Nowe podejście do waloryzacji rozwoju zrównoważonego

Zoran Radojicic


University of Belgrade, Faculty of Organizational Sciences, Laboratory for Statistics, Jove Ilica 154, 11000 Belgrade (Serbia)

Sonja Isljamovic


University of Belgrade, Faculty of Organizational Sciences, Laboratory for Statistics, Jove Ilica 154, 11000 Belgrade (Serbia)

Natasa Petrovic


University of Belgrade, Faculty of Organizational Sciences, Laboratory for Statistics, Jove Ilica 154, 11000 Belgrade (Serbia)

Veljko Jeremic

jeremicv@fon.rs
University of Belgrade, Faculty of Organizational Sciences, Laboratory for Statistics, Jove Ilica 154, 11000 Belgrade (Serbia)


Abstrakt

Rozwój zrównoważony jest zagadnieniem trudnym do zmierzenia, tym bardziej, że nie ma jednej uniwersalnej metody takiego pomiaru. W tym artykule proponujemy metodę statystyczną, która sprowadza wiele wskaźników w jeden wskaźnik ilościowy. Przeanalizowano uwarunkowania rozwoju zrównoważonego w 27 krajach Unii Europejskiej. Rezultaty pokazują, że najbardziej zaawansowanymi we wdrażaniu tego rozwoju są Szwecja i Dania. Na drugim końcu skali znajdują się nowi członkowie UE, kraje takie jak Łotwa, Węgry, Estonia, Litwa i Słowacja. To wyzwanie dla Unii, jeśli chce ona odgrywać wiodącą rolę we wdrażaniu rozwoju zrównoważonego w perspektywie globalnej.

Należy podkreślić, że proponowaną metodę można zastosować w stosunku do wszystkich innych regionów, a poprzez to uzyskać informacje pozwalającej określić, czy świat zmierza w kierunku realizacji celów zrównoważonego rozwoju.


Słowa kluczowe:

rozwój zrównoważony, metoda I-distance, ranking krajów

A-LAGILLI S., JEREMIC V., SEKE K., JEREMIC D., RADOJICIC Z., 2011, Evaluating the health of nations: a Libyan perspective, in: Libyan Journal of Medicine, vol. 6, article 6021, doi: 10.3402/ljm.v6i0.6021.
  Google Scholar

BRUNI M.E., GUERRIERO F., PATITUCCI V., 2011, Benchmarking Sustainable Development via Data development Analysis: an Italian case study, in: International Journal of Environmental Research, vol. 5, no 2, p. 47-56.
  Google Scholar

DURBIN P. T., Humanitarian Motives for Sustainable Development in a Global Economy: An Essay, in: Problemy Ekorozwoju/ Problems of Sustainable Development, vol. 5, no 1, p. 9-13.
  Google Scholar

EU ENERGY POLICY, 2010, http://www.energy.eu/renewables/eu-charts/RE-in-final.html (31.08.2011).
  Google Scholar

EUROSTAT, 2010, http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/sdi/indicators/ (8.06.2011).
  Google Scholar

DAVIDSON E.A., You can’t eat GNP: Economics as if ecology mattered, Peresus, Cambridge 2000.
  Google Scholar

GREENWOOD D., 2004, A Foucaultian analysis of environmental education: Toward the socioecological challenge of the Earth Charter, in: Curriculum Inquire, vol. 34, no 1, p. 71-107.
  Google Scholar

HU J., XIAO Z.B., ZHOU R.J., DENG W.J., WANG M.X., MA S.S., 2011, Ecological utilization of leather tannery waste with circular economy model, in: Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 19, no 2-3, p. 221-228.
  Google Scholar

IVANOVIC B., A method of establishing a list of development indicators, United Nations educational, scientific and cultural organization, Paris 1973.
  Google Scholar

IVANOVIC B., Classification Theory, Institute for Industrial Economic, Belgrade, 1977.
  Google Scholar

IVANOVIC B., FANCHETTE S., Grouping and ranking of 30 countries of Sub-Saharan Africa, Two distance-based methods compared, United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, Paris 1973.
  Google Scholar

JEREMIC V., RADOJICIC Z., 2010, A New Approach in the Evaluation of Team Chess Championships Rankings, in: Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports., vol. 6, no 3, article 7.
  Google Scholar

JEREMIC V., BULAJIC M., MARTIC M., RADOJICIC Z., 2011a, A fresh approach to evaluating the academic ranking of world universities, in: Scientometrics, vol. 87, no 3, p. 587-596.
  Google Scholar

JEREMIC V., ISLJAMOVIC S., PETROVIC N., RADOJICIC Z., MARKOVIC A., BULAJIC M., 2011b, Human development index and sustainability: What’s the correlation?, in: Metalurgia International, vol. 16, no 7, p. 63-67.
  Google Scholar

JEREMIC V., VUKMIROVIC D., RADO-JICIC Z., DJOKOVIC A., 2011c, Towards a framework for evaluating ICT infrastructure of countries: a Serbian perspective, in: Metalurgia International, vol. 16, no 9, p. 15-18.
  Google Scholar

JEREMIC V., MARKOVIC A., RADOJICIC Z., 2011d, ICT as crucial component of socio-economic development, in: Management, vol. 16, no 60.
  Google Scholar

JEREMIC V., SEKE K., RADOJICIC Z., JEREMIC D., MARKOVIC A., SLOVIC D., ALEKSIC A., 2012, Measuring health of countries: a novel approach, in: HealthMED, vol. 6, no 1.
  Google Scholar

KRAS E., 2011, The Deep Roots of Sustainability, in: Problemy Ekorozwoju/Problems of Sustainable Development, vol. 6, no 1, p. 11-30.
  Google Scholar

MIHAILOVIC N., BULAJIC M., SAVIC G., 2009, Ranking of banks in Serbia, in: YUJOR, vol. 19, no 2, p. 323–334.
  Google Scholar

MIHCI H., MOLLAVELIGIU S., 2011, An Assessment of Sustainable Agriculture in the OECD Countries with Special Reference to Turkey, in: New Medit, vol. 10, no 2, p. 4-17.
  Google Scholar

MITCHELL R.B., 2006, The effectiveness of international environmental regimes – problem structure, institutional design, and the relative effectiveness of international environmental agreements, in: Global Environmental Politics, vol. 6, no 3, p. 72-88.
  Google Scholar

MOFFAT I., HANLEY N., WILSON M.D., Measuring and Modeling Sustainable Development, The Parthenon Publishing Group, Bristol 2001.
  Google Scholar

MUNDA G., NARDO M., 2009, Non-compensatory/nonlinear composite indicators for ranking countries: a defensible setting, in: Applied Economics, vol. 41, no 12, p. 1513-1523.
  Google Scholar

NESS B., URBEL-PIIRSALU E., ANDER-BERG S., OLSSON L., 2007, Categorizing tools for sustainability assessment, in: Ecological Economics, vol. 60, p. 498-508.
  Google Scholar

PAWŁOWSKI A., 2009, The Sustainable Development Revolution, in: Problemy Ekorozwoju/ Problems of Sustainable Development, vol. 4, no 1, p. 65-76.
  Google Scholar

PETROVIC N., ISLJAMOVIC S., JEREMIC V., 2010, Zero waste as a new concept for sustainable development, in: Management, vol. 15, no 57, p. 39-45.
  Google Scholar

PETROVIC N., ISLJAMOVIC S., JEREMIC V., VUK D., SENEGACNIK M., 2011a, Ecological Footprint as indicator of students environmental awareness level at Faculties of Organizational Sciences, University of Belgrade and University of Maribor, in: Management, vol. 16, no 58, p. 15-21.
  Google Scholar

PETROVIC N., DRAKULIC M., VUJIN V., DRAKULIC R., JEREMIC V., 2011b, Climate changes and green information technologies, in: Management, vol. 16, no 59, p. 35-43.
  Google Scholar

PITT C., GRECO G., POWELL JACKSON T., MILLS A., 2011, Countdown to 2015: assessment of official development assistance to maternal, newborn, and child health, 2003-08, in: Lancet, vol. 376, no 9751, p. 1485-1496.
  Google Scholar

POLIMENI J.M., 2011, Factor Five: Transforming the Global Economy Through 80% Improvements in Resource Productivity, in: Ecological Economics, vol. 70, no 6, p. 1240-1241.
  Google Scholar

POPE G,. ANNANDALE D., MORRISON-SAUNDERS A., 2004, Conceptualising sustainability assessment, in: Environmental Impact Assessment Review, vol. 24, p. 595-616.
  Google Scholar

REDCLIFT M. R., 2009, Sustainable Development (1987 – 2005) – an Oxymoron Comes of Age, in: Problemy Ekorozowju/ Problems of Sustainable Development vol. 4, no 1, p. 33-50.
  Google Scholar

ROPKE I., 2005, Trends in the development of ecological economics from the late 1980s to the early 2000s, in: Ecological Economics, vol. 55, no 2, p. 262-290.
  Google Scholar

STEINBERGER J.K., KRAUSMANN F., EISENMENGER N., 2010, Global patterns of materials use: A socioeconomic and geophysical analysis, in: Ecological Economics, vol. 69, no 5, p. 1148-1158.
  Google Scholar

QUENTAL N., LOURENCO J., NUNES DA SILVA F., 2011, Sustainable Development Policy: Goals, Targets and Political Cycles, in: Sustainable Development, vol. 19, p. 15-29.
  Google Scholar

The Earth Charter, 2008, http://earth charterinaction.org/2000/10/the_earth_charter.html (28.V.2011).
  Google Scholar

TUZIAK A., 2010, Socio-economic aspects of sustainable development on global and local level, in: Problemy Ekorozwoju/Problems of Sustainable Development, vol. 5, no 2, p. 39-49.
  Google Scholar

UNDSD – United Nations Division for Sustainable Development, 2008, National Sustainable Development Strategies: the Global Picture, http://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/natlinfo/nsds/nsds_map2008.pdf (12.05.2011).
  Google Scholar

UNEP – United Nations Environment Program, Global Environment Outlook 4: Environment for Development, Progress, Valletta 2007.
  Google Scholar

WCED – World Commission on Environment and Development, Our Common Future, Oxford University Press, Oxford 1987.
  Google Scholar

ZHONG W., YUAN W., LI S.X., HUANG Z.M., 2011, The performance evaluation of regional R&D invest-ments in China: An application of DEA based on the first official China economic census data, in: Omega, vol. 39, no 4, p. 447-455.
  Google Scholar


Opublikowane
2012-01-02

Cited By / Share

Radojicic, Z., Isljamovic, S., Petrovic, N., & Jeremic, V. (2012). Nowe podejście do waloryzacji rozwoju zrównoważonego. Problemy Ekorozwoju Problems of Sustainable Development, 7(1), 81–85. Pobrano z https://ph.pollub.pl/index.php/preko/article/view/4838

Autorzy

Zoran Radojicic 

University of Belgrade, Faculty of Organizational Sciences, Laboratory for Statistics, Jove Ilica 154, 11000 Belgrade Serbia

Autorzy

Sonja Isljamovic 

University of Belgrade, Faculty of Organizational Sciences, Laboratory for Statistics, Jove Ilica 154, 11000 Belgrade Serbia

Autorzy

Natasa Petrovic 

University of Belgrade, Faculty of Organizational Sciences, Laboratory for Statistics, Jove Ilica 154, 11000 Belgrade Serbia

Autorzy

Veljko Jeremic 
jeremicv@fon.rs
University of Belgrade, Faculty of Organizational Sciences, Laboratory for Statistics, Jove Ilica 154, 11000 Belgrade Serbia

Statystyki

Abstract views: 10
PDF downloads: 3