Wyjaśnienie zjawiska kołowości w gospodarce o obiegu zamkniętym w kontekście pojęcia potencjału
Tetiana Shevchenko
Sumy National Agrarian University; H. Kondratiiev 160, 40021 Sumy (Ukraina)
Roman Vavrek
vavrek.roman@gmail.comVŠB—Technical University of Ostrava; Sokolská třída 33, 702 00 Ostrava (Czechy)
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6047-9434
Yuriy Danko
Sumy National Agrarian University; H. Kondratiiev 160, 40021 Sumy (Ukraina)
Olena Gubanova
Odessa State Environmental University; Lvivska 15, 65016 Odessa (Ukraina)
Jana Chovancová
University of Prešov; Konštantínova 16, 080 01 Prešov (Słowacja)
Liubov Mykhailova
Sumy National Agrarian University; H. Kondratiiev 160, 40021 Sumy (Ukraina)
Abstrakt
Przechodząc od modelu biznesowego liniowego do cyrkularnego, od kołyski do grobu do od kołyski do kołyski i od odpadów do bogactwa, koncepcja gospodarki o obiegu zamkniętym (CE) stała się ważnym narzędziem promowania zrównoważonego rozwoju, ponieważ łączy w sobie ekonomię, korzyści środowiskowe i społeczne w skali lokalnej i globalnej. W przejściu na CE, zbadanie CE z perspektywy jej potencjału jest kluczowe dla jej szerszego i efektywniejszego wdrożenia w praktyce. Celem artykułu jest wyjaśnienie zjawiska kołowości w gospodarce o obiegu zamkniętym w kontekście pojęcia potencjału w części (1) elementów strukturalnych, (2) podstawowych kategorii i (3) podstawowych właściwości, co stanowi kontynuację poprzednich badań dotyczących zarządzania potencjałem obiegu zamkniętego. Badanie ukazuje ramy teoretyczne potencjału obiegu zamkniętego poprzez opracowanie kategoryzacji potencjału obiegu zamkniętego w celu uzyskania kompleksowego obrazu tego, co zostało zrobione w przeszłości i czego należy dokonać teraz, aby osiągnąć postęp w kierunku obiegu zamkniętego w przyszłości. Podstawowe właściwości potencjału obiegu zamkniętego, takie jak integralność, dynamizm, przynależność terytorialna i zgodność różnych strategii, zostały omówione w celu zarządzania potencjałem obiegu zamkniętego. Wnioski zawarte w artykule prowadzą w kierunku opracowania nowych mierników do pomiaru postępu w kierunku zero-waste i CE, których celem jest identyfikacja i monitorowanie wszystkich możliwych form potencjału obiegu zamkniętego, a więc: możliwości, rezerwy, dostępne zasoby, a nie jedynie dostępne zasoby, które były brane pod uwagę przede wszystkim w poprzednich próbach operacjonalizacji gospodarki o obiegu zamkniętym.
Słowa kluczowe:
gospodarka o obiegu zamkniętym, potencjał obiegu zamkniętego, potencjał ponownego wykorzystania, zero waste, recyklingBibliografia
ALLWOOD J.M., CULLEN J.M., CARRUTH M.A., 2012, Sustainable materials: With both eyes open, UIT Cambridge Ltd, Cambridge.
Google Scholar
BLOMSMA F., BRENNAN G., 2017, The Emergence of Circular Economy A New Framing Around Prolonging Resource Productivity, in: Journal of Industrial Ecology, 21(3), p. 603-614.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12603
Google Scholar
BOCKEN N. M. P., OLIVETTI E. A., CULLEN J. M., POTTING J., LIFSET R., 2017, Taking the Circularity to the Next Level, in: Journal of Industrial Ecology, 21(3), p. 476-482.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12606
Google Scholar
BOCKEN N. M. P., PAUW I., BAKKER C., GRINTEN B., 2016, Product design and business model strategies for a circular economy, in: Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, 33, p. 308-320.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21681015.2016.1172124
Google Scholar
BOCKEN N. M. P., SHORT S. W., RANA P., EVANS S., 2014, A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes, in: Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, p. 42–56.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.039
Google Scholar
BRAUNGART M., MCDONOUGH W., BOLLINGER A., 2007, Cradle-to-cradle design: creating healthy emissions – a strategy for eco-effective product and system design, in: Journal of Cleaner Production, 15(13-14), p. 1337-1348.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.08.003
Google Scholar
BRIDGENS B., POWELL M., FARMER G., WALSH C., REED E., ROYAPOOR M., GOSLING P., HALL J., 2017, Framework for Implementing the Principles of the Circular Economy in Organizations–Guide, The British Standards Institution, London.
Google Scholar
CIRCULAR ACADEMY, 2017, Circular Economy: Some Definitions, http://www.circular.academy/circular-economy-some-definitions/ (10.11.2019).
Google Scholar
COX J., GRITH S., GIORGI, S., KING G., 2013, Consumer understanding of product lifetimes, in: Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 79, p. 21-29.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.05.003
Google Scholar
DEN HOLLANDER M.C., BAKKER C. A., HULTINK E. J., 2017, Product Design in a Circular Economy: Development of a Typology of Key Concepts and Terms, in: Journal of Industrial Ecology, 21(3), p. 517-525.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12610
Google Scholar
Decision No. 1386/2013/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 November 2013 on a General Union Environment Action Programme to 2020 ‘Living well, within the limits of our planet’, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32013D1386&from =EN (10.11.2019).
Google Scholar
DOMENECH T., BLEISCHWITZ R., DORANOVA A., PANAYOTOPOULOS D., ROMAN R., 2019, Mapping Industrial Symbiosis Development in Europe typologies of networks, characteristics, performance and contribution to the Circular Economy, in: Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 141, p. 76–98.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.09.016
Google Scholar
ELIA V., GNONI M. G., TORNESE F., 2016, Measuring circular economy strategies through index methods: A critical analysis, in: Journal of Cleaner Production, 142(4), p. 2741-2751.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.196
Google Scholar
ELLEN MACARTHUR FOUNDATION AND GRANTA, 2015, Circularity indicators. An approach to measuring circularity. Methodology, Ellen MacArthur Foundation, Medina.
Google Scholar
ELLEN MACARTHUR FOUNDATION, 2013a, Towards the circular economy. Economic and business rationale for an accelerated transition, Ellen MacArthur Foundation, Medina.
Google Scholar
ELLEN MACARTHUR FOUNDATION, 2013b, Towards the circular economy. Opportunities for the consumers goods sector, Ellen MacArthur Foundation, Medina.
Google Scholar
ELLEN MACARTHUR FOUNDATION, 2014, Towards the circular economy. Accelerating the scaleup across supply chains, Ellen MacArthur Foundation, Medina.
Google Scholar
EUROPEAN COMMISSION, 2015, Closing the loop – An EU action plan for the Circular Economy.
Google Scholar
Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52015DC0614 (15.10.2019).
Google Scholar
EUROPEAN COMMISSION, 2018, A European Strategy for Plastics in a Circular Economy, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?qid=1516265440535&uri=COM:2018:28:FIN (10.11.2019).
Google Scholar
FRANKLIN-JOHNSON E., FIGGE F., CANNING L., 2016, Resource duration as a managerial indicator for Circular Economy performance, in: Journal of Cleaner Production, 133, p. 589-598.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.023
Google Scholar
GEISSDOERFER M., SAVAGET P., BOCKEN N., HULTINK E., 2017, The Circular Economy – A new sustainability paradigm?, in: Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, p. 757-768.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048
Google Scholar
GLADYSHEV N. G., 2013, Scientific basics of recycling in techno-natural waste management clusters, Samara University, Samara.
Google Scholar
GUBANOVA E. R., 2009, The mechanism of economic and environmental incentives for the use of secondary resources, OSEU, Odessa.
Google Scholar
JAWAHIR I. S., BRADLEY R., 2016, Technological Elements of Circular Economy and the Principles of 6R-Based Closed-loop Material Flow in Sustainable Manufacturing, in: Procedia CIRP, 40, p. 103-108.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.01.067
Google Scholar
KAUTISH P., PAUL J., SHARMA R., 2019, The moderating influence of environmental consciousness and recycling intentions on green purchase behavior, in: Journal of Cleaner Production, 228, p. 1425-1436.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.389
Google Scholar
KOMAR I., 1975, Rational use of natural resources and resource cycles, Nauka Publishing House, Moscow.
Google Scholar
KRONENBERG J., WINKLER R., 2009, Wasted waste: An evolutionary perspective on industrial byproducts, in: Ecological Economics, 68(12), p. 3026-3033.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.07.006
Google Scholar
MONT O., PLEPYS A., WHALEN K., NUBHOLZ J. L. K., 2017, Business model innovation for a Circular Economy: Drivers and barriers for the Swedish industry – the voice of REES companies, Mistra REES, Linkoping.
Google Scholar
MONT O., HEISKANEN E-K., 2015, Breaking the stalemate of sustainable consumption with industrial ecology and a circular economy, in: Handbook of Research on Sustainable Consumption, Reisch L. and Thøgersen J., Edward Edgar, Cheltenham, p. 33-49.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781783471270.00009
Google Scholar
MURRAY A., SKENE K. HAYNES K., 2015, The Circular Economy: An Interdisciplinary Exploration of the Concept and Application in a Global Context, in: Journal of Business Ethics, 140(3), p. 369-380.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2693-2
Google Scholar
NETO J. Q. F., BLOEMHOF J., CORBETT C., 2016, Market prices of remanufactured, used and new items: Evidence from eBay, in: International Journal of Production Economics, 171, p. 371-380.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.02.006
Google Scholar
PARK H. J., LIN L. M., 2018, Exploring attitude–behavior gap in sustainable consumption: comparison of recycled and upcycled fashion products, in: Journal of Business Research, (in press).
Google Scholar
PARK J. Y., CHERTOW M. R., 2014, Establishing and testing the ‘reuse potential’ indicator for managing wastes as resources, in: Journal of Environmental Management, 137, p. 45-53.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.11.053
Google Scholar
PAULIUK S., 2018, Critical appraisal of the circular economy standard BS 8001:2017 and a dashboard of quantitative system indicators for its implementation in organizations, in: Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 129, p. 81-92.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.10.019
Google Scholar
PETRUSHENKO M., SHEVCHENKO H., 2013, Management of ecological-economical conflicts within the framework of the theory of optimal mechanisms for resource distribution, in: Actual Problems of Economics, 141(3), p. 186-192.
Google Scholar
PIERONI M., MCALOONE T., PIGOSSO D., 2019, Business model innovation for circular economy and sustainability: A review of approaches, in: Journal of
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.036
Google Scholar
Cleaner Production, 215, p. 98-216.
Google Scholar
PISCICELLI L., LUDDEN G. D. S., COOPER T., 2018, What makes a sustainable business model successful? An empirical comparison of two peer-topeer goods-sharing platforms, in: Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, p. 4580-4591.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.170
Google Scholar
POTTING J., KROEZE C., 2010, Cradle to cradle: Old wine or new spirits?, in: Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 6(2), p. 315-317.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.42
Google Scholar
PROKOPENKO O.V., KYSLY V.M., SHEVCHENKO H.M., 2014, Peculiarities of the natural resources economic estimation under the transformational conditions, in: Economic Annals-XXI, 7–8(1), p. 40-43.
Google Scholar
RASHID A., ASIF F.M.A., KRAJNIK P., NICOLESCU C.M., 2013, Resource Conservative Manufacturing: an essential change in business and technology paradigm for sustainable manufacturing, in: Journal of Cleaner Production, 57, p. 166-177.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.06.012
Google Scholar
SHEVCHENKO T., KRONENBERG J., 2017, Management of material cyclicity potential: example of electrical and electronic products, in: Research in Design Series, 9, p. 377-381.
Google Scholar
SHEVCHENKO T., KRONENBERG J., 2020, Management of material and product circularity potential as an approach to operationalise circular economy, in: Progress in Industrial Ecology An International Journal, 14(1), p. 30-57.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/PIE.2020.105193
Google Scholar
SKENE K. R., 2017, Circles, spirals, pyramids and cubes: why the circular economy cannot work, Sustainability Science, 13(2), p. 479-492.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-017-0443-3
Google Scholar
STAHEL W., 2010, The Performance Economy, Palgrave-MacMillan, London.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230274907
Google Scholar
VELIS C. A, BRUNNER P. H., 2013, Recycling and resource efficiency: it is time for a change from quantity to quality, Waste Management and Research, 31(6), p. 539-540.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X13489782
Google Scholar
WEELDEN E., MUGGE R., BAKKER C., 2016, Paving the way towards circular consumption: exploring consumer acceptance of refurbished mobile phones in the Dutch market, in: Journal of Cleaner Production, 113, p. 743-754.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.11.065
Google Scholar
WEBSTE K., 2015, The Circular Economy: A Wealth of Flows, Ellen MacArthur Foundation, Isle of Wight.
Google Scholar
ZENG X., LI J., SINGH N., 2014, Recycling of Spent Lithium-Ion Battery: A Critical Review, in: Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 44(10), p. 1129-1165.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2013.763578
Google Scholar
Autorzy
Tetiana ShevchenkoSumy National Agrarian University; H. Kondratiiev 160, 40021 Sumy Ukraina
Autorzy
Roman Vavrekvavrek.roman@gmail.com
VŠB—Technical University of Ostrava; Sokolská třída 33, 702 00 Ostrava Czechy
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6047-9434
Autorzy
Yuriy DankoSumy National Agrarian University; H. Kondratiiev 160, 40021 Sumy Ukraina
Autorzy
Olena GubanovaOdessa State Environmental University; Lvivska 15, 65016 Odessa Ukraina
Autorzy
Jana ChovancováUniversity of Prešov; Konštantínova 16, 080 01 Prešov Słowacja
Autorzy
Liubov MykhailovaSumy National Agrarian University; H. Kondratiiev 160, 40021 Sumy Ukraina
Statystyki
Abstract views: 102PDF downloads: 18
Licencja
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Na tych samych warunkach 4.0 Miedzynarodowe.