Digital Transformation in the Context of Sustainable Development of European Countries
Irina Kolupaieva
Linkoping University, Linkoping, Sweden (Sweden)
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1256-0817
Iryna Sheiko
irina.sheiko@nure.uaKharkiv National University of Radio Electronics, Kharkiv (Ukraine)
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5770-3677
Tetiana Polozova
Kharkiv National University of Radio Electronics, Kharkiv (Ukraine)
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9956-8816
Abstract
The country’s sustainable development is focused on improving the quality of life at the global level, ensuring equal access to education and public goods, and caring for the environment and biodiversity, as well as responsible consumption and production. Digital technologies are among the main drivers of sustainable development. It is very important to develop government strategy and choose correct measures aimed at ensuring sustainable development of the countries in terms of the digitalization processes. The purpose of the research is to investigate the nature of the correlation between indicators of digital development and sustainable development of the European countries, as well as to identify policy directions and measures regarding their digital and sustainable progress. Methods of the research are principal component analysis, geometric aggregation, and cluster analysis. The positive correlation within the digital and sustainable development is observed. Most indicators of digital and sustainable development positively correlate with each other. Based on PCA, it was found that indicators of sustainable development have a stronger intercorrelation than those of digital development. Based on the construction of integral indicators of digital and sustainable development, a cluster analysis was conducted. The main digital tools that contribute to the achievement of each of the 17 goals of sustainable development were determined. The results of the analysis provide a suitable basis for comparing the digital and sustainable development of individual countries and offer opportunities to identify tools and strategy directions for policymakers.
Supporting Agencies
Keywords:
digitalization, sustainable development, European countries, principal component analysis, cluster analysisReferences
AMUSO V., POLETTI G., MONTIBELLO D., 2019, The Digital Economy: Opportunities and Challenges, Global Policy, 11(1): 124-127, https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12745.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12745
Google Scholar
ANDRONICEANU A., GEORGESCU I., & KINNUNEN J., 2019, Digitalization Clusters within the European Union, IBIMA, 33rd IBIMA Conference. Granada, Spain, 10-11 April: 1321-1331.
Google Scholar
BASU S., PASCALI L., SCHIANTARELLI F., & SERVEN L., 2012, Productivity and the Welfare of Nations, NBER Working Paper, No. 17971, https://doi.org/10.3386/w17971.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w17971
Google Scholar
BENZ S., GONZALES F., 2019, Intra-EEA STRI Database: Methodology and Results, OECD Trade Policy Papers, No. 223, https://doi.org/10.1787/2aac6d21- en.
Google Scholar
BILOZUBENKO V., YATCHUK O., WOLANIN E., SEREDIUK T., KORNEYEV M., 2020, Comparison of the digital econ-omy development parameters in the EU countries in the context of bridging the digital divide, Problems and Perspectives in Man-agement, 18(2): 206-218, https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.18(2).2020.18.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.18(2).2020.18
Google Scholar
BOHNSACK R., BIDMON C.M., & PINKSE J., 2022, Sustainability in the digital age: Intended and unintended consequences of digital technologies for sustainable development, Business Strategy Environment, 31: 599-602,
Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2938.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2938
Google Scholar
CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY, 2020, The role of industrial digitalisation in post-Covid-19 manufacturing recovery diversifica-tion and resilience, https://www.ciip.group.cam.ac.uk/reports-and-articles/role-industrial-digitalisation-post-covid-19-manuf/download/2020-10-08-DigitalBR.pdf (10.02.2023).
Google Scholar
CHAKRAVORTI B., CHATURVEDI R. S., 2017, Digital planet: how competitiveness and trust in digital economies vary across the world, Tufts University, https://sites.tufts.edu/digitalplanet/files/2020/03/Digital_Planet_2017_FINAL.pdf (04.02.2023).
Google Scholar
CHAMBERS N., SIMMONS C., WACKERNAGEL M., 2000, Sharing nature’s interest. Ecological footprints as an indicator of sustainability, Earthscan, London.
Google Scholar
CHEN W., WELLMAN B., 2004, The Global Digital Divide – Within and Between Countries. IT & Society, 1(7): 39-45, http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary. (25.01.2023).
Google Scholar
COLGLAZIER E.W., 2018, The sustainable development goals: Roadmaps to progress. Science and Diplomacy 7(1), March 2018, http://www.sciencediplomacy.org/editorial/2018/sdg-roadmaps (22.01.2023).
Google Scholar
DRASTICHOVÁ M., FILZMOSER P., 2019, Assessment of Sustainable Development Using Cluster Analysis and Principal Component Analysis, Problemy Ekorozwoju/ Problems of Sustainable Development, 14/2: 7-24.
Google Scholar
DRASTICHOVÁ M., FILZMOSER P., 2021, Factors of quality of life in a group of selected European Union and OECD coun-tries, Problemy Ekorozwoju/ Problems of Sustainable Development, 16/2: 75-93, https://doi.org/10.35784/pe.2021.2.09.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.35784/pe.2021.2.09
Google Scholar
EVANGELISTA R., GUERRIERI P., MELICIANI V., 2014, The economic impact of digital technologies in Europe. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, November, https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2014.918438.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2014.918438
Google Scholar
EUROPEAN COMMISSION, 2010, Europe 2020: A European strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth, https://ec.europa.eu/eu2020/pdf/COMPLET%20EN%20BARROSO%20%20%20007%20-%20Europe%202020%20-%20EN%20version.pdf (07.02.2023).
Google Scholar
EUROPEAN COMMISSION, 2001, A Sustainable Europe for a Better World: A European Union Strategy for Sustainable Development (Commission's proposal to the Gothenburg European Council), https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52001DC0264 (07.02.2023).
Google Scholar
EUROPEAN COMMISSION, OECD, 2019, Handbook of construction of composite indicators: methodology and users guide, https://www.oecd.org/sdd/42495745.pdf (25.01.2023).
Google Scholar
EUROSTAT, 2021, EU: key economic indicators, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/main/data/database (12.02.2023).
Google Scholar
FERENCZ, J., 2019, The OECD Digital Services Trade Restrictiveness Index, OECD Trade Policy Papers, No. 221, https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/16ed2d78-en.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/16ed2d78-en
Google Scholar
FISCHER J. M., ADJO A., 2011, Quality of life, sustainable civil Infrastructure, and sustainable development: Strategically ex-panding choice, Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 137(1): 39-48, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000039.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000039
Google Scholar
GEORGE G., MERRILL R. K., SCHILLEBEECKX, S. J., 2021, Digital sustainability and entrepreneurship: How digital innova-tions are helping tackle climate change and sustainable development. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 45(5): 999-1027, https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258719899425.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258719899425
Google Scholar
HALLWARD-DRIEMEIER M., NAYYAR G., 2017, Trouble in the Making?: The Future of Manufacturing-Led Development. Washington, DC: World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/27946. (16.02.2023).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1174-6
Google Scholar
HOLLAND S. M., 2019, Principal Component Analysis (PCA), http://strata.uga.edu/8370/handouts/pcaTutorial.pdf (18.02.2023).
Google Scholar
HUTTMANOVÁ E., 2016, Sustainable Development and Sustainability Management in the European Union Countries, Europe-an Journal of Sustainable Development 5(4): 475-482, https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2016.v5n4p475.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2016.v5n4p475
Google Scholar
IAVORSKYI P., TARAN S., SHEPOTYLO O., HAMANIUK O., 2020, Ukraine’s Integration into the EU’s digital single mar-ket: potential economic benefits. Analytical report, Ministry of Digital Transformation of Ukraine, https://ucep.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/dig_ukraine_eu_ENG-_2_WEB.pdf (11.02.2023).
Google Scholar
IMD WORLD COMPETITIVENESS CENTER, 2022, World Digital Competitiveness Ranking, December, 2022, https://www.imd.org/centers/world-competitiveness-center/rankings/world-digital-competitiveness/ (15.02.2023).
Google Scholar
JOLLIFFE I. T., CADIMA J., 2016, Principal component analysis: a review and recent developments, Philisophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 374(2065), https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2015.0202.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2015.0202
Google Scholar
KOLUPAIEVA I. V., GAVKALOVA N. L., BARKA Z., 2017, Analysis of leverages’ efficiency in the context of state regulato-ry policy implementation, Economic Annals-ХХI, 165(5-6): 41-46, https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V165-09.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V165-09
Google Scholar
MONDEJAR M. E., AVTAR R., DIAZ H. L. B., DUBEY R. K., ESTEBAN J., GOMEZ-MORALES A., HALLAM B., MBUNGU N. T., OKOLO C. C., PRASAD K. A., SHE Q., GARCIA-SEGURA S., 2021, Digitalization to achieve sustainable development goals: Steps towards a Smart Green Planet, Science of The Total Environment, 794: 148539, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148539.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148539
Google Scholar
MILOŠEVIĆ N., DOBROTA M., BARJAKTAROVIC-RAKOCEVIC S., 2018, Digital economy in Europe: Evaluation of countries’ performances. Zbornik Radova Ekonomskog Fakultet au Rijeci, 36(2): 861-880, https://doi.org/10.18045/zbefri.2018.2.861.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18045/zbefri.2018.2.861
Google Scholar
MITTAL P., 2020, A multi-criterion decision analysis based on PCA for analyzing the digital technology skills in the effectiveness of government services, 2020 International Conference on Decision Aid Sciences and Application (DASA), 2020: 490-494, https://doi.org/10.1109/DASA51403.2020.9317241.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/DASA51403.2020.9317241
Google Scholar
NAMBISAN S., WRIGHT M., FELDMAN M., 2019, The digital transformation of innovation and entrepreneurship: Progress, challenges and key themes. Research Policy, 48(8): 1-9, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.03.018.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.03.018
Google Scholar
NOVAK J., PURTA M., MARCINIAK M., IGNATOWICZ K., ROZENBAUM K., YEARWOOD K., 2018, The rise of Digital Challengers – how digitization can become the next growth engine for Central and Eastern Europe. McKinsey & Company, https://digitalchallengers.mckinsey.com/ (22.02.2023).
Google Scholar
OECD, 2022, Digital Services Trade Restrictiveness Index, https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=STRI_DIGITAL (25.02.2023)
Google Scholar
PELLÉNYI G. M., 2020, The Role of Central & Eastern Europe in Global Value Chains: Evidence from Occupation-Level Em-ployment Data, European Economy Economic Brief, 062, https://ec.europa.eu/info/publications/economic-and-financial-affairs-publications_en. (18.02.2023).
Google Scholar
POLOZOVA T., KOLUPAIEVA I., SHEIKO I., 2021, Digital Gap in EU Countries and its Impact on Labour Productivity and Global Competitiveness., Hradec Economic Days, University of Hradec, Králové. part 1, 2021: 569-570,
Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.36689/uhk/hed/2021-01-065.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36689/uhk/hed/2021-01-065
Google Scholar
POLOZOVA T., KUTSENKO YU., KANOVA O., 2022, Formation of Sustainable Investment Attractiveness of Regions Under the Conditions of COVID-19, Problemy Ekorozwoju/ Problems of Sustainable Development, 17(1): 16-22,
Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.35784/pe.2022.1.03.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.35784/pe.2022.1.03
Google Scholar
SMITH L. I., A tutorial on Principal Components Analysis, http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/~pift6080/H09/documents/papers/pca_tutorial.pdf (12.02.2023).
Google Scholar
SOCIAL PROGRESS IMPERATIVE, 2021, Social Progress Index, https://www.socialprogress.org/index/global/results (05.03.2023).
Google Scholar
SOCIAL PROGRESS IMPERATIVE, 2021, The Contribution of Social Progress Index to the 2030 Agenda, https://www.socialprogress.org/about-us/sdgs (05.03.2023).
Google Scholar
TWI2050 – The World in 2050, 2019, The Digital Revolution and Sustainable Development: Opportunities and Challenges. Re-port prepared by The World in 2050 initiative. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Luxembourg, Austria, https://www.idos-research.de/uploads/media/TWI2050-for-web.pdf (11.02.2023).
Google Scholar
UNITED NATIONS, 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainability Development, https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/21252030%20Agenda%20for%20Sustainable%20Development%20web.pdf (12.01.2023).
Google Scholar
UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME, 2021, Human Development Index, https://hdr.undp.org/data-center/human-development-in-dex?utm_source=EN&utm_medium=GSR&utm_content=US_UNDP_PaidSearch_Brand_English&utm_campaign=CENTRAL&c_src=CENTRAL&c_src2=GSR&gclid=CjwKCAjwlqOXBhBqEiwA-hhitKBUKD6xDDo4eeU10R6dFztGJCd6nsafa7jwd_8M_9MDHijpHUEMKxoCah0QAvD_BwE#/indicies/HDI (06.03.2023).
Google Scholar
UNITED NATIONS, 2022, Economic and Social Council Progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals, Advance uned-ited version (Working paper), https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/29858SG_SDG_Progress_Report_2022.pdf (12.02.2023).
Google Scholar
de VRIES B., PETERSON A., 2009, Conceptualizing sustainable development: An assessment methodology connecting values, knowledge, worldviews and scenarios, Ecological Economics, 68: 106-1019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.11.015.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.11.015
Google Scholar
WORLD BANK, 2018, Aggregated Logistic Performance Index [Data set]. Retrieved December 01, 2021, https://lpi.worldbank.org/international/aggregated-ranking. (04.03.2023).
Google Scholar
WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM (WEF), 2021, Digital skills among population ranking (in Global Competitiveness index), https://tcdata360.worldbank.org/indicators/hb0649ed2?country=BRA&indicator=41400&countries=NLD&viz=line_chart&years=2017,2019. (23.02.2023).
Google Scholar
WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM, 2020, Global Social mobility report 2020: equality, opportunity and a new economic imperative, https://www3.weforum.org/docs/Global_Social_Mobility_Report.pdf (26.02.2023).
Google Scholar
Authors
Irina KolupaievaLinkoping University, Linkoping, Sweden Sweden
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1256-0817
Guest lecturer at Linkoping University, Sweden.
Profesor Katedry Cybernetyki Ekonomicznej i Zarządzania Bezpieczeństwem Ekonomicznym w Charkowie Narodowym Uniwersytecie Elektroniki Radiowej, Charków, Ukraina., Doktor nauk ekonomicznych, profesor
Research internship in Linkoping University, Sweden (Sweden, 2022-2023)
Project leader and coordinator of Erasmus Jean Monnet Module «Ukraine-EU: Digital innovations making connections 4 changes» – EUDI4C #101047751 (Since 2022) ; Erasmus+ Jean Monnet Module «Ukraine-EU: Circular Economy solutions 4 Smart and Sustainable Cities» -Eco4Smart#101127659 (since 2023); «Improvements of Mechanisms of Digital Regulatory Policy of Ukraine in relation to the EU», Linkoping University, Sweden (September 2022-June 2023)
Authors
Iryna Sheikoirina.sheiko@nure.ua
Kharkiv National University of Radio Electronics, Kharkiv Ukraine
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5770-3677
Associate professor of Economic Сybernetics and Management of Economic Security Department, in Kharkov National University of Radio Electronics, Kharkiv, Ukraine. Candidate of Economic Sciences, PhD
Authors
Tetiana PolozovaKharkiv National University of Radio Electronics, Kharkiv Ukraine
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9956-8816
Head of Department of Economic Cybernetics and Management of Economic Security in Kharkov National University of Radio Electronics, Kharkiv, Ukraine. Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor.
Research interests: diagnostics of innovative and investment activity of the enterprise, estimation of economic efficiency of innovative and investment projects
Statistics
Abstract views: 358PDF downloads: 476