Co jest dobre, a co złe w modelu zarządzania środowiskiem? Analiza przepisów środowiskowych dla poprawy jakości zrównoważenia środowiskowego
Jajat S. Ardiwinata
Department Community Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Kota Bandung, Jawa Barat 40154, Indonesia (Indonezja)
Khalid Zaman
khalid_zaman786@yahoo.comDepartment of Economics, University of Haripur, Haripur Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan (Pakistan)
Abdelmohsen A. Nassani
Department of Management, College of Business Administration, King Saud University, P.O. Box 71115, Riyadh, 11587, Saudi Arabia (Arabia Saudyjska)
Mohamed Haffar
Department of Management, Birmingham Business School, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom (Wielka Brytania)
Chairil Faif Pasani
Mathematics and Science Education, Universitas Lambung Mangkurat, Banjarmasin 70123, Indonesia (Indonezja)
Sriyanto Sriyanto
Social Studies Department, Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto, Purwokerto, 53182, Indonesia (Indonezja)
Abstrakt
Niewłaściwa alokacja zasobów gospodarczych i środowiskowych szkodzi Agendzie ONZ na rzecz zrównoważonego rozwoju, która pozostaje wyzwaniem dla decydentów, aby powstrzymać negatywne trendy za pomocą skutecznych mechanizmów zarządzania. W ramach tego studium opracowano efektywne ramy zarządzania środowiskiem poprzez rozszerzenie zakresu różnych czynników zarządzania związanych z ocenami poziomu zrównoważenia środowiskowego wśród 67 krajów. Wyniki pokazują, że korupcja środowiskowa (system-1), polityka środowiskowa (system-2) i prawo środowiskowe (system-2) ujemnie korelowały z oceną zrównoważenia środowiskowego, podczas gdy demokracja środowiskowa (systemy-1 & 2) pozytywnie skorelowane są z Agendą zrównoważonego rozwoju środowiska w różnych krajach. Zarówno skuteczność rządu, jak i dochód kraju na mieszkańca podnoszą oceny zrównoważenia środowiskowego. Wyniki są zgodne z teorią Demopolis, efektywną teorią regulacji oraz teorią prawa i polityki. Szacunki przyczynowości pokazują, że korupcja środowiskowa i skuteczność rządu wpływają na politykę środowiskową i wzrost gospodarczy. W przeciwieństwie do tego, demokracja środowiskowa i regulacje środowiskowe powodują wzrost dochodu na mieszkańca. Dwukierunkowy związek przyczynowy występuje między regulacjami środowiskowymi a korupcją środowiskową z jednej strony, podczas gdy regulacje środowiskowe i polityka środowiskowa Granger są ze sobą bezpośrednio związane. Wyniki pokazują znaczenie przepisów środowiskowych w zarządzaniu korupcją ekologiczną i polityką w różnych krajach. Analiza rozkładu wariancji sugeruje, że polityka środowiskowa prawdopodobnie wpłynęła na program zrównoważonego rozwoju środowiska, a następnie skuteczność rządu i demokrację środowiskową przez następne dziesięć lat. W badaniu podkreślono potrzebę zaprojektowania skutecznych ram zarządzania środowiskiem, które zminimalizują korupcję środowiskową i umożliwią dążenie do demokracji środowiskowej, rygorystycznych przepisów i regulacji dotyczących ochrony środowiska. Skuteczność rządu byłaby powiązana głównie z ograniczaniem korupcji i niestabilności politycznej w celu osiągnięcia czystego, zielonego i zrównoważonego rozwoju.
Słowa kluczowe:
klasyfikacja zrównoważoności środowiskowej, wskaźniki zarządzania środowiskowego, regulacje środowiskowe, skuteczność rząduBibliografia
ADAMS D., ADAMS K., ULLAH S., ULLAH F., 2019, Globalisation, governance, accountability and the natural resource ‘curse’: Implications for socioeconomic growth of oil-rich developing countries, Resources Policy, 61: 128-140.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.02.009
Google Scholar
ADEKUNLE I.A., 2021, On the search for environmental sustainability in Africa: the role of governance, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(12): 14607-14620.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11432-5
Google Scholar
AGUILERA R.V., ARAGÓN-CORREA J.A., MARANO V., TASHMAN P.A., 2021, The corporate governance of environmental sustainability: A review and proposal for more integrated research, Journal of Management, https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206321991212.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3760077
Google Scholar
AHMED Z., CARY M., LE H. P., 2021, Accounting asymmetries in the long-run nexus between globalization and environmental sustainability in the United States: an aggregated and disaggregated investigation, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 86:106511.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106511
Google Scholar
ANSER M. K., AHMAD M., KHAN M. A., NASSAN, A. A., ASKAR S. E., ZAMAN K., KABBANI A., 2021, Progress in nuclear energy with carbon pricing to achieve environmental sustainability agenda: on the edge of one’s seat, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12966-y.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12966-y
Google Scholar
ARMINEN H., MENEGAKI A.N., 2019, Corruption, climate and the energy-environment-growth nexus, Energy Economics, 80: 621-634.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2019.02.009
Google Scholar
ASONGU S.A., ODHIAMBO N.M., 2021, Enhancing governance for environmental sustainability in sub-Saharan Africa, Energy Exploration & Exploitation, 39(1): 444-463.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0144598719900657
Google Scholar
BARBOSA L.G., ALVES M.A.S., GRELLE C.E. V., 2021, Actions against sustainability: Dismantling of the environmental policies in Brazil, Land Use Policy, 104: 105384.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105384
Google Scholar
BENNETT N.J., SATTERFIELD T., 2018, Environmental governance: A practical framework to guide design, evaluation, and analysis, Conservation Letters, 11(6): e12600.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12600
Google Scholar
CHENG R., LI W., LU Z., ZHOU S., MENG C., 2020, Integrating the three-line environmental governance and environmental sustainability evaluation of urban industry in China, Journal of Cleaner Production, 264: 121554.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121554
Google Scholar
COENEN J., BAGER S., MEYFROIDT P., NEWIG J., CHALLIES E., 2021, Environmental Governance of China's Belt and Road Initiative, Environmental Policy and Governance, 31(1): 3-17.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1901
Google Scholar
DRESSEL S., SJÖLANDER-LINDQVIST A., JOHANSSON M., ERICSSON G., SANDSTRÖM C., 2021, Achieving Social and Ecological Outcomes in Collaborative Environmental Governance: Good Examples from Swedish Moose Management, Sustainability, 13(4): 2329, https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042329.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042329
Google Scholar
GANDA F., 2020, The influence of corruption on environmental sustainability in the developing economies of Southern Africa, Heliyon, 6(7): e04387.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04387
Google Scholar
GIANNETTI B.F., AGOSTINHO F., ERAS J.C., YANG Z., ALMEIDA C.M.V.B., 2020, Cleaner production for achieving the sustainable development goals, Journal of Cleaner Production, 271:122127.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122127
Google Scholar
GIESEKE T., 2020, Collaborative Environmental Governance Frameworks: A Practical Guide. CRC Press, Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, UK, https://www.routledge.com/Collaborative-Environmental-Governance-Frameworks-A-Practical-Guide/Gieseke/p/book/9781138584501# (16-07-2021).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429505973
Google Scholar
GÖK A., SODHI N., 2021, The environmental impact of governance: a system-generalized method of moments analysis, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28: 32995-33008.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12903-z
Google Scholar
GUPTA A.C., CHATTERJEE N., 2021, Economic Values for the Environment with Special Reference to the Contingent Valuation Method, Environmental Management: Issues and Concerns in Developing Countries, ed. Sikdar P.K., Springer, Cham, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62529-0_14.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62529-0_14
Google Scholar
GUPTA, A., BOAS I., OOSTERVEER P., 2020, Transparency in global sustainability governance: to what effect?, Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 22(1): 84-97.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2020.1709281
Google Scholar
HASEEB M., ZAM M., 2021, Dynamic nexus among tourism, corruption, democracy and environmental degradation: a panel data investigation, Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23(4):5557-5575.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00832-9
Google Scholar
JAGER N.W., NEWIG J., CHALLIES E., KOCHSKÄMPER E., 2020, Pathways to implementation: Evidence on how participation in environmental governance impacts on environmental outcomes, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 30(3): 383-399.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muz034
Google Scholar
JIANG X., LI G., FU W., 2021, Government environmental governance, structural adjustment and air quality: A quasi-natural experiment based on the three-year action plan to win the blue sky defense war, Journal of Environmental Management, 277:111470.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111470
Google Scholar
KAGAYA S., WADA T., 2021, The application of environmental governance for sustainable watershed-based management, Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, 5(2): 643-671.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41685-020-00185-1
Google Scholar
KAMAH M., RITI J. S., BIN P., 2021, Inclusive growth and environmental sustainability: the role of institutional quality in sub-Saharan Africa, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13125-z.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13125-z
Google Scholar
KHAN H., WEILI L., KHAN I., 2021, Environmental innovation, trade openness and quality institutions: an integrated investigation about environmental sustainability, Environment, Development and Sustainability, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01590-y.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01590-y
Google Scholar
LAWLESS S., SONG A. M., COHEN P. J., MORRISON T. H., 2020, Rights, equity and justice: a diagnostic for social meta-norm diffusion in environmental governance, Earth System Governance, 6:100052.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esg.2020.100052
Google Scholar
LE H. P., SARKODIE S.A., 2020, Dynamic linkage between renewable and conventional energy use, environmental quality and economic growth: evidence from Emerging Market and Developing Economies, Energy Reports, 6: 965-973.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2020.04.020
Google Scholar
LEAL P.H., MARQUES A.C., 2021, The environmental impacts of globalisation and corruption: Evidence from a set of African countries, Environmental Science & Policy, 115: 116-124.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.10.013
Google Scholar
MAZUR K., TOMASHUK I., 2019, Governance and regulation as an indispensable condition for developing the potential of rural areas, Baltic journal of economic studies, 5(5): 67-78.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2019-5-5-67-78
Google Scholar
MOUSSA T., KOTB A., HELFAYA A., 2021, An Empirical Investigation of UK Environmental Targets Disclosure: The Role of Environmental Governance and Performance, European Accounting Review, https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2021.1890173
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2021.1890173
Google Scholar
MURSHED M., RAHMAN M.A., ALAM M.S., AHMAD P., DAGAR V., 2021, The nexus between environmental regulations, economic growth, and environmental sustainability: linking environmental patents to ecological footprint reduction in South Asia, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-13381-z.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13381-z
Google Scholar
NGUYEN B., 2021, Does Local Environmental Governance Improve Tourism Companies’ Performance? Evidence from Vietnam, Journal of Travel Research, https://doi.org/10.1177/00472875211002653.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00472875211002653
Google Scholar
PASGAARD M., VAN HECKEN G., EHAMMER A., STRANGE N., 2017, Unfolding scientific expertise and security in the changing governance of Ecosystem Services, Geoforum, 84: 354-367.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.02.001
Google Scholar
PEKER E., ATAÖV A., 2021, Governance of Climate Responsive Cities: Scale Matters!, Governance of Climate Responsive Cities. The Urban Book Series, eds. Peker E., Ataöv A., Springer, Cham, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73399-5_1.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73399-5
Google Scholar
PICKERING J., BÄCKSTRAND K., SCHLOSBERG D., 2020, Between environmental and ecological democracy: theory and practice at the democracy-environment nexus, Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 22(1): 1-15.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2020.1703276
Google Scholar
QUANDT R.E., 1972, A new approach to estimating switching regressions, Journal of the American statistical association, 67(338): 306-310.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1972.10482378
Google Scholar
QURESHI M.I., QAYYUM S., NASSAN A.A., ALDAKHIL A.M., ABRO M.M.Q., ZAMAN K., 2019, Management of various socio-economic factors under the United Nations sustainable development agenda, Resources Policy, 64: 101515.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.101515
Google Scholar
RAJESH, R., 2020, Exploring the sustainability performances of firms using environmental, social, and governance scores, Journal of Cleaner Production, 247: 119600.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119600
Google Scholar
RAJESH, R., RAJENDRAN, C., 2020, Relating environmental, social, and governance scores and sustainability performances of firms: An empirical analysis, Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(3): 1247-1267.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2429
Google Scholar
RAJMOHAN K.V.S., RAMYA C., VISWANATHAN M.R., VARJANI S., 2019, Plastic pollutants: effective waste management for pollution control and abatement, Current Opinion in Environmental Science & Health, 12: 72-84.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coesh.2019.08.006
Google Scholar
RAMZAN S., LIU C., MUNIR H., XU Y., 2019, Assessing young consumers’ awareness and participation in sustainable e-waste management practices: a survey study in Northwest China, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(19): 20003-20013.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05310-y
Google Scholar
REED G., BRUNET N.D., LONGBOAT S., NATCHER D.C., 2021, Indigenous guardians as an emerging approach to indigenous environmental governance, Conservation Biology, 35(1): 179-189.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13532
Google Scholar
SAVAGE J.M., HUDSON M.D., OSBORNE P.E., 2020, The challenges of establishing marine protected areas in South East Asia, Marine protected areas, Elsevier:343-359.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102698-4.00018-6
Google Scholar
SUN H., MOHSIN M., ALHARTHI M., ABBAS Q., 2020, Measuring environmental sustainability performance of South Asia, Journal of Cleaner Production, 251: 119519.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119519
Google Scholar
TACCONI L., WILLIAMS D.A., 2020, Corruption and Anti-Corruption in Environmental and Resource Management, Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 45: 305-329.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-012320-083949
Google Scholar
TAN Y., GENG Y., 2020, Coupling coordination measurement of environmental governance: case of China, Environmental and Ecological Statistics, 27(2): 253-272.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10651-020-00444-6
Google Scholar
THALER G.M., 2021, Ethnography of environmental governance: Towards an organizational approach, Geoforum, 120: 122-131.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2021.01.026
Google Scholar
USMAN O., OLANIPEKUN I.O., IOREMBER P. T., ABU-GOODMAN M., 2020, Modelling environmental degradation in South Africa: the effects of energy consumption, democracy, and globalization using innovation accounting tests, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(8): 8334-8349.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06687-6
Google Scholar
VAN ASSCHE K., BEUNEN R., GRUEZMACHER M., DUINEVELD M., 2020, Rethinking strategy in environmental governance, Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 22(5): 695-708.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2020.1768834
Google Scholar
WANG S., WANG H., WANG J., YANG F., 2020, Does environmental information disclosure contribute to improve firm financial performance? An examination of the underlying mechanism, Science of the Total Environment, 714: 136855.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136855
Google Scholar
WGI 2021, World governance indicators, World Bank, Washington D.C.
Google Scholar
WILLIAMS A., DUPUY K., 2017, Deciding over nature: Corruption and environmental impact assessments, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 65: 118-124.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2017.05.002
Google Scholar
WORLD BANK 2021, World development indicators, World Bank, Washington D.C.
Google Scholar
ZAMAN K., AZIZ A.R.A., SRIYANTO S., INDRIANTI Y., JAMBARI H., 2021, The role of solar energy demand in the relationship between carbon pricing and environmental degradation: A blessing in disguise, Journal of Public Affairs, e2702.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2702
Google Scholar
ZHANG J., CHANG Y., ZHANG L., LI D., 2018, Do technological innovations promote urban green development? – A spatial econometric analysis of 105 cities in China, Journal of cleaner production, 182: 395-403.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.067
Google Scholar
Autorzy
Jajat S. ArdiwinataDepartment Community Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Kota Bandung, Jawa Barat 40154, Indonesia Indonezja
Autorzy
Khalid Zamankhalid_zaman786@yahoo.com
Department of Economics, University of Haripur, Haripur Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan Pakistan
Autorzy
Abdelmohsen A. NassaniDepartment of Management, College of Business Administration, King Saud University, P.O. Box 71115, Riyadh, 11587, Saudi Arabia Arabia Saudyjska
Autorzy
Mohamed HaffarDepartment of Management, Birmingham Business School, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom Wielka Brytania
Autorzy
Chairil Faif PasaniMathematics and Science Education, Universitas Lambung Mangkurat, Banjarmasin 70123, Indonesia Indonezja
Autorzy
Sriyanto SriyantoSocial Studies Department, Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto, Purwokerto, 53182, Indonesia Indonezja
Statystyki
Abstract views: 82PDF downloads: 41
Licencja
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Na tych samych warunkach 4.0 Miedzynarodowe.