Wyjaśnienie zjawiska kołowości w gospodarce o obiegu zamkniętym w kontekście pojęcia potencjału

Tetiana Shevchenko


Sumy National Agrarian University; H. Kondratiiev 160, 40021 Sumy (Ukraina)

Roman Vavrek

vavrek.roman@gmail.com
VŠB—Technical University of Ostrava; Sokolská třída 33, 702 00 Ostrava (Czechy)
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6047-9434

Yuriy Danko


Sumy National Agrarian University; H. Kondratiiev 160, 40021 Sumy (Ukraina)

Olena Gubanova


Odessa State Environmental University; Lvivska 15, 65016 Odessa (Ukraina)

Jana Chovancová


University of Prešov; Konštantínova 16, 080 01 Prešov (Słowacja)

Liubov Mykhailova


Sumy National Agrarian University; H. Kondratiiev 160, 40021 Sumy (Ukraina)

Abstrakt

Przechodząc od modelu biznesowego liniowego do cyrkularnego, od kołyski do grobu do od kołyski do kołyski i od odpadów do bogactwa, koncepcja gospodarki o obiegu zamkniętym (CE) stała się ważnym narzędziem promowania zrównoważonego rozwoju, ponieważ łączy w sobie ekonomię, korzyści środowiskowe i społeczne w skali lokalnej i globalnej. W przejściu na CE, zbadanie CE z perspektywy jej potencjału jest kluczowe dla jej szerszego i efektywniejszego wdrożenia w praktyce. Celem artykułu jest wyjaśnienie zjawiska kołowości w gospodarce o obiegu zamkniętym w kontekście pojęcia potencjału w części (1) elementów strukturalnych, (2) podstawowych kategorii i (3) podstawowych właściwości, co stanowi kontynuację poprzednich badań dotyczących zarządzania potencjałem obiegu zamkniętego. Badanie ukazuje ramy teoretyczne potencjału obiegu zamkniętego poprzez opracowanie kategoryzacji potencjału obiegu zamkniętego w celu uzyskania kompleksowego obrazu tego, co zostało zrobione w przeszłości i czego należy dokonać teraz, aby osiągnąć postęp w kierunku obiegu zamkniętego w przyszłości. Podstawowe właściwości potencjału obiegu zamkniętego, takie jak integralność, dynamizm, przynależność terytorialna i zgodność różnych strategii, zostały omówione w celu zarządzania potencjałem obiegu zamkniętego. Wnioski zawarte w artykule prowadzą w kierunku opracowania nowych mierników do pomiaru postępu w kierunku zero-waste i CE, których celem jest identyfikacja i monitorowanie wszystkich możliwych form potencjału obiegu zamkniętego, a więc: możliwości, rezerwy, dostępne zasoby, a nie jedynie dostępne zasoby, które były brane pod uwagę przede wszystkim w poprzednich próbach operacjonalizacji gospodarki o obiegu zamkniętym.


Słowa kluczowe:

gospodarka o obiegu zamkniętym, potencjał obiegu zamkniętego, potencjał ponownego wykorzystania, zero waste, recykling

ALLWOOD J.M., CULLEN J.M., CARRUTH M.A., 2012, Sustainable materials: With both eyes open, UIT Cambridge Ltd, Cambridge.
  Google Scholar

BLOMSMA F., BRENNAN G., 2017, The Emergence of Circular Economy A New Framing Around Prolonging Resource Productivity, in: Journal of Industrial Ecology, 21(3), p. 603-614.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12603   Google Scholar

BOCKEN N. M. P., OLIVETTI E. A., CULLEN J. M., POTTING J., LIFSET R., 2017, Taking the Circularity to the Next Level, in: Journal of Industrial Ecology, 21(3), p. 476-482.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12606   Google Scholar

BOCKEN N. M. P., PAUW I., BAKKER C., GRINTEN B., 2016, Product design and business model strategies for a circular economy, in: Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, 33, p. 308-320.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21681015.2016.1172124   Google Scholar

BOCKEN N. M. P., SHORT S. W., RANA P., EVANS S., 2014, A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes, in: Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, p. 42–56.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.039   Google Scholar

BRAUNGART M., MCDONOUGH W., BOLLINGER A., 2007, Cradle-to-cradle design: creating healthy emissions – a strategy for eco-effective product and system design, in: Journal of Cleaner Production, 15(13-14), p. 1337-1348.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.08.003   Google Scholar

BRIDGENS B., POWELL M., FARMER G., WALSH C., REED E., ROYAPOOR M., GOSLING P., HALL J., 2017, Framework for Implementing the Principles of the Circular Economy in Organizations–Guide, The British Standards Institution, London.
  Google Scholar

CIRCULAR ACADEMY, 2017, Circular Economy: Some Definitions, http://www.circular.academy/circular-economy-some-definitions/ (10.11.2019).
  Google Scholar

COX J., GRITH S., GIORGI, S., KING G., 2013, Consumer understanding of product lifetimes, in: Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 79, p. 21-29.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.05.003   Google Scholar

DEN HOLLANDER M.C., BAKKER C. A., HULTINK E. J., 2017, Product Design in a Circular Economy: Development of a Typology of Key Concepts and Terms, in: Journal of Industrial Ecology, 21(3), p. 517-525.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12610   Google Scholar

Decision No. 1386/2013/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 November 2013 on a General Union Environment Action Programme to 2020 ‘Living well, within the limits of our planet’, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32013D1386&from =EN (10.11.2019).
  Google Scholar

DOMENECH T., BLEISCHWITZ R., DORANOVA A., PANAYOTOPOULOS D., ROMAN R., 2019, Mapping Industrial Symbiosis Development in Europe typologies of networks, characteristics, performance and contribution to the Circular Economy, in: Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 141, p. 76–98.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.09.016   Google Scholar

ELIA V., GNONI M. G., TORNESE F., 2016, Measuring circular economy strategies through index methods: A critical analysis, in: Journal of Cleaner Production, 142(4), p. 2741-2751.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.196   Google Scholar

ELLEN MACARTHUR FOUNDATION AND GRANTA, 2015, Circularity indicators. An approach to measuring circularity. Methodology, Ellen MacArthur Foundation, Medina.
  Google Scholar

ELLEN MACARTHUR FOUNDATION, 2013a, Towards the circular economy. Economic and business rationale for an accelerated transition, Ellen MacArthur Foundation, Medina.
  Google Scholar

ELLEN MACARTHUR FOUNDATION, 2013b, Towards the circular economy. Opportunities for the consumers goods sector, Ellen MacArthur Foundation, Medina.
  Google Scholar

ELLEN MACARTHUR FOUNDATION, 2014, Towards the circular economy. Accelerating the scaleup across supply chains, Ellen MacArthur Foundation, Medina.
  Google Scholar

EUROPEAN COMMISSION, 2015, Closing the loop – An EU action plan for the Circular Economy.
  Google Scholar

Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52015DC0614 (15.10.2019).
  Google Scholar

EUROPEAN COMMISSION, 2018, A European Strategy for Plastics in a Circular Economy, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?qid=1516265440535&uri=COM:2018:28:FIN (10.11.2019).
  Google Scholar

FRANKLIN-JOHNSON E., FIGGE F., CANNING L., 2016, Resource duration as a managerial indicator for Circular Economy performance, in: Journal of Cleaner Production, 133, p. 589-598.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.023   Google Scholar

GEISSDOERFER M., SAVAGET P., BOCKEN N., HULTINK E., 2017, The Circular Economy – A new sustainability paradigm?, in: Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, p. 757-768.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048   Google Scholar

GLADYSHEV N. G., 2013, Scientific basics of recycling in techno-natural waste management clusters, Samara University, Samara.
  Google Scholar

GUBANOVA E. R., 2009, The mechanism of economic and environmental incentives for the use of secondary resources, OSEU, Odessa.
  Google Scholar

JAWAHIR I. S., BRADLEY R., 2016, Technological Elements of Circular Economy and the Principles of 6R-Based Closed-loop Material Flow in Sustainable Manufacturing, in: Procedia CIRP, 40, p. 103-108.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.01.067   Google Scholar

KAUTISH P., PAUL J., SHARMA R., 2019, The moderating influence of environmental consciousness and recycling intentions on green purchase behavior, in: Journal of Cleaner Production, 228, p. 1425-1436.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.389   Google Scholar

KOMAR I., 1975, Rational use of natural resources and resource cycles, Nauka Publishing House, Moscow.
  Google Scholar

KRONENBERG J., WINKLER R., 2009, Wasted waste: An evolutionary perspective on industrial byproducts, in: Ecological Economics, 68(12), p. 3026-3033.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.07.006   Google Scholar

MONT O., PLEPYS A., WHALEN K., NUBHOLZ J. L. K., 2017, Business model innovation for a Circular Economy: Drivers and barriers for the Swedish industry – the voice of REES companies, Mistra REES, Linkoping.
  Google Scholar

MONT O., HEISKANEN E-K., 2015, Breaking the stalemate of sustainable consumption with industrial ecology and a circular economy, in: Handbook of Research on Sustainable Consumption, Reisch L. and Thøgersen J., Edward Edgar, Cheltenham, p. 33-49.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781783471270.00009   Google Scholar

MURRAY A., SKENE K. HAYNES K., 2015, The Circular Economy: An Interdisciplinary Exploration of the Concept and Application in a Global Context, in: Journal of Business Ethics, 140(3), p. 369-380.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2693-2   Google Scholar

NETO J. Q. F., BLOEMHOF J., CORBETT C., 2016, Market prices of remanufactured, used and new items: Evidence from eBay, in: International Journal of Production Economics, 171, p. 371-380.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.02.006   Google Scholar

PARK H. J., LIN L. M., 2018, Exploring attitude–behavior gap in sustainable consumption: comparison of recycled and upcycled fashion products, in: Journal of Business Research, (in press).
  Google Scholar

PARK J. Y., CHERTOW M. R., 2014, Establishing and testing the ‘reuse potential’ indicator for managing wastes as resources, in: Journal of Environmental Management, 137, p. 45-53.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.11.053   Google Scholar

PAULIUK S., 2018, Critical appraisal of the circular economy standard BS 8001:2017 and a dashboard of quantitative system indicators for its implementation in organizations, in: Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 129, p. 81-92.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.10.019   Google Scholar

PETRUSHENKO M., SHEVCHENKO H., 2013, Management of ecological-economical conflicts within the framework of the theory of optimal mechanisms for resource distribution, in: Actual Problems of Economics, 141(3), p. 186-192.
  Google Scholar

PIERONI M., MCALOONE T., PIGOSSO D., 2019, Business model innovation for circular economy and sustainability: A review of approaches, in: Journal of
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.036   Google Scholar

Cleaner Production, 215, p. 98-216.
  Google Scholar

PISCICELLI L., LUDDEN G. D. S., COOPER T., 2018, What makes a sustainable business model successful? An empirical comparison of two peer-topeer goods-sharing platforms, in: Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, p. 4580-4591.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.170   Google Scholar

POTTING J., KROEZE C., 2010, Cradle to cradle: Old wine or new spirits?, in: Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 6(2), p. 315-317.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.42   Google Scholar

PROKOPENKO O.V., KYSLY V.M., SHEVCHENKO H.M., 2014, Peculiarities of the natural resources economic estimation under the transformational conditions, in: Economic Annals-XXI, 7–8(1), p. 40-43.
  Google Scholar

RASHID A., ASIF F.M.A., KRAJNIK P., NICOLESCU C.M., 2013, Resource Conservative Manufacturing: an essential change in business and technology paradigm for sustainable manufacturing, in: Journal of Cleaner Production, 57, p. 166-177.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.06.012   Google Scholar

SHEVCHENKO T., KRONENBERG J., 2017, Management of material cyclicity potential: example of electrical and electronic products, in: Research in Design Series, 9, p. 377-381.
  Google Scholar

SHEVCHENKO T., KRONENBERG J., 2020, Management of material and product circularity potential as an approach to operationalise circular economy, in: Progress in Industrial Ecology An International Journal, 14(1), p. 30-57.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/PIE.2020.105193   Google Scholar

SKENE K. R., 2017, Circles, spirals, pyramids and cubes: why the circular economy cannot work, Sustainability Science, 13(2), p. 479-492.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-017-0443-3   Google Scholar

STAHEL W., 2010, The Performance Economy, Palgrave-MacMillan, London.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230274907   Google Scholar

VELIS C. A, BRUNNER P. H., 2013, Recycling and resource efficiency: it is time for a change from quantity to quality, Waste Management and Research, 31(6), p. 539-540.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X13489782   Google Scholar

WEELDEN E., MUGGE R., BAKKER C., 2016, Paving the way towards circular consumption: exploring consumer acceptance of refurbished mobile phones in the Dutch market, in: Journal of Cleaner Production, 113, p. 743-754.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.11.065   Google Scholar

WEBSTE K., 2015, The Circular Economy: A Wealth of Flows, Ellen MacArthur Foundation, Isle of Wight.
  Google Scholar

ZENG X., LI J., SINGH N., 2014, Recycling of Spent Lithium-Ion Battery: A Critical Review, in: Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 44(10), p. 1129-1165.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2013.763578   Google Scholar


Opublikowane
2021-01-04

Cited By / Share

Shevchenko, T., Vavrek, R., Danko, Y., Gubanova, O., Chovancová, J., & Mykhailova, L. (2021). Wyjaśnienie zjawiska kołowości w gospodarce o obiegu zamkniętym w kontekście pojęcia potencjału. Problemy Ekorozwoju Problems of Sustainable Development, 16(1), 79–89. https://doi.org/10.35784/pe.2021.1.09

Autorzy

Tetiana Shevchenko 

Sumy National Agrarian University; H. Kondratiiev 160, 40021 Sumy Ukraina

Autorzy

Roman Vavrek 
vavrek.roman@gmail.com
VŠB—Technical University of Ostrava; Sokolská třída 33, 702 00 Ostrava Czechy
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6047-9434

Autorzy

Yuriy Danko 

Sumy National Agrarian University; H. Kondratiiev 160, 40021 Sumy Ukraina

Autorzy

Olena Gubanova 

Odessa State Environmental University; Lvivska 15, 65016 Odessa Ukraina

Autorzy

Jana Chovancová 

University of Prešov; Konštantínova 16, 080 01 Prešov Słowacja

Autorzy

Liubov Mykhailova 

Sumy National Agrarian University; H. Kondratiiev 160, 40021 Sumy Ukraina

Statystyki

Abstract views: 102
PDF downloads: 18