Racjonalizacja decyzji inwestycyjnych w zrównoważonym zarządzaniu rozwojem miast – czy jest potrzebny nowy paradygmat?

Anna Wojewnik-Filipkowska


University of Gdańsk, Faculty of Management, Department of Investment and Real Estate, ul. Armii Krajowej 101, 81-824 Sopot, Poland (Polska)


Abstrakt

W warunkach ograniczeń finansowych, rosnących potrzeb i świadomości oraz oczekiwań w zakresie uczestnictwa, obywatelstwa i publicznej odpowiedzialności, zarządzanie dynamicznym i złożonym systemem miejskim według koncepcji rozwoju zrównoważonego i zgodnie z zasadami New Public Managment (nowego zarzadzania publicznego), jest już niewystarczające. Głównym celem artykułu jest synteza różnych koncepcji, tak by na ich bazie zaproponować nowe podejście wspierające podejmowanie decyzji inwestycyjnych zarówno na poziomie strategicznym i operacyjnym. Racjonalizacja decyzji inwestycyjnych w zakresie zarządzania rozwojem miast wymaga akceptacji nowego paradygmatu łączącego idee zrównoważonego rozwoju i inteligentnego miasta, triady creativity – circularisation – synergy (kreatywność – cyrkulacja – synergia), teorii interesariuszy i odpowiedzialności społecznej. Racjonalizacja wymaga również zastosowania analizy wielokryterialnej, która uwzględnia dwojaki charakter inwestycji w rozwoju miasta. Proponowane podejście może być teoretycznym odniesieniem dla dalszych badań metodologicznych, a także może znaleźć zastosowanie w zarządzaniu projektami w rozwoju miasta. Koncepcja, dostarczając wsparcia w procesie decyzyjnym, może więc być użyteczna dla menedżerów w sektorze publicznym. Innowacyjność rozwiązania nie opiera się na stworzeniu nowej koncepcji od podstaw. Polega na zastosowaniu pojęć i teorii znanych, które są niezbędne, aby stworzyć nowy paradygmat, zgodnych z faktami. Artykuł opiera się na krytycznym przeglądzie literatury.


Słowa kluczowe:

zrównoważony rozwój, inteligentne miasta, rozwój miasta, zarządzanie publiczne, planowanie, ocena inwestycji

ALFORD J., 2001, The implications of ‘publicness’ for strategic management theory, in: Exploring Public Sector Strategy, eds. Johnson G., Scholes K., Prentice Hall-Pearson Education, London, p. 1-16.
  Google Scholar

ANDRISANI P. J., HAKIM S., SAVAS E. S., 2002, The New Public Management, Lessons from Innovating Governors and Mayors, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell.
  Google Scholar

APPLEBY P. H., 1949, Policy and Administration, University of Alabama Press, Chicago.
  Google Scholar

ATKINSON A. B., STIGLITZ J. E., 1980, Lectures in Public Economics, McGraw-Hill Book Co, Ltd., New York.
  Google Scholar

BARON M., 2012, Do We Need Smart Cities for Resilience, in: Journal of Economics & Management, vol. 10, p. 32-46.
  Google Scholar

BEHRENS W., HAWRANEK P. M., 1991, Manual for the preparation of industrial feasibility studies, United Nations Industrial Development Organisation (UNIDO), Vienna.
  Google Scholar

BLOESCH J., von HAUFF M., MAINZER K., MOHAN S. V., RENN O., RISSE V., SONG Y., TAKEUCHI K., WILDERER P. A., 2015, Sustainable Development integrated in the Concept of Resilience, in: Problemy Ekorozwoju/ Problems of Sustainable Development, vol. 10, no 1, p. 7-14.
  Google Scholar

BOARDMAN A. E., GREENBERHG D. H., 2001, Cost-Benefit Analysis. Concepts and Practice, Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
  Google Scholar

BOUCKAERT G., 1993, Measurement and Meaningful Management, in: Public Productivity & Management Review, vol. 17, no 1, p. 31-43.
  Google Scholar

BOX R. C., MARSHALL G. S., REED B. J., REED C. M., 2001, New Public Management and Substantive Democracy, in: Public Administration Review, vol. 61, p. 608-619.
  Google Scholar

BRYSON J. M., CROSBY B. C., BLOOMBERG L., 2014, Public Value Governance: Moving Beyond Traditional Public Administration and the New Public Management, in: Public Administration Review, vol. 74, p. 445-456.
  Google Scholar

BOLAND T., FOWLER A., 2000, A systems perspective of performance management in public sector organisation, in: The International Journal of Public Sector Management, vol. 13, no 5, p. 417-446.
  Google Scholar

CHAN Y.-C. L, 1999, Performance measurement and adoption of balanced scorecard: A survey of municipal governments in the USA and Canada, in: The International Journal of Public Sector Management, vol. 17, no 3, p. 204-221.
  Google Scholar

Commission of the European Communities, 2001, Green Paper, Promoting a European Framework for Corporate Social Responsibility, European Commission, Brussels.
  Google Scholar

DENHARDT J.V., DENHARDT R.B., 2011, The New Public Service: Serving, Not Steering, M. E. Sharpe, Armonk, New York.
  Google Scholar

DIXON M. J., 2012, How Smart Cities Save Money (and the Planet), Harvard Business Review, HBR Blog Network, 29 Oct, https://hbr.org/2012/10/tech-savvy-cities-are-saving-m (20.09.2015).
  Google Scholar

DRUCKER P. F., 1973, Managing the Public Service Institution, The Public Interest, in: College and Research Libraries, vol. 37, no 1, p. 4-14.
  Google Scholar

European Commission, 2005, Partnership Development Toolkit, A partnership oriented planning, monitoring and evaluation guide for facilitators of EQUAL Development and Transnational Partnerships, Belgium http://ec.europa.eu/employment_social/equal_consolidated/data /document/pdtoolkit_en.pdf (10.09.2015).
  Google Scholar

EUROSTAT, 2015, Sustainable development in the European Union, 2015 monitoring report of the EU Sustainable Development Strategy, http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/3217494/6975281/KS-GT-15-001-EN-N.pdf (20.09.2015).
  Google Scholar

FISHER T., 2014, Public Value and the Integrative Mind: How Multiple Sectors Can Collaborate in City Building, in: Public Administration Review, vol. 74, p. 457-464.
  Google Scholar

FLINT J., RACO M., Introduction: Characterising the ‘new’ politics of sustainability: from managing growth to coping with crisis, in: The Future of Sustainable Cities: Critical Reflections, eds. Flint J., Raco M., University Press Scholarship, Southampton, 2012, p. 3-28.
  Google Scholar

FONTAINE C., HAARMAN A., SCHMID S., 2006, The Stakeholder Theory, Edlays.
  Google Scholar

FREEMAN R. E., 1984, Strategic Management: a Stakeholder Approach, Basic Books, Cambridge University Press, New York.
  Google Scholar

GEDDES P., 1915, Cities in evolution: an introduction to the town planning movement and to the study of civics, Williams & Norgate, London 1915.
  Google Scholar

GIFFINGER R., FERTNER C., KRAMAR H., KALASEK R., PICHLER-MILANOVIC N., 2007, MEIJERS E., Smart Cities – Ranking of European Medium-Sized Cities, Research Report, Vienna University of Technology, Vienna.
  Google Scholar

GIRARD L. F., 2011, Multidimensional Evaluation Processes to Manage Creative, Resilient and Sustainable City, in: Aestimum, vol. 59, p. 123-139.
  Google Scholar

GIRARD L. F., 2013, Toward a smart sustainable development of port cities/areas: the role of the ‘historic urban landscape approach’, in: Sustainability, vol. 5, no 10, p. 4329-4348.
  Google Scholar

GIRARD L. F., 2010, Creative Evaluations for a Human Sustainable Planning, in: Making Strategies in Spatial Planning, CERRETA M., CONCILIO G., MONNO V. (eds.), 2010, Springer, Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London, New York, p. 305-328.
  Google Scholar

GIRARD L. F., NIJKAMP P., 1997, Le Valutazioni Integrate per lo Sviluppo Sostenibile della Città e del Territorio, FrancoAngeli, Milano.
  Google Scholar

GÓRECKA D., 2010, On the choice of method in multi-criteria decision aiding process concerning European projects, in: Multiple Criteria Decision Making '10-11, eds. Trzaskalik T., Wachowicz T., University of Economics in Katowice, Katowice, p. 81-103.
  Google Scholar

GRIFFIN R. W., 2002, Fundamentals of Management, A&M University, Texas.
  Google Scholar

HALACHMI A., 1996, Business process reengineering in the public sector: Trying to get another frog to fly? In: National Productivity Review, vol. 15, no 3, p. 9-18.
  Google Scholar

HARDI P., MERTINUZZI A., 2007, Series editors’ preface: Evaluating Sustainable Development – topics, trends and target groups of this new book series, in: Sustainable Development in Europe. Concepts, Evaluation and Applications, eds. Schubert U., Störmer E., Elgar E., Cheltenham, p. XVII-XXIV.
  Google Scholar

HIRIGOYEN G., LAOUER R., 2013, Convergence of Corporate and Public Governance: Insights From Board Process View, in: SAGE Open, April-June, p. 1-8.
  Google Scholar

HM Treasury, 2012, A new approach to public private partnerships, https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/205112/pf2_infrastructure_new_approach_to_public_private_parnerships_051212.pdf (2016.04.10).
  Google Scholar

HOLLANDS R., 2008, Will the Real Smart City Stand Up? Creative, Progressive, or Just Entrepreneurial? In: City, vol. 12, no 3, p. 302-320.
  Google Scholar

HOOD C., 1991, A public management for all seasons? In: Public Administration, vol. 69, p. 3-19.
  Google Scholar

ITU (International Telecommunication Union), 2014, Smart sustainable cities: An analysis of definitions, Focus Group Technical Report, http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-T/focusgroups/ssc/Documents/Approved_Deliverables/TR-Overview-SSC.docx (20.09.2015)
  Google Scholar

JONES P. S., 2003, Urban Regeneration’s Poisoned Chalice: Is There an Impasse in (Community) Participation-based Policy? In: Urban Studies, vol. 40, no 3, p. 581-601.
  Google Scholar

KAGANOVA O. , 2011, Guidebook on Capital Investment Planning for Local Governments, The World Bank, http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTURBANDEVELOPMENT/Resources/3363871169585750379/UDS3CIP.pdf (10.09.2015).
  Google Scholar

KALAMBOKIDIS L., 2014, Creating Public Value with Tax and Spending Policies: The View from Public Economics, in: Public Administration Review, vol. 74, p. 519-526.
  Google Scholar

LEŹNICKI M., LEWANDOWSKA A., 2016, Contemporary Concepts of a City in the Context of Sustainable Development: Perspective of Humanities and Natural Sciences, Problemy Ekorozwoju/ Problems of Sustainable Development, vol. 11, no 2, 45-54.
  Google Scholar

LOMBARDI P., GIORDANO S., CARAGLUI A., DEL BO C., DEAKIN M. , NJIKAMP P., KOURTIT K. , 2011, An advanced triple helix network model for smart city performance, Research Memorandum, University of Amsterdam vol. 45, http://degree.ubvu.vu.nl/repec/vua/wpaper/pdf/20110045.pdf (20.09.2015).
  Google Scholar

LYONS M., SMUTS C., STEPHENS A., 2001, Participation, Empowerment and Sustainability: (How) Do the Links Work? In: Urban Studies, vol. 38, no 8, p. 1233– 1251.
  Google Scholar

MINISTRY of Economy, 2012, Poland 2012 Report Economy, Warsaw, https://www.mr.gov.pl/media/15367/Poland_2012_Report_economy_eng.pdf (10.09.2015).
  Google Scholar

MITCHELL R. K., AGLE B. R., WOOD D. J., 1997, Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts, in: The Academy of Management Review, vol. 22, no 4, p. 853-886.
  Google Scholar

NIJAKI L. K, WORREL G., 2012, Procurement for sustainable local economic development, in: International Journal of Public Sector Management, vol. 25, no 2, p. 133-153.
  Google Scholar

OSBORNE S. P., 2010, The New Public Governance? Emerging Perspectives on the Theory and Practice of Public Governance, Routledge, New York.
  Google Scholar

PAWŁOWSKI A., 2008, How many dimensions does sustainable development have?, in: Sustainable Development, vol. 16, no 2, p. 81-92.
  Google Scholar

PHELPS A., 2010, Rationale, practice and outcomes in municipal property asset management, in: Journal of Corporate Real Estate, vol. 12, no 3, p. 157-174.
  Google Scholar

POISTERT H., STREIB G. D., 1999, Strategic Management in the Public Sector: Concepts, Models, and Processes, in: Public Productivity and Management Review, vol. 22, no 3, p. 308-325.
  Google Scholar

RADNOR Z., OSBORNE S. P., 2013, Lean: A failed theory for public services?, in: Public Management Review, vol. 15, no 2, p. 265-287.
  Google Scholar

RAVETZ J., 2011, Urban Synergy-Foresight, Urban Governance in the EU, in: Current Challenges and Future Prospects, EU, p. 31-44.
  Google Scholar

ROBBINS S. P., DECENZO D. A., 2005, Fundamentals of Management, Pearson Education, New Delhi.
  Google Scholar

SAYCE S., SMITH J., COOPER R., VENMORE-ROWLAND P., 2006, Real Estate Appraisal: From Value to Worth, Blackwell Publishing Ltd., Oxford.
  Google Scholar

SIENKIEWICZ M. W., 2013, Determinants and effects on strategic management in the local government in Poland and western Europe, in: Proceedings: NISPAcee Annual Conference Regionalization and Inter-regional Cooperation, Belgrade, Serbia, May 16-18, p. 1-16.
  Google Scholar

SIMMIE J., MARTIN R., 2010, The Economic Resilience of Regions: Towards an Evolutionary Approach, in: Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, vol. 3, p. 27-3.
  Google Scholar

SIMONE H. A., 1946, The Proverbs of Administration, in: Public Administration Review, vol. 6, no 1, p. 53-67.
  Google Scholar

STAMP J. C., 1923, The Contrast Between the Administration of Business and Public Affairs, in: Public Administration, vol. 1, p. 158-171.
  Google Scholar

STOKER G., 2006, Public Value Management: A New Narrative for Networked Governance?, in: American Review of Public Administration, vol. 36, no 1, p. 41–57.
  Google Scholar

UNITED NATIONS, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, 2014(a), World Urbanization Prospects: The 2014 Revision, Highlights, New York.
  Google Scholar

UNITED NATIONS, General Assembly, 2014 (b), Open Working Group of the General Assembly on Sustainable Development Goals, Open Working Group proposal for Sustainable Development Goals, A/68/970, http://www.un. org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/68/970 &Lang=E (20.09.2015).
  Google Scholar

WCED (Brundtland Commission), 1987, Our Common Future, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  Google Scholar

WĘGRZYN J., 2016, The Perception of Critical Success Factors for PPP Projects in Different Stakeholder Groups, in: Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, vol. 4, no 2, p. 81-92.
  Google Scholar

WHITE A. D., 2011, A review of UK public sector real estate asset management, in: Journal of Corporate Real Estate, vol. 13, no 1, p. 6-15.
  Google Scholar

WOJEWNIK-FILIPKOWSKA A., 2012, Investments in the process of urban regeneration – concept of investment economic evaluation, in: Journal of the Polish Real Estate Scientific Society, vol. 20, no 3, p. 247-259.
  Google Scholar

WOJEWNIK-FILIPKOWSKA A., RYMA-RZAK K M., 2013, Decision-making in corporate and municipal asset management – literature review, in: International Journal of Real Estate Studies, vol. 8, no 1, p. 16-29.
  Google Scholar

WOJEWNIK-FILIPKOWSKA A., RYMA-RZAK M., LAUSBERG C., 2015, Current Managerial Topics in Public Real Estate Asset Management, in: World of Real Estate, vol. 4, no 94, p. 5-10.
  Google Scholar

YANG K., 2007, Making performance measurement relevant? Administrators' attitudes and structural orientations, in: Public Administration Quarterly, vol. 31, no 3, p. 342-383.
  Google Scholar

ZEEMERING E., 2009, What does sustainability mean to city officials?, in: Urban Affairs Review, vol. 45, p. 247-73.
  Google Scholar

ZELENY M., 2010, Knowledge Management and Strategic Self-Sustainability: A Human Systems Perspective, in: eds. Cerreta M., Concilio G., Monno V., Making Strategies in Spatial Planning, Springer Dordrecht Heidelberg London New York, p. 257-280.
  Google Scholar


Opublikowane
2017-01-02

Cited By / Share

Wojewnik-Filipkowska, A. (2017). Racjonalizacja decyzji inwestycyjnych w zrównoważonym zarządzaniu rozwojem miast – czy jest potrzebny nowy paradygmat?. Problemy Ekorozwoju Problems of Sustainable Development, 12(1), 79–90. Pobrano z https://ph.pollub.pl/index.php/preko/article/view/5000

Autorzy

Anna Wojewnik-Filipkowska 

University of Gdańsk, Faculty of Management, Department of Investment and Real Estate, ul. Armii Krajowej 101, 81-824 Sopot, Poland Polska

Statystyki

Abstract views: 15
PDF downloads: 9