Amerykańskie trawniki z bliska: świadomość, edukacja i kultura jako motywy polityki publicznej prowadzącej w kierunku zrównoważoności
Yaoqi Zhang
zhangy3@auburn.eduInternational Center for Ecology, Meteorology and Environment (IceMe), School of Applied Meteorology, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210044, China; School of Forestry and Wildlife Sciences, Auburn, AL 36849-5418, USA (Chiny)
Bin Zheng
College of Economics and Management, Nanjing Forestry University, 159 Longpan Road, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210037 (Chiny)
Ge Sun
USDA Forest Service Southern Research Station, Raleigh, NC 27606 (Stany Zjednoczone)
Peilei Fan
School of Planning, Design & Construction (SPDC) and Center for Global Change and Earth Observations (CGCEO), Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824 (Stany Zjednoczone)
Abstrakt
Trawnik już o dawna był używany w kształtowaniu krajobrazu, ogrodnictwie i upiększaniu domów. Ewolucja trawników odzwierciedla istotne kulturowe i biofizyczne interakcje pomiędzy ludźmi i przyrodą. Trawnik trafił do Ameryki z Europy i stał się częścią amerykańskiego snu o własności i kulturze domu. Później stał się on jednak obszarem przeciwstawiającym się naturze z uwagi na intensywnie stosowanie substancji chemicznych i generowanie zanieczyszczeń. Wykazując, w jaki sposób trawnik staje się ważną częścią kultury, ten artykuł skupia się na bardziej aktualnych kwestiach zanieczyszczeń i innych problemów środowiskowych. Wykształcenie świadomości, zmieniającą się kultura smaku i preferencje, łącznie z prawem i technologią, mogą stanowić dodatkowe środki prowadzące w kierunku zrównoważonego kształtowania trawników w Stanach Zjednoczonych i na świecie.
Słowa kluczowe:
trawa, amerykańska kultura, demonstracyjna kultura, industrializacja, urbanizacja, zanieczyszczenie, estetyka, krajobrazBibliografia
ALUMAI A., SALMINEN S., RICHMOND D., CARDINA J., GREWAL P., 2009, Comparative evaluation of aesthetic, biological, and economic effectiveness of different lawn management programs, in: Urban Ecosystem, vol. 12, no 2, p. 127-144.
Google Scholar
BALLING, J. D., AND FALK, J. H., 1982, Development of visual preference for natural environments, in: Environment and Behavior, vol. 14, p. 5-28.
Google Scholar
BEARD J.B., GREEN R.L., 1994, The role of turfgrass in environmental protection and their benefit to humans, in: Journal of Environmental Quality, vol. 23, p. 452-460.
Google Scholar
BORMANN F H., DIANA B., GORDON T. G., 1993, Redesigning the American lawn, Yale University Press, New Haven.
Google Scholar
CARSON R., 1962, Silent Spring, Houghton Mifflin.
Google Scholar
CLAYTON S., 2007, Domesticated nature: Motivations for gardening and perceptions of environmental impact, in: Journal of Environmental Psychology, vol. 27, p. 215-224.
Google Scholar
DANIELS S., 1995, The green lawn handbook, Macmillan, New York.
Google Scholar
DEAN M., 1986, In Search of the Perfect Lawn, Black Moss Press, , Windsor, ON, p. 37.
Google Scholar
DOMENE E., SAURI D., 2007, Urbanization and class-produced natures: Vegetable gardens in the Barcelona Metropolitan Region, in: Geoforum, vol. 38, p. 287-298.
Google Scholar
EMMONS R., and THOMAS R. D., 2007, Turfgrass Science and Management – Fourth Edition, in: Delmar Learning, (800) 354-9706, http://www.delmarlearning.com.
Google Scholar
FEAGAN R B., RIPMEESTER M., 1999, Contesting naturalized lawns: a geography of private green space in the Niagra region, in: Urban Geography, vol. 20, no 7, p. 617-634.
Google Scholar
FELDMAN T. D., JONAS A. E. G., 2000, Sage scrub revolution? Property rights, political fragmentation, and conservation planning in Southern California under the federal endangered species act, in: Annals of the Association of American Geographers, vol. 90, no 2, p. 256-292.
Google Scholar
GIGLIOTTI C. M., JARROTT S. E., 2005, Effects of horticulture therapy on engagement and affect, in: Canadian Journal on Aging, vol. 24, p. 367-377.
Google Scholar
HATCH P. J., 1971, Thomas Jefferson's Flower Garden at Monticello, University of Virginia Press; 3rd edition.
Google Scholar
HEAD L., MUIR P., 2007, Backyard: Nature and Culture in Suburban Australia, University of Wollongong Press with Halstead Press.
Google Scholar
HOEBEL A., 1996, Anthropology: Study of Man. McGraw-Hill, 3rd edition, New York.
Google Scholar
JACKSON K. T., 1985, Crabgrass Frontier-The Suburbanization of the United States, Oxford University Press, New York.
Google Scholar
JENKINS V. S., 1994, A green velvety carpet: The front lawn in America, in: Journal of American Culture, vol. 17, no 3, p. 43-47.
Google Scholar
JENKINS V. S., 1994, The Lawn: A History of an American Obsession, Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington and London.
Google Scholar
JOHNSON K., 1999, English landscape gardens in the 1700s: The history of English garden design from classical to natural style, in: Garden Design, July 1999.
Google Scholar
KAUFMAN A. J., LOHR, V. I., 2002, Where the lawn mower stops: The social construction of alternative front yard ideologies, in C.A. Shoemaker (Ed.) Interaction by design: bringing people and plants together for health and wellbeing, Iowa State Press, Iowa.
Google Scholar
KAYS et al., DROHAN J., DOWNING A., FINLEY, J., 2006, The Woods in Your Backyard: Learning to Create and Enhance Natural Areas Around Your Home, Ithaca, Natural Resource, Agriculture, and Engineering Service, New York.
Google Scholar
KENNEDY M., 2000, The evolution of the lawn mower, in: Grounds Maintenance, vol. 35, no 5, p. 16-20.
Google Scholar
KONOPACKI S., AKBARI H., 2002, Energy Savings for Heat Island Reduction Strategies in Chicago and Houston (Including Updates for Baton Rouge, Sacramento, and Salt Lake City), Paper LBNL-49638. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA.
Google Scholar
LANDRIGAN P. J., GARG A., 2002, Chronic Effects of Toxic Environmental Exposures on Children's Health, in: Journal of Toxicology –Clinical Toxicology, vol. 40, no 4, p. 449-456.
Google Scholar
LARSON K. L., CASAGRANDE D., HARLAN S. L., YABIKU S. T., 2009, Residents’ Yard Choices and Rationales in a Desert City: Social Priorities, Ecological Impacts, and Decision Tradeoffs, in: Environmental Management, vol. 44, p. 921-937.
Google Scholar
LEWIS C. A., Gardening as healing process, in M. Francis, and R. T. Hester Jr. (Eds.), 1990, The meaning of gardens, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, p. 244-251.
Google Scholar
LUC M., 2014, Placing the idea of sustainable landscape in ecophilosophy, in: Problemy Ekorozwoju/Problems Of Sustainable Development, vol. 9, no 1, p. 81-88.
Google Scholar
LUSH W.M., ROGERS M.E., 1992, Cutting height and the biomass and tiller density of Lolium perenne amenity turfs, in: Journal of Applied Ecology 29:611–618.
Google Scholar
PAWUL M., SOBCZYK W., 2011, Ecological Education in Waste Management as a Tool for The Implementation of Sustainable Development, in: Problemy Ekorozwoju/Problems Of Sustainable Development, vol. 6, no 1, p. 147-156.
Google Scholar
MANCA J., 2012, George Washington's Eye: Landscape, Architecture, and Design at Mount Vernon, Johns Hopkins University Press.
Google Scholar
MELYAYEV M., 2002, The adverse effects of green lawns, http://83.149.74.79/refs/29/33443/1.html (21.04.2009).
Google Scholar
MEYER M., BEHE B., AND HEILIG J., 2001, The Environmental and Economic Impact of Home Lawns in Minnesota, in: Horticulture Technology, vol. 11, p. 585-590.
Google Scholar
MILESI C, RUNNING S. W., ELVIDGE C. D., DIETZ J. B., TUTTLE B. T., NEMANI R. R., 2005, Mapping and modeling the biochemical cycling of turfgrass in the United States, in: Environ Management, vol. 36, p. 426-438.
Google Scholar
NASSAUER J. I.,, 1997a, The beauty that requires health, in: Nassauer J.I. (Ed.): Placing nature: Culture and landscape ecology, Island Press, Washington, D. C., p.87-106.
Google Scholar
NASSAUER J. I., 1997b, Cultural sustainability: Aligning aesthetics and ecology, Island Press, Washington, D. C.
Google Scholar
NASSAUER J. I., 1995, Messy ecosystems, orderly frames, in: Landscape Journal, vol. 14, no 2, p. 161-170.
Google Scholar
NASSAUER J. I., 1988, The aesthetics of horticulture: Neatness as a form of care, in: HortScience, vol. 23, no 6, p. 973-977.
Google Scholar
National Turfgrass Federation, 2003, The turfgrass industry – present and future. The National Turfgrass Research Initiative. National Turfgrass Federation, Beltsville, Maryland, p. 5-7.
Google Scholar
NELSON R. H., 2002, Privatizing the neighborhood: A proposal to replace zoning with private collective property rights to existing neighborhoods, in: Beito D. T., Gordon P. and Tabarrok A. (eds.), The voluntary city: Choice, community, and civil society, The University of Michigan Press, Michigan.
Google Scholar
POLLAN M., 1989, Why mow? The case against lawns, in: The New York Times Magazine, vol. 28, May, p. 23-27.
Google Scholar
ROBBINS P., BIRKENHOLTZ T., 2003, Turfgrass revolution: the ecology of urban sprawl, in: Land Use Policy, vol. 20, p. 181-194. .
Google Scholar
ROBBINS P., AND BIRKENHOLTZ T., 2003, Turfgrass revolution: Measuring the expansion of the American lawn, in: Land Use Policy, vol. 20, p. 181-194.
Google Scholar
ROBBINS P., POLDERMAN A. M., BIRKENHOLTZ T., 2002, Lawns and toxins: an ecology of the city. , in: Cities, vol. 18, no 6, p. 369-380.
Google Scholar
SCOTT F. J., 1873, The Art of Beautifying Suburban Home Grounds of Small Extent, New York, D. Appleton & Co.
Google Scholar
SHUMAN L. M., 2002, Phosphorus and nitrate nitrogen in runoff following fertilizer application to turfgrass, in: Journal of Environmental Quality, vol. 31, no 5, p. 1710.
Google Scholar
STEINBERG T., 2006, American Green-The obsessive quest for the perfect lawn. New York, W.W. Norton and Company.
Google Scholar
SUN G. AND LOCKABY B. G., Chapter 3: Water quantity and quality at the urban-rural interface, in: Laband D. N., Lockaby B. G. and Zipperer W. (eds.): Urban-Rural Interfaces: Linking People and Nature, American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI 2012, p. 26-45.
Google Scholar
TAHVANAINEN L., TYRVÄINENA L., IHALAINEN M., VUORELA N., KOLEHMAINEN O., 2001, Forest management and public perceptions – visual versus verbal information, in: Landscape and Urban Planning, vol. 53, p. 53-70.
Google Scholar
TRIGGER D., MULCOCK J., GAYNOR A., TOUSSAINT Y., 2008, Ecological restoration, cultural preferences and the negotiation of ‘nativeness’ in Australia, in: Geoforum, vol. 39, p. 1273–1283.
Google Scholar
US Senate, 1991, The use and regulation of lawn care chemicals, Hearing before the Subcommittee on Toxic Substances, Environmental Oversight, Research and Development, Senate Hearing 101-685, Washington, D.C.
Google Scholar
USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency), 199, Preliminary Data Summary of Urban Stormwater Best Management Practices.
Google Scholar
VEBLEN T., 1899, The Theory of the Leisure Class. Macmillan, New York.
Google Scholar
WALDICHUK T., 1998, A comparison of Japanese and North American attitudes towards residential landscapes in the rural-urban fringe, in: The Great Lakes Geographer, vol. 5, no 1 and 2 p. 15–29.
Google Scholar
WEIGERT A. J., 1994, Lawns of weeds: Status in opposition to life, in: The American Sociologist, vol. 84, no 1, p. 80-96.
Google Scholar
WILSON A., 1992, The culture of nature: North American Landscape from Disney to the Exxon Valdez, Blackwell, Cambridge.
Google Scholar
ZHENG B., ZHANG Y., CHEN J, 2011, Preferences to home landscape: wildness vs. neatness, in: Landscape and Urban Planning, vol. 99, p. 1-8.
Google Scholar
Autorzy
Yaoqi Zhangzhangy3@auburn.edu
International Center for Ecology, Meteorology and Environment (IceMe), School of Applied Meteorology, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210044, China; School of Forestry and Wildlife Sciences, Auburn, AL 36849-5418, USA Chiny
Autorzy
Bin ZhengCollege of Economics and Management, Nanjing Forestry University, 159 Longpan Road, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210037 Chiny
Autorzy
Ge SunUSDA Forest Service Southern Research Station, Raleigh, NC 27606 Stany Zjednoczone
Autorzy
Peilei FanSchool of Planning, Design & Construction (SPDC) and Center for Global Change and Earth Observations (CGCEO), Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824 Stany Zjednoczone
Statystyki
Abstract views: 13PDF downloads: 15
Licencja
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Na tych samych warunkach 4.0 Miedzynarodowe.