 19(1), 308–324. https://doi.org/10.35784/preko.5386

Authors

Fengjiao Ye 
1317438599@qq.com
School of Information Engineering, Quanzhou Ocean Institute China
https://orcid.org/0009-0000-1320-9450

Authors

Xueru Wang 

School of Information Engineering, Quanzhou Ocean Institute China

Authors

Jun Lin 

School of Information Engineering, Quanzhou Ocean Institute China

Statistics

Abstract views: 121
PDF downloads: 317


License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.