Kompromis pomiędzy wzrostem a środowiskiem: Przykład Chin i USA
Jing Xu
Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu, 611130, China (Chiny)
Jianjun Li
Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu, 611130, China (Chiny)
Abstrakt
Artykuł poddaje analizie indywidualne postawy odnoszące się do kompromisu pomiędzy środowiskiem a ekonomią, a także czynniki, które mają wpływ na kształtowanie się takich postaw, w odniesieniu do dwóch ważnych krajów: Chin i USA. Według danych World Value Survey okazuje się, ze Chińczycy są bardziej skłonni wspierać ochronę środowiska, podczas gdy Amerykanie za priorytet uznają rozwój ekonomiczny. Uwzględniając trzy zbiory korelatów odnoszące się do socjodemografii, postaw wobec środowiska i kontekstu społecznego, zmienne takie jak edukacja, orientacja polityczna i świadomość ekologiczna, okazuje się, że te czynniki odgrywają istotne znaczenie w kształtowaniu indywidualnych priorytetów, a kwestie zdrowia, wieku, zatrudnienia i stanu cywilnego wypadają podobnie w różnych krajach. Dane z takiego mikro poziomu pokazują, jak ludzie indywidualnie rozstrzygają spór pomiędzy ekonomią a środowiskiem, co stanowi polityczną wskazówkę dla rządu, dzięki której można lepiej odpowiadać na nastroje społeczne.
Słowa kluczowe:
rozwój ekonomiczny, ochrona środowiska, kompromis, indywidualne preferencje, opinia publicznaBibliografia
ANTWEILER, W., COPELAND, B.R., & TAYLOR, M.S., 2001, Is free trade good for the environment? in: American Economic Review, 91(4), p. 877-908.
Google Scholar
ARKESTEIJIN, K., & OERLEMANS, L.A., 2005, The early adoption of green power by Dutch households: An Empirical Exploration of Factors Influencing the Early Adoption of Green Electricity for Domestic Purposes, in: Energy Policy, 33(2), p. 183-196.
Google Scholar
AZOMAHOUA, T., LAISNEY, F., & NGUYEN-VAN, P., 2006, Economic development and CO2 emissions: A nonparametric panel approach, in: Journal of Public Economics, 90(6-7), p. 1347-1363.
Google Scholar
BARRETT, S., & GRADDY, K., 2000, Freedom, growth, and the environment, in: Environment and Development Economics, 5(04), p. 433-456.
Google Scholar
BARR, S., 2007, Factors influencing environmental attitudes and behaviors: A UK case study of household waste management, in: Environment and Behavior, 39(4), p. 435-473.
Google Scholar
BECKERMAN, W., 1992, Economic growth and the environment: Whose growth? Whose environment? in: World Development, 20(4), p. 481-496.
Google Scholar
COLE, M., & ELLIOTT, R., 2003, Determining the trade-environment composition effect: The role of capital, labor and environmental regulations, in: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 46(3), p. 363-383.
Google Scholar
COOK, S.W., & JOY, L.B., 1981, Approaches to encouraging conservation behavior: A review and conceptual framework, in: Journal of Social Issues, 37(2), p. 73-107.
Google Scholar
CUÑADO J., & DE GRACIA, F., 2013, Environment and happiness: New evidence for Spain, in: Social Indicators Research, 112(3), p. 549-567.
Google Scholar
DAVIDSON, D.J., & FREUDENBURG, W.R., 1996, Gender and environmental risk concerns: A review and analysis of available research, in: Environment and Behavior, 28(3), p. 302-339.
Google Scholar
DOLNICAR, S., & GRÜN, B., 2009, Environmentally friendly behavior-- can heterogeneity among individuals and contexts/environments be harvested for improved sustainable management? in: Environment and Behavior, 41(5), p. 693-714.
Google Scholar
ECKERSLEY, R., 1989, Green politics and the new class: selfishness or virtue? in: Political Studies, 37(2), p. 205-223.
Google Scholar
FERREIRA, S., AKAY, A., BRERETON, F., CUÑADO, J., MARTINSSON, P., MORO, M., & NINGAL, T., 2013, Life satisfaction and air quality in Europe, in: Ecological Economics, 88(4),
Google Scholar
p. 1-10.
Google Scholar
FERREI-I-CARBONELL, A., & FRIJTERS, P., 2004, How important is methodology for the estimates of the determinants of happiness? in: The Economic Journal, 114(7), p. 641-659.
Google Scholar
GADENNE, D., SHARMA, B., KERR, D., & SMITH, T., 2011, The influence of consumers' environmental beliefs and attitudes on energy saving behaviours, in: Energy Policy, 39(12), p. 7684-7694.
Google Scholar
GALE, L.R., & MENDEZ, J.A., 1998, The empirical relationship between trade, growth and the environment, in: International Review of Economics & Finance, 7(1), p. 53-61.
Google Scholar
GROSSMAN, G.M., & KRUEGER, A.B., 1995, Economic growth and the environment, in: Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(2), p. 353-377.
Google Scholar
HAMILTON, L.C., 2011, Education, politics and opinions about climate change: Evidence for interaction effects, in: Climatic Change, 104(2), p. 231-242.
Google Scholar
HARBAUGH, W.T., LEVINSON, A., & WILSON, D.M., 2002, Reexamining the empirical evidence for an Environmental Kuznets Curve, in: Review of Economics and Statistics, 84(3), p. 541-551.
Google Scholar
HEATH, Y., & GIFFORD, R., 2006, Free-Market ideology and environmental degradation: The case of belief in global climate change, in: Environment and Behavior, 38(1), p. 48-71.
Google Scholar
JONES, R.E., & DUNLAP, R.E., 1992, The social bases of environmental concern: Have they changed over time? in: Rural Sociology, 57(1), p. 28-47.
Google Scholar
KAISER, F.G., WOLFING, S., & FUHRER, U., 1999, Environmental attitude and ecological behavior, in: Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19(1), p. 1-19.
Google Scholar
LOWE, P., & RÜDIG, W., 1986, Political ecology and the social sciences – The state of the art, in: British Journal of Political Science, 16(4), p. 513-550.
Google Scholar
MADDISON, D., & REHDANZ, K., 2011, The impact of climate on life satisfaction, in: Ecological Economics, 70(12), p. 2437-2445.
Google Scholar
OLLI, E., GRENDSTAD, G., & WOLLEBAEK, D., 2001, Correlates of environmental behaviors bringing back social context, in: Environment and Behavior, 33(2), p. 181-208.
Google Scholar
PERMAN, R., & STERN, D., 2003, Evidence from panel unit root and cointegration tests that the Environmental Kuznets Curve does not exist, in: Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 47(3), p. 325-347.
Google Scholar
RYDZEWSKI, P., 2015, Sustainable development as seen by the residents of Eastern and Western Europe on the basis of ISSP environment data, in: Problemy Ekorozwoju/ Problems of Sustainable Development, 10(1), p. 49-53.
Google Scholar
SCHULTZ, P.W., OSKAMP, S., & MAINIERI, T., 1995, Who recycles and when – A review of personal and situational factors., in: Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15(2), p. 105-121.
Google Scholar
SCOTT, D., 1999, Equal opportunity, unequal results determinants of household recycling intensity, in: Environment and Behavior, 31(2), p. 267-290.
Google Scholar
STEEL, B.S., 1996, Thinking globally and acting locally? Environmental attitudes, behavior and activism, in: Journal of Environmental Management, 47(1), p. 27-36.
Google Scholar
STERN, D.I., 1998, Progress on the Environmental Kuznets Curve? in: Environment and Development Economics, 3(02), p. 173-196.
Google Scholar
SWAMI, V., CHAMORRO-PREMUZIC, T., SNELGAR, R., & FURNHAM, A., 2011, Personality, individual differences, and demographic antecedents of self-reported household waste management behaviours, in: Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31(1), p. 21-26.
Google Scholar
VAN LIERE, K.D. and DUNLAP, R.E., 1980, The social bases of environmental concern: A review of hypotheses, explanations and empirical evidence, in: Public Opinion Quarterly 44, p. 181-197
Google Scholar
ZELEZNY, L.C., CHUA, P.P., & ALDRICH, C., 2000, New ways of thinking about environmentalism: Elaborating on gender differences in environmentalism, in: Journal of Social issues, 56(3), p. 443-457.
Google Scholar
Autorzy
Jing XuSouthwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu, 611130, China Chiny
Autorzy
Jianjun LiSouthwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu, 611130, China Chiny
Statystyki
Abstract views: 13PDF downloads: 8
Licencja
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Na tych samych warunkach 4.0 Miedzynarodowe.