Sustainable Development versus Gender Gap – Do Women Matter?

Ada Domańska


Maria Curie-Sklodowska University in Lublin, Maria Curie-Sklodowska sq. 5, 20-031 Lublin, Poland (Poland)

Beata Żukowska


Maria Curie-Sklodowska University in Lublin, Maria Curie-Sklodowska sq. 5, 20-031 Lublin, Poland (Poland)

Robert Zajkowski


Maria Curie-Sklodowska University in Lublin, Maria Curie-Sklodowska sq. 5, 20-031 Lublin, Poland (Poland)


Abstract

Striving for sustainable development of society and economy is a concept that for decades has been the subject of scientific inquiry. Additionally, the sustainable development concept is based on three main and overlapping pillars (social, economic and environmental). Maintaining balance between them is only way to achieve at least acceptable effects of sustainable development. Analyses in this field have focused on identification of boosters and inhibitors of sustainable development. Taking into consideration this context in our paper, the analyses were devoted to identifying whether a smaller gender gap level (e.g. incentives, political engagement, and education) aligns with higher results in obtaining sustainable development goals. Three hypotheses were formulated that state that mitigating the gender gap supports the social, economic and environmental pillars of sustainable development. Indeed, the results of our study show that in particular, a smaller gender gap related to educational attainment and political empowerment of females is connected positively with higher levels of sustainable development of the three pillars in specific countries. The final conclusion is that diminishment of inequality between females and males supports harmonious and sustainable development of societies in social, economic and environmental dimensions.


Keywords:

sustainable development, pillars of sustainable development, gender gap

ANNAN K., 2008, Quotes on human rights, https://www.unfpa.org/resources/quotes-human-rights (6.11.2018).
  Google Scholar

ARBIA G., 2014, A primer for spatial econometrics: with applications in R, Palgrave Macmillan, Springer, London.
  Google Scholar

BENAVOT A., 1989,. Education, gender, and economic development: A cross-national study, in: Sociology of Education, p. 14-32.
  Google Scholar

BANERJEE S., CARLI N B. P., GELFAND A. E., 2004, Hierarchical modeling and analysis for spatial data, Chapman and Hall/CRC.
  Google Scholar

BOULANGER P. M., 2008, Sustainable development indicators: A scientific challenge, a democratic issue, in: SAPI EN. S. Surveys and Perspectives Integrating Environment and Society.
  Google Scholar

BOOTH C., 2001, Seeking true democracy: The challenge and promise of full equality for women, Chatham House.
  Google Scholar

CORNING A. F., MYERS D. J., 2002, Individual orientation toward engagement in social action, in: Political Psychology, 23(4), p. 703-729.
  Google Scholar

COWAN G., 1998, Statistical data analysis, Oxford University Press.
  Google Scholar

DOMAŃSKA A., ŻUKOWSKA B., ZAJKOWSKI R., 2018, Green entrepreneurship as a connector among social, environmental and economic pillars of -sustainable development. Why some countries are more agile?, in: Problemy Ekorozwoju/ Problems of Sustainable Development, 13(2), p. 67-76.
  Google Scholar

EAGLY A. H., JOHANNESEN-SCHMIDT M. C., VAN ENGEN M. L., 2003, Transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles: A meta-analysis comparing women and men, in: Psychological Bulletin, 129(4), p. 569.
  Google Scholar

EAGLY A. H., JOHANNESEN-SCHMIDT M. C., 2001, The leadership styles of women and men, in: Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), p. 781-797.
  Google Scholar

Engendering Development through Gender Equality in Rights, Resources and Voice, 2001, World Bank, Oxford University Press.
  Google Scholar

FOTHERINGHAM A. S., BRUNSDON C., CHARLTON M., 2003, Geographically weighted regression, John Wiley & Sons, West Atrium.
  Google Scholar

GAARD G., GRUEN L., 2005, Ecofeminism: Toward global justice and planetary health, in: Environmental philosophy: From animal rights to radical ecology, eds. Zimmerman, Callicott, Warren, Klaver, & Clark, Pearson Prentice Hall, New Jersey, p. 155-177.
  Google Scholar

Gender and sustainable development: Maximising the economic, social and environmental role of women, 2008, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris.
  Google Scholar

Gender Equality as Smart Economics, 2009, The World Bank, Washington DC.
  Google Scholar

GIDDINGS B., HOPWOOD B., O'BRIEN G., 2002, Environment, economy and society: Fitting them together into sustainable development, in:. Sustainable development, 10(4), p. 187-196.
  Google Scholar

GUTERREZ M. (ed.), 2003, Macro-economics: Making gender matter: Concepts, policies and institutional change in developing countries, Zed Books.
  Google Scholar

Green jobs and women workers: Employment, equity, equality, draft report for SustainLabour/International Trade Union Confederation (ITUC), 2009, SustainLabour.
  Google Scholar

HILL M. A., KING E., 1995, Women's education and economic well-being, in: Feminist Economics, 1(2), p. 21-46.
  Google Scholar

HOPWOOD B., MELLOR M., O'BRIEN G., 2005, Sustainable development: Mapping different approaches, in: Sustainable Development, 13(1), p. 38-52.
  Google Scholar

Implementing the Goals of Global Responsibilities https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/ (6.11.2018).
  Google Scholar

The Global Gender Gap Report 2017, https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-global-gender-gap-report-2017 (5.11.2018).
  Google Scholar

2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/development-agenda/ (5.11.2018).
  Google Scholar

JEFFREY K., WHEATLEY H., ABDALLAH S., 2016, The Happy Planet Index 2016, a global index of sustainable wellbeing, New Economics Foundation.
  Google Scholar

RODGERS L. J., NICEWANDER W. A., 1988, Thirteen ways to look at the correlation coefficient, in: The American Statistician, 42(1), p. 59-66.
  Google Scholar

MANSBRIDGE J., 1999, Should blacks represent blacks and women represent women? A contingent ‘yes’, in: The Journal of Politics, 61(3), p. 628-657.
  Google Scholar

MIZOBUCHI H., 2014, Measuring world better life frontier: A composite indicator for OECD better life index, in: Social Indicators Research, 118(3), p. 987-1007.
  Google Scholar

MIES M., SHIVA V., 1993, Ecofeminism, Zed Press, London.
  Google Scholar

WCED, 1987, Our Common Future. The Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development (Brundtalnd Report), Oxford University Press, New York.
  Google Scholar

O'RIORDAN T., 1989, The challenge for environmentalism, in:. New Models in Geography, eds. Peet R., Thrift N., Unwin Hyman, London.
  Google Scholar

PAWŁOWSKI A., 2008, How many dimensions does sustainable development have?, in: Sustainable Development, 16(2), p. 81-90.
  Google Scholar

PHILLIPS A., 1995, The politics of presence, Clarendon Press.
  Google Scholar

RYDZEWSKI P., 2018, Indicators of social aspects of sustainable development in selected nationwide databases, in: Problemy Ekorozwoju/ Problems of Sustainable Development, 13(1), p. 69-74.
  Google Scholar

SEGUINO S., 2000, Gender inequality and economic growth: A cross-country analysis, in: World Development, 28(7), p. 1211-1230.
  Google Scholar

STEVENS C., 2010, Are women the key to sustainable development?, The Frederick S. Pardee Center for the Study of the Longer-Range Future, Boston University, Boston.
  Google Scholar

TAYLOR R., 1990, Interpretation of the correlation coefficient: A basic review, in: Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography, 6(1), p. 35-39.
  Google Scholar

Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, 2015, United Nations Sus-
  Google Scholar

tainable Development Knowledge Platform, https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld (5.11.2018).
  Google Scholar

The Global Gender Gap Report 2017. (2017). World Economic Forum.
  Google Scholar

Women in parliament in 2017. The year in review, 2017, Inter-Parliamentary Union.
  Google Scholar

Women matter, time to accelerate. Ten years of insights into gender diversity, 2017, McKinsey & Company.
  Google Scholar

World Development Report 2012: Gender Equality and Development, 2012, The World Bank, http://go.worldbank.org/CQCTMSFI40 (5.11.2018).
  Google Scholar

ZAJKOWSKI R., 2018, Transfery władzy, własności i wartości w przedsiębiorstwach rodzinnych. Efekt drugiego pokolenia, C. H. Beck, Warsaw.
  Google Scholar

Download


Published
2019-07-01

Cited by

Domańska, A., Żukowska, B., & Zajkowski, R. (2019). Sustainable Development versus Gender Gap – Do Women Matter?. Problemy Ekorozwoju, 14(2), 129–142. Retrieved from https://ph.pollub.pl/index.php/preko/article/view/5087

Authors

Ada Domańska 

Maria Curie-Sklodowska University in Lublin, Maria Curie-Sklodowska sq. 5, 20-031 Lublin, Poland Poland

Authors

Beata Żukowska 

Maria Curie-Sklodowska University in Lublin, Maria Curie-Sklodowska sq. 5, 20-031 Lublin, Poland Poland

Authors

Robert Zajkowski 

Maria Curie-Sklodowska University in Lublin, Maria Curie-Sklodowska sq. 5, 20-031 Lublin, Poland Poland

Statistics

Abstract views: 110
PDF downloads: 27