Racjonalizacja decyzji inwestycyjnych w zrównoważonym zarządzaniu rozwojem miast – czy jest potrzebny nowy paradygmat?
Anna Wojewnik-Filipkowska
University of Gdańsk, Faculty of Management, Department of Investment and Real Estate, ul. Armii Krajowej 101, 81-824 Sopot, Poland (Polska)
Abstrakt
W warunkach ograniczeń finansowych, rosnących potrzeb i świadomości oraz oczekiwań w zakresie uczestnictwa, obywatelstwa i publicznej odpowiedzialności, zarządzanie dynamicznym i złożonym systemem miejskim według koncepcji rozwoju zrównoważonego i zgodnie z zasadami New Public Managment (nowego zarzadzania publicznego), jest już niewystarczające. Głównym celem artykułu jest synteza różnych koncepcji, tak by na ich bazie zaproponować nowe podejście wspierające podejmowanie decyzji inwestycyjnych zarówno na poziomie strategicznym i operacyjnym. Racjonalizacja decyzji inwestycyjnych w zakresie zarządzania rozwojem miast wymaga akceptacji nowego paradygmatu łączącego idee zrównoważonego rozwoju i inteligentnego miasta, triady creativity – circularisation – synergy (kreatywność – cyrkulacja – synergia), teorii interesariuszy i odpowiedzialności społecznej. Racjonalizacja wymaga również zastosowania analizy wielokryterialnej, która uwzględnia dwojaki charakter inwestycji w rozwoju miasta. Proponowane podejście może być teoretycznym odniesieniem dla dalszych badań metodologicznych, a także może znaleźć zastosowanie w zarządzaniu projektami w rozwoju miasta. Koncepcja, dostarczając wsparcia w procesie decyzyjnym, może więc być użyteczna dla menedżerów w sektorze publicznym. Innowacyjność rozwiązania nie opiera się na stworzeniu nowej koncepcji od podstaw. Polega na zastosowaniu pojęć i teorii znanych, które są niezbędne, aby stworzyć nowy paradygmat, zgodnych z faktami. Artykuł opiera się na krytycznym przeglądzie literatury.
Słowa kluczowe:
zrównoważony rozwój, inteligentne miasta, rozwój miasta, zarządzanie publiczne, planowanie, ocena inwestycjiBibliografia
ALFORD J., 2001, The implications of ‘publicness’ for strategic management theory, in: Exploring Public Sector Strategy, eds. Johnson G., Scholes K., Prentice Hall-Pearson Education, London, p. 1-16.
Google Scholar
ANDRISANI P. J., HAKIM S., SAVAS E. S., 2002, The New Public Management, Lessons from Innovating Governors and Mayors, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell.
Google Scholar
APPLEBY P. H., 1949, Policy and Administration, University of Alabama Press, Chicago.
Google Scholar
ATKINSON A. B., STIGLITZ J. E., 1980, Lectures in Public Economics, McGraw-Hill Book Co, Ltd., New York.
Google Scholar
BARON M., 2012, Do We Need Smart Cities for Resilience, in: Journal of Economics & Management, vol. 10, p. 32-46.
Google Scholar
BEHRENS W., HAWRANEK P. M., 1991, Manual for the preparation of industrial feasibility studies, United Nations Industrial Development Organisation (UNIDO), Vienna.
Google Scholar
BLOESCH J., von HAUFF M., MAINZER K., MOHAN S. V., RENN O., RISSE V., SONG Y., TAKEUCHI K., WILDERER P. A., 2015, Sustainable Development integrated in the Concept of Resilience, in: Problemy Ekorozwoju/ Problems of Sustainable Development, vol. 10, no 1, p. 7-14.
Google Scholar
BOARDMAN A. E., GREENBERHG D. H., 2001, Cost-Benefit Analysis. Concepts and Practice, Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
Google Scholar
BOUCKAERT G., 1993, Measurement and Meaningful Management, in: Public Productivity & Management Review, vol. 17, no 1, p. 31-43.
Google Scholar
BOX R. C., MARSHALL G. S., REED B. J., REED C. M., 2001, New Public Management and Substantive Democracy, in: Public Administration Review, vol. 61, p. 608-619.
Google Scholar
BRYSON J. M., CROSBY B. C., BLOOMBERG L., 2014, Public Value Governance: Moving Beyond Traditional Public Administration and the New Public Management, in: Public Administration Review, vol. 74, p. 445-456.
Google Scholar
BOLAND T., FOWLER A., 2000, A systems perspective of performance management in public sector organisation, in: The International Journal of Public Sector Management, vol. 13, no 5, p. 417-446.
Google Scholar
CHAN Y.-C. L, 1999, Performance measurement and adoption of balanced scorecard: A survey of municipal governments in the USA and Canada, in: The International Journal of Public Sector Management, vol. 17, no 3, p. 204-221.
Google Scholar
Commission of the European Communities, 2001, Green Paper, Promoting a European Framework for Corporate Social Responsibility, European Commission, Brussels.
Google Scholar
DENHARDT J.V., DENHARDT R.B., 2011, The New Public Service: Serving, Not Steering, M. E. Sharpe, Armonk, New York.
Google Scholar
DIXON M. J., 2012, How Smart Cities Save Money (and the Planet), Harvard Business Review, HBR Blog Network, 29 Oct, https://hbr.org/2012/10/tech-savvy-cities-are-saving-m (20.09.2015).
Google Scholar
DRUCKER P. F., 1973, Managing the Public Service Institution, The Public Interest, in: College and Research Libraries, vol. 37, no 1, p. 4-14.
Google Scholar
European Commission, 2005, Partnership Development Toolkit, A partnership oriented planning, monitoring and evaluation guide for facilitators of EQUAL Development and Transnational Partnerships, Belgium http://ec.europa.eu/employment_social/equal_consolidated/data /document/pdtoolkit_en.pdf (10.09.2015).
Google Scholar
EUROSTAT, 2015, Sustainable development in the European Union, 2015 monitoring report of the EU Sustainable Development Strategy, http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/3217494/6975281/KS-GT-15-001-EN-N.pdf (20.09.2015).
Google Scholar
FISHER T., 2014, Public Value and the Integrative Mind: How Multiple Sectors Can Collaborate in City Building, in: Public Administration Review, vol. 74, p. 457-464.
Google Scholar
FLINT J., RACO M., Introduction: Characterising the ‘new’ politics of sustainability: from managing growth to coping with crisis, in: The Future of Sustainable Cities: Critical Reflections, eds. Flint J., Raco M., University Press Scholarship, Southampton, 2012, p. 3-28.
Google Scholar
FONTAINE C., HAARMAN A., SCHMID S., 2006, The Stakeholder Theory, Edlays.
Google Scholar
FREEMAN R. E., 1984, Strategic Management: a Stakeholder Approach, Basic Books, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Google Scholar
GEDDES P., 1915, Cities in evolution: an introduction to the town planning movement and to the study of civics, Williams & Norgate, London 1915.
Google Scholar
GIFFINGER R., FERTNER C., KRAMAR H., KALASEK R., PICHLER-MILANOVIC N., 2007, MEIJERS E., Smart Cities – Ranking of European Medium-Sized Cities, Research Report, Vienna University of Technology, Vienna.
Google Scholar
GIRARD L. F., 2011, Multidimensional Evaluation Processes to Manage Creative, Resilient and Sustainable City, in: Aestimum, vol. 59, p. 123-139.
Google Scholar
GIRARD L. F., 2013, Toward a smart sustainable development of port cities/areas: the role of the ‘historic urban landscape approach’, in: Sustainability, vol. 5, no 10, p. 4329-4348.
Google Scholar
GIRARD L. F., 2010, Creative Evaluations for a Human Sustainable Planning, in: Making Strategies in Spatial Planning, CERRETA M., CONCILIO G., MONNO V. (eds.), 2010, Springer, Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London, New York, p. 305-328.
Google Scholar
GIRARD L. F., NIJKAMP P., 1997, Le Valutazioni Integrate per lo Sviluppo Sostenibile della Città e del Territorio, FrancoAngeli, Milano.
Google Scholar
GÓRECKA D., 2010, On the choice of method in multi-criteria decision aiding process concerning European projects, in: Multiple Criteria Decision Making '10-11, eds. Trzaskalik T., Wachowicz T., University of Economics in Katowice, Katowice, p. 81-103.
Google Scholar
GRIFFIN R. W., 2002, Fundamentals of Management, A&M University, Texas.
Google Scholar
HALACHMI A., 1996, Business process reengineering in the public sector: Trying to get another frog to fly? In: National Productivity Review, vol. 15, no 3, p. 9-18.
Google Scholar
HARDI P., MERTINUZZI A., 2007, Series editors’ preface: Evaluating Sustainable Development – topics, trends and target groups of this new book series, in: Sustainable Development in Europe. Concepts, Evaluation and Applications, eds. Schubert U., Störmer E., Elgar E., Cheltenham, p. XVII-XXIV.
Google Scholar
HIRIGOYEN G., LAOUER R., 2013, Convergence of Corporate and Public Governance: Insights From Board Process View, in: SAGE Open, April-June, p. 1-8.
Google Scholar
HM Treasury, 2012, A new approach to public private partnerships, https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/205112/pf2_infrastructure_new_approach_to_public_private_parnerships_051212.pdf (2016.04.10).
Google Scholar
HOLLANDS R., 2008, Will the Real Smart City Stand Up? Creative, Progressive, or Just Entrepreneurial? In: City, vol. 12, no 3, p. 302-320.
Google Scholar
HOOD C., 1991, A public management for all seasons? In: Public Administration, vol. 69, p. 3-19.
Google Scholar
ITU (International Telecommunication Union), 2014, Smart sustainable cities: An analysis of definitions, Focus Group Technical Report, http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-T/focusgroups/ssc/Documents/Approved_Deliverables/TR-Overview-SSC.docx (20.09.2015)
Google Scholar
JONES P. S., 2003, Urban Regeneration’s Poisoned Chalice: Is There an Impasse in (Community) Participation-based Policy? In: Urban Studies, vol. 40, no 3, p. 581-601.
Google Scholar
KAGANOVA O. , 2011, Guidebook on Capital Investment Planning for Local Governments, The World Bank, http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTURBANDEVELOPMENT/Resources/3363871169585750379/UDS3CIP.pdf (10.09.2015).
Google Scholar
KALAMBOKIDIS L., 2014, Creating Public Value with Tax and Spending Policies: The View from Public Economics, in: Public Administration Review, vol. 74, p. 519-526.
Google Scholar
LEŹNICKI M., LEWANDOWSKA A., 2016, Contemporary Concepts of a City in the Context of Sustainable Development: Perspective of Humanities and Natural Sciences, Problemy Ekorozwoju/ Problems of Sustainable Development, vol. 11, no 2, 45-54.
Google Scholar
LOMBARDI P., GIORDANO S., CARAGLUI A., DEL BO C., DEAKIN M. , NJIKAMP P., KOURTIT K. , 2011, An advanced triple helix network model for smart city performance, Research Memorandum, University of Amsterdam vol. 45, http://degree.ubvu.vu.nl/repec/vua/wpaper/pdf/20110045.pdf (20.09.2015).
Google Scholar
LYONS M., SMUTS C., STEPHENS A., 2001, Participation, Empowerment and Sustainability: (How) Do the Links Work? In: Urban Studies, vol. 38, no 8, p. 1233– 1251.
Google Scholar
MINISTRY of Economy, 2012, Poland 2012 Report Economy, Warsaw, https://www.mr.gov.pl/media/15367/Poland_2012_Report_economy_eng.pdf (10.09.2015).
Google Scholar
MITCHELL R. K., AGLE B. R., WOOD D. J., 1997, Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts, in: The Academy of Management Review, vol. 22, no 4, p. 853-886.
Google Scholar
NIJAKI L. K, WORREL G., 2012, Procurement for sustainable local economic development, in: International Journal of Public Sector Management, vol. 25, no 2, p. 133-153.
Google Scholar
OSBORNE S. P., 2010, The New Public Governance? Emerging Perspectives on the Theory and Practice of Public Governance, Routledge, New York.
Google Scholar
PAWŁOWSKI A., 2008, How many dimensions does sustainable development have?, in: Sustainable Development, vol. 16, no 2, p. 81-92.
Google Scholar
PHELPS A., 2010, Rationale, practice and outcomes in municipal property asset management, in: Journal of Corporate Real Estate, vol. 12, no 3, p. 157-174.
Google Scholar
POISTERT H., STREIB G. D., 1999, Strategic Management in the Public Sector: Concepts, Models, and Processes, in: Public Productivity and Management Review, vol. 22, no 3, p. 308-325.
Google Scholar
RADNOR Z., OSBORNE S. P., 2013, Lean: A failed theory for public services?, in: Public Management Review, vol. 15, no 2, p. 265-287.
Google Scholar
RAVETZ J., 2011, Urban Synergy-Foresight, Urban Governance in the EU, in: Current Challenges and Future Prospects, EU, p. 31-44.
Google Scholar
ROBBINS S. P., DECENZO D. A., 2005, Fundamentals of Management, Pearson Education, New Delhi.
Google Scholar
SAYCE S., SMITH J., COOPER R., VENMORE-ROWLAND P., 2006, Real Estate Appraisal: From Value to Worth, Blackwell Publishing Ltd., Oxford.
Google Scholar
SIENKIEWICZ M. W., 2013, Determinants and effects on strategic management in the local government in Poland and western Europe, in: Proceedings: NISPAcee Annual Conference Regionalization and Inter-regional Cooperation, Belgrade, Serbia, May 16-18, p. 1-16.
Google Scholar
SIMMIE J., MARTIN R., 2010, The Economic Resilience of Regions: Towards an Evolutionary Approach, in: Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, vol. 3, p. 27-3.
Google Scholar
SIMONE H. A., 1946, The Proverbs of Administration, in: Public Administration Review, vol. 6, no 1, p. 53-67.
Google Scholar
STAMP J. C., 1923, The Contrast Between the Administration of Business and Public Affairs, in: Public Administration, vol. 1, p. 158-171.
Google Scholar
STOKER G., 2006, Public Value Management: A New Narrative for Networked Governance?, in: American Review of Public Administration, vol. 36, no 1, p. 41–57.
Google Scholar
UNITED NATIONS, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, 2014(a), World Urbanization Prospects: The 2014 Revision, Highlights, New York.
Google Scholar
UNITED NATIONS, General Assembly, 2014 (b), Open Working Group of the General Assembly on Sustainable Development Goals, Open Working Group proposal for Sustainable Development Goals, A/68/970, http://www.un. org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/68/970 &Lang=E (20.09.2015).
Google Scholar
WCED (Brundtland Commission), 1987, Our Common Future, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Google Scholar
WĘGRZYN J., 2016, The Perception of Critical Success Factors for PPP Projects in Different Stakeholder Groups, in: Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, vol. 4, no 2, p. 81-92.
Google Scholar
WHITE A. D., 2011, A review of UK public sector real estate asset management, in: Journal of Corporate Real Estate, vol. 13, no 1, p. 6-15.
Google Scholar
WOJEWNIK-FILIPKOWSKA A., 2012, Investments in the process of urban regeneration – concept of investment economic evaluation, in: Journal of the Polish Real Estate Scientific Society, vol. 20, no 3, p. 247-259.
Google Scholar
WOJEWNIK-FILIPKOWSKA A., RYMA-RZAK K M., 2013, Decision-making in corporate and municipal asset management – literature review, in: International Journal of Real Estate Studies, vol. 8, no 1, p. 16-29.
Google Scholar
WOJEWNIK-FILIPKOWSKA A., RYMA-RZAK M., LAUSBERG C., 2015, Current Managerial Topics in Public Real Estate Asset Management, in: World of Real Estate, vol. 4, no 94, p. 5-10.
Google Scholar
YANG K., 2007, Making performance measurement relevant? Administrators' attitudes and structural orientations, in: Public Administration Quarterly, vol. 31, no 3, p. 342-383.
Google Scholar
ZEEMERING E., 2009, What does sustainability mean to city officials?, in: Urban Affairs Review, vol. 45, p. 247-73.
Google Scholar
ZELENY M., 2010, Knowledge Management and Strategic Self-Sustainability: A Human Systems Perspective, in: eds. Cerreta M., Concilio G., Monno V., Making Strategies in Spatial Planning, Springer Dordrecht Heidelberg London New York, p. 257-280.
Google Scholar
Autorzy
Anna Wojewnik-FilipkowskaUniversity of Gdańsk, Faculty of Management, Department of Investment and Real Estate, ul. Armii Krajowej 101, 81-824 Sopot, Poland Polska
Statystyki
Abstract views: 15PDF downloads: 9
Licencja
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Na tych samych warunkach 4.0 Miedzynarodowe.