Ekonomiczne i środowiskowe ograniczenia zrównoważonej transformacji energetycznej w Europie

Olha Prokopenko

prokopenko.olha.w@gmail.com
Estonian Entrepreneurship University of Applied Sciences (Estonia)
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1362-478X

Viktor Koval


Izmail State University of Humanities (Ukraina)
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2562-4373

Julia Yereshko


Technical University of Munich (Niemcy)
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9161-8820

Olexiy Kuzkin


National University Zaporizhzhia Polytechnic (Ukraina)
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3160-1285

Tetiana Skibina


Christiana-Albrecht University of Kiel (Niemcy)
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8298-1460

Vitalii Travin


Zhytomyr Polytechnic State University (Ukraina)
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7386-7372

Abstrakt

W ostatnich dziesięcioleciach koncepcja zrównoważonego rozwoju stała się coraz bardziej powszechna, szczególnie od czasu przyjęcia Konwencji ONZ w sprawie zmian klimatycznych. Jednak jest on również nadużywany, upolityczniany, a nawet ignorowany.

W niniejszym badaniu przeanalizowano obecne warunki i długoterminowe konsekwencje europejskiej transformacji energetycznej oraz omówiono ograniczenia oraz prawdziwe implikacje gospodarcze i środowiskowe wdrożenia zrównoważonego rozwoju energetycznego. Celem artykułu jest zrozumienie obecnych warunków środowiskowych i wyzwań związanych z ekonomicznymi, finansowymi i środowiskowymi konsekwencjami wprowadzenia odnawialnych źródeł energii w Europie.

Badania wykazały, że odnawialne źródła energii, choć czystsze, niekoniecznie są zrównoważone. Istnieją różne implikacje i ograniczenia, tj.: początkowy ślad węglowy, ślad gruntowy, problemy z recyklingiem, szkodliwy wpływ na dziką przyrodę i ludzi, a ponadto problem efektywności i skutków ekonomicznych w przypadku przejścia na zero netto. Należy rozważyć i wprowadzić podstawowe zasady transformacji energetycznej, aby była ona rzeczywiście zrównoważona. Stwierdzono, że wprowadzając lub udoskonalając model energetyczny, należy wziąć pod uwagę wyjściową bazę energetyczno-zasobową danego kraju. Nie powinno się przy tym lekceważyć energetyki jądrowej, którą należy postrzegać jako źródło czystej, a zarazem bezpiecznej energii, szczególnie w kontekście narodowego bezpieczeństwa energetycznego, które jest w dużym stopniu uzależnione od transformacji energetycznej.


Słowa kluczowe:

transformacja energetyczna, energia odnawialna, energia jądrowa, zrównoważony rozwój, wpływ na środowisko, aspekty ekonomiczne

ABBASI T., PREMALATHA M., ABBASI S.A., 2011, The Return to Renewables: Will It Help in Global Warming Control?, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 15: 891–894, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.09.048.
  Google Scholar

AKBAR A., LIEW K. M., 2020, Assessing recycling potential of carbon fiber reinforced plastic waste in production of eco-efficient cement-based materials, Journal of Cleaner Production, 274: 123001, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123001.
  Google Scholar

AMELANG S., APPUNN K., KYLLMANN C., WEHRMANN B., WETTENGEL J., 2022, War in Ukraine: Tracking the impacts on German Energy and Climate Policy, Clean Energy Wire, https://www.cleanenergywire.org/news/ukraine-war-tracking-impacts-german-energy-and-climate-policy (2.11.2022).
  Google Scholar

BASHYNSKA I., MUKHAMEJANULY S., MALYNOVSKA Y., BORTNIKOVA M., SAIENSUS M., MAL-YNOVSKYY Y., 2023, Assessing the Outcomes of Digital Transformation Smartization Projects in Indus-trial Enterprises: A Model for Enabling Sustainability, Sustainability, 15: 14075, https://doi.org/10.3390/su151914075.
  Google Scholar

BEUTELBACHER S., 2023, Europas Traum von der Klimaneutralität droht zu platzen, Die Welt, Berlin, https://www.msn.com/de-de/finanzen/top-stories/europas-traum-von-der-klimaneutralit%C3%A4t-droht-zu-platzen/ar-AA1d1ni4?ocid=msedgntp (30.06.2023)
  Google Scholar

BOEHM S., LEBLING K., LEVIN K., FEKETE H., WAITE R., GEIGES A., NILSSON A., WILSON R., THWAITES J., JAEGER J., PLECHATY D., 2021, We're not on track for 1.5 degrees C. what will it take?, World Resources Institute, https://www.wri.org/insights/climate-action-progress-indicators-2030-2050-targets (27.12.2022).
  Google Scholar

BOEHMER-CHRISTIANSEN S., 2002, The geopolitics of sustainable development: bureaucracies and politicians in search of the holy grail, Geoforum, 33(3): 351-365,
  Google Scholar

https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0016718502000180.
  Google Scholar

BRANDT A., KRÄMER H., 2022, Droht der deutschen Wirtschaft eine Deindustrialisierung?, Wirtschafts-dienst, 102(12): 917, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10273-022-3336-8.
  Google Scholar

BRUNDTLAND G. H., 1987, Our common future, Oxford University Press, New York.
  Google Scholar

CHUPRYNA I., TORMOSOV R., ABZHANOVA D., RYZHAKOV D., GONCHAR V., PLYS N., 2022, Sci-entific and Methodological Approaches to Risk Management of Clean Energy Projects Implemented in Ukraine on the Terms of Public-Private Partnership, Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Smart Information Systems and Technologies (SIST); IEEE: 1-8,
  Google Scholar

https://doi.org/10.1109/SIST54437.2022.9945809.
  Google Scholar

DE CHALENDAR J. A., BENSON S. M., 2019, Why 100% renewable energy is not enough, Joule, 3(6): 1389-1393, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2019.05.002.
  Google Scholar

DENHOLM P., MARGOLIS R. M., 2008, Land-use requirements and the per-capita solar footprint for photovoltaic generation in the United States, Energy Policy, 36(9): 3531-3543, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.05.035.
  Google Scholar

DESAI J., NELSON M., 2017, Are we headed for a solar waste crisis. Environmental Progress, http://environmentalprogress.org/big-news/2017/6/21/are-we-headed-for-a-solar-waste-crisis (2.12.2022).
  Google Scholar

DINCER I., 2000, Renewable Energy and Sustainable Development: A Crucial Review, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 4: 157–175, https://doi.org/10.1016/s1364-0321(99)00011-8.
  Google Scholar

DUDEK M., BASHYNSKA I., FILYPPOVA S., YERMAK S., CICHOŃ D., 2023, Methodology for assess-ment of inclusive social responsibility of the energy industry enterprises, Journal of Cleaner Production, 394: 136317, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136317.
  Google Scholar

EARTH OVERSHOOT DAY, 2021, July 12, Past earth overshoot days – move the date of earth overshoot day, https://www.overshootday.org/newsroom/past-earth-overshoot-days/ (17.02.2022).
  Google Scholar

EIB, 2022, 2022-2023 EIB climate survey, part 1 of 2: Majority of Europeans say the war in Ukraine and high energy prices should accelerate the green transition, https://www.eib.org/en/surveys/climate-survey/5th-climate-survey/eu-usa-china (2.11.2022).
  Google Scholar

ELLABBAN O., ABU-RUB H., BLAABJERG F., 2014, Renewable energy resources: Current status, future prospects and their enabling technology, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 39: 748-764, https://doi.org10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.113.
  Google Scholar

EUROPEAN COMISSION, 2022, REPowerEU, https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/priorities-2019-2024/european-green-deal/repowereu-affordable-secure-and-sustainable-energy-europe_en (30.12.2023).
  Google Scholar

EUROPEAN ENVIRONMENTAL AGENCY, 2023, Share of energy consumption from renewable sources in Europe, https://www.eea.europa.eu/en/analysis/indicators/share-of-energy-consumption-from-renewable-resources.
  Google Scholar

EUROSTAT, 2020, Renewable energy statistics. Statistics Explained, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Renewable_energy_statistics (17.02.2022).
  Google Scholar

EUROSTAT, 2022, Shares (Renewables) – Energy – Eurostat, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/energy/data/shares (27.02.2023)
  Google Scholar

FOUNTAIN H., ROJANASAKUL M., 2023, The last 8 years were the hottest on record, The New York Times, https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2023/climate/earth-hottest-years.html?utm_campaign=likeshopme&utm_medium=instagram&utm_source=dash+hudson&utm_content=ig-nytimes (27.09.2023).
  Google Scholar

GEORGESCU-ROEGEN N., 2013, The entropy law and the economic process, Harvard University Press.
  Google Scholar

GERLITZ L., MILDENSTREY E., PRAUSE G., 2022, Ammonia as Clean Shipping Fuel for the Baltic Sea Region, Transport and Telecommunication Journal, 23 (1): 102−112, https://doi.org/10.2478/ttj-2022-0010.
  Google Scholar

GOHLKE J. M., HRYNKOW S. H., PORTIER CH. J., 2008, Health, Economy, and Environment: Sustain-able Energy Choices for a Nation, Environmental Health Perspectives, 116(6): A236-A237, https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.11602.
  Google Scholar

IPPC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), 2015, Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change, Working group III contribution to the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report, Cambridge University Press.
  Google Scholar

IEA (International Energy Agency), 2020, Germany 2020 – Energy Policy Review, https://www.iea.org/reports/germany-2020 (17.02.2022).
  Google Scholar

IRENA, 2022, Statistical Profiles, https://www.irena.org/Data/Energy-Profiles (27.12.2022).
  Google Scholar

IRENA, 2020, International renewable energy agency. Renewable Energy Target Setting, Abu Dhabi, UAE. https://www.irena.org/ (2.09.2021).
  Google Scholar

ISKAKOVA D., KIRDASINOVA K.A., SEMBIYEVA L., MAKYSH S., KAZBEKOV G. SABIROVA R., UMARBEKOVA A., 2017, Innovative approaches to electric power industry management, International Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11(2): 418–428, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloei.2021.01.006.
  Google Scholar

JANKAUSKAS V., RUDZKIS P., KANOPKA A., 2014, Risk factors for stakeholders in renewable energy investments. Energetika, 60(2): 113–124, https://doi.org/10.6001/energetika.v60i2.2935.
  Google Scholar

KOVAL V., SRIBNA Y., KACZMARZEWSKI S., SHAPOVALOVA A., STUPNYTSKYI V., 2021, Regulato-ry policy of renewable energy sources in the European national economies, Polityka Energetyczna – Ener-gy Policy Journal, 24(3): 61-78, https://doi.org/10.33223/epj/141990.
  Google Scholar

KORNYLIUK A., IVASHCHENKO A., POLISHCHUK Y., TERESHCHENKO O., ONIKIIENKO S., 2022, Government early policy responses on COVID-19 challenges in Central and Eastern Europe: SME support, Acta Innovations, 2022(42): 50–58, https://10.32933/ActaInnovations.42.4.
  Google Scholar

KURBATOVA T., SIDORTSOV R., 2022, Trash to Hryvnias: The economics of electricity generation from landfill gas in Ukraine, International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management, 33: 53-64, https://doi.org/10.5278/ijsepm.6707.
  Google Scholar

KURBATOVA T., 2018, Economic benefits for producers of biogas from cattle manure within energy co-operatives in Ukraine, International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management, 18: 69–80, https://doi.org/10.5278/ijsepm.2018.18.5.
  Google Scholar

KURBATOVA T., SOTNYK I., PROKOPENKO O., BASHYNSKA I., PYSMENNA U., 2023, Improving the Feed-in Tariff Policy for Renewable Energy Promotion in Ukraine’s Households, Energies, 16: 6773,https://doi.org/10.3390/en16196773.
  Google Scholar

KWILINSKI A., LYULYOV O., PIMONENKO T., 2023a, Environmental Sustainability within Attaining Sustainable Development Goals: The Role of Digitalization and the Transport Sector, Sustainability, 15(14): 11282, https://doi.org/10.3390/su151411282.
  Google Scholar

KWILINSKI A., LYULYOV O., PIMONENKO T., 2023b, Greenfield Investment as a Catalyst of Green Economic Growth, Energies, 16: 2372, https://doi.org/10.3390/en16052372.
  Google Scholar

KWILINSKI A., LYULYOV O., PIMONENKO T., 2023c, The Effects of Urbanisation on Green Growth within Sustainable Development Goals, Land, 12: 511, https://doi.org/10.3390/land12020511.
  Google Scholar

LUKPANOVA Z., JUMABEKOVA A., MUKUSHEV A., MATAIBAYEVA G., KADRINOV M., BAIMAGAMBETOVA Z., 2022, Environmental Concerns Associated with the Development of the Agro-Industrial Complex and Analysis of Its Financing, Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, 13(5): 1396–1406, https://doi.org/10.14505/jemt.v13.5(61).15.
  Google Scholar

MASYK M., BURYK Z., RADCHENKO O., SAIENKO V., DZIURAKH Y., 2023, Criteria for governance’ institutional effectiveness and quality in the context of sustainable development tasks, International Jour-nal for Quality Research, 17(2): 501-514, https://10.24874/IJQR17.02-13.
  Google Scholar

MATTAUCH L., RADEBACH A., SIEGMEIER J., SULIKOVA S., 2018, Shrink emissions, not the econo-my, Our World in Data, https://ourworldindata.org/shrink-emissions-not-the-economy (27.12.2022).
  Google Scholar

MCDONALD R. I., FARGIONE J., KIESECKER J., MILLER W. M., POWELL J., 2009, Energy sprawl or energy efficiency: climate policy impacts on natural habitat for the United States of America, PloS one, 4(8): e6802, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0006802.
  Google Scholar

MIKHNO I., REDKVA O., UDOVYCHENKO V., TSIMOSHYNSKA O., KOVAL V., KOPACZ M., 2022, Sustainable energy supply management in the mechanical-engineering industry, Polityka Energetyczna – Energy Policy Journal, 25(4): 39-54, https://doi.org/10.33223/epj/156627.
  Google Scholar

MOORE A., 2019, Renewable energy poses challenge for wildlife conservation, College of Natural Re-sources News, https://cnr.ncsu.edu/news/2019/11/renewable-energy-poses-challenge-for-wildlife-conservation/ (17.02.2022).
  Google Scholar

MORIARTY P., HONNERY D., 2020, Feasibility of a 100% Global Renewable Energy System, Energies, 13: 5543, https://doi.org/10.3390/en13215543.
  Google Scholar

NITSENKO V., MARDANI A., STREIMIKIS J., SHKRABAK I., KLOPOV I., NOVOMLYNETS O., PO-DOLSKA O., 2018, Criteria for Evaluation of Efficiency of Energy Transformation Based on Renewable Energy Sources, Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 14(4): 237-247, https://doi.org/10.14254/1800-5845/2018.14-4.17.
  Google Scholar

O'RIORDAN T., 1988, The politics of sustainability, Sustainable environmental management, Belhaven Press, London: 48-54.
  Google Scholar

OAKLEAF J. R., KENNEDY C. M., BARUCH-MORDO S., GERBER J. S., WEST P. C., JOHNSON J. A., KIESECKER J., 2019, Mapping global development potential for renewable energy, fossil fuels, mining and agriculture sectors, Sci Data, 6: 101, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-019-0084-8.
  Google Scholar

OLANIYI E. O., PRAUSE G., GERASIMOVA V., INKINEN T., 2022, Clean Cruise Shipping: Experience from the BSR, Sustainability, 14 (9): 5002, https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095002.
  Google Scholar

OSTAPENKO O., OLCZAK P., KOVAL V., НREN L., MATUSZEWSKA D., POSTUPNA О., 2022, Applica-tion of Geoinformation Systems for Assessment of Effective Integration of Renewable Energy Technolo-gies in the Energy Sector of Ukraine, Applied Sciences, 12(2): 592, https://doi.org/10.3390/app12020592.
  Google Scholar

PEHL M., ARVESEN A., HUMPENÖDER F., POPP A., HERTWICH E. G., LUDERER G., 2017, Under-standing future emissions from low-carbon power systems by integration of life-cycle assessment and inte-grated energy modelling, Nature Energy, 2(12): 939-945, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-017-0032-9.
  Google Scholar

PELLEY S., 2023, Inside the nuclear fusion breakthrough that could be a step to unlimited clean energy in the distant future, CBS News, https://www.cbsnews.com/news/nuclear-fusion-60-minutes-2023-01-1 (25.01.2023).
  Google Scholar

PERSON, 2022, German economy to lose $265 billion in added value due to war, high energy prices, study says, https://www.reuters.com/markets/europe/german-economy-lose-265-bln-added-value-due-war-high-energy-prices-study-2022-08-09/ (4.10.2023).
  Google Scholar

PRAUSE G., OLANIYI E. O., GERSTLBERGER W., 2023, Ammonia Production as Alternative Energy for the Baltic Sea Region, Energies, 16 (4): 1831, https://10.3390/ en16041831.
  Google Scholar

PROKOPENKO O., CEBULA J., CHAYEN S., PIMONENKO T., 2017, Wind energy in Israel, Poland and Ukraine: Features and opportunities, International Journal of Ecology and Development, 32(1): 98-107, http://www.ceser.in/ceserp/index.php/ijed/article/view/4772 (20.02.2021).
  Google Scholar

PROKOPENKO O., CHECHEL A., SOTNYK I., OMELYANENKO V., KURBATOVA T., NYCH T., 2021, Improving state support schemes for the sustainable development of renewable energy in Ukraine, Poli-tyka Energetyczna, 24(1): 85-100, https://doi.org/10.33223/epj/134144.
  Google Scholar

REDKO K., BORYCHENKO O., CHERNIAVSKYI A., SAIENKO V., DUDNIKOV S., 2023, Comparative analysis of innovative development strategies of fuel and energy complex of Ukraine and the EU coun-tries: international experience, International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 13(2): 301-308, https://10.32479/ijeep.14035.
  Google Scholar

REITER G., LINDORFER J., 2015, Global Warming Potential of Hydrogen and Methane Production from Renewable Electricity via Power-to-Gas Technology, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess, 20: 477–489, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-015-0848-0.
  Google Scholar

RITCHIE H., 2020, What are the safest and cleanest sources of energy?, Our World in Data, https://ourworldindata.org/safest-sources-of-energy (27.12.2022).
  Google Scholar

RITCHIE H., ROSER M., ROSADO P., 2020, CO2 emissions, Our World in Data, https://ourworldindata.org/co2-emissions (2.06.2022).
  Google Scholar

RUI LI, JIANG H., SOTNYK I., KUBATKO O., ISMAIL ALMASHAQBEH, Y.A., 2020, The CO2 emissions drivers of post-communist economies in Eastern Europe and Central Asia, Atmosphere, 11(9): 1019, https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11091019.
  Google Scholar

SAIK P., DYCHKOVSKYI R., LOZYNSKYI V., FALSHTYNSKYI V., CABANA E. C., HRYTSENKO L., 2021, Chemistry of the Gasification of Carbonaceous Raw Material, Materials Science Forum, 1045: 67–78, https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.1045.67.
  Google Scholar

SALA D., BASHYNSKA I., PAVLOVA O., PAVLOV K., CHORNA N., ROMANYUK R., 2023, Investment and Innovation Activity of Renewable Energy Sources in the Electric Power Industry in the South-Eastern Region of Ukraine, Energies, 16: 2363, https://doi.org/10.3390/en16052363.
  Google Scholar

SAMANDARI H., PINNER D., BOWCOTT H., WHITE O., 2022, The net-zero transition in the wake of the war in Ukraine: A detour, a derailment, or a different path?, McKinsey Company, https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/sustainability/our-insights/the-net-zero-transition-in-the-wake-of-the-war-in-ukraine-a-detour-a-derailment-or-a-different-path (29.08.2022).
  Google Scholar

SEMBIYEVA L., SERIKOVA M., SATYMBEKOVA K., TULEGENOVA Z., NURMAGANBETOVA B., ZHAGYPAROVA A., 2021, Tax audit in innovative development of the energy sector of the economy: Global trends, Journal of Water and Land Development, 48(1-3): 70–80.
  Google Scholar

SHKOLA V., PROKOPENKO O., STOYKA A., NERSESOV V., SAPIŃSKI A., 2021, Green Project Assess-ment within the Advanced Innovative Development Concept, Estudios de Economia Aplicada, 39(5), https://doi.org/10.25115/eea.v39i5.5135.
  Google Scholar

SHPAK N., OHINOK S., KULYNIAK I., SROKA W., ANDRONICEANU A., 2022a, Macroeconomic Indi-cators and CO2 Emissions in the EU Region, Amfiteatru Economic, 24(61): 817-830, https://www.amfiteatrueconomic.ro/Home_Ro.aspx.
  Google Scholar

SHPAK N., OHINOK S., KULYNIAK I., SROKA W., FEDUN Y., GINEVIČIUS R., CYGLER J., 2022b, CO2 Emissions and Macroeconomic Indicators: Analysis of the Most Polluted Regions in the World, Ener-gies, 15(8): 2928, https://doi.org/10.3390/en15082928.
  Google Scholar

SINGH H. V., BOCCA R., GOMEZ P., DAHLKE S., BAZILIAN M., 2019, The energy transitions index: An analytic framework for understanding the evolving global energy system, Energy Strategy Reviews, 26: 100382, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2019.100382.
  Google Scholar

SRIBNA Y., SKAKOVSKA S., PANIUK T., HRYTSIUK I., 2023, The Economics of Technology Transfer in The Environmental Safety of Enterprises for the Energy Transition, Economics Ecology Socium, 7: 84-96, https://doi.org/10.31520/2616-7107/2023.7.1-8.
  Google Scholar

THE ECONOMIST, 2022, The world is going to miss the totemic 1.5°C climate target, https://www.economist.com/interactive/briefing/2022/11/05/the-world-is-going-to-miss-the-totemic-1-5c-climate-target (23.08.2023)
  Google Scholar

TRUTH IN ADVERTISING, 2021, November 22, Earth day 2021: Companies accused of Greenwashing, https://www.truthinadvertising.org/six-companies-accused-greenwashing/ (17.02.2022).
  Google Scholar

TRYPOLSKA G., KURBATOVA T., PROKOPENKO O., HOWANIEC H., KLAPKIV Y., 2022, Wind and Solar Power Plant End‐of‐Life Equipment: Prospects for Management in Ukraine, Energies, 15(5): 1662, https://doi.org/10.3390/en15051662.
  Google Scholar

TURNER R. K., 1988, Sustainability, resource conservation and pollution control: an overview, Belhaven Press, London.
  Google Scholar

YMOSHENKO M., SAIENKO V., SERBOV M., SHASHYNA M., SLAVKOVA, O., 2023, The impact of industry 4.0 on modelling energy scenarios of the developing economies, Financial and credit activity-problems of theory and practice, 1(48): 336-350, https://doi.org/10.55643/fcaptp.1.48.2023.3941.
  Google Scholar

UKRINFORM, 2022, Ukrenergo awaits decision to raise electricity exports to Europe, https://www.ukrinform.net/rubric-economy/3556868-ukrenergo-awaits-decision-to-raise-electricity-exports-to-europe.html (4.10.2023).
  Google Scholar

UNEP, 2022, Emissions gap report 2022, https://www.unep.org/resources/emissions-gap-report-2022 (27.12.2022).
  Google Scholar

UNFCCC, 2015, The Paris Agreement, https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-agreement/the-paris-agreement (27.12.2022).
  Google Scholar

UNITED NATIONS, 1994, What is the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change? https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/what-is-the-united-nations-framework-convention-on-climate-change (27.12.2022).
  Google Scholar

VAN DER PLOEG F., WITHAGEN C., 2015, Global Warming and the Green Paradox: A Review of Ad-verse Effects of Climate Policies, Rev. Environ. Econ. Pol., 9: 285–303, https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/rev008.
  Google Scholar

WANG J. B., HUANG L., 2021, A Game-Theoretic Analytical Approach for Fostering Energy-Saving Inno-vation in the Electric Vehicle Supply Chain, SAGE Open, 11(2): 21582440211021581.
  Google Scholar

WWF (World Wide Fund), 2016, Living Planet Report 2016, https://admin.zsl.org/sites/default/files/media/2016-10/LPR_2016_Full%20Report.pdf (27.12.2022).
  Google Scholar

YERESHKO J., KOVAL V., NESENENKO P., KOVBASENKO S., GUI H., TAMOŠIŪNIENĖ R., 2022, Theory meets reality: Investigating the financial, economic and environmental aspects of sustainability, 12th International Scientific Conference Business and Management 2022, https://doi.org/10.3846/bm.2022.908.
  Google Scholar

ZGUROVSKY M., 2006, Ukraine in global dimensions of sustainable development, Dzerkalo tyzhnya, 19(598): 14.
  Google Scholar


Opublikowane
2024-07-01

Cited By / Share

Prokopenko, O., Koval, V., Yereshko, J., Kuzkin, O., Skibina, T., & Travin, V. (2024). Ekonomiczne i środowiskowe ograniczenia zrównoważonej transformacji energetycznej w Europie. Problemy Ekorozwoju Problems of Sustainable Development, 19(2), 66–80. https://doi.org/10.35784/preko.5574

Autorzy

Olha Prokopenko 
prokopenko.olha.w@gmail.com
Estonian Entrepreneurship University of Applied Sciences Estonia
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1362-478X

Autorzy

Viktor Koval 

Izmail State University of Humanities Ukraina
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2562-4373

Autorzy

Julia Yereshko 

Technical University of Munich Niemcy
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9161-8820

Autorzy

Olexiy Kuzkin 

National University Zaporizhzhia Polytechnic Ukraina
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3160-1285

Autorzy

Tetiana Skibina 

Christiana-Albrecht University of Kiel Niemcy
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8298-1460

Autorzy

Vitalii Travin 

Zhytomyr Polytechnic State University Ukraina
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7386-7372

Statystyki

Abstract views: 4
PDF downloads: 7


Licencja

Creative Commons License

Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0 Międzynarodowe.