Imperatywy moralne zrównoważonego rozwoju: podejście kantowskie

Pankojini Mulia


Department of Humanities and Sciences, SR International Institute of Technology Hyderabad-501301 (Indie)

Dr. Ajit Kumar Behura


Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology(ISM) Dhanbad-826004 (Indie)

Dr. Sarita Kar


Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology(ISM) Dhanbad-826004 (Indie)


Abstrakt

Filozofia Immanuela Kanta oparta jest w ogólności na logicznej analizie rozumu, ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem rozumowania moralnego. Według niego zasady moralne powinny pochodzić z rozumu, a nie z doświadczenia. Najważniejszy jest oparty na rozumie Imperatyw kategoryczny; to Prawo Moralne. W tym artykule problematyka zrównoważonego rozwoju została omówiona z perspektywy Imperatywu kategorycznego. Trzem aspektom zrównoważoności: potrzebom, sprawiedliwości i ograniczeniom środowiskowym nadana równą rangę, a cała dyskusja uwzględnia trzy różne kategorie: kantowski imperatyw społeczny, kantowski imperatyw ekonomiczny i kantowski imperatyw środowiskowy.


Słowa kluczowe:

zrównoważony rozwój, rozumowanie moralne, kantowski imperatyw społeczny, kantowski imperatyw ekonomiczny, kantowski imperatyw środowiskowy

BECKERMAN W., 1994, Sustainable Development: Is it a Useful Concept?, in: Environmental Value, vol. 3, p. 191-209.
  Google Scholar

BECKERMAN W., 1995, How Would You Like your Sustainability Sir? Weak or Strong? A Reply to My Critics, in: Environmental Values,vol. 4, p. 169-179.
  Google Scholar

BOWIE N. E., 1999, Business Ethics: A Kantian Perspective, Blackwell Publishers, Malden.
  Google Scholar

BRAND F., 2009, Critical Natural Capital Revisited: Ecological Resilience and Sustainable Development, in: Ecological Economics, vol. 68, p. 605-612.
  Google Scholar

CARSON R., Silent Spring, Hamish Hamilton, London 1962.
  Google Scholar

DIETZ S., NEUMAYER E., 2007, Weak and Strong Sustainability in the SEEA: Concepts and Measurement, in: Ecological Economics, vol. 61, p. 617-626.
  Google Scholar

DILLARD J. F., DUJON V., KING M. C., 2009, Understanding the Social Dimension of Sustainability, Rutledge, New York.
  Google Scholar

EHRLICH P. R., 1968, The Population Bomb, Ballantine Books, New York.
  Google Scholar

EKINS P., SIMON S., DEUTSCH, L., FOLKE, C., DEGROOT R., 2003, A Framework for the Practical Application of the Concepts Critical Natural Capital and Strong Sustainability, in: Ecological Economics, vol. 44, p. 165-185.
  Google Scholar

ELKINGTON J., 1997, Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Lines of 21st Century Business, Capstone Publishing, Oxford.
  Google Scholar

ELKINGTON J., 1998, Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business, Gabriola Island, New Society Publishers, Canada.
  Google Scholar

FUKUYAMA F., 1995, Trust: the Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity, Free Press, New York.
  Google Scholar

Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change (IPCC), 2007, Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report. Assessment Report 4, http://www.ipcc.ch/publications/and/data/ar4/syr/en/contents.html (25.04.2015).
  Google Scholar

JAMIESON D., 1998, Sustainability and Beyond, in: Ecological Economics, vol. 24, p. 183-192.
  Google Scholar

KANT I., trans. and ed. Gregor M. J., 1996, Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  Google Scholar

KANT, I., trans. and ed. J.H. Bernard, 1951, Critique of Pure Judgment, Hafner Press, New York.
  Google Scholar

KANT I., ed. P. Heath and J. B. Schneewind, trans. P. Heath, 1997, Lectures on Ethics, Cambridge.
  Google Scholar

MCKENZIE S., 2004, Social Sustainability: Towards Some Definitions, Hawke Research Institute Working Paper Series, No 27.
  Google Scholar

MULIA P., BEHURA A. K., KAR S., 2016, Categorical Imperative in Defense of Strong Sustainability, in: ProblemyEkorozwoju/ Problems of Sustainable Development, vol. 11, no 2, p. 29-36.
  Google Scholar

NEUMAYER E., 2012, Human Development and Sustainability, in: Journal of Human Development Capabilities, vol.13, no 4, p. 561-579.
  Google Scholar

PALERMO G. S., 1999, Sustainable Environments, Kant and Architectural Education: Reflections on an Intersection, Architecture Conference Proceedings and Presentations.
  Google Scholar

PAUL J., LIAM M., ANDY S., MANFRED B., 2015, Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability, Routledge, London.
  Google Scholar

PEET J., 2009, Strong Sustainability for New Zealand: Principles and Scenario, SANZ (Phase-2) Report, Nakedize Ltd., New Zealand.
  Google Scholar

PELENC J., BALLET J., 2015, Strong Sustainability, Critical Natural Capital and the Capability Approach, in: Ecological Economics, vol. 112, p. 36-44.
  Google Scholar

PETER S., 2003, Not for Humans Only: The Place of Nonhumans in Environmental Issues, in: Environmental Ethics: An Anthology, eds. Light A. and Rolston, H., Wiley-Blackwell, Malden.
  Google Scholar

SKIDMORE J., 2001, Duties to Animals: The Failure of Kant’s Moral Theory, in: The Journal of Value Inquiry, vol. 35, p. 541-559.
  Google Scholar

SVOBODA T., 2015, Duties Regarding Nature: A Kantian Approach to Environmental Ethics, Routledge, London.
  Google Scholar

UNITED NATIONS, 2015, Transferring Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Resolution adopted by General Assembly on 25th September 2015, http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/70/1&Lang=E.http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11822/20181 (27.06.2016).
  Google Scholar

UNITED NATIONS Conference on the Human Environment (UNCE), 1972, Report of the United Nations Conference on Human Environment, http://www.un-documents.net/aconf48-14r1.pdf (27.09.2015).
  Google Scholar

UNITED NATIONS Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED), 1992, Rio-Declaration on Environment and Development, http://www.jus.uni.no/lm/environmental.development.rio.declaration.1992/portrait.pdf (25.01.2015).
  Google Scholar

World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED), 1987, Our Common Future, Oxford University Press, New York 1987.
  Google Scholar


Opublikowane
2018-07-02

Cited By / Share

Mulia, P., Behura, D. A. K., & Kar, D. S. (2018). Imperatywy moralne zrównoważonego rozwoju: podejście kantowskie. Problemy Ekorozwoju Problems of Sustainable Development, 13(2), 77–82. Pobrano z https://ph.pollub.pl/index.php/preko/article/view/5015

Autorzy

Pankojini Mulia 

Department of Humanities and Sciences, SR International Institute of Technology Hyderabad-501301 Indie

Autorzy

Dr. Ajit Kumar Behura 

Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology(ISM) Dhanbad-826004 Indie

Autorzy

Dr. Sarita Kar 

Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology(ISM) Dhanbad-826004 Indie

Statystyki

Abstract views: 11
PDF downloads: 5