Wpływ uwarunkowań środowiskowych na społeczne poparcie dla Programu odnowy środowiska rzecznego w Chinach

Yifei Zhang


International Business School, Shanghai University of International Business and Economics, Shanghai, 201620 (Chiny)

Sheng Li


Department of Agricultural Economics, Auburn University, USA, 36849-5406 and Department of Economic and Management, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai, China, 201306 (Stany Zjednoczone)


Abstrakt

Odnowa środowiska rzecznego na terenach zurbanizowanych staje się w Chinach ważnym problemem środowiskowym, z uwagi na wysoki poziom zanieczyszczeń. Oprócz wyzwań technicznych, wyraźne uwzględnienie preferencji lokalnych społeczności odnoszących się do zarządzania środowiskiem i jego restytucji stanowi istotne wyzwanie dla miejskich planistów i wdrażanych programów. W tym artykule zastosowano metodę wyceny warunkowej w celu określenia społecznych preferencji związanych z wdrażanym programem odnowy środowiska rzecznego w Hangzou i Najing w Chinach.  Otrzymane wyniki pokazują, że preferencje środowiskowe (uwzględniające percepcję, przekonania i dotychczasowe wzorce zachowania) okazały się być trafniejszymi zmiennymi wyjaśniającymi, niż wskaźniki społeczno-demograficzne, w kontekście wyjaśniania poziomu społecznego wsparcia dla działań podejmowanych na rzecz restytucji środowiska. Zarazem popyt i podaż respondentów na dobra środowiskowe rozmijają się. Ludzie oczekują lepszej jakości środowiska, ale nie są zainteresowani podejmowaniem osobistych działań w tym kierunku. Okazało się także, że przeciętny poziom hipotetycznego finansowego wsparcia respondentów dla działań na rzecz środowiska wynosi zaledwie 36 yuanów RMB za kapitał. Wysiłki w celu oceny i kształtowania wsparcia dla odbudowy środowiska powinny w większym stopniu zwracać uwagę na społeczny odbiór podejmowanych działań, ludzkie przekonania i dotychczasowe wzorce zachowania.


Słowa kluczowe:

restytucja środowiska wodnego, preferencje społeczne, świadomość ekologiczna, planowanie miast, jakość wody, urbanizacja, Chiny

ADAMOWICZ W., BOXALL P., WILLIAMS M., LOUVIERE J., 1998,Stated Preference Approaches for Measuring Passive Use Values: Choice Experiments and Contingent Valuation, in: American Journal of Agricultural Economics 80 (1), p. 64-75.
  Google Scholar

AJZEN I., FISHBEIN M.,Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behaviors, Prentice-Hall, New York 1980.
  Google Scholar

APPLETON J., 1975, Landscape Evaluation: The Theoretical Vacuum, in: Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 66, p. 120-123.
  Google Scholar

BAE H., 2011, Urban Stream Restoration in Korea: Design Considerations and Residents’ Willingness to Pay, in: Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 10(2), p. 119-126.
  Google Scholar

BARRO S. C., BRIGHT A. D.,1998, Public Views on Ecological Restoration A Snapshot from the Chicago Area, in: Ecological Restoration, 16 (1), p. 59-65.
  Google Scholar

BOHM P., 1994, CVM Spells Responses to Hypothetical Questions, in: Journal of Natural Resources 34, p. 37.
  Google Scholar

BOYD J., WAINGER L., 2003,Measuring Ecosystem Service Benefits: The Use of Landscape Analysis to Evaluate Environmental Trades and Compensation.Discussion Paper, http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/handle/10738.
  Google Scholar

(1.02.2014).
  Google Scholar

CAIRNS Jr. J., 1991, The Status of the Theoretical and Applied Science of Restoration Ecology, in: Environmental Professional 13(3), p. 186-194.
  Google Scholar

CAMERON T. A., 1988, A New Paradigm for Valuing Non-market Goods Using Referendum Data: Maximum Likelihood Estimation by Censored Logistic Regression, in: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 15 (3), p. 355-379.
  Google Scholar

CAMERON T. A., 1991, Interval Estimates of Non-market Resource Values from Referendum Contingent Valuation Surveys, in: Land Economics 67 (4), p. 413-421.
  Google Scholar

CAMERONT.A., JAMES M.D., 1987. Efficient Estimation Methods for ‘Closed-ended’ Contingent Valuation Surveys, in: The Review of Economics and Statistics 69(2), p. 269-276.
  Google Scholar

CARNES S.A., SCHWEITZER M., PEELLE E.B., WOLFE A.K., MUNRO J.F., 1998, Measuring the Success of Public Participation on Environmental Restoration and Waste Management Activities in the US Department of Energy, in: Technology in Society 20 (4), p. 385-406.
  Google Scholar

CARPENTER S. R., CARACO N. F., CORNELL D. L., HOWARTH R. W., SHARPLEY A. N., SMITH V. H., 1998, Nonpoint Pollution of Surface Waters with Phosphorus and Nitrogen, in: Ecological Applications 8 (3), p. 559-568.
  Google Scholar

CHAN K. W., 2010, The Household Registration System and Migrant Labor in China: Notes on a Debate, in: Population and Development Review 36 (2), p. 357-364.
  Google Scholar

CICCHETTI C. J., PECK N., 1989, Assessing Natural Resource Damages: The Case Against Contingent Value Survey Methods, in: Natural. Resources & Environment 4, p. 6.
  Google Scholar

COBBING P., SLEE B., 1994, The Application of CVM to a Land Use Controversy in the Scottish Highlands, in:Landscape Research 19 (1), p. 14-17.
  Google Scholar

DAMIGOS D., KALIAMPAKOS D., 2003, Assessing the Benefits of Reclaiming Urban Quarries: a CVM Analysis, in: Landscape and Urban Planning 64 (4), p. 249-258.
  Google Scholar

DOWNS P. W., KONDOLF G. M., 2002, Post-project Appraisals in Adaptive Management of River Channel Restoration, in: Environmental Management 29 (4), p. 477-496.
  Google Scholar

DUNLAP R. E., 1991, Trends in Public Opinion Toward Environmental Issues: 1965-1990, in: Society & Natural Resources 4 (3), p. 285-312.
  Google Scholar

ENDTER-WADA J., BLAHNA D., KRANNICH R., BRUNSON M., 1998,A Framework for Understanding Social Science Contributions to Ecosystem Management, in: Ecological Applications 8 (3), p. 891-904.
  Google Scholar

FAN C. C., 2008, China on the Move: Migration, the State, and the Household, in: The China Quarterly 196, p. 924-956.
  Google Scholar

GORE J.A., Restoration of Rivers and Streams, Butterworth Publishers, MA:985.
  Google Scholar

HADKER N., SHARMA S., DAVID A., MURALEEDHARAN T. R., 1997, Willingness-to-pay for Borivli National Park: Evidence from a Contingent Valuation, in: Ecological Economics, 21 (2), p. 105-122.
  Google Scholar

HAGER M. A., WILSON S., POLLAK T. H., ROONEY P. M., 2003, Response Rates for Mail Surveys of Nonprofit Organizations: A Review and Empirical Test, in: Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 32 (2), p. 252-267.
  Google Scholar

HANEMANN M., LOOMIS J., KANNINE B., 1991, Statistical Efficiency of Double-bounded Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation, in: American Journal of Agricultural Economics 1255-1263.
  Google Scholar

HANEY A., POWER R. L., 1996, Adaptive Management for Sound Ecosystem Management, in: Environmental Management 20 (6), p. 879-886.
  Google Scholar

HITE D., HUDSON D., INTARAPAPONG W., 2002, Willingness to Pay for Water Quality Improvements: The Case of Precision Application Technology, in: Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 27 (2), p. 433-449.
  Google Scholar

HONG H., TAMER E., 2003, A Simple Estimator for Nonlinear Error in Variable Models, in: Journal of Econometrics 117 (1), p. 1-19.
  Google Scholar

HUANG M., JIANG H., 2009, The spatial and temporal characteristics of surface ultraviolet radiation and total ozone in urban agglomeration of Yangtze River Delta, in: Urban Remote Sensing Event, p. 1-7.
  Google Scholar

KAPLAN S., 1987, Aesthetics, Affect, and Cognition Environmental Preference from an Evolutionary Perspective, in: Environment and Behavior 19 (1), p. 3-32.
  Google Scholar

KEMPTON W. M., BOSTER J. S., HARTLEY J. A., Environmental Values in American Culture, MIT Press, 1996.
  Google Scholar

KERN K., 1992,Rehabilitation of Streams in South-west Germany, in: River Conservation and Management, p. 321-335.
  Google Scholar

LEE K. N., 1995, Deliberately Seeking Sustainability in the Columbia River Basin, in: Barriers and Bridges to the Renewal of Ecosystems and Institutions, p. 214-238.
  Google Scholar

LOOMIS J., KENT P., STRANGE L., FAUSCH K., COVICH A., 2000, Measuring the Total Economic Value of Restoring Ecosystem Services in an Impaired River Basin: Results from a Contingent Valuation Survey, in: Ecological Economics 33 (1), p. 103-117.
  Google Scholar

MANGIONE T. W.,Mail Surveys: Improving the Quality, California: Thousand Oaks, 1995.
  Google Scholar

MANSKI C. F., TAMER E., 2003,Inference on Regressions with Interval Data on a Regressor or Outcome, in: Econometrica, 70 (2), p. 519-546.
  Google Scholar

McCARTHY N., 2004,Local-level Public Goods and Collective Action. International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), http://www.ifpri.org/publication/local-level-public-goods-and-collective-action (1.02.2014).
  Google Scholar

McCOY E.D., MUSHINSKY H.R., 2002, Measuring the Success of Wildlife Community Restoration, in: Ecological Applications 12 (6), p. 1861-1871.
  Google Scholar

MILON J. W., ADAMS C. M., CARTER D. W.,Floridians’ Attitudes About the Environment and Coastal Marine Resources, Florida Sea Grant College Program, University of Florida 1998.
  Google Scholar

PRATKANIS A. R., BRECKLER S. J., GREENWALD A. G.,Attitude Structure and Function, NJ: Hillsdale 1989.
  Google Scholar

PROCTOR J. D., 1998, Environmental Values and Popular Conflict over Environmental Management: A Comparative Analysis of Public Comments on the Clinton Forest Plan, in: Environmental Management 22 (3), p. 347-358.
  Google Scholar

PRUCKNER G. J., 1995, Agricultural Landscape Cultivation in Austria: An Application of the CVM, in: European Review of Agricultural Economics 22 (2), p. 173-190.
  Google Scholar

RIVERS D., VUONG Q. H., 1988, Limited Information Estimators and Exogeneity Tests for Simultaneous Probit Models, in: Journal of Econometrics 39 (3), p. 347-366.
  Google Scholar

ROSENBERGER R. S., WALSH R. G., 1997, Nonmarket Value of Western Valley Ranchland Using Contingent Valuation, in: Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 22, p. 296-309.
  Google Scholar

SCHMIDT D. C., CARLSON S. R., KYLE G. B., FINNEY B. P., 1998, Influence of Carcass-derived Nutrients on Sockeye Salmon Productivity of Karluk Lake, Alaska: Importance in the Assessment of an Escapement Goal, in: North American Journal of Fisheries Management 18 (4), p. 743-763.
  Google Scholar

SCHMIDT J.C., WEBB R.H., VALDEZ R.A., MARZOLF G.R., STEVENS L.E., 1998, Science and Values in River Restoration in the Grand Canyon, in: BioScience, 48 (9), p. 735-747.
  Google Scholar

SMITH C. L., GILDEN J. D., CONE J. S., STEEL B. S., 1997, Contrasting Views of Coastal Residents and Coastal Coho Restoration Planners, in: Fisheries 22 (12), p. 8-15.
  Google Scholar

VAN der STEDE W. A., YOUNG S. M., CHEN C. X., 2005, Assessing the Quality of Evidence in Empirical Management Accounting Research: The Case of Survey Studies, in: Accounting, Organizations and Society 30 (7), p. 655-684.
  Google Scholar

STEEL B. S., LIST P., SHINDLER B., 1994, Conflicting Values About Federal Forests: a Comparison of National and Oregon Publics, in: Society & Natural Resources 7 (2), p. 137-153.
  Google Scholar

STEEL B. S., SODEN D. L., WARNER R. L., 1990, The Impact of Knowledge and Values on Perceptions of Environmental Risk to the Great Lakes, in: Society & Natural Resources 3(4), P. 331-348.
  Google Scholar

STEVENS T. H., ECHEVERRIA J., GLASS R. J., HAGER T., MORE T. A., 1991, Measuring the Existence Value of Wildlife: What Do CVM Estimates Really Show?, in: Land Economics 67 (4), p. 390-400.
  Google Scholar

TOURANGEAU R., COUPER M. P., CONRAD F., 2004, Spacing, Position, and Order Interpretive Heuristics for Visual Features of Sur vey Questions, in: Public Opinion Quarterly 68 (3), p. 368-393.
  Google Scholar

TUNSTALL S. M., TAPSELL S. M., EDEN S., 1999, How Stable Are Public Responses to Changing Local Environments? A’before’and’after’case Study of River Restoration, in: Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 42 (4), p. 527-545.
  Google Scholar

ULRICH R. S., 1984, View Through a Window May Influence Recovery from Surgery, in: Science 224 (4647), p. 420-421.
  Google Scholar

WILKINS S., KEITH D.A., ADAM P., 2003, Measuring Success: Evaluating the Restoration of a Grassy Eucalypt Woodland on the Cumberland Plain, Sydney, Australia, in: Restoration Ecology 11 (4), p. 489-503.
  Google Scholar

WONG L., WAI P. H., 1998, Reforming the Household Registration System: A Preliminary Glimpse of the Blue Chop Household Registration System in Shanghai and Shenzhen, in: International Migration Review 32(4), p. 974-994.
  Google Scholar

WU X., & TREIMAN D. J., 2004, The Household Registration System and Social Stratification in China: 1955-1996, in: Demography 41 (2), p. 363-384.
  Google Scholar

ZHAO Y., 1997, Labor Migration and Returns to Rural Education in China, in: American Journal of Agricultural Economics 79 (4), p. 1278-1287.
  Google Scholar

ZHAO Y., 1997, Labor Migration and Returns to Rural Education in China, in: American Journal of Agricultural Economics 79 (4), p. 1278-1287.
  Google Scholar


Opublikowane
2014-07-01

Cited By / Share

Zhang, Y., & Li, S. (2014). Wpływ uwarunkowań środowiskowych na społeczne poparcie dla Programu odnowy środowiska rzecznego w Chinach. Problemy Ekorozwoju Problems of Sustainable Development, 9(2), 55–64. Pobrano z https://ph.pollub.pl/index.php/preko/article/view/4874

Autorzy

Yifei Zhang 

International Business School, Shanghai University of International Business and Economics, Shanghai, 201620 Chiny

Autorzy

Sheng Li 

Department of Agricultural Economics, Auburn University, USA, 36849-5406 and Department of Economic and Management, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai, China, 201306 Stany Zjednoczone

Statystyki

Abstract views: 11
PDF downloads: 5