Analiza i audyt sprawozdawczości zrównoważonego rozwoju dla sieci handlowych i kierunków ich doskonalenia

Alla Us

allaus2@ukr.net
Kyiv National University of Trade and Economics, Department of Financial Analysis and Audit, Kyiv, Ukraine (Ukraina)
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1462-7694

Karina Nazarova


Kyiv National University of Trade and Economics, Department of Financial Analysis and Audit, Kyiv, Ukraine (Ukraina)
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5019-9244

Abstrakt

We współczesnym świecie kwestia osiągnięcia modelu zrównoważonego rozwoju gospodarczego staje się coraz bardziej paląca. Jednym z jego elementów jest przestrzeganie przez przedsiębiorstwa Celów zrównoważonego rozwoju oraz weryfikacja przez organy państwowe i niezależnych audytorów przedsiębiorstw w zakresie zrównoważonego rozwoju środowiskowego. Tym samym istotne staje się rozważenie nowoczesnych metod składania i audytu raportów zrównoważonego rozwoju (SDR) oraz analiza możliwości ich doskonalenia. W niniejszej pracy zwrócono uwagę na przedsiębiorstwa zajmujące się handlem detalicznym, biorąc pod uwagę specyfikę, z jaką spotykają się przy składaniu SDR. Celem badania była analiza najpowszechniejszych metod raportowania zrównoważonego rozwoju oraz wypracowanie efektywnego modelu (i rekomendacji do niego) audytu i analizy raportowania zrównoważonego rozwoju. Modelowanie stało się główną metodą podczas pisania artykułu, uwzględniając opracowany model analizy i weryfikacji SDR. W artykule zaproponowano nowy model weryfikacji informacji niefinansowych w raportowaniu zrównoważonego rozwoju oraz ich graficzne przedstawienie w raporcie z audytu. Na jego podstawie możliwe staje się zbudowanie nowej metodyki badania SDR. Ponadto przeanalizowano najpopularniejsze międzynarodowe metody SDR, a mianowicie Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) oraz International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC). Autorzy doszli do wniosku, że GRI jest najbardziej uniwersalną z całej trójki, podczas gdy SASB koncentruje się wyłącznie na inwestorach. IIRC, będąc podobny do obu opisanych powyżej, jest opcją pośrednią. Niemniej jednak złożenie według systemu SASB jest najbardziej efektywne dla sieci handlowych, biorąc pod uwagę specyfikę funkcjonowania tego typu firm i stopień ich wpływu na otoczenie zewnętrzne. Wyniki przeprowadzonych badań oraz dane zaprezentowane w artykule pozwalają w nowy sposób ocenić nowoczesne metody składania sprawozdań finansowych i dają podstawę do budowy nowych standardów badania tych sprawozdań.


Słowa kluczowe:

księgowość, zrównoważony rozwój, firmy handlu detalicznego, audyt międzynarodowy, modelowanie

ACCOUNTABILITY.OTG, 2019, Assurance Standards, https://www.accountability.org/standards/.
  Google Scholar

AL-SHAER H., ZAMAN M., 2019, CEO compensation and sustainability reporting assurance: evidence from the UK, Journal of Business Ethics 158: 233-252, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3735-8.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3735-8   Google Scholar

BARYSHNIKOVA O.M., 2016, Features of the organization of the system of verification of sustainable development reporting, Economy and State, 8: 131-140.
  Google Scholar

BOIRAL O., HERAS-SAIZARBITORIA I., BROTHERTON M., 2019, Assessing and improving the quality of sustainability reports: the auditors’ perspective, Journal of Business Ethics 155: 703-721, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3516-4.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3516-4   Google Scholar

BUSCO C., CONSOLANDI C., ECCLES R.G., SOFRA E., 2020, A Preliminary Analysis of SASB Reporting: Disclosure Topics, Financial Relevance, and the Financial Intensity of ESG Materiality, Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 22(2): 117-125, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3548849.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jacf.12411   Google Scholar

CHEN H.S.Y., CHENG T.C.E., 2021, Shades of green: HOPF for standardized environmental performance indicators, Sustainable Resource Management 1: 241-271, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-824342-8.00017-1.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-824342-8.00017-1   Google Scholar

CORPORATE REGISTER, 2021, Live charts, https://www.corporateregister.com/livecharts.
  Google Scholar

Decree 2012-557 on obligations regarding transparency on social and environmental disclosure by companies, 2012, https://cutt.ly/LV3VpG2.
  Google Scholar

Directive 2014/95/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2014 amending Directive 2013/34/EU as regards disclosure of non-financial and diversity information by certain large undertakings and groups, 2014, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2014/95/oj.
  Google Scholar

ECCLES R.G., CHENG B., SALTZMAN D., 2010, The Landscape of Integrated Reporting, Bussines School, Harvard.
  Google Scholar

GAMKALO O.B., 2017, Non-Financial Reporting as an Instrument for Measuring the Social Activity of Domestic Enterprises, Statistics of Ukraine 4: 79-86.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31767/su.4(79).2017.04.10   Google Scholar

GERWANSKI J., 2020, Does it pay off? Integrated reporting and cost of debt: European evidence, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 27(5): 2299-2319, https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1965.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1965   Google Scholar

GLOBAL REPORTING INITIATIVE, 2022, Standards, https://www.globalreporting.org/standard/.
  Google Scholar

GOVERNMENT OFFICIES OF SWEDEN, 2007, Guidelines for external reporting by state-owned companies, 2007, https://www.government.se/information-material/2007/12/guidelines-for-external-reporting-by-state-owned-companies/.
  Google Scholar

GRAY R., 2020, Current developments and trends in social and environmental auditing, reporting and attestation: a review and comment, International Journal of Auditing,4(3): 247-268, DOI: 10.1111/1099-1123.00316.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1099-1123.00316   Google Scholar

HERZIG C., PIANOWSKI M., 2009, Business management, Wirtschaften im Unternehmen, Stuttgart.
  Google Scholar

International Integrated Reporting Council, 2022, https://www.iasplus.com/en-gb/resources/global-organisations/iirc.
  Google Scholar

International Standard on Assurance Engagements (ISAE) 3000, 2013, https://www.iaasb.org/publications/international-standard-assurance-engagements-isae-3000-revised-assurance-engagements-other-audits-or-0.
  Google Scholar

IOANNOU I., SERAFEIM G., 2011, The Consequences of Mandatory Corporate Sustainability Reporting, Harvard Business School Research Working Paper 11(100): 49-60.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1799589   Google Scholar

ISMAYILOV V.I., ALMASOV N.N., MUSAYEV N.S., SAMEDOVA A.Q., 2021, Influence of internal production conditions on the efficiency and competitiveness of enterprises, Future Business Journal 7(1): 40, https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-021-00086-5.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-021-00086-5   Google Scholar

ISO, 2010, ISO-26000:2010 Guidance on social responsibility, https://www.iso.org/ru/standard/42546.html.
  Google Scholar

ISO, 2022, ISO 14000 Environmental management, https://www.iso.org/ru/iso-14001-environmental-management.html.
  Google Scholar

JONES P., COMFORT D., 2021, Leading European Retailers and the Sustainable Development Goals, Journal of Sustainability Research 3(1): e210001, https://doi.org/: 10.20900/jsr20210001.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.20900/jsr20210001   Google Scholar

KAYA I., 2017, Sustainability reporting assurance: a literature survey. Regional Studies on Economic Growth, Fi-nancial Economics and Management, Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics, Springer, Cham, https://doi.org/: 10.1007/978-3-319-54112-9_3.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54112-9_3   Google Scholar

KETNERS K., 2020, Spending review as essential part of public sector budgeting: Latvian experience, Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference Economic Science for Rural Development 53: 97-106.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22616/ESRD.2020.53.011   Google Scholar

KOK P., VAN DER WIELE T., MCKENNA R., BROWN A.A., 2001, Corporate social responsibility audit within a quality management framework, Journal of Business Ethics 31: 285-297, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010767001610.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010767001610   Google Scholar

KPMG, 2010, Corporate Governance Code King III, https://cutt.ly/IV3V4Ph.
  Google Scholar

KPMG, 2021, The KPMG Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting, https://assets.kpmg/content/dam/kpmg/ xx/pdf/2020/11/the-time-has-come.pdf.
  Google Scholar

LUEG K., LUEG R., 2021, Deconstructing corporate sustainability narratives: A taxonomy for critical assessment of integrated reporting types, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 26(6): 1785-1800, https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2152.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2152   Google Scholar

MAKARENKO I., KRAVCHENKO O., OVCHAROVA N., ZEMLYAK N., MAKARENKO S., 2020, Standardiza-tion of audit reporting on sustainable development of companies, Agricultural and Resource Economics 6(2): 78-90.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51599/are.2020.06.02.05   Google Scholar

MARTINKOVIC M., 2021, Development of the party system and the character of coalition governments in Slovakia in the years 2006-2016, Vestnik Tomskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta-Filosofiya-Sotsiologiya-Politologiya-Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy Sociology and Political Science 60: 194-205, https://doi.org/10.17223/1998863X/60/17.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17223/1998863X/60/17   Google Scholar

MAZURYK O.V., 2015, Social audit as a modern diagnostic technology: theoretical and methodological principles of research, Bulletin of V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University 1148(34): 107-113.
  Google Scholar

MELNYK K.P., 2019, Formalization of the subject area of audit in terms of sustainable development, Problems of Theory and Methodology of Accounting, Control and Analysis 3(44): 34-39.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26642/pbo-2019-3(44)-34-39   Google Scholar

MICHELON G., PATTEN D.M., ROMI A.N., 2019, Creating legitimacy for sustainability assurance practices: evi-dence from sustainability restatements, European Accounting Review 28(2): 395-422, https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180. 2018.1469424.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2018.1469424   Google Scholar

MORIMOTO R., ASH J., HOPE C., 2005, Corporate social responsibility audit: from theory to practice, Journal of Business Ethics,62: 315-325, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-0274-5.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-0274-5   Google Scholar

SAJ, 2007, SAJSA8000 Standard, https://sa-intl.org/programs/sa8000/.
  Google Scholar

SHERRY B., 2021, More Than Half of S&P Global 1200 Now Disclose Using SASB Standards, https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2021/09/22/2301122/0/en/More-Than-Half-of-S-P-Global-1200-Now-Disclose-Using-SASB-Standards.html.
  Google Scholar

Sustainability Accounting Standards Board, 2022, https://www.sasb.org/.
  Google Scholar

TAIWAN STOCK EXCHANGE, 2021, Corporation Rules Governing the Preparation and Filing of Corporate Social Responsibility Reports by TWSE Listed Companies, https://cutt.ly/AV3Biio.
  Google Scholar

UN, 2020, Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda.
  Google Scholar

VASILIEVA T., LIEONOV S., MAKARENKO I., SIRKOVSKA N., 2017, Sustainability information disclosure as an instrument of marketing communication with stakeholders: markets, social and economic aspects, Marketing and Management of Innovation 4: 350-357, https://doi.org/10.21272/MMI.2017.4-31.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2017.4-31   Google Scholar

VELTE P., 2021, Archival Research on Integrated Reporting: a Systematic Review of Main Drivers and the Impact of Integrated Reporting on Firm Value, Journal of Management and Governance 26: 997-1061, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-021-09582-w.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-021-09582-w   Google Scholar

VOROBEY V., ZHUROVSKA I., 2021, Non-financial reporting: tools of socially responsible business, FOP O.M. Kostyuchenko, Kyiv.
  Google Scholar

WADDOCK S., SMITH N., 2000, Corporate Responsibility Audits: Doing Well by Doing Good, Sloan Management Review 41(2): 75-83.
  Google Scholar

YANG Y., ORZES G., JILA F., 2019, Does GRI Sustainability Reporting Pay Off? An Empirical Investigation of Publicly Listed Firms in China, Business & Society 60(7): 1738-1772, https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650319831632.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650319831632   Google Scholar

ZEMLYAK N.V., SERPENINOVA Y.S., 2020, Methods of Reporting on Sustainable Development and its Audit, Educational and Scientific Institute of Business Technologies, Sumy.
  Google Scholar


Opublikowane
2023-07-07

Cited By / Share

Us, A., & Nazarova, K. (2023). Analiza i audyt sprawozdawczości zrównoważonego rozwoju dla sieci handlowych i kierunków ich doskonalenia . Problemy Ekorozwoju Problems of Sustainable Development, 18(2), 183–192. https://doi.org/10.35784/preko.4032

Autorzy

Alla Us 
allaus2@ukr.net
Kyiv National University of Trade and Economics, Department of Financial Analysis and Audit, Kyiv, Ukraine Ukraina
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1462-7694

Autorzy

Karina Nazarova 

Kyiv National University of Trade and Economics, Department of Financial Analysis and Audit, Kyiv, Ukraine Ukraina
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5019-9244

Statystyki

Abstract views: 331
PDF downloads: 303