Values Orientation Change – an Important Prerequisite for the Development of a Sustainable Economy
Article Sidebar
Open full text
Issue Vol. 20 No. 1 (2025)
-
The Journal Problemy Ekorozwoju/ Problems of Sustainable Development as a Polish Platform for International Interdisciplinary Scientific Discourse
Artur Pawłowski1-5
-
From Environmental Ethics to Sustainability Ethics
Hong Du6-14
-
The Role of Christianity in Ecological Awakening: Foundations for Christians' Sustainable Behavior Toward Nature
Ryszard Sadowski15-24
-
Gandhian Interpretation of the Bhagavad Gita: A Solution to Sustainable Living
Namarta Sharma25-33
-
Values Orientation Change – an Important Prerequisite for the Development of a Sustainable Economy
Eva Pechociakova Svitacova34-42
-
Assessing Sustainable Development Performance and Alternative Concepts in a Group of Developed Countries in Europe
Magdaléna Drastichová, Peter Filzmoser43-73
-
Resilience after COVID-19: A Global Review of Recovery Strategies and their impact on Demographic and Economic Sectors
Jhoana Romero, Monica Mesa, Cesar Minoli, Juan Aristizabal74-95
-
Digital Inequality and Sustainable Development
Pawel Rydzewski96-108
-
Digital Trade and Regional Economic Resilience: A Case Study from China
Paijie Wan, Feng He109-128
-
Examining the Relationship between Globalization and Sustainable Migration in OECD Countries
Mehmet Şükrü Nar, Mehmet Nar129-142
-
Estimating the Role of Economic Globalization, Technological Development and Household Consumption on Ecological Footprint in Visegrad Countries
Orhan Cengiz, Fatma İdil Baktemur, Meltem Canoglu143-158
-
Relationship Between Organic Farmland Expansion and Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Europe in Implementing the Sustainable Development Goals
Serhii Kozlovskyi, Ivan Zayukov, Volodymyr Kozlovskyi, Oleksandr Tregubov, Sviatoslav Storchak, Viktor Mishchenko, Ruslan Lavrov159-173
-
Spatiotemporal Distribution of the Impact of Climate Change and Human Activities on NDVI in China
Shuyi Dong, Wen Zhuang, Shuting Zhang, Shanshan Xie174-189
-
How Economic and Monetary Policy Uncertainty Affect Climate Policy Uncertainty in the United States?
Ahmet Tayfur Akcan, Muhammad Shahbaz, Cuneyt Kılıç, Hasan Kazak190-207
-
A Framework for Modeling the Decarbonization of the Economy Based on Energy Innovations in the Context of Industry 5.0 and Sustainable Development: International Perspective
Maryna Kravchenko, Kateryna Kopishynska, Olena Trofymenko, Ivan Pyshnograiev, Kateryna Boiarynova207-220
-
Assessing the Level of Energy Security of China: Evidence from TOPSIS-entropy Weight Method
Li Pan221-235
-
Sustainable Development through Geothermal Energy: Findings from Germany, Italy, Turkey, Iceland and France
Ignas Mikalauskas, Gabija Stanislovaitytė236-244
-
Impact of Climate Change on Women’s Political Empowerment: The Sustainable Development Perspective
Chun-Ling Ding, Yan Ma, Guo-Hua Ni, Chun-Ping Chang245-260
-
Women's Leadership in Accelerating Sustainable Development : Care Based Approach for Transformative Change
Purnima Lenka, Diptiranjan Khatua261-270
-
Macroeconomic and Institutional Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment in SAARC Countries
Jai Kumar, Chen Xi, Joti Kumari, Jinyan Huang271-287
-
Economic Growth and Sustainable Development in Asia: The Role of Political Institutions and Natural Resources
Li Guo, Romanus Osabohien, Armand Fréjuis Akpa Akpa, Mamdouh Abdulaziz Saleh Al-Faryan288-309
-
Impact of Multidimensional Distance on Financial Cooperation: A Case Study of China and Neighboring Countries
Fuchang Li, Han Wang, Xiaohui Hu, Wenli Ding310-328
Archives
-
Vol. 20 No. 2
2025-09-16 20
-
Vol. 20 No. 1
2025-01-10 22
-
Vol. 19 No. 2
2024-07-01 24
-
Vol. 19 No. 1
2024-01-08 27
-
Vol. 18 No. 2
2023-07-10 25
-
Vol. 18 No. 1
2023-01-01 25
-
Vol. 17 No. 2
2022-07-04 26
-
Vol. 17 No. 1
2022-01-03 28
-
Vol. 16 No. 2
2021-07-01 26
-
Vol. 16 No. 1
2021-01-04 24
Main Article Content
DOI
Authors
Abstract
Issues of unsustainability or sustainability arise also in the context of the functioning of an economy that should responsibly meet human needs, taking into account human resources, nature and the environment. The current economy needs to be transformed into a sustainable one, and it is pointed out that one of the important prerequisites for this is a change in value orientation. Especially of those actors who are involved in the economy. The change in value orientation concerns, in particular, fundamental values, values that are key to sustainable development, such as nature, the environment, but also the human being who is part of them. In justifying the need to change the value orientation of these actors, we rely on thinkers who reject reductionist-economist approaches in economics and explicate the values that must underpin a sustainable economy. The development of such an economy requires economic actors to be guided not only by economic values, but also by humane and environmental values, and to accept values compatible with a sustainable way of life, which are alternative values to those that underpin contemporary postmodern society. Confirmation of the fact that some economic actors are already orienting themselves towards new values that also support a sustainable economy are some of the new trends in economic thinking, alternative sustainable economic concepts and models. They confirm the start of an environmentally and socially useful transformation process of the economy into a sustainable one.
Keywords:
References
1. BROŽÍK V., 2000, Hodnotové orientácie, UKF, Nitra, Slovakia.
2. DALY H. E., 2007, Ecological Economics and Sustainable Development. Selected Essays of Herman Daly, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, GB. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781847206947
3. EUROPEAN COMMISSION, 2016, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Next steps for a sustainable European future. European action for sustainability, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52016DC0739&from=en (18.06.2024).
4. LEAL FILHO W., LEVESQUE V., SIVAPALAN S., SALVIA A.L., FRITZEN B., DECKERT R., KOZLOVA V., LEVASSEUR T.J., EMBLEN-PERRY K., AZEITEIRO U.M., PAÇO A., BORSARI B., SHIEL C., 2022, Social values and sustainable development: community experiences, Environmental Sciences Europe, 34(1):67, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-022-00641-z. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-022-00641-z
5. GERBERY D., 2022, Úvod do ekonomickej sociológie, STIMUL, Bratislava, Slovakia.
6. HANUSIN J., HUBA M., IRA V., KLINEC I., PODOBA J., SZOLLOS J., 2000, Dictionary from Sustainability (In Slovak), STUŽ/SR, Bratislava, Slovakia.
7. HUBA M., 2006a, Hodnoty, globálne problémy a hľadanie udržateľnejšej budúcnosti, Životné prostredie, 40(6): 285-287.
8. HUBA M., 2006b, Values for a sustainable future vs. Global problems and threats, Filozofia, 61(7): 520-532.
9. HUBA M., 2022, Human Values for Sustainable Future from the Czech and Slovak Perspective, Envigogika, 14(2), https://doi.org/10.14712/18023061.638. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14712/18023061.638
10. INVESTOPEDIA STAFF, 2020, Sharing Economy, https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/sharing-economy.asp (2.5.2024).
11. JONAS H., 1997, The Imperative of Responsibility. In Search of an Ethics for the Technological Age, University of Chicago Press, Chicaho, USA.
12. JUVIN H., LIPOVETSKY G., 2012, Globalizovaný Západ. Polemika o planetární kultúře, PROSTOR, Prague, Czech Republic.
13. KELLER J., 2019, Společnost věčného mládí, Sociologické nakladatelství SLON, Prague, Czech Republic.
14. KOLÁŘ P., SVOBODA V., 1997, Logika a etika. Úvod do metaetiky, FILOSOFIA, Prague, Czech Republic. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47376/filosofia.1997.1
15. LYOTARD J. F., 1993, Postmoderní situace. O postmodernismu, FILOSOFIA, Prague, Czech Republic.
16. MÁRTON M., 2000, К univerzálnosti, situatívnosti a relevancii modelu homo oeconomicus, Ekonomický časopis/Journal of Economics 48(2): 164-172.
17. MEADOWS D., MEADOWS D., RANDERS J., BEHRENSW., 1972, The limits to growth. A Report for the club of Rome´s Project on the Predicament of Mankind, Universe Books, New York, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1349/ddlp.1
18. MRAVCOVÁ A., 2023, On Global Environmental Citizenship in the Context of the Anthropocene and the Deepening Environmental Crisis, Filozofia, 78(105): 75-89, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31577/filozofia.2023.78.10.Suppl.7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31577/filozofia.2023.78.10.Suppl.7
19. NOVÁČEK P., VAVROUŠEK J., 1993, Lidské hodnoty a trvale udržitelný způsob života, Vydavatelství Univerzity Palackého, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
20. OECD, Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), https://www.oecd.org/en/topics/sustainable-development-goals-sdgs.html (04.07.2024).
21. OECD, 2021, Green growth and sustainable development, http://www.oecd.org/greengrowth/ (03.06.2024).
22. PARSONS T., SHILS E. (eds)., 2001, Toward a general theory of action. Theoretical Foundations for the Social Sciences, Routledge, New York, USA.
23. PRŮCHA J., 2009, Pedagogická encyklopedie, Portál, Prague, Czech Republic.
24. RICH A., 1994, Etika hospodářství II. OIKOYMENH, Prague, Czech Republic.
25. ROKEACH M., 1973, The Nature of Human Values, Free Press, New York, USA.
26. ROKEACH M., 1979, Understanding Human Values. Individual and Societal, Free Press, New York, USA.
27. SADOWSKI R., AYVAZ, Z., 2023, Biblical and Quranic Argumentation for Sustainable Behaviors Toward Nature, Problemy Ekorozwoju/ Problems of Sustainable Development 18(1): 152-163, https://doi.org/10.35784/pe.2023.1.15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35784/pe.2023.1.15
28. SARIATLI F., 2017, Linear Economy versus Circular Economy: A Comparative and Analyzer Study for Optimization of Economy for Sustainability, Visegrad Journal on Bioeconomy and Sustainable Development, 6(1): 31-34, https://doi.org/10.1515/vjbsd-2017-0005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/vjbsd-2017-0005
29. SCHNEIDER F., KALLIS G., MARTINEZ-ALIER J., 2010, Crisis or opportunity? Economic degrowth for social equity and ecological sustainability. Introduction to this special issue, Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(6): 511-518. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.01.014
30. SCHWARTZ S.H., 2012, An overview of the Schwartz theory of basic values, Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1116
31. SCHWEITZER A., 1993, Náuka úcty k životu, Dharma Gaia, Prague, Czech Republic.
32. SEN A., 2002, Etika a ekonomie, Vyšehrad, Prague, Czech Republic.
33. SEN A., 2004, Elements of a Theory of Human Rights, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 32(4): 315-356. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.2004.00017.x
34. SISÁKOVÁ O., 1999, Nesúmerateľnosť hodnôt – existenciálny variant riešenia, Filozofia, 54(7): 474-482.
35. SKOLIMOWSKI H., 1992, Ecological spirituality and its practical consequences, The Teilhard Review, 27(2): 43-53.
36. SKOLIMOWSKI H., 1999, Living Philosophy: Eco-Philosophy as a Tree of Life, Penguin Books, London, Great Britain.
37. SMITH B. M., 1991, Values, Self & Society. Toward a Humanist Social Psychology, Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, Canada.
38. SMITH-SEBASTO N. J., 1997, Education for ecological literacy, Environmental Education for the 21st century: International and interdisciplinary perspectives, ed. Thompson, P. J. Peter Lang Publishing Inc., New York, USA: 279-288.
39. SMOLKOVÁ E., 2003, Environmentálne hodnoty v hodnotových systémoch, Filozofia, 58(7): 471-483.
40. SPOUSTA V., 2008, Krize současné společnosti a proměny hodnot na přelomu tisícletí, Pedagogika 18(3): 241-252.
41. ŠMAJS J., 2010, Ekonomika a příroda – filosofická reflexe problému, Ekonomický časopis, 58(2): 126-143.
42. THE GLOBAL SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT REPORT, 2023, Times Of Crisis, Times Of Change. Science For Accelerating Transformations To Sustainable Development, https://sdgs.un.org/sites/default/files/2023-09/FINAL%20GSDR%202023-Digital%20-110923_1.pdf (25.05.2024).
43. UN, 1948, Universal Declaration of Human Rights, https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights (30.4.2024).
44. UNDP, 2015, Sustainable Development Goals, https://www.undp.org/sustainable-development-goals/ (2.01.2023).
45. UNEP, 2011, United Nations Environment Programme Sustainable consumption and production policies, https://www.unep.org/explore-topics/resource-efficiency/what-we-do/ sustainable- consumption-and-production-policies (31.05.2023).
46. VAVROUŠEK J., 1993, Perspectives of Human ValuesCompatible with Sustainable Way of Living, Human Values and Sustainable Way of Living. Proceedings (In Czech), eds. Novacek, P., Vavroušek, J.. STUZ UP, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
47. VAVROUŠEK J., 1994, Hledání lidských hodnot slučitelných s trvale udržitelným spúsobem života, https://stuz.cz/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=132:hledani-lidskych-hodnot-slucitelnych-s-trvale-udrzitelnym-zpusobem-zivota&catid=56&Itemid=56 (31.05.2024).
48. WEBER M., 2009, Metodologie, sociologie a politika, Oikoymenh, Prague, Czech Republic.
49. WORLD COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT, 1987, Our Common Future, Oxford, University Press, Oxford, USA, https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/5987our-common-future.pdf (18.05.2024).
50. ZORIKOVA U., 2020, The Essence and Main Components of Value Orientations, Novateur Publications JournalNX – A Multidisciplinary Peer Reviewed Journal, 6(12): 301-303.
Article Details
Abstract views: 274

