Praktyki zielonych technologii informatycznych wśród profesjonalistów z zakresu IT – perspektywa teorii planowanego zachowania
Ibrahim Akman
Atilim University, Incek, 06836, Ankara (Turcja)
Alok Mishra
alok@atilim.edu.trAtilim University, Incek, 06836, Ankara (Turcja)
Abstrakt
Według wskazań literaturowych, determinanty ekologicznych postaw i zachowań odgrywają istotną rolę w ich kształtowaniu i warto badać wpływ, jaki wywierać może na nie stosowanie technologii informatycznych. W tej pracy wykorzystano teorię planowanego zachowania (Theory of Planned Behavior – TPB), aby wyjaśnić podejście profesjonalistów z zakresu IT do praktyk związanych ze stosowaniem zielonych technologii informatycznych (Green Information Technologies – GIT). Badania wśród pracowników IT przeprowadzono w firmach reprezentujących dwa sektory: państwowym i prywatnym. Otrzymane wyniki pokazały, że model TPB, uwzględniający cztery filary, wyjaśnia determinanty odnoszące się do zachowania. W artykule omówiono także napotkane ograniczenia, a także implikacje dla teorii TPB, które z przeprowadzonych badań wynikają.
Słowa kluczowe:
Teoria planowanego zachowania, zrównoważoność, zielone technologie informatyczne, profesjonaliści z zakresu IT, ANOVABibliografia
ABOELMAGED M. G., GEBBA T. R., 2013, Mobile Banking Adoption: An Examination of Technology Acceptance Model and Theory of Planned Behavior, in: International Journal of Business Research and Development 2(1), p. 35‐50.
Google Scholar
AGILAR-LUZON M. del C., a-MARTINEZ J. M. Á. G. CALVO-SALGUERO A. and SALINAS J. M., 2012, Comparative Study Be-tween the Theory of Planned Behavior and the Value–Belief–Norm Model Regarding the Environment, on Spanish Housewives’ Recycling Behavior, in: Journal of Applied Social Psy-chology 42 (11), p. 2797-2833.
Google Scholar
AJZEN I., 1991, The theory of planned behav-ior, in: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50 (2), p. 179-211.
Google Scholar
AJZEN I., 2002, Residual effects of past be-havior, habituation and reasoned action per-spectives, in: Personality and Social Psychol-ogy Review 6, p. 107-122.
Google Scholar
BAMBERG S., 2013, Changing environmen-tally harmful behaviors: A stage model of self-regulated behavioral change, in: Journal of Environmental Psychology 34, p. 151-159.
Google Scholar
BAMBERG S., & SSCMIDT S., 2003, Incen-tives, morality or habit? Predicting students’ car use for university routes with the models of Ajzen, Schwartz and Triandis, in: Environment and Behavior 35, p. 264-285.
Google Scholar
BERHON P., DONNELLAN B., 2011, The Greening of IT: Paradox or promise?, in: The Journal of Strategic Information Systems 20:1, p. 3-5.
Google Scholar
BOSE R, LUO X., 2011, Integrative framework for assessing firms’ potential to undertake Green IT initiatives via virtualization – A theo-retical perspective, in: J. Strateg. Inform. Syst. 20(1), p. 38-54.
Google Scholar
BROWN J. D., 2002, The Cronbach alpha reliability estimate, in: Shiken: JALT Testing & Evaluation SIG Newsletter 6(1), p. 17-19.
Google Scholar
CAPRA E., FRANCALANCI C., SLAUGHTER S.A., 2012, Is software green? Application development environments and energy efficiency in open source applications, in: Inf. Softw. Technol. 54(1), p. 60-71.
Google Scholar
CHAU P.Y.K., PAUL J. H., 2002, Examining a Model of Information Technology Acceptance by Individual Professionals: An Exploratory Study, in: Journal of Management Information Systems 18, p. 191-229.
Google Scholar
CHEN Y., 2010, The drivers of green brand equity: Green brand image, green satisfaction, and green trust, in: Journal of Business Ethics 93, p. 307-319.
Google Scholar
DAO V., LANGELLA I., CARBO J., (2011, From green to sustainability: Information Technology and an integrated sustainability framework, in: J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 20, 1 (March 2011), p. 63-79.
Google Scholar
DE GROOT J., STEG L., 2008, Value orienta-tions to explain beliefs related to environmental significant behavior: how to measure egoistic, altruistic, and biospheric value orientations, in: Environment and Behavior 40, p. 330-354.
Google Scholar
DUNLAP R. E., VAN LIERE K. D., MERTIG A. G., JONES R.E., 2000, Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: a revised NEP scale, in: Journal of Social Issues 56(3), p. 425-442.
Google Scholar
EREK K., SCHMIDT N.-H., ZARNEKOW R., KOLBE L.M., 2009, Sustainability in information systems: assortment of current practices in IS organizations, in: Proceedings of the Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS). San Francisco, August 2009 (paper 123).
Google Scholar
FILEDING K.S., McDONALD R. LOUIS W. R., 2008, Theory of planned behavior, identity and intentions to engage in environmental activism, in: Journal of Environmental Psychology 28, 2008, p. 318-326.
Google Scholar
Gartner Inc., 2008, Green IT: The new industry shockwave. Presentation at symposium/ITXPO conference, http://www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/503867 (1.01.2014).
Google Scholar
GREAVES M., ZIBARRAS L. D. STRIDE C., 2013, Using the theory of planned behavior to explore environmental behavioral intentions in the workplace, in: Journal of Environmental Psychology 34, p. 109-120.
Google Scholar
HAN H., HSU L-T., SHEU C., 2010, Applica-tion of the Theory of Planned Behavior to green hotel choice: Testing the effect of environmental friendly activities, in: Tourism Management, 31 (3), p. 325-334.
Google Scholar
HARPER P., Australia’s Environment: Issues and Trends 2006, Australian Bureau of Statistics, Cat. No. 4613.0, http://www.ausstats.abs.gov.au (1.06.2008).
Google Scholar
HART S., MILSTEIN M.B., 2003, Creating sustainable value, in: Academy of Management Executive 17, p. 56-67.
Google Scholar
HILTY L. M., ARNFLAK P., ERDMANN L., GOODMAN J., LEHMANN M., WAGER P. A., 2006, The relevance of information and communication technologies for environmental sustainability. A prospective simulation study, in: Environmental Modelling & Software 21, p. 1618-1629.
Google Scholar
JIN K.G., DROZDENKO R., BASKETT R., 2007, Information technology professionals’ perceived organizational values and managerial ethics: an empirical study, in: Journal of Business Ethics 71(2), March, p. 149-159.
Google Scholar
JENKIN T.A., McSHANE L., WEBSTER J., 2011a, Green Information Technologies and Systems: Employees’ Perceptions of Organizational Practices, in: Business & Society, 50(2), p. 266-314.
Google Scholar
JENKIN T.A., WEBSTER J., McSHANE L., 2011b, An agenda for Green information technology and systems research, in: Information and Organization, 21(1), p. 17-40.
Google Scholar
MALMODIN J., MOBERG Å., LUNDéN, D., FINNVEDEN G., and LöVEHAGEN N., 2010, Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Operational Electricity Use in the ICT and Entertainment & Media Sectors, in: Journal of Industrial Ecology (4:5), p. 770-790.
Google Scholar
MELVILLE N.P., 2010, Information systems innovation for environmental sustainability, in: MIS Quarterly, 31(1), p. 1-21.
Google Scholar
MILTON J.S., ARNOLD L.C., Introduction to Probability and Statistics: Principles and Ap-plications for Engineering and the Computing Sciences, McGraw Hill, Boston 2003.
Google Scholar
MISHRA A., AKMAN I., 2010, Information Technology in Human Resource Management: An Empirical Assessment, in: Public Personnel Management, 39(3), p. 243-262.
Google Scholar
MYKYTYN P.P., HARRISON D.A., 1993, The Application of Theory of Reasoned Action to Senior Management and Strategic Information Systems, in: Information Resources Management Journal, Vol. 6(2), p. 15-26.
Google Scholar
NCHISE A., 2012, An Empirical Analysis of the Theory of Planned Behavior, A Review of Its Application on E-democracy Adoption Using the Partial Least Squares Algorithm, in: JeDEM 4(2), p. 171-182.
Google Scholar
NIAURA A., 2013, Using the Theory of Planned Behavior to Investigate the Determinants of Environmental Behavior among Youth, in: Environmental Research, Engineering and Management, no. 1(63), p. 74-81.
Google Scholar
NORDLUND A.M., GARVILL J., 2003, Effects of values, problem awareness, and personal norm on willingness to reduce personal car use, in: Journal of Environmental Psychology 23, p. 339-347.
Google Scholar
NORDLUND A. M., GARVILL, J., 2002, Value structures behind proenvironmental behavior, in: Environment and Behavior 34, p. 740-756.
Google Scholar
PARK S.Y., 2007, An Analysis of the Technology Acceptance Model in Understanding University Students’ Behavioral Intention to Use e-Learning, in: Educational Technology & Society, 12 (3), p. 150-162.
Google Scholar
PAVLOU P. A., CHAI L., 2002, What Drives Electronic Commerce Across Cultures? A Cross-Cultural Empirical Investigation of the Theory of Planned Behavior, in: Journal of Electronic Commerce Research 3(4), p. 240-253.
Google Scholar
PORTER M., KRAMER M., 2006, Strategy and society: the link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility, in: Harvard Business Review 84 (12), p. 78-92.
Google Scholar
SIEGLER K., GAUGHAN B., 2008,. A practical approach to Green IT, Webinar, http://www.itmanagement.com/land/green-it-webinar/?tfso=2058 (14.07.2008)
Google Scholar
STEG L., DREIJERNIK L., ABRAHAMSE W., 2005, Factors influencing the acceptability of energy policies: testing VBN theory, in: Journal of Environmental Psychology 25, p. 415-425.
Google Scholar
STEG L., VLEK C., 2009, Encouraging pro-environmental behavior: An integrative review and research agenda, in: Journal of Environ-mental Psychology 29, p. 309-317.
Google Scholar
WEBB M., 2008, SMART 2020: Enabling the Low Carbon Economy in the Information Age, http://www.theclimategroup.org (1.01.2014).
Google Scholar
YU A., 2007,. Assess students: Item analysis. Instructional Assessment Resources, IAR, http://www.utexas.edu/academic/ctl/assessment/jar/students/report/itemanalysis.php (10.04.2011).
Google Scholar
Autorzy
Ibrahim AkmanAtilim University, Incek, 06836, Ankara Turcja
Statystyki
Abstract views: 8PDF downloads: 12
Licencja
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-sa/4.0/88x31.png)
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Na tych samych warunkach 4.0 Miedzynarodowe.