Co jest dobre, a co złe w modelu zarządzania środowiskiem? Analiza przepisów środowiskowych dla poprawy jakości zrównoważenia środowiskowego

Jajat S. Ardiwinata


Department Community Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Kota Bandung, Jawa Barat 40154, Indonesia (Indonezja)

Khalid Zaman

khalid_zaman786@yahoo.com
Department of Economics, University of Haripur, Haripur Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan (Pakistan)

Abdelmohsen A. Nassani


Department of Management, College of Business Administration, King Saud University, P.O. Box 71115, Riyadh, 11587, Saudi Arabia (Arabia Saudyjska)

Mohamed Haffar


Department of Management, Birmingham Business School, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom (Wielka Brytania)

Chairil Faif Pasani


Mathematics and Science Education, Universitas Lambung Mangkurat, Banjarmasin 70123, Indonesia (Indonezja)

Sriyanto Sriyanto


Social Studies Department, Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto, Purwokerto, 53182, Indonesia (Indonezja)

Abstrakt

Niewłaściwa alokacja zasobów gospodarczych i środowiskowych szkodzi Agendzie ONZ na rzecz zrównoważonego rozwoju, która pozostaje wyzwaniem dla decydentów, aby powstrzymać negatywne trendy za pomocą skutecznych mechanizmów zarządzania. W ramach tego studium opracowano efektywne ramy zarządzania środowiskiem poprzez rozszerzenie zakresu różnych czynników zarządzania związanych z ocenami poziomu zrównoważenia środowiskowego wśród 67 krajów. Wyniki pokazują, że korupcja środowiskowa (system-1), polityka środowiskowa (system-2) i prawo środowiskowe (system-2) ujemnie korelowały z oceną zrównoważenia środowiskowego, podczas gdy demokracja środowiskowa (systemy-1 & 2) pozytywnie skorelowane są z Agendą zrównoważonego rozwoju środowiska w różnych krajach. Zarówno skuteczność rządu, jak i dochód kraju na mieszkańca podnoszą oceny zrównoważenia środowiskowego. Wyniki są zgodne z teorią Demopolis, efektywną teorią regulacji oraz teorią prawa i polityki. Szacunki przyczynowości pokazują, że korupcja środowiskowa i skuteczność rządu wpływają na politykę środowiskową i wzrost gospodarczy. W przeciwieństwie do tego, demokracja środowiskowa i regulacje środowiskowe powodują wzrost dochodu na mieszkańca. Dwukierunkowy związek przyczynowy występuje między regulacjami środowiskowymi a korupcją środowiskową z jednej strony, podczas gdy regulacje środowiskowe i polityka środowiskowa Granger są ze sobą bezpośrednio związane. Wyniki pokazują znaczenie przepisów środowiskowych w zarządzaniu korupcją ekologiczną i polityką w różnych krajach. Analiza rozkładu wariancji sugeruje, że polityka środowiskowa prawdopodobnie wpłynęła na program zrównoważonego rozwoju środowiska, a następnie skuteczność rządu i demokrację środowiskową przez następne dziesięć lat. W badaniu podkreślono potrzebę zaprojektowania skutecznych ram zarządzania środowiskiem, które zminimalizują korupcję środowiskową i umożliwią dążenie do demokracji środowiskowej, rygorystycznych przepisów i regulacji dotyczących ochrony środowiska. Skuteczność rządu byłaby powiązana głównie z ograniczaniem korupcji i niestabilności politycznej w celu osiągnięcia czystego, zielonego i zrównoważonego rozwoju.


Słowa kluczowe:

klasyfikacja zrównoważoności środowiskowej, wskaźniki zarządzania środowiskowego, regulacje środowiskowe, skuteczność rządu

ADAMS D., ADAMS K., ULLAH S., ULLAH F., 2019, Globalisation, governance, accountability and the natural resource ‘curse’: Implications for socioeconomic growth of oil-rich developing countries, Resources Policy, 61: 128-140.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.02.009   Google Scholar

ADEKUNLE I.A., 2021, On the search for environmental sustainability in Africa: the role of governance, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(12): 14607-14620.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11432-5   Google Scholar

AGUILERA R.V., ARAGÓN-CORREA J.A., MARANO V., TASHMAN P.A., 2021, The corporate governance of environmental sustainability: A review and proposal for more integrated research, Journal of Management, https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206321991212.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3760077   Google Scholar

AHMED Z., CARY M., LE H. P., 2021, Accounting asymmetries in the long-run nexus between globalization and environmental sustainability in the United States: an aggregated and disaggregated investigation, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 86:106511.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106511   Google Scholar

ANSER M. K., AHMAD M., KHAN M. A., NASSAN, A. A., ASKAR S. E., ZAMAN K., KABBANI A., 2021, Progress in nuclear energy with carbon pricing to achieve environmental sustainability agenda: on the edge of one’s seat, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12966-y.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12966-y   Google Scholar

ARMINEN H., MENEGAKI A.N., 2019, Corruption, climate and the energy-environment-growth nexus, Energy Economics, 80: 621-634.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2019.02.009   Google Scholar

ASONGU S.A., ODHIAMBO N.M., 2021, Enhancing governance for environmental sustainability in sub-Saharan Africa, Energy Exploration & Exploitation, 39(1): 444-463.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0144598719900657   Google Scholar

BARBOSA L.G., ALVES M.A.S., GRELLE C.E. V., 2021, Actions against sustainability: Dismantling of the environmental policies in Brazil, Land Use Policy, 104: 105384.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105384   Google Scholar

BENNETT N.J., SATTERFIELD T., 2018, Environmental governance: A practical framework to guide design, evaluation, and analysis, Conservation Letters, 11(6): e12600.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12600   Google Scholar

CHENG R., LI W., LU Z., ZHOU S., MENG C., 2020, Integrating the three-line environmental governance and environmental sustainability evaluation of urban industry in China, Journal of Cleaner Production, 264: 121554.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121554   Google Scholar

COENEN J., BAGER S., MEYFROIDT P., NEWIG J., CHALLIES E., 2021, Environmental Governance of China's Belt and Road Initiative, Environmental Policy and Governance, 31(1): 3-17.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1901   Google Scholar

DRESSEL S., SJÖLANDER-LINDQVIST A., JOHANSSON M., ERICSSON G., SANDSTRÖM C., 2021, Achieving Social and Ecological Outcomes in Collaborative Environmental Governance: Good Examples from Swedish Moose Management, Sustainability, 13(4): 2329, https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042329.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042329   Google Scholar

GANDA F., 2020, The influence of corruption on environmental sustainability in the developing economies of Southern Africa, Heliyon, 6(7): e04387.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04387   Google Scholar

GIANNETTI B.F., AGOSTINHO F., ERAS J.C., YANG Z., ALMEIDA C.M.V.B., 2020, Cleaner production for achieving the sustainable development goals, Journal of Cleaner Production, 271:122127.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122127   Google Scholar

GIESEKE T., 2020, Collaborative Environmental Governance Frameworks: A Practical Guide. CRC Press, Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, UK, https://www.routledge.com/Collaborative-Environmental-Governance-Frameworks-A-Practical-Guide/Gieseke/p/book/9781138584501# (16-07-2021).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429505973   Google Scholar

GÖK A., SODHI N., 2021, The environmental impact of governance: a system-generalized method of moments analysis, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28: 32995-33008.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12903-z   Google Scholar

GUPTA A.C., CHATTERJEE N., 2021, Economic Values for the Environment with Special Reference to the Contingent Valuation Method, Environmental Management: Issues and Concerns in Developing Countries, ed. Sikdar P.K., Springer, Cham, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62529-0_14.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62529-0_14   Google Scholar

GUPTA, A., BOAS I., OOSTERVEER P., 2020, Transparency in global sustainability governance: to what effect?, Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 22(1): 84-97.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2020.1709281   Google Scholar

HASEEB M., ZAM M., 2021, Dynamic nexus among tourism, corruption, democracy and environmental degradation: a panel data investigation, Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23(4):5557-5575.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00832-9   Google Scholar

JAGER N.W., NEWIG J., CHALLIES E., KOCHSKÄMPER E., 2020, Pathways to implementation: Evidence on how participation in environmental governance impacts on environmental outcomes, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 30(3): 383-399.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muz034   Google Scholar

JIANG X., LI G., FU W., 2021, Government environmental governance, structural adjustment and air quality: A quasi-natural experiment based on the three-year action plan to win the blue sky defense war, Journal of Environmental Management, 277:111470.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111470   Google Scholar

KAGAYA S., WADA T., 2021, The application of environmental governance for sustainable watershed-based management, Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, 5(2): 643-671.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41685-020-00185-1   Google Scholar

KAMAH M., RITI J. S., BIN P., 2021, Inclusive growth and environmental sustainability: the role of institutional quality in sub-Saharan Africa, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13125-z.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13125-z   Google Scholar

KHAN H., WEILI L., KHAN I., 2021, Environmental innovation, trade openness and quality institutions: an integrated investigation about environmental sustainability, Environment, Development and Sustainability, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01590-y.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01590-y   Google Scholar

LAWLESS S., SONG A. M., COHEN P. J., MORRISON T. H., 2020, Rights, equity and justice: a diagnostic for social meta-norm diffusion in environmental governance, Earth System Governance, 6:100052.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esg.2020.100052   Google Scholar

LE H. P., SARKODIE S.A., 2020, Dynamic linkage between renewable and conventional energy use, environmental quality and economic growth: evidence from Emerging Market and Developing Economies, Energy Reports, 6: 965-973.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2020.04.020   Google Scholar

LEAL P.H., MARQUES A.C., 2021, The environmental impacts of globalisation and corruption: Evidence from a set of African countries, Environmental Science & Policy, 115: 116-124.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.10.013   Google Scholar

MAZUR K., TOMASHUK I., 2019, Governance and regulation as an indispensable condition for developing the potential of rural areas, Baltic journal of economic studies, 5(5): 67-78.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2019-5-5-67-78   Google Scholar

MOUSSA T., KOTB A., HELFAYA A., 2021, An Empirical Investigation of UK Environmental Targets Disclosure: The Role of Environmental Governance and Performance, European Accounting Review, https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2021.1890173
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2021.1890173   Google Scholar

MURSHED M., RAHMAN M.A., ALAM M.S., AHMAD P., DAGAR V., 2021, The nexus between environmental regulations, economic growth, and environmental sustainability: linking environmental patents to ecological footprint reduction in South Asia, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-13381-z.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13381-z   Google Scholar

NGUYEN B., 2021, Does Local Environmental Governance Improve Tourism Companies’ Performance? Evidence from Vietnam, Journal of Travel Research, https://doi.org/10.1177/00472875211002653.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00472875211002653   Google Scholar

PASGAARD M., VAN HECKEN G., EHAMMER A., STRANGE N., 2017, Unfolding scientific expertise and security in the changing governance of Ecosystem Services, Geoforum, 84: 354-367.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.02.001   Google Scholar

PEKER E., ATAÖV A., 2021, Governance of Climate Responsive Cities: Scale Matters!, Governance of Climate Responsive Cities. The Urban Book Series, eds. Peker E., Ataöv A., Springer, Cham, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73399-5_1.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73399-5   Google Scholar

PICKERING J., BÄCKSTRAND K., SCHLOSBERG D., 2020, Between environmental and ecological democracy: theory and practice at the democracy-environment nexus, Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 22(1): 1-15.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2020.1703276   Google Scholar

QUANDT R.E., 1972, A new approach to estimating switching regressions, Journal of the American statistical association, 67(338): 306-310.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1972.10482378   Google Scholar

QURESHI M.I., QAYYUM S., NASSAN A.A., ALDAKHIL A.M., ABRO M.M.Q., ZAMAN K., 2019, Management of various socio-economic factors under the United Nations sustainable development agenda, Resources Policy, 64: 101515.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.101515   Google Scholar

RAJESH, R., 2020, Exploring the sustainability performances of firms using environmental, social, and governance scores, Journal of Cleaner Production, 247: 119600.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119600   Google Scholar

RAJESH, R., RAJENDRAN, C., 2020, Relating environmental, social, and governance scores and sustainability performances of firms: An empirical analysis, Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(3): 1247-1267.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2429   Google Scholar

RAJMOHAN K.V.S., RAMYA C., VISWANATHAN M.R., VARJANI S., 2019, Plastic pollutants: effective waste management for pollution control and abatement, Current Opinion in Environmental Science & Health, 12: 72-84.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coesh.2019.08.006   Google Scholar

RAMZAN S., LIU C., MUNIR H., XU Y., 2019, Assessing young consumers’ awareness and participation in sustainable e-waste management practices: a survey study in Northwest China, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(19): 20003-20013.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05310-y   Google Scholar

REED G., BRUNET N.D., LONGBOAT S., NATCHER D.C., 2021, Indigenous guardians as an emerging approach to indigenous environmental governance, Conservation Biology, 35(1): 179-189.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13532   Google Scholar

SAVAGE J.M., HUDSON M.D., OSBORNE P.E., 2020, The challenges of establishing marine protected areas in South East Asia, Marine protected areas, Elsevier:343-359.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102698-4.00018-6   Google Scholar

SUN H., MOHSIN M., ALHARTHI M., ABBAS Q., 2020, Measuring environmental sustainability performance of South Asia, Journal of Cleaner Production, 251: 119519.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119519   Google Scholar

TACCONI L., WILLIAMS D.A., 2020, Corruption and Anti-Corruption in Environmental and Resource Management, Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 45: 305-329.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-012320-083949   Google Scholar

TAN Y., GENG Y., 2020, Coupling coordination measurement of environmental governance: case of China, Environmental and Ecological Statistics, 27(2): 253-272.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10651-020-00444-6   Google Scholar

THALER G.M., 2021, Ethnography of environmental governance: Towards an organizational approach, Geoforum, 120: 122-131.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2021.01.026   Google Scholar

USMAN O., OLANIPEKUN I.O., IOREMBER P. T., ABU-GOODMAN M., 2020, Modelling environmental degradation in South Africa: the effects of energy consumption, democracy, and globalization using innovation accounting tests, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(8): 8334-8349.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06687-6   Google Scholar

VAN ASSCHE K., BEUNEN R., GRUEZMACHER M., DUINEVELD M., 2020, Rethinking strategy in environmental governance, Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 22(5): 695-708.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2020.1768834   Google Scholar

WANG S., WANG H., WANG J., YANG F., 2020, Does environmental information disclosure contribute to improve firm financial performance? An examination of the underlying mechanism, Science of the Total Environment, 714: 136855.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136855   Google Scholar

WGI 2021, World governance indicators, World Bank, Washington D.C.
  Google Scholar

WILLIAMS A., DUPUY K., 2017, Deciding over nature: Corruption and environmental impact assessments, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 65: 118-124.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2017.05.002   Google Scholar

WORLD BANK 2021, World development indicators, World Bank, Washington D.C.
  Google Scholar

ZAMAN K., AZIZ A.R.A., SRIYANTO S., INDRIANTI Y., JAMBARI H., 2021, The role of solar energy demand in the relationship between carbon pricing and environmental degradation: A blessing in disguise, Journal of Public Affairs, e2702.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2702   Google Scholar

ZHANG J., CHANG Y., ZHANG L., LI D., 2018, Do technological innovations promote urban green development? – A spatial econometric analysis of 105 cities in China, Journal of cleaner production, 182: 395-403.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.067   Google Scholar


Opublikowane
2022-01-03

Cited By / Share

Ardiwinata, J. S., Zaman, K., Nassani, A. A., Haffar, M., Pasani, C. F., & Sriyanto, S. (2022). Co jest dobre, a co złe w modelu zarządzania środowiskiem? Analiza przepisów środowiskowych dla poprawy jakości zrównoważenia środowiskowego. Problemy Ekorozwoju Problems of Sustainable Development, 17(1), 123–139. https://doi.org/10.35784/pe.2022.1.12

Autorzy

Jajat S. Ardiwinata 

Department Community Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Kota Bandung, Jawa Barat 40154, Indonesia Indonezja

Autorzy

Khalid Zaman 
khalid_zaman786@yahoo.com
Department of Economics, University of Haripur, Haripur Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan Pakistan

Autorzy

Abdelmohsen A. Nassani 

Department of Management, College of Business Administration, King Saud University, P.O. Box 71115, Riyadh, 11587, Saudi Arabia Arabia Saudyjska

Autorzy

Mohamed Haffar 

Department of Management, Birmingham Business School, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom Wielka Brytania

Autorzy

Chairil Faif Pasani 

Mathematics and Science Education, Universitas Lambung Mangkurat, Banjarmasin 70123, Indonesia Indonezja

Autorzy

Sriyanto Sriyanto 

Social Studies Department, Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto, Purwokerto, 53182, Indonesia Indonezja

Statystyki

Abstract views: 82
PDF downloads: 41