Funkcja i postrzeganie usług pełnionych przez ekosystemy miejskie w społeczeństwie
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Open full text
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
DOI
Authors
Abstrakt
Rozprzestrzenianie się miast, który odbywa się obecnie na całym świecie, doprowadziło do największego stałego zajęcia gruntów, oznaczającego zniszczenie ekosystemów i wyczerpywania się zasobów naturalnych. Obecnie około 50% światowej populacji mieszka w miastach i szacuje się, że do 2030 r. będzie to około 70%. To, że gromadzimy się coraz liczniej w miastach, oznacza, że musimy transportować duże ilości zasobów do tych obszarów, co powoduje powstawanie odpadów i emisji zanieczyszczeń, co obciąża sąsiadujące z miastami środowisko do jego granic. Prowadzi to do powstawania problemów odnoszących się zarówno do ludzkiego zdrowia, jak i gospodarki społecznej, ponieważ ekosystemy, które mają nam pomagać, ulegają zniszczeniu. Aby temu przeciwdziałać, konieczne jest lepsze planowanie miast, które uwzględniałoby pełnione przez środowisko w społeczeństwie usługi ekosystemowe. Problemem jest to, że takie usługi nie mają one wartości handlowej, co utrudnia ich uznanie, ponieważ nie wskazują na żadne korzyści ekonomiczne. Dlatego konieczne jest pogłębienie wiedzy na temat ich znaczenia, aby można było je skorelować z tym, jak służą społeczeństwu w trzech wymiarach: ekonomicznym, społecznym i środowiskowym.
Słowa kluczowe:
Bibliografia
ADEGUN O., 2017, Developing Green Infrastructure in a Johannesburg Informal Settlement: Investigating Residents’ Willingness to Pay, in: Procedia Engineering, 198, p. 176-186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.07.081
AGUILAR F. X., OBENG E. A., CAI Z., 2018, Water quality improvements elicit consistent willingness-to-pay for the enhancement of forested watershed ecosystem services, in: Ecosystem Services, 30, p. 158-171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.02.012
AMANO T., BUTT I. PEH K. S.-H., 2018, The importance of green spaces to public health: a multi-continental analysis, in: Ecological Applications, 28(6), p. 1473-1480. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.1748
ANDERSSON-SKÖLD Y., KLINGBERG J., GUNNARSSON B., CULLINANE K., GUSTAFSSON I., HEDBLOM M., KNEZ I., LINDBERG F., ODE S. Å., PLEIJEL, H., THORSSON P., THORSSON S., 2018, A framework for assessing urban greenery’s effects and valuing its ecosystem services, in: Journal of Environmental Management, 205, p. 274-285. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.09.071
ARITFUL ISLAM M., AHMAD S.A., ISLAM R., 2018, Estimating Willingness to Pay for Improving River Water Quality Using Contingent Valuation Method: A Conceptual Framework, in: International Journal of Management, Accounting & Economics, 5(8), p. 643-657.
BENDPR T. K., SHANDAS V., MILES B., BELT K., OLANDER L., 2018, Ecosystem services and U.S. stormwater planning: An approach for improving urban stormwater decisions, in: Environmental Science and Policy, 88, p. 92-103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.06.006
BERLAND A., SHIFLETT S. A., SHUSTER W. D., GARMESTANI A. S., GODDARD H. C., HERRMANN D. L., HOPTON M. E., 2017, The role of trees in urban stormwater management, in: Landscape and Urban Planning, 162, p. 167-177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.02.017
BISSONNETTE J.-F., DUPRAS J., MESSIER C., LECHOWICZ M., DAGENAIS D., PAQUETTE A., JAEGER J. A. G., GONZALES A., 2018, Moving forward in implementing green infrastructures: Stakeholder perceptions of opportunities and obstacles in a major North American metropolitan area, in: Cities, 81, p. 61-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.03.014
CHEN X., de VRIES S., ASSMUTH T., DICK J., HERMANS T., HERTEL O., JENSEN A., JONES L., KABISCH S., LANKI T., LEHMANN I., MASKELL L., NORTON L., REIS S., 2018, Research challenges for cultural ecosystem services and public health in (peri-)urban environments, in: Science of The Total Environment, 651, p. 2118-2129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.030
CHIABAI A., QUIROGA S., MARTINEZJUAREZ P., HIGGINS S., TAYLOR T., 2018, The nexus between climate change, ecosystem services and human health: Towards a conceptual framework, in: Science of The Total Environment, 635, p. 1191-1204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.323
CHIARA C., 2018, Ecosystem services in urban plans: What is there, and what is still needed for better decisions – ScienceDirect.
CZAJKOWSKI J., ENGEL V., MARTINEZ C., MIRCHI A., WATKINS D., SUKOP M. C., HUGHES J. D., 2018, Economic impacts of urban flooding in South Florida: Potential consequences of managing groundwater to prevent salt water intrusion, in: Science of The Total Environment, 621, p. 465-478. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.251
DEMUZERE M., ORRU K., HEIDRICH O., OLAZABAL E., GENELETTI D., ORRU H., BHAVE A. G., MITTAL N., FELIU E., FAEHNLE M., 2014, Mitigating and adapting to climate change: Multi-functional and multiscale assessment of green urban infrastructure, in: Journal of Environmental Management, 146. P. 107-115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.07.025
DERKZEN M. L., van TEEFFELEN A. J. A., VERBUNG P. H., 2017, Green infrastructure for urban climate adaptation: How do residents’ views on climate impacts and green infrastructure shape adaptation preferences?, in: Landscape and Urban Planning, 157, p. 106-130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.05.027
ELMQVIST T., SETÄLÄ H., HANDEL S., van der PLOEG S., ARONSON J., BLIGNAUT J., GÓMEZ-BAGGETHUN E., NOWAK D., KRONENBERG J., de GROOT R., 2015, Benefits of restoring ecosystem services in urban areas, in: Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 14, p. 101-108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2015.05.001
FELTYNOWSKI M., KRONENBERG J., BERGIER T., KABISCH N., ŁASZKIEWICZ E., STROHBACH M. W., 2018, Challenges of urban green space management in the face of using inadequate data, in: Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 31, p. 56-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2017.12.003
GROSHANS G. R., MIKHAILOVA E. A., POST C. J., SCHLAUTMAN M. A., ZURQANI H. A., ZHANG L., 2018, Assessing the Value of Soil Inorganic Carbon for Ecosystem Services in
the Contiguous United States Based on Liming Replacement Costs, in: Land, 7(4), p. 149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/land7040149
GUSTAFSSON S., HERMELIN B., SMAS L., 2018, Integrating environmental sustainability into strategic spatial planning: the importance of management, in: Journal of Environmental Planning and Management. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2018.1495620
HEGETSCHWEILER K. T., de VRIES S., ARNBERGER A., BELL S., BRENNAN M., SITER N., OLAFSSON A. S., VOIGHT, A., HUNZIKER M., 2017, Linking demand and supply factors in identifying cultural ecosystem services of urban green infrastructures: A review of European studies, in: Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 21, p. 48-59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2016.11.002
HUANG L., CAO W., XU X., FAN J., WANG J., 2018, Research article: Linking the benefits of ecosystem services to sustainable spatial planning of ecological conservation strategies, in: Journal of Environmental Management, 222, p. 385-395. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.05.066
JIANG W., 2017, Ecosystem services research in China: A critical review, in: Ecosystem Services, 26, p. 10-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.05.012
KIM D., JIN J., 2018, Does happiness data say urban parks are worth it?, in: Landscape and Urban Planning, 178, p. 1-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.05.010
LI F., LIU X., ZHANG X., ZHAO D., LIU H., ZHOU C. , WANG R., 2017, Urban ecological infrastructure: an integrated network for ecosystem services and sustainable urban systems, in: Journal of Cleaner Production, 163, p. S12-S18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.079
LIMA L. S. de KRUEGER T., GARCIA-MARQUEZ, J., 2017, Uncertainties in demonstrating environmental benefits of payments for ecosystem services, in: Ecosystem Services, 27, p. 139-149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.005
MABON L., SHIH W.-Y., 2018, What might ‘just green enough’ urban development mean in the context of climate change adaptation? The case of urban greenspace planning in Taipei Metropolis, Taiwan, in: World Development, 107, p. 224-238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.02.035
di MARINO M., LAPINTIE K., 2018, Exploring the concept of green infrastructure in urban landscape. Experiences from Italy, Canada and Finland, in: Landscape Research, 43(1), p. 139-149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2017.1300640
MEEROW S., NEWELL J. P., 2017, Spatial planning for multifunctional green infrastructure: Growing resilience in Detroit, in: Landscape and Urban Planning, 159, p. 62-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.10.005
MEXIA T., VIEIRA J., PRÍNCIPE A., ANJOS A., SILVA P., LOPES N., FREITAS C., SANTOS-REIS M., CORREIA O., BRANQUINHO C., PINHO P., 2018, Ecosystem services: Urban parks under a magnifying glass, in: Environmental Research, 160, p. 469-478. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2017.10.023
NATURVÅRDSVERKET, 2015, Guide för värdering av ekosystemtjänster, Naturvårdsverket, Stockholm.
NATURVÅRDSVERKET, 2019, Vad är ekosystemtjänster?,https://www.naturvardsverket.se/Miljoarbete-i-samhallet/Miljoarbete-iSverige/Uppdelat-efter-omrade/Ekosystemtjanster/Vad-ar-ekosystemtjanster/ (16.01.2019).
NIELSEN-PINCUS M., SUSSMAN P., BENNETT D. E., GOSNELL, H., PARKER R., 2017, The Influence of Place on the Willingness to Pay for Ecosystem Services, in: Society & Natural Resources, 30(12), p. 1423-1441. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2017.1347976
NIKODINOSKA N., PALETTO A., PASTORELLA F., GRANVIK M., FRANZESE P. P., 2018, Assessing, valuing and mapping ecosystem services at city level: The case of Uppsala (Sweden), in: Ecological Modelling, 368, p. 411-424. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2017.10.013
REGERINGSKANSLIET R., 2015, Ekosystem och biologisk mångfald, https://www.regeringen.se/regeringens-politik/globala-malen-ochagenda-2030/ekosystem-och-biologisk-mangfald/ (16.01.2019).
RIECHERS M., BARKMANN J., TSCHARNTKE T., 2018, Diverging perceptions by social groups on cultural ecosystem services provided by urban green, in: Landscape and Urban Planning, 175, p. 161-168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.03.017
RODRÍGUEZ-LOINAZ G., PEÑA L., PALACIOS-AGUNDEZ I., AMETZAGA I., ONAINDIA M., 2018, Identifying Green Infrastructure as a Basis for an Incentive Mechanism at the Municipality Level in Biscay (Basque Country), in: Forests, 9(1), p. 22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/f9010022
ROEBELING P., SARAIVA M., PALLA A., GNECCO I., TEOTÓNIO C., FIDELIS T., MARTINS F., ALVES H., ROCHA J., 2017, Assessing the socio-economic impacts of green/blue space, urban residential and road infrastructure projects in the Confluence (Lyon): a hedonic pricing simulation approach, in: Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 60(3), p. 482-499. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2016.1162138
SHACKLETON R. T., ANGELSTAM P., van der WAAL B., ELBAKIDZE M., 2017, Progress made in managing and valuing ecosystem services: a horizon scan of gaps in research, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.11.020
management and governance, in: Ecosystem Services, 27, p. 232-241.
SILVENNOINEN S., TAKA M., YLI-PELKONEN V., KOIVUSALO H., OLLIKAINEN M., SETÄLÄ H., 2017, Monetary value of urban green space as an ecosystem service provider: A
case study of urban runoff management in Finland, in: Ecosystem Services, 28, p. 17-27.
SIRAKAYA A., CLIQUET A., HARRIS J., 2018, Ecosystem services in cities: Towards the international legal protection of ecosystem services in urban environments, in: Ecosystem Services, 29, p. 205-212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.01.001
VALLECILLO S., LA NOTTE A., ZULIAN G., FERRINI S., MAES J., 2019, Ecosystem services accounts: Valuing the actual flow of nature-based recreation from ecosystems to people, in: Ecological Modelling, 392, p. 196-211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2018.09.023
VALLECILLO S., POLCE C., BARBOSA A., PERPIÑA CASTILLO C., VANDECASTEELE I., RUSCH G. M., MAES J., 2018, Spatial alternatives for Green Infrastructure planning across the EU: An ecosystem service perspective, in: Landscape and Urban Planning, 174, p. 41-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.03.001
VARIS O., KESKINEN M., KUMMU M., 2017, Four dimensions of water security with a case of the indirect role of water in global food security, in: Water Security, 1, p. 36-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasec.2017.06.002
WANG J., BANZHAF E., 2018, Towards a better understanding of Green Infrastructure: A critical review, in: Ecological Indicators, 85, p. 758-772. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.09.018
WANG Y., LI X., SUN M., YU H., 2018, Managing urban ecological land as properties: Conceptual model, public perceptions, and willingness to pay, in: Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 133, p. 21-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.01.038
WANG Y.-C., SHEN J.-K., XIANG W.-N., 2018, Ecosystem service of green infrastructure for adaptation to urban growth: function and configuration, in: Ecosystem Health and Sustainability, 4(5), p. 132-143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/20964129.2018.1474721
Wei, J., Qian, J., Tao, Y., Hu, F. & Ou, W. (2018). Evaluating Spatial Priority of Urban Green Infrastructure for Urban Sustainability in Areas of Rapid Urbanization: A Case Study of DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020327
Pukou in China, in: Sustainability, 10(2) , 327.
WILKERSON M. L., MITCHELL M. G. E., SHANAHAN D., WILSON K. A., IVES C. D., LOVELOCK C. E., RHODES J. R., 2018, The role of socio-economic factors in planning and managing urban ecosystem services, in: Ecosystem Services, 31(Part A), p. 102-110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.02.017
XIAO Y., LU Y., GUO Y., YUAN Y., 2017, Estimating the willingness to pay for green space services in Shanghai: Implications for social equity in urban China, in: Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 26, p. 95-103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2017.06.007
ZINIA N. J., MCSHANE P., 2018, Ecosystem services management: An evaluation of green adaptations for urban development in Dhaka, Bangladesh, in: Landscape and Urban Planning, 173, p. 23-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.01.008
##plugins.generic.usageStats.downloads##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Abstract views: 77
Licencja

Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Na tych samych warunkach 4.0 Miedzynarodowe.