Zrównoważony rozwój i zrównoważona nauka. Skąd przyszliśmy, gdzie jesteśmy i dokąd zmierzamy? Część II: Dogłębna analiza koncepcji zrównoważonego rozwoju

Magdalena Drastichová

magdalena.drastichova@vsb.cz
Technical University of Ostrava, Czechia (Czechy)

Abstrakt

Pojęcie zrównoważonego rozwoju (SD) jest szerokie i często stosowane zamiennie z bardziej ogólnym, ale czasem także bardziej szczegółowym pojęciem zrównoważoności. Pojęcie SD jest analizowane na podstawie jego rozwoju (analizowane w pierwszej części: Drastichová, 2022) oraz związków ze zrównoważonością i powiązanymi koncepcjami naukowymi (teoretycznymi) i praktycznymi. Celem tej pracy jest wyjaśnienie znaczenia ZR, w tym pojęcia zrównoważoności, i na tej podstawie wskazanie głównych dróg przybliżania się do celów ZR, w tym jakości życia i dobrostanu. Zidentyfikowano i podsumowano ograniczenia tej koncepcji, podobnie jak alternatywy dla zrównoważonego rozwoju i zrównoważoności. Przesłanką tej pracy jest nie tylko doprecyzowanie koncepcji ZR, ale także normatywna ocena tej koncepcji w odniesieniu do dobrostanu i jakości życia ludności Ziemi w nieskończonym okresie czasu, przy zachowaniu podaży ekosystemów usług świadczonych na planecie, biorąc pod uwagę fakt, że zasoby te są nie tylko źródłem dobrobytu ludzi, ale są ogólnie niezbędne do przetrwania ludzkości. Dlatego też niniejsza praca zawiera dogłębne i rozważania koncepcji ZR w oparciu o jej historyczny rozwój, a także oceny normatywne koncepcji wynikające z tej wiedzy. Podsumowano również alternatywne koncepcje i możliwości nauki o zrównoważoności. Podjęto znaczny wysiłek, aby zidentyfikować związki koncepcji zrównoważonego rozwoju ze zrównoważonością oraz z głównymi powiązanymi koncepcjami naukowymi (teoretycznymi) i praktycznymi, a także z koncepcjami alternatywnymi do nich. Wyniki te ponownie uzyskano ze szczegółowej analizy historycznej i odpowiednich prac naukowych. Na koniec nakreślono możliwy projekt koncepcji ZR na podstawie analizy i syntezy wiedzy.


Słowa kluczowe:

jakość życia, zrównoważony rozwój, zrównoważoność, zrównoważona nauka, dobrostan

ANDERSON D.A., 2013, Environmental Economics and Natural Resource Management, Taylor & Francis, New York.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315884257   Google Scholar

ANDERSON D.A., 2010, Environmental Economics and Natural Resource Management, Routledge, Abingdon, Oxon.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203855553   Google Scholar

ARUSHANYAN Y., EKENER E, MOBERG Ǻ, 2017, Sustainability assessment framework for scenarios – SAFS, Environmental Impact Assessment Review 63: 23-34, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2016.11.001.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2016.11.001   Google Scholar

AXELSSON R., ANGELSTAM P., ELBAKIDZE M., STRYAMETS N., JOHANSSON K. E., 2011, Sustaina-ble Development and Sustainability: Landscape Approach as a Practical Interpretation of Principles and Implementa-tion Concepts, Journal of Landscape Ecology, 4(3): 5-30, https://doi.org/10.2478/v10285-012-0040-1.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10285-012-0040-1   Google Scholar

AYRES R.U., SIMONIS U.E. (eds), 1994, Industrial Metabolism. Restructuring for Sustainable Development, United Nations University Press, Tokyo, New York, Paris.
  Google Scholar

BAKER S., 2006, Sustainable development, Routledge, London, New York.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203495933   Google Scholar

BARBIER E., 2012, The green economy post Rio+20, Science 338 (6109): 887-888.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1227360   Google Scholar

BARBIER E., 1987, The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development, Environmental Conservation, 14(2): 101-110, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892900011449.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892900011449   Google Scholar

BEEKS J. C., 2016, Which of the current diverse ideas on alternative Economics are the best for adequately and Comprehensively addressing the great Transition to climate, energy, and biodiversity Sustainability?, California Institute of Integral Studies, San Francisco, CA.
  Google Scholar

BINA O., LA CAMERA F., 2011, Promise and shortcomings of a green turn in recent policy responses to the double crisis, Ecological Economics 70 (12): 2308-2316.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.06.021   Google Scholar

BOSSEL H., 1996, Deriving indicators of sustainable development, Environmental Modelling and Assessment 1(4): 193-218.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01872150   Google Scholar

BOSSEL H., 1998, Earth at a Crossroads. Paths to a Sustainable Future, Cambridge University Press, Cam-bridge, UK.
  Google Scholar

BERKES F., FOLKE C., COLDING J., 2000, Linking Social and Ecological Systems: Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511541957   Google Scholar

BOYER R., PETERSON N., ARORA P., CALDWELL K., 2016, Five approaches to social sustainability and an integrated way forward, Sustainability 8:1-18, https://doi.org/10.3390/su8090878.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su8090878   Google Scholar

BROWN E., CLOKE J., GENT D., JOHNSON P.H., HILL C., 2014. Green growth or ecological commodifica-tion: debating the green economy in the global south, Geografiska Annaler. Series B, Human Geography, 96 (3): 245-259.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/geob.12049   Google Scholar

BROWN B. J., HANSON M. E., LIVERMAN D. M., MERIDETH R.W., 1987, Global sustainability: towards definition, Environmental Management, 11: 713-719, DOI: 10.1007/BF01867238.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01867238   Google Scholar

CARLOWITZ H. C. von, 1713, Sylvicultura oeconomica – Anweisung zur wilden Baumzucht, Leipzig, (Reprint, Freiberg, 2000: 84).
  Google Scholar

CARTER K., MOIR, S., 2012, Diagrammatic representations of sustainability – a review and synthesis, Proceed-ings of the 28th annual ARCOM conference, ed. Smith S.D., 3-5 September, UK, Edinburgh: 1479-1489.
  Google Scholar

CATO M. S., 2009, Green economics: An introduction to theory, policy and practice, Earthscan, London.
  Google Scholar

CLARK W.C., 2007, Sustainability science: a room of its own, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 104(6): 1737–38.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0611291104   Google Scholar

CLARK T.W., 2002, The policy process: A practical guide for natural resource professionals, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt32bt8g   Google Scholar

CLARK W.C., DICKSON N.M., 2003. Sustainability science: the emerging research program, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 100(14): 8059.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1231333100   Google Scholar

COMMON M., PERRINGS C., 1992, Towards an ecological economics of sustainability, Ecological Economics 6(1): 7-34.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0921-8009(92)90036-R   Google Scholar

CUSACK C., 2019, Sustainable Development and Quality of Life, Multidimensional Approach to Quality of Life Issues, ed. Sinha B., Springer, Singapore.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6958-2_3   Google Scholar

DALY H. E., 1991, Steady-State Economics, Second Edition with new Essays, Island Press, Covelo, Washington.
  Google Scholar

DALY H. E., 2008. A steady-state economy. Opinion Piece for Redefining Prosperity, Sustainable Development Commission, UK, http://www.sd-commission.org.uk/publications.php?id=775.
  Google Scholar

DALY H. E., COBB, J., 1989, For the Common Good: Redirecting the Economy Towards the Community, the Environment and a Sustainable Future, Beacon Press, Boston.
  Google Scholar

DANIELS S. E., WALKER G. B., 2001, Working through environmental conflict – the collaborative learning ap-proach, Praeger, Westport, London.
  Google Scholar

DAWE N. K, RYAN K.L, 2003, The faulty three-legged-stool of sustainable development, Conservation Biology 17: 1458-1460, https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.02471.x.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.02471.x   Google Scholar

DEATH C., 2015, Four discourses of the green economy in the global South, Third World Quarterly, 36:12, 2207-2224, https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2015.1068110.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2015.1068110   Google Scholar

DOVERS S., HANDMER J., 1992, Uncertainty, sustainability and change, Global Environmental Change, 2(4): 262-276.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-3780(92)90044-8   Google Scholar

DRASTICHOVÁ M., 2022, Sustainable Development and Sustainable Science. Where We Came From, Where We Are Now and Where We Are Heading? Part I: The History of the Concept, Problemy Ekorozwoju/ Problems of Sustainable Development 17(2): 7-18, https://doi.org/10.35784/pe.2022.2.01.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.35784/pe.2022.2.01   Google Scholar

DRASTICHOVA M., 2018, The Theory and Measurement of Sustainable Development, SAEI, 52, VSB-TU Os-trava, Ostrava.
  Google Scholar

DRASTICHOVÁ M., FILZMOSER, P. 2019, Assessment of Sustainable Development Using Cluster Analysis and Principal Component Analysis, Problemy Ekorozwoju/ Problems of Sustainable Development, 14(2): 7-24.
  Google Scholar

DU PISANI J. A., 2006, Sustainable development – historical roots of the concept, Environmental Sciences, 3: 83-96, https://doi.org/10.1080/15693430600688831.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15693430600688831   Google Scholar

EKINS P., SIMON S., DEUTSCH L., FOLKE C., GROOT R. De, 2003, A Framework for the practical applica-tion of the concepts of critical natural capital and strong sustainability, Ecological Economics, 44 (2-3): 165-185, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-3428009(02)00272-0.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00272-0   Google Scholar

EUROPEAN COMMISSION, 2011, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Coun-cil, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, COM(2011) 571 final, Roadmap to a Resource Efficient Europe, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX: 52011DC0571&from=EN.
  Google Scholar

FERGUSON P., 2014, The green economy agenda: business as usual or transformational discourse?, Environmen-tal Politics, https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2014.919748.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2014.919748   Google Scholar

FELCE D., 1997, Defining and applying the concept of quality of life, Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 41: 126-135.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.1997.tb00689.x   Google Scholar

FELCE D., PERRY J., 1995, Quality of life: Its definition and measurement, Research in Developmental Disabili-ties, 16(1): 51-74.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0891-4222(94)00028-8   Google Scholar

FELCE D., PERRY J., 1996, Adaptive behaviour gains in ordinary housing for people with intellectual disabilities, Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 9(2): 101-114.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3148.1996.tb00101.x   Google Scholar

FISCHER-KOWALSKI M., 1996, Society’s metabolism: on the childhood and adolescence of a rising conceptual star, International Handbook of Environmental Sociology, eds Redclift M., Woodgate G., Cheltenham, Edward El-gar Publishing, UK: 119-137.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781843768593.00015   Google Scholar

FRITZ M., KOCH M., 2016, Economic development and prosperity patterns around the world: Structural challeng-es for a global steady-state economy, Global Environmental Change, 38(38): 41-48.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.02.007   Google Scholar

GINSBERG E., 1980, Man and his work, Managing people at work, ed. Beach D.S., Macmillan Publishing Co., New York.
  Google Scholar

GEORGESON L. MASLIN M., POESSINOUW M., 2017, Geography and Environment, 4(1), https://doi.org/10.1002/geo2.36.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/geo2.36   Google Scholar

GOODLAND R. 1995, The concept of environmental sustainability, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 26: 1-24.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.26.1.1   Google Scholar

GROBER U., 2007, Deep roots: A conceptual history of 'sustainable development' (Nachhaltigkeit), WZB Discussion Paper, No. P 2007-002, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB), Berlin.
  Google Scholar

GREENWOOD D. T., HOLT R. P. F., 2010, Local economic development in the 21st century: Quality of life and sustainability, M.E. Sharpe Inc., Armonk, New York.
  Google Scholar

HARTIG G., 1804: Anweisung zur taxation und beschreibung der forste. zweyte, ganz umgearbeitete und stark vermehrte auflage. Georg Friedrich von Heyer, Giessen und Darmstadt.
  Google Scholar

HEDIGER W., 2000, Sustainable development and social welfare, Ecological Economics 32(3): 481-492.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00117-2   Google Scholar

HEDIGER W., 1999, Reconciling ‘weak’ and ‘strong’ sustainability,. International Journal of Social Economics 26(7/8/9): 1120-1144.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/03068299910245859   Google Scholar

HOWARTH R.B., NORGAARD R. B., 1990, Intergenerational resource rights, efficiency, and social optimality, Land Economics, 66(1): 1-11.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3146678   Google Scholar

HUNTER M.L., 1996, Fundamentals of conservation biology, Blackwell Science, Cambridge, MA.
  Google Scholar

IISD International Institute for Sustainable Development, 2002, Summary of the World Summit on Sustainable De-velopment, Earth Negotiations Bulletin, 22(51): 1-18.
  Google Scholar

IPCC, 2007, Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability, Working Group II Contribution to the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report, IPCC Switzerland, Geneva.
  Google Scholar

JACKSON T., 2012, Prosperity without growth: Economics for a finite planet, Routledge, New York.
  Google Scholar

JACOBS M., 2012, Green Growth: Economic Theory and Political Discourse, GRI Working Papers 92, Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment.
  Google Scholar

JERNECK A., OLSSON L., NESS B., ANDERBERG S., BAIER M., CLARK E., HICKLER T., HORNBORG A., KRONSELL A., LÖVBRAND E., 2011, Structuring sustainability science, Sustainability Science 6(1): 1-14.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-010-0117-x   Google Scholar

JEVONS W.S., 1866, The Coal Question. An Inquiry Concerning the Progress of the Nation, and the Probable Exhaustion of Our Coal-Mines by William Stanley Jevons, second revised edition, Macmillan and Co., London.
  Google Scholar

LEE K.N., 1993, Compass and Gyroscope: Integrating Science and Politics for the Environment. Island Press, Washington D.C.
  Google Scholar

KAJIKAWA Y., OHNO J., TAKEDA Y., MATSUSHIMA K., KOMIYAMA H., 2007, Creating an academic landscape of sustainability science: an analysis of the citation network, Sustainability Science 2(2): 221-31.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-007-0027-8   Google Scholar

KASTENHOFER K., BECHTOLD U., WILFING H., 2011, Sustaining sustainability science: the role of estab-lished inter-disciplines, Ecological Economics, 70(4): 835-843.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.12.008   Google Scholar

KALLIS G., 2011, In defence of degrowth, Ecological Economics, 70(5): 873-880, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.12.007.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.12.007   Google Scholar

KATES R. W., CLARK W. C., CORELL R., HALL J.M., JAEGER C. C., LOWE I., MCCARTHY J. J., SCHELLNHUBER H.J., BOLIN B., DICKSON N.M., FAUCHEUX S., GALLOPIN G.C., GRÜBLER A., UNTLEY B., JÄGER J., JODHA N.S., KASPERSON R.E., MABOGUNJE A., MATSON P., MOONEY H., MOORE III B., O’RIORDAN T., SVEDIN U., 2001, Sustainability science, Science 292(5517): 641-2.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1059386   Google Scholar

KAUFFMAN J., 2009, Advancing sustainability science: report on the International Conference on Sustainability Science (ICSS) 2009, Sustainability Science 4(2): 233-42.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-009-0088-y   Google Scholar

KEEN M., BROWN V., DYBALL R., 2005, Social Learning in Environmental Management: Towards a sustain-able future, James & James/Earthscan, London.
  Google Scholar

KERSCHNER CH., 2010, Economic de-growth vs. steady-state economy, Journal of Cleaner Production 18: 544-551.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.10.019   Google Scholar

KIDD C.V., 1992, The evolution of sustainability, Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 5(1): 1-26.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01965413   Google Scholar

KOMIYAMA H., TAKEUCHI K., 2006, Sustainability science: building a new discipline, Sustainability Science, 1(1): 1-6.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-006-0007-4   Google Scholar

KOTHARI A., DEMARIA F., ACOSTA, A., 2014, Buen Vivir, Degrowth and Ecological Swaraj: Alternatives to sustainable development and the Green Economy, Development 57: 362-375, https://doi.org/10.1057/dev.2015.24.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/dev.2015.24   Google Scholar

KUHN T.S., 1962, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, University of Chicago Press, Chicago IL, USA.
  Google Scholar

LOTFI S., FARAJI A., HATAMINEJAD H., AHMAD P., 2011. A study of urban quality of life in a developing country, Journal of Social Sciences, 7(2): 232-240.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3844/jssp.2011.232.240   Google Scholar

LOZANO R., 2008, Envisioning sustainability three-dimensionally, Journal of Cleaner Production 16(17): 1838=1846, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.02.008.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.02.008   Google Scholar

MILLENNIUM ECOSYSTEM ASSESSMENT, 2005, Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis, Island Press, Washington, D.C.
  Google Scholar

MORI K,. CHRISTODOULOU A. 2012, Review of sustainability indices and indicators: towards a new city sus-tainability index (CSI).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2011.06.001   Google Scholar

MARTÍNEZ-ALIER J., PASCUAL U., VIVIEN F., ZACCAI E., 2010, Sustainable degrowth: Mapping the con-text, criticisms, and future prospects of an emergent paradigm, Ecological Economics, 69(9): 1741-1747, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.04.017.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.04.017   Google Scholar

MARTENS P., 2006, Sustainability: science or fiction?, Sustainability: Science, Practice & Policy, 2(1): 36-41.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2006.11907976   Google Scholar

NEUMAYER E., 1999, Weak versus Strong Sustainability: Exploring the Limits of Two Opposing Paradigms, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, Northampton, MA, USA.
  Google Scholar

NORTON B.G., 2005, Sustainability: A philosophy of adaptive ecosystem management, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226595221.001.0001   Google Scholar

NOWOTNY H., SCOTT P., GIBBONS M., 2001, Re-thinking science: knowledge and the public in an age of un-certainty, Polity Press, Cambridge, UK.
  Google Scholar

NUSSBAUM M., SEN A., 1993, The Quality of Life, Oxford University Press, https://doi.org/10.1093/0198287976.001.0001.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/0198287976.001.0001   Google Scholar

O’NEILL D. W., FANNING A. L., LAMB W. F. et al., 2018, A good life for all within planetary boundaries, Nat Sustain, 1: 88-95, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0021-4.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0021-4   Google Scholar

O'NEILL D. W., 2012, Measuring progress in the degrowth transition to a steady state economy, Ecological Eco-nomics, Elsevier, 84(C): 221-231.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.05.020   Google Scholar

OECD, 2011, Towards Green Growth. A Summary for Policy Makers, OECD, Paris, France.
  Google Scholar

OECD, 2009, Declaration on Green Growth Adopted at the Meeting of the Council at Ministerial Level on 25 June 2009, C/MIN(2009)5/ADD1/FINAL.
  Google Scholar

OLAWUMI T.O., CHAN D.W. M., 2018, A scientometric review of global research on sustainability and sustain-able development, Journal of Cleaner Production, 183: 231-250.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.162   Google Scholar

OPSCHOOR J. B., 1996, Institutional change and development towards sustainability, Getting Down to Earth: Practical Applications of Ecological Economics, eds. Costanza R., Segura O. Martinez-Alier J., Island Press, Washington D.C., Covelo, CA.
  Google Scholar

OSTROM E., 1990, Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action, Cambridge Univer-sity Press, Cambridge.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807763   Google Scholar

PETERS B.G., 2000, Governance and comparative politics, Debating governance: Authority. steering, and democ-racy, ed. Pierre J., Oxford University Press, Oxford.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198295143.003.0003   Google Scholar

PIERRE J., 2000, Introduction: Understanding governance, Debating governance: Authority. steering, and democ-racy, ed. Pierre J., Oxford University Press, Oxford.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198295143.001.0001   Google Scholar

PURVIS B., MAO Y., ROBINSON D., 2019, Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins, Sus-tainability Science, 14: 681-695, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5   Google Scholar

PAULI G., 2010, The blue economy, Our Planet, 1: 24-26.
  Google Scholar

PAROTTA J., AGNOLETTI M., JOHAN E., 2006, Cultural heritage and sustainable forest management: the role of traditional knowledge, Ministerial Conference on the Protection of Forests in Europe, Liaison Unit Warsaw.
  Google Scholar

PEARCE D. W, MARKANDYA A., BARBIER E. B, 1989, Blueprint for a green economy, Earthscan, London.
  Google Scholar

PEARCE D.W., ATKINSON G.D., DUBOURG W.R., 1994, The economics of sustainable development, Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, 19(1): 457-474.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.eg.19.110194.002325   Google Scholar

PRETTY J., 2003, Social capital and the collective management of resources, Science, 302: 1912-1914.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1090847   Google Scholar

RAMAKRISHNAN P.S., 2001, Ecology and Sustainable Development, National Book Trust of India, New Delhi.
  Google Scholar

RAPPORT D. J., 2007, Sustainability science: an ecohealth perspective, Sustainability Science, 2(1): 77-84.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-006-0016-3   Google Scholar

RASKIN P.D., 2008, World lines: a framework for exploring global pathways, Ecological Economics 65(3): 461-70.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.01.021   Google Scholar

REBORATTI C.E., 1999, Territory, scale and sustainable development, Sustainability and the social sciences: A cross-disciplinary approach to integrating environmental considerations into theoretical considerations, eds. Becker E., Jahn T., Zed Books, London: 207-222.
  Google Scholar

RUZZENENTI F., VIVANCO D., GALVIN R., SORRELL S., WAGNER A., WALNUM H. J., 2019, The Re-bound Effect and the Jevons' Paradox: Beyond the Conventional Wisdom, Frontiers in Energy Research,7: 90, https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2019.00090.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2019.00090   Google Scholar

SARTORI S., LATRÔNICO F., CAMPOS L. M. S., 2014, Sustainability and sustainable development: a taxono-my in the field of literature, Ambiente & Sociedade, 17(1): 01-22, https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-44220003491.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-44220003490   Google Scholar

SEN A., 1999, Commodities and capabilities, OUP Catalogue.
  Google Scholar

SEN A., 1985, Well-Being Agency and Freedom: The Dewey Lectures 1984, Journal of Philosophy, 82(4): 169-221.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2026184   Google Scholar

SLIMANE M., 2012, Role and relationship between leadership and sustainable development to release social, hu-man, and cultural dimension, Social and Behavioral Sciences, 41: 92-99.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.04.013   Google Scholar

SOLOW R.M., 1986, On the intergenerational allocation of natural resources, The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 88(1): 141-149.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3440280   Google Scholar

SOLOW R.M., 1974, Intergenerational equity and exhaustible resources, The Review of Economic Studies, 41: 29-45.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2296370   Google Scholar

SORRELL S., 2009, Jevons’ Paradox revisited: The evidence for backfire from improved energy efficiency, Energy Policy, 37(4): 1456-1469, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421508007428.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.12.003   Google Scholar

SÖDERBAUM P., 2000, Ecological Economics, Earthscan, London, UK.
  Google Scholar

SPANGENBERG J., 2011, Sustainability science: A review, an analysis and some empirical lessons, Environmen-tal Conservation, 38(3): 275-287, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892911000270.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892911000270   Google Scholar

SPANGENBERG J., 2002, Environmental space and the prism of sustainability: frameworks for indicators meas-uring sustainable development, Ecological Indicators, 2(3): 295-309.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-160X(02)00065-1   Google Scholar

SPANGENBERG J. H., O'CONNOR M., 2010, Sustainability science: a new mode of science, another step in the evolution of science paradigms, Global Responsibility, 61: 13-16.
  Google Scholar

STRANGE, T., BAYLEY, A., 2008, Sustainable development linking economy, society, environment, OECD In-sights, OECD.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264055742-en   Google Scholar

TANGUAY G. A., RAJAONSON J., LEFEBVRE J.-F., LANOIE P., 2010, Measuring the sustainability of cit-ies: an analysis of the use of local indicators, Ecological Indicators, 10(2): 407-418, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2009.07.013.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2009.07.013   Google Scholar

ten BRINK P., MAZZA L., BADURA T., KWTTUNEN M., WITHANA S.. 2012, Nature and its role in the tran-sition to a green economy, The Economics of Ecosystems & Biodiversity and the Institute for European Environ-mental Policy, Geneva and London.
  Google Scholar

THOMPSON P. B., 2017, The spirit of the soil: agriculture and environmental ethics, 2nd edition, Routlege, New York.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315559971   Google Scholar

TRAINER T., 2011, The radical implications of zero growth economy, Real-World Economics Review, 57(1): 71-82.
  Google Scholar

TURNER R.K., 1992. Speculations on weak and strong sustainability, CSERGE Working Papers, GEC: 92-26.
  Google Scholar

UNITED NATIONS, EUROPEAN COMMISSION, INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND, OECD, WORLD BANK, 2003, Handbook of national accounting. Integrated environmental and economic accounting, Studies in Methods, F(61), Rev.1.
  Google Scholar

UNDP, 2022, United Nations Development Programme, Human Development Reports, http://hdr.undp.org/en/humandev.
  Google Scholar

UNEP, 2016, Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, http://www.unep.org/Documents. multilin-gual/Default.asp?DocumentID=78&ArticleID=1163.
  Google Scholar

UNEP, 2011, Towards a Green Economy: Pathways to Sustainable Development and Poverty Eradication, Nairo-bi, United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi.
  Google Scholar

UNEP, 2007, GEO 4 Global Environment Outlook. Environment for Development. Valletta, Malta, Progress Press.
  Google Scholar

UNITED NATIONS, EUROPEAN COMMISSION, INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND, OECD, WORLD BANK, 2003, Handbook of National Accounting. Integrated Environmental and Economic Accounting 2003, Studies in Methods, F(61), Rev.1.
  Google Scholar

VAN DEN BERGH J. C. J. M., 2011, Environment versus growth e a criticism of ‘degrowth’ and a plea for ‘a-growth’, Ecological Economics, 70: 881-890.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.09.035   Google Scholar

VAN DEN BERGH J. C. J. M., KALLIS G., 2012, Growth, A-Growth or Degrowth to Stay within Planetary Boundaries?, Journal of Economic Issues, 46:4: 909-920, DOI: 10.2753/JEI0021-3624460404.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2753/JEI0021-3624460404   Google Scholar

VAN DEN HOVE S., 2007, A rationale for science-policy interfaces, Futures 39(7): 807-26.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2006.12.004   Google Scholar

WALS A. E. J., 2009, Social learning towards a sustainable world, Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wa-geningen.
  Google Scholar

WEAVER P. M., ROTMANS J., 2006, Integrated sustainability assessment: what is it, why do it and how?, Inter-national Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, 1(4): 284-303.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJISD.2006.013732   Google Scholar

WEINSTEIN M.P., 2010, Sustainability science: the emerging paradigm and the ecology of cities, Sustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy 6(1): 1-5.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2010.11908037   Google Scholar

WCED, 1987, Our common future, Oxford University Press, New York.
  Google Scholar

VICTOR P.A., 1991, Indicators of sustainable development: Some lessons from capital theory, Ecological Eco-nomics, 4(3): 191-213.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0921-8009(91)90051-F   Google Scholar

VOS R. O., 2007, Defining sustainability: a conceptual orientation, J Chem Technol Biotechnol, 82: 334-339, https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.1675.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.1675   Google Scholar

WOOLCOCK M., 1998, Social capital and economic development: Towards a theorethical synthesis and policy framework, Theory and society, 27(2): 151-208.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006884930135   Google Scholar

ZIJP M. C, HEIJUNGS R., VAN DER VOET E. et al., 2015, An identification key for selecting methods for sus-tainability assessments, Sustainability, 7: 2490-2512, https://doi.org/10.3390/su7032490.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su7032490   Google Scholar


Opublikowane
2023-07-09

Cited By / Share

Drastichová, M. (2023). Zrównoważony rozwój i zrównoważona nauka. Skąd przyszliśmy, gdzie jesteśmy i dokąd zmierzamy? Część II: Dogłębna analiza koncepcji zrównoważonego rozwoju . Problemy Ekorozwoju Problems of Sustainable Development, 18(1), 9–27. https://doi.org/10.35784/pe.2023.1.02

Autorzy

Magdalena Drastichová 
magdalena.drastichova@vsb.cz
Technical University of Ostrava, Czechia Czechy

Statystyki

Abstract views: 150
PDF downloads: 131