Analiza wpływu nierówności dochodowych na zarządzanie środowiskiem w Chinach
Yao Bo Shi
School of Economics and Management, Xi’an University of Technology, Xi’an, China (Chiny)
Xin Xin Zhao
China School of Economics and Management, Xi’an University of Technology, Xi’an, China (Chiny)
Chyi-Lu Jang
Department of Political Economy, National Sun Yat-Sen University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan (Tajwan, Prowincja Chińska)
Qiang Fu
School of Economics and Management, Changsha University of Science and Technology, Changsha, Hunan, China (Chiny)
Chun-Ping Chang
cpchang@g2.usc.edu.twShih Chien University at Kaohsiung, Kaohsiung, Taiwan (Tajwan, Prowincja Chińska)
Abstrakt
W niniejszym artykule zbadano wpływ nierówności dochodów (wykorzystując przez indeks Giniego) na zarządzanie środowiskiem (uwzględniając inwestycje rządu per capita na zapobieganie zanieczyszczeniom przemysłowym) poprzez zastosowanie modelu o stałych efektach panelowych, uogólnionej metody systemowej momentów i skorygowanego odchylenia modelu zmiennych pozornych najmniejszych kwadratów dla 23 chińskich prowincji w latach 1995-2014. Wyniki wskazują, że nierówność dochodów może wywierać znaczny pozytywny wpływ na rządowe inwestycje w zarządzanie środowiskiem w Chinach, co pokazuje, że wzrost nierówności w dochodach może przyczynić się do poprawy zarządzania środowiskiem w Chinach; oferujemy zatem kilka wymiernych rozwiązań dla decydentów w chińskich prowincjach, a także dla rządów wschodzących gospodarek, takich jak Chiny.
Słowa kluczowe:
nierówność dochodowa, zarządzanie środowiskiem, SYS_GMM, LSDVCBibliografia
ALI H. S., HASSAN S., KOFARMATA Y. I., 2016, Dynamic impact of income inequality on carbon dioxide emissions in Africa: new evidence from heterogeneous panel data analysis, in: International Journal of Energy Economics & Policy, 6, p. 760-766.
Google Scholar
ARELLANO M., BOND S. R., 1991, Some tests of specification for panel data: monte carlo evidence and an application to employment equations, in: Review of Economic Studies, 58, p. 277-297.
Google Scholar
ARELLANO M., BOVER O., 1995, Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models, in: Journal of Econometrics, 68, p. 29-51.
Google Scholar
BAEK J., GWEISAH G., 2013, Does income inequality harm the environment? : Empirical evidence from the united states, in: Energy Policy, 62, p. 1434-1437.
Google Scholar
BERTHE A., ELIE L., 2015, Mechanisms explaining the impact of economic inequality on environmental deterioration, in: Ecological Economics, 116, p. 191-200.
Google Scholar
BIMONTE S., 2002, Information access, income distribution, and the Environmental Kuznets Curve, in: Ecological Economics, 41, p. 145-156.
Google Scholar
BLUNDELL R., BOND S., 1998, Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models, in: Economics Papers, 87, p. 115-143.
Google Scholar
BOND S. R., HOEFFLER A., TEMPLE J. R. W., 2001, GMM estimation of empirical growth models, in: Cepr Discussion Papers, 159, p. 99-115.
Google Scholar
BOYCE J. K., 1994, Inequality as a Cause of Environmental Degradation, in: Ecological Economics, 11, p. 169-78.
Google Scholar
BOYCE J. K., KLEMER A. R., TEMPLET P. H., WILLIS C. E., 1999, Power distribution, the environment, and public health: a state-level analysis, in: Ecological Economics, 29, p. 127-140.
Google Scholar
BRASINGTON D. M., HITE D., 2005, Demand for environmental quality: a spatial hedonic analysis, in: Regional Science & Urban Economics, 35, p. 57-82.
Google Scholar
BRITISH PETROLEUM (BP), Statistical Review of World Energy 2016.
Google Scholar
BRUNO G. S. F., 2005, Estimation and inference in dynamic unbalanced panel data models with a small number of individuals, in: Stata Journal, 5, p. 473-500.
Google Scholar
GOLLEY J., MENG X., 2012, Income inequality and carbon dioxide emissions: the case of Chinese urban households, in: Energy Economics, 34, p. 1864-1872.
Google Scholar
GUO P., YANG M. J., 2014, A Research on the Impact of China's Fiscal Decentralization on Environmental Governance (in Chinese), in: Urban Development Research, 21, p. 84-90.
Google Scholar
HAO Y., CHEN H., ZHANG Q., 2016, Will income inequality affect environmental quality? analysis based on China's provincial panel data, in: Ecological Indicators, 67, p. 533-542.
Google Scholar
JALAN J., SOMANATHAN E., CHAUDHURI S., 2007, Demand for environmental quality: survey evidence on drinking water in urban India, in: Working Papers, 14, p. 665-692.
Google Scholar
JAYANTHAKUMARAN K., LIU Y., 2012, Openness and the Environmental Kuznets Curves: evidence from China, in: Economic Modelling, 29, p. 566-576.
Google Scholar
KIVIET J. F., 1995, On bias, inconsistency, and efficiency of various estimators in dynamic panel data models, in: Journal of Econometrics, 68, p. 53-78.
Google Scholar
LUO L., DENG L., 2012, Regional Distribution of Environmental Kuznets Curves in Different Provinces of China (in Chinese), in: Statistics and Decision, 34, p. 99-101.
Google Scholar
MAGNANI E., 2000, The Environmental Kuznets Curve, Environmental Protection Policy and Income Distribution, in: Ecological Economics, 32, p. 431-43.
Google Scholar
MARSILIANI L., RENSTROM T. I., 2000, Time inconsistency in environmental policy: tax earmarking as a commitment solution, in: Economic Journal, 110, p. 123-138.
Google Scholar
MARTINEZ-ALIER J., 1995, Distributional issues in ecological economics, in: Review of Social Economy, 53, p. 511-528.
Google Scholar
PANAYOTOU T., 2001, Demystifying the Environmental Kuznets Curve: turning a black box into a policy tool, in: Environment & Development Economics, 2, p. 465-484.
Google Scholar
PANAYOTOU T., 2011, Economic growth and the environment, in: Value Engineering, 110, p. 277-284.
Google Scholar
SHAHBAZ M., SBIA R., HAMDI H., OZTURK I., 2014, Economic growth, electricity consumption, urbanization and environmental degradation relationship in United Arab Emirates, in: Ecological Indicators, 45, p. 622-631.
Google Scholar
SUNDRUM R. M., 1990, Income Distribution in Less Development Countries, Routledge, London and New York, p. 50.
Google Scholar
TIAN W. M., 2012, The measurement of Gini coefficients for Chinese provincial residents and an analysis on their changing trend (in Chinese), in: Economic Science, 40, p. 48-59.
Google Scholar
TORRAS M., BOYCE J. K., 1998, Income, inequality, and pollution: a reassessment of the Environmental Kuznets Curve, in: Ecological Economics, 25, p. 147-160.
Google Scholar
VORNOVYTSJYY M.S., BOYCE J. K., 2010, Economic inequality and environmental quality: evidence of pollution shifting in Russia, in: Working Papers.
Google Scholar
WOLDE-RUFAEL Y., IDOWU S., 2017, Income distribution and CO2, emission: a comparative analysis for China and India, in: Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 74, p. 1336-1345.
Google Scholar
XIN C. C., ZHOU Q. L., 2018, Has Fiscal Decentralization Promoted or Restricted Public Environmental Expenditure? An Empirical Analysis Based on China’s Provincial Panel Data (in Chinese), in: Contemporary Finance & Economics, 39, p. 24-35.
Google Scholar
YAN W. J., 2012, Fiscal Decentralization, Government Competition and Environmental Governance Investment (in Chinese), in: Finance and Trade Research, 23, p. 91-97.
Google Scholar
YANG J., YANG Z. K., SHENG P. F., 2011, Income distribution, human capital and environmental quality: empirical study in China, in: Energy Procedia, 5, p. 1689-1696.
Google Scholar
ZHANG Y. J., HAO J. F., 2016, The evaluation of environmental capacity: evidence in Hunan province of China, in: Ecological Indicators, 60, p. 514-523.
Google Scholar
ZHAO Y., XU H., ZHOU X. M., 2015, Spatial effects of environmental pollution and governance (in Chinese), in: Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 29, p. 170-175.
Google Scholar
ZHENG Y., ZHAO X. X., 2014, Technical Efficiency of Environment, Pollution Abatement and Environmental Performance-Based on 1998-2012 Provincial Panel Data Analysis (in Chinese), in: Chinese Journal of Management Science, 22, p. 767-773.
Google Scholar
Autorzy
Yao Bo ShiSchool of Economics and Management, Xi’an University of Technology, Xi’an, China Chiny
Autorzy
Xin Xin ZhaoChina School of Economics and Management, Xi’an University of Technology, Xi’an, China Chiny
Autorzy
Chyi-Lu JangDepartment of Political Economy, National Sun Yat-Sen University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan Tajwan, Prowincja Chińska
Autorzy
Qiang FuSchool of Economics and Management, Changsha University of Science and Technology, Changsha, Hunan, China Chiny
Autorzy
Chun-Ping Changcpchang@g2.usc.edu.tw
Shih Chien University at Kaohsiung, Kaohsiung, Taiwan Tajwan, Prowincja Chińska
Statystyki
Abstract views: 15PDF downloads: 6
Licencja
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Na tych samych warunkach 4.0 Miedzynarodowe.