Możliwość wykorzystania rzepaku ozimego (Brassica napus L. var. Napus) do celów energetycznych

Jakub Siemek

siemek@agh.edu.pl
AGH University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Drilling, Oil and Gas, al. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Krakow (Polska)

Jan Macuda


AGH University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Drilling, Oil and Gas, al. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Krakow (Polska)

Łukasz Łukańko


AGH University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Drilling, Oil and Gas, al. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Krakow (Polska)

Jakub Nowak


AGH University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer, al. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Krakow (Polska)

Tadeusz Zając


University of Agriculture, Unit of Crop Production, Institute of Plant Production, al. Mickiewicza 21, 31-120 Krakow (Polska)

Abstrakt

Biomasa jest istotnym elementem w bilansie energetycznym na świecie i odgrywa dużą rolę w działaniach na rzecz redukcji emisji gazów cieplarnianych, stanowiąc zrównoważone źródło energii. Jednym ze sposobów użycia biomasy jest jej współspalanie z węglem kamiennym i brunatnym w celu wytwarzania energii elektrycznej. Ważnym czynnikiem promującym wykorzystanie biomasy w państwach Unii Europejskiej jest fakt, że emisja CO2 z jej spalania nie wlicza się do sumy emisji ze spalania paliw, zgodnie z zasadami ustalonymi w systemie handlu uprawnieniami EU ETS.

Celem badań było zbadanie możliwości wykorzystania rzepaku ozimego do celów energetycznych, wychodowanego w trzech lokalizacjach Polski południowej. Do badań wykorzystane zostały dwa gatunki rzepaku ozimego Adam i Poznanianki, analizy wykonano dla łuszczyny, nasion, łodygi głównej i bocznej. W ramach przeprowadzonych badań określona została wartość opałowa oraz ciepło spalanie dla 20 próbek rzepaku ozimego. Najwyższe wartości zostały uzyskane dla ziaren rzepaku, natomiast najniższe dla łodyg. Obliczone wartości emisji dwutlenku węgla dla badanych próbek w większości przypadków wynosiły powyżej 100 mg/kJ i były dużo większe niż emisja podczas spalania węgla kamiennego i brunatnego. Dodatkowo w ramach badania oznaczono wilgotność biomasy, ilość powstałego w procesie spalania popiołu oraz oceniono zawartość części lotnych oraz węgla i siarki. Ponadto w ramach badania wykonano pomiary wilgotność biomasy, ilość wytworzonego popiołu w procesie spalania oraz określono zawartość związków lotnych oraz węgla i siarki.


Słowa kluczowe:

biomasa, rzepak ozimy, wartość opałowa, emisja ditlenku węgla

AGBOR E., ZHANG X., KUMAR A., 2014, A review of biomass co-firing in North America, in: Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 40, p. 930-943.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.195   Google Scholar

AL-MANSOUR F., ZUWALA J., 2010, An evaluation of biomass co-firing in Europe, in: Biomass & Bioenergy, 34, p. 620-629.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.01.004   Google Scholar

BAJWA D.S., PETERSON T., SHARM N., SHOJAEIARANI J., BAJWA S.G., 2018, A review of densified solid biomass for energy production, in: Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 96, p. 295-305.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.07.040   Google Scholar

CAO Y., PAWŁOWSKI A., 2013, Biomass as an answer to sustainable energy. Opportunity versus challenge, in: Environment Protection Engineering, 39(1), p. 153-161.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.37190/epe130112   Google Scholar

CENTRAL STATISTICAL OFFICE (GUS), 2017, Poland Environment, Warsaw.
  Google Scholar

CHEN C., QIN S., CHEN F., LU Z., CHENG Z., 2019, Co-combustion characteristics study of bagasse, coal and their blends by thermogravimetric analysis, in: Journal of the Energy Institute, 92(2), p. 364-369.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joei.2017.12.008   Google Scholar

DEMIRBAS A., 2007, Effects of moisture and hydrogen content on the heating value of fuels, in: Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization and Environmental Effects, 29, p. 649-655.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/009083190957801   Google Scholar

DZIKUC M., PIWOWAR A., 2016, Ecological and economic aspects of electric energy production using the biomass co-firing method: the case of Poland, in: Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 55, p. 856-862.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.11.027   Google Scholar

EMERHI E.A., 2011, Physical and combustion properties of briquettes produced from sawdust of three hardwood species and different organic binders, in: Advances in Applied Science Research, 2, p. 236-246.
  Google Scholar

ENERGY REGULATORY OFFICE, 2018, Energy consumption in Poland 2005-2018, Warsaw.
  Google Scholar

EA (ENVIRONEMNTAL AGENCY), 2016, Material comparators for end-of-waste decision,. Fuels: biomass, Report – SC130040/R7, Bristol.
  Google Scholar

EROL M., HAYKIRI-ACMA H., KUCUKBAYRAK S., 2010, Calorific value estimation of biomass from their proximate analyses data, in: Renewable Energy, 35, p.170-173.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2009.05.008   Google Scholar

EC (EUROPEAN COMMISSION), 2012, DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR RESEARCH AND INNOVATION, Innovating for sustainable growth: A bioeconomy for Europe, Brussels.
  Google Scholar

EC (EUROPEAN COMMISSION), 2017, Biomass issues in the EU ETS, Guidance Document, Brussels.
  Google Scholar

EEA (EUROPEAN ENVIRONMENTAL AGENCY), 2018, Air quality in Europe – 2018 report, Copenhagen.
  Google Scholar

EU (EUROPEAN UNION), 2009, Directive 2009/28/EC of The European Parliament and of The Council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC, in: Off J. European Union, p. 16-62.
  Google Scholar

EUROSTAT, AIR EMISSION, 2019a, Greenhouse gas emissions by source sector, http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset=env_air_gge&lang=en (16.07.2019).
  Google Scholar

EUROSTAT, AIR EMISSION 2019b, Air pollutants by source sector, http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/submitViewTableAction.do (16.07.2019).
  Google Scholar

EUROSTAT CROP PRODUCER, 2019, Crop production, http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/submitViewTableAction.do (30.05.2019).
  Google Scholar

EUROSTAT ENERGY, 2019, Production ofelectricity and derived heat by type of fuel 2019, Crop production, http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/submitViewTableAction.do (30.05.2019).
  Google Scholar

EUROSTAT STATISTICS EXPLAINED, 2018, Main annual crop statistic, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Main_annual_crop_ statistics, (4.12.2018).
  Google Scholar

GILLENWATER M., 2005, Calculation Tool for Direct Emissions from Stationary Combustion version 3.0, in: Environmental Resources Trust, Washington DC.
  Google Scholar

GOTO K., YOGO K., HIGASHII T., 2013, A review of efficiency penalty in a coal-fired power plant with post-combustion CO2 capture, in: Applied Energy, 111, p. 710-720.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.05.020   Google Scholar

GUSTAVSSON L., JOELSSON A., SATHRE R., 2010, Life cycle primary energy use and carbon emission of an eight-storey, in: Energy and Buildings, 42, p. 230-242.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2009.08.018   Google Scholar

INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE, 2006, IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, ed. Eggleston S. et al., Inst. Global Environ. Strategies, Hayama.
  Google Scholar

IEA (INTERNATIOANAL ENERGY AGENCY), 2017, CO2 emissions from fuel combustion – highlights (2017th ed.), IEA/OECD, Paris.
  Google Scholar

JANDACKA J., MALCHO M., OCHODEK T., KOLONICNY J., HOLUBCIK M., 2015, The increase of silver grass ash melting temperature using additives, in: International Journal of Renewable Energy Research, 5, p. 258-265.
  Google Scholar

LESTANDER T.A., JOHNSSON B., GROTHAGE M., 2009, NIR techniques create added values for the pellet and biofuel industry, in: Bioresource Technology, 100(4), p. 1589-1594.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.08.001   Google Scholar

MAJ G., KRZACZEK P., KURANC A., PIEKARSKI W., 2017, Energy properties of sunflower seed husk as industrial extrusion residue, in: Research in Agricultural Engineering, 21, p. 77-84.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/agriceng-2017-0008   Google Scholar

MCKENDRY P., 2002, Energy production from biomass (Part I): overview of biomass, in: Bioresource Technology, 83 p. 37-46.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(01)00118-3   Google Scholar

MITCHELL E.J.S., LEA-LANGTON A.R., JONES J.M., WILLIAMS A., LAYDEN P., JOHNSON R., 2016, The impact of fuel properties on the emissions from the combustion of biomass and other solid fuels in a fixed bed domestic stove, in: Fuel Processing Technology, 142 p. 115-123.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2015.09.031   Google Scholar

OZYUGURAN A., YAMAN S., 2017, Prediction of Calorific Value of Biomass from Proximate Analysis, in: Energy Procedia, 107, p. 130-136.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2016.12.149   Google Scholar

PAWŁOWSKI L. PAWŁOWSKI A., 2016, Wpływ sposobów pozyskiwania energii na realizację paradygmatów zrównoważonego rozwoju, in: Rocznik Ochrona Środowiska/Annual Set Environment Protection, 18(2), p. 19-37.
  Google Scholar

POLISH INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION, 2016, Calorific value an CO2 emission Factor, Emissions Trading System (EU ETS), Warsaw.
  Google Scholar

TUMULURU J.S., WRIGHT C.T., KENNY K.L., HESS J.R., 2010, A review on biomass densification technologies for energy application, Idaho Natl. Lab., Idaho.
  Google Scholar

VASSILEV S., VASSILEVA C., VASSILEV V., 2015, Advantages and disadvantages of composition and properties of biomass in comparison with coal: an overview, in: Fuel, 158, p. 330-350.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2015.05.050   Google Scholar

VICENTE E.D., ALVES C.A., 2018, An overview of particulate emissions from residential biomass combustion, in: Atmospheric Research, 199, p. 159-185.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2017.08.027   Google Scholar

WIELGOSIŃSKI G., ŁECHTAŃSKA P., NAMIECIŃSKA O., 2017, Emission of some pollutants from biomass combustion in comparison to hard coal combustion, in: Journal of the Energy Institute, 90, p. 787-796.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joei.2016.06.005   Google Scholar

UN: UNITED NATIONS’ DIVISION FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS, 2012, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, New York.
  Google Scholar

ZAJĄC T., KLIMEK-KOPYRA A., OLEKSY A., LORENC-KOZIK A., RATAJCZAK K., 2016, Analysis of yield and planttraits of oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) cultivated in temperate region in light possibilities of sowing in arid areas, in: Acta Agrobotanica, 69, p. 1696-1709.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5586/aa.1696   Google Scholar

ZAJĄC T., SYNOWIEC A., OLEKSY A., MACUDA J., KLIMEK-KOPYRA A., BOROWIEC F., 2017, Accumulation of biomass and bioenergy in culms of cereals as a factor of straw cutting height, in: International Agrophysics, 31, p. 273-285.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/intag-2016-0041   Google Scholar

ZHANG X., LUO L., SKITMORE M., 2015, Household carbon emission research: an analytical review of measurement, influencing factors and mitigation prospects, in: Journal of Cleaner Production, 103, p. 873-883.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.024   Google Scholar


Opublikowane
2020-01-02

Cited By / Share

Siemek, J., Macuda, J., Łukańko, Łukasz, Nowak, J., & Zając, T. (2020). Możliwość wykorzystania rzepaku ozimego (Brassica napus L. var. Napus) do celów energetycznych. Problemy Ekorozwoju Problems of Sustainable Development, 15(1), 167–177. https://doi.org/10.35784/pe.2020.1.18

Autorzy

Jakub Siemek 
siemek@agh.edu.pl
AGH University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Drilling, Oil and Gas, al. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Krakow Polska

Autorzy

Jan Macuda 

AGH University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Drilling, Oil and Gas, al. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Krakow Polska

Autorzy

Łukasz Łukańko 

AGH University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Drilling, Oil and Gas, al. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Krakow Polska

Autorzy

Jakub Nowak 

AGH University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer, al. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Krakow Polska

Autorzy

Tadeusz Zając 

University of Agriculture, Unit of Crop Production, Institute of Plant Production, al. Mickiewicza 21, 31-120 Krakow Polska

Statystyki

Abstract views: 27
PDF downloads: 15