Values Orientation Change – an Important Prerequisite for the Development of a Sustainable Economy
Eva Pechociakova Svitacova
eva.svitacova@uniag.skSlovak Agricultural University of Nitra (Slovakia)
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7201-6691
Abstract
Issues of unsustainability or sustainability arise also in the context of the functioning of an economy that should responsibly meet human needs, taking into account human resources, nature and the environment. The current economy needs to be transformed into a sustainable one, and it is pointed out that one of the important prerequisites for this is a change in value orientation. Especially of those actors who are involved in the economy. The change in value orientation concerns, in particular, fundamental values, values that are key to sustainable development, such as nature, the environment, but also the human being who is part of them. In justifying the need to change the value orientation of these actors, we rely on thinkers who reject reductionist-economist approaches in economics and explicate the values that must underpin a sustainable economy. The development of such an economy requires economic actors to be guided not only by economic values, but also by humane and environmental values, and to accept values compatible with a sustainable way of life, which are alternative values to those that underpin contemporary postmodern society. Confirmation of the fact that some economic actors are already orienting themselves towards new values that also support a sustainable economy are some of the new trends in economic thinking, alternative sustainable economic concepts and models. They confirm the start of an environmentally and socially useful transformation process of the economy into a sustainable one.
Keywords:
values, change, value orientation, sustainability, sustainable economyReferences
1. BROŽÍK V., 2000, Hodnotové orientácie, UKF, Nitra, Slovakia.
Google Scholar
2. DALY H. E., 2007, Ecological Economics and Sustainable Development. Selected Essays of Herman Daly, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, GB.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781847206947
Google Scholar
3. EUROPEAN COMMISSION, 2016, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Next steps for a sustainable European future. European action for sustainability, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52016DC0739&from=en (18.06.2024).
Google Scholar
4. LEAL FILHO W., LEVESQUE V., SIVAPALAN S., SALVIA A.L., FRITZEN B., DECKERT R., KOZLOVA V., LEVASSEUR T.J., EMBLEN-PERRY K., AZEITEIRO U.M., PAÇO A., BORSARI B., SHIEL C., 2022, Social values and sustainable development: community experiences, Environmental Sciences Europe, 34(1):67, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-022-00641-z.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-022-00641-z
Google Scholar
5. GERBERY D., 2022, Úvod do ekonomickej sociológie, STIMUL, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Google Scholar
6. HANUSIN J., HUBA M., IRA V., KLINEC I., PODOBA J., SZOLLOS J., 2000, Dictionary from Sustainability (In Slovak), STUŽ/SR, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Google Scholar
7. HUBA M., 2006a, Hodnoty, globálne problémy a hľadanie udržateľnejšej budúcnosti, Životné prostredie, 40(6): 285-287.
Google Scholar
8. HUBA M., 2006b, Values for a sustainable future vs. Global problems and threats, Filozofia, 61(7): 520-532.
Google Scholar
9. HUBA M., 2022, Human Values for Sustainable Future from the Czech and Slovak Perspective, Envigogika, 14(2), https://doi.org/10.14712/18023061.638.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14712/18023061.638
Google Scholar
10. INVESTOPEDIA STAFF, 2020, Sharing Economy, https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/sharing-economy.asp (2.5.2024).
Google Scholar
11. JONAS H., 1997, The Imperative of Responsibility. In Search of an Ethics for the Technological Age, University of Chicago Press, Chicaho, USA.
Google Scholar
12. JUVIN H., LIPOVETSKY G., 2012, Globalizovaný Západ. Polemika o planetární kultúře, PROSTOR, Prague, Czech Republic.
Google Scholar
13. KELLER J., 2019, Společnost věčného mládí, Sociologické nakladatelství SLON, Prague, Czech Republic.
Google Scholar
14. KOLÁŘ P., SVOBODA V., 1997, Logika a etika. Úvod do metaetiky, FILOSOFIA, Prague, Czech Republic.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.47376/filosofia.1997.1
Google Scholar
15. LYOTARD J. F., 1993, Postmoderní situace. O postmodernismu, FILOSOFIA, Prague, Czech Republic.
Google Scholar
16. MÁRTON M., 2000, К univerzálnosti, situatívnosti a relevancii modelu homo oeconomicus, Ekonomický časopis/Journal of Economics 48(2): 164-172.
Google Scholar
17. MEADOWS D., MEADOWS D., RANDERS J., BEHRENSW., 1972, The limits to growth. A Report for the club of Rome´s Project on the Predicament of Mankind, Universe Books, New York, USA.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1349/ddlp.1
Google Scholar
18. MRAVCOVÁ A., 2023, On Global Environmental Citizenship in the Context of the Anthropocene and the Deepening Environmental Crisis, Filozofia, 78(105): 75-89, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31577/filozofia.2023.78.10.Suppl.7.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31577/filozofia.2023.78.10.Suppl.7
Google Scholar
19. NOVÁČEK P., VAVROUŠEK J., 1993, Lidské hodnoty a trvale udržitelný způsob života, Vydavatelství Univerzity Palackého, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Google Scholar
20. OECD, Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), https://www.oecd.org/en/topics/sustainable-development-goals-sdgs.html (04.07.2024).
Google Scholar
21. OECD, 2021, Green growth and sustainable development, http://www.oecd.org/greengrowth/ (03.06.2024).
Google Scholar
22. PARSONS T., SHILS E. (eds)., 2001, Toward a general theory of action. Theoretical Foundations for the Social Sciences, Routledge, New York, USA.
Google Scholar
23. PRŮCHA J., 2009, Pedagogická encyklopedie, Portál, Prague, Czech Republic.
Google Scholar
24. RICH A., 1994, Etika hospodářství II. OIKOYMENH, Prague, Czech Republic.
Google Scholar
25. ROKEACH M., 1973, The Nature of Human Values, Free Press, New York, USA.
Google Scholar
26. ROKEACH M., 1979, Understanding Human Values. Individual and Societal, Free Press, New York, USA.
Google Scholar
27. SADOWSKI R., AYVAZ, Z., 2023, Biblical and Quranic Argumentation for Sustainable Behaviors Toward Nature, Problemy Ekorozwoju/ Problems of Sustainable Development 18(1): 152-163, https://doi.org/10.35784/pe.2023.1.15.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.35784/pe.2023.1.15
Google Scholar
28. SARIATLI F., 2017, Linear Economy versus Circular Economy: A Comparative and Analyzer Study for Optimization of Economy for Sustainability, Visegrad Journal on Bioeconomy and Sustainable Development, 6(1): 31-34, https://doi.org/10.1515/vjbsd-2017-0005.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/vjbsd-2017-0005
Google Scholar
29. SCHNEIDER F., KALLIS G., MARTINEZ-ALIER J., 2010, Crisis or opportunity? Economic degrowth for social equity and ecological sustainability. Introduction to this special issue, Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(6): 511-518.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.01.014
Google Scholar
30. SCHWARTZ S.H., 2012, An overview of the Schwartz theory of basic values, Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1116.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1116
Google Scholar
31. SCHWEITZER A., 1993, Náuka úcty k životu, Dharma Gaia, Prague, Czech Republic.
Google Scholar
32. SEN A., 2002, Etika a ekonomie, Vyšehrad, Prague, Czech Republic.
Google Scholar
33. SEN A., 2004, Elements of a Theory of Human Rights, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 32(4): 315-356.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.2004.00017.x
Google Scholar
34. SISÁKOVÁ O., 1999, Nesúmerateľnosť hodnôt – existenciálny variant riešenia, Filozofia, 54(7): 474-482.
Google Scholar
35. SKOLIMOWSKI H., 1992, Ecological spirituality and its practical consequences, The Teilhard Review, 27(2): 43-53.
Google Scholar
36. SKOLIMOWSKI H., 1999, Living Philosophy: Eco-Philosophy as a Tree of Life, Penguin Books, London, Great Britain.
Google Scholar
37. SMITH B. M., 1991, Values, Self & Society. Toward a Humanist Social Psychology, Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, Canada.
Google Scholar
38. SMITH-SEBASTO N. J., 1997, Education for ecological literacy, Environmental Education for the 21st century: International and interdisciplinary perspectives, ed. Thompson, P. J. Peter Lang Publishing Inc., New York, USA: 279-288.
Google Scholar
39. SMOLKOVÁ E., 2003, Environmentálne hodnoty v hodnotových systémoch, Filozofia, 58(7): 471-483.
Google Scholar
40. SPOUSTA V., 2008, Krize současné společnosti a proměny hodnot na přelomu tisícletí, Pedagogika 18(3): 241-252.
Google Scholar
41. ŠMAJS J., 2010, Ekonomika a příroda – filosofická reflexe problému, Ekonomický časopis, 58(2): 126-143.
Google Scholar
42. THE GLOBAL SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT REPORT, 2023, Times Of Crisis, Times Of Change. Science For Accelerating Transformations To Sustainable Development, https://sdgs.un.org/sites/default/files/2023-09/FINAL%20GSDR%202023-Digital%20-110923_1.pdf (25.05.2024).
Google Scholar
43. UN, 1948, Universal Declaration of Human Rights, https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights (30.4.2024).
Google Scholar
44. UNDP, 2015, Sustainable Development Goals, https://www.undp.org/sustainable-development-goals/ (2.01.2023).
Google Scholar
45. UNEP, 2011, United Nations Environment Programme Sustainable consumption and production policies, https://www.unep.org/explore-topics/resource-efficiency/what-we-do/ sustainable- consumption-and-production-policies (31.05.2023).
Google Scholar
46. VAVROUŠEK J., 1993, Perspectives of Human ValuesCompatible with Sustainable Way of Living, Human Values and Sustainable Way of Living. Proceedings (In Czech), eds. Novacek, P., Vavroušek, J.. STUZ UP, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Google Scholar
47. VAVROUŠEK J., 1994, Hledání lidských hodnot slučitelných s trvale udržitelným spúsobem života, https://stuz.cz/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=132:hledani-lidskych-hodnot-slucitelnych-s-trvale-udrzitelnym-zpusobem-zivota&catid=56&Itemid=56 (31.05.2024).
Google Scholar
48. WEBER M., 2009, Metodologie, sociologie a politika, Oikoymenh, Prague, Czech Republic.
Google Scholar
49. WORLD COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT, 1987, Our Common Future, Oxford, University Press, Oxford, USA, https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/5987our-common-future.pdf (18.05.2024).
Google Scholar
50. ZORIKOVA U., 2020, The Essence and Main Components of Value Orientations, Novateur Publications JournalNX – A Multidisciplinary Peer Reviewed Journal, 6(12): 301-303.
Google Scholar
Authors
Eva Pechociakova Svitacovaeva.svitacova@uniag.sk
Slovak Agricultural University of Nitra Slovakia
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7201-6691
Statistics
Abstract views: 105PDF downloads: 48
