Zrównoważoność środowiskowa w krajach rozwijających się: czy demokracja ma znaczenie?
Neslihan Ursavaş
karakoc.neslihan@gmail.comUniversity of Liverpool, Geographic Data Science Lab, Liverpool (Wielka Brytania)
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4640-8135
Şükrü Apaydın
Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli University, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences Nevşehir, Turkey (Turcja)
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4640-8135
Abstrakt
Jednymi z celów zrównoważonego rozwoju jest ograniczenie degradacji środowiska i promowanie zrównoważonego środowiska. Jednym z istotnych czynników promujących zrównoważone środowisko jest poziom demokracji w kraju. W niniejszym badaniu zbadano wpływ demokracji na ślad ekologiczny (EF) na mieszkańca w 68 krajach rozwijających się w latach 1990–2018. W tym celu korzystamy z estymatorów wykonalnych uogólnionych najmniejszych kwadratów (FGLS) i skorygowanych błędów standardowych metodą panelową (PCSE). Wyniki empiryczne pokazują, że istnieje pozytywny związek pomiędzy demokracją a EF. Innymi słowy, wzrost demokracji zwiększa degradację środowiska w krajach rozwijających się. Poza tym ustalenia pokazują również, że podczas gdy wzrost PKB na mieszkańca zwiększa EF, wzrost zużycia energii odnawialnej zmniejsza EF. Nasze ustalenia pokazują, że demokracja ma znaczenie dla zrównoważenia środowiskowego w krajach rozwijających się. Dlatego też rządy i decydenci powinni wziąć pod uwagę demokrację przy formułowaniu polityk środowiskowych.
Słowa kluczowe:
zrównoważony rozwój, ślad ekonomiczny, wzrost ekonomiczny, konsumpcja OZEBibliografia
ADAMS S., ACHEAMPONG A.O., 2019, Reducing Carbon Emissions: The Role of Renewable Energy and Democra-cy, Journal of Cleaner Production, 240: 118-245.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118245
Google Scholar
ADAMS S., ADOM P.K., KLOBODU E.K.M., 2016, Urbanization, Regime Type and Durability, and Environmental Degradation in Ghana, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 23(23): 23825-23839.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-7513-4
Google Scholar
ADAMS S., KLOBODU E.K.M., 2017, Urbanization, Democracy, Bureaucratic Quality, and Environmental Degradation, Journal of Policy Modeling, 39: 1035-1051.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2017.04.006
Google Scholar
ADAMS S., NSİAH C. 2019, Reducing Carbon Dioxide Emissions: Does Renewable Energy Matter?, Science of The Total Environment, 693: 133288.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.094
Google Scholar
AHMED Z., ADEBAYO T. S., UDEMBA E. N., MURSHED M., KİRİKKALELİ D., 2022, Effects of Economic Com-plexity, Economic Growth, and Renewable Energy Technology Budgets on Ecological Footprint: The Role of Democratic Accountability, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(17): 24925-24940.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17673-2
Google Scholar
AHMED Z., AHMAD M., RJOUB H., KALUGİNA O. A., HUSSAİN N., 2022, Economic Growth, Renewable Energy Consumption, and Ecological Footprint: Exploring The Role of Environmental Regulations and Democracy in Sustainable Development, Sustainable Development, 30(4): 595-605.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2251
Google Scholar
AHMED Z., ASGHAR M. M., MALİK M. N., NAWAZ K., 2020, Moving Towards A Sustainable Environment: The Dynamic Linkage Between Natural Resources, Human Capital, Urbanization, Economic Growth, and Ecological Footprint in China, Resources Policy, 67: 101677.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101677
Google Scholar
AHMED Z., CAGLAR A. E., MURSHED M., 2022, A Path Towards Environmental Sustainability: The Role of Clean Energy and Democracy in Ecological Footprint of Pakistan, Journal of Cleaner Production, 358, 132007.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132007
Google Scholar
AKALIN G., ERDOGAN S., 2021, Does Democracy Help Reduce Environmental Degradation?, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(6): 7226-7235.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11096-1
Google Scholar
ARVIN B.M., LEW B., 2011, Does Democracy Affect Environmental Quality in Developing Countries?, Applied Eco-nomics, 43(9): 1151-1160.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840802600277
Google Scholar
BERGE E. 1994, Democracy and Human Rights: Conditions For Sustainable Resource Utilization. The Third Biennial Conference of the International Association for the Study of Common Property, 17-20 September, Washington, DC. https://hdl.handle.net/10535/813.
Google Scholar
BERNAUER T., KOUBI V., 2004, On The Political Determinants of Environmental Quality, Paper Prepared for Presen-tation at The Annual Convention of The American Political Science Association in Chicago September 2-5.
Google Scholar
BERNAUER T., KOUBI V., 2009, Political Determinants of Environmental Quality, Ecological Economics, 68(5): 1355-1365.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.09.003
Google Scholar
BINDER S., NEUMAYER E., 2005, Environmental Pressure Group Strength and Air Pollution: An Empirical Analysis, Ecological Economics, 55(4): 527-538.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.12.009
Google Scholar
BRENNA K.A., 2015, Democracy and Climate Change The Relationship Between Democracy and CO2-Emissions, Master's Thesis University Of Oslo, Norway.
Google Scholar
BUITENZORGY M., MOL A.P.J., 2011, Does Democracy Lead To A Better Environment? Deforestation and The Dem-ocratic Transition Peak, Environmental and Resource Economics, 48:c59–70.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-010-9397-y
Google Scholar
CETIN M., ECEVIT E., YUCEL A.G., 2018, The Impact of Economic Growth, Energy Consumption, Trade Openness, and Financial Development on Carbon Emissions: Empirical Evidence From Turkey, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25(36): 36589-36603.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3526-5
Google Scholar
CHARFEDDINE L., MRABET Z., 2017, The Impact of Economic Development and Social-Political Factors on Ecologi-cal Footprint: A Panel Data Analysis For 15 MENA Countries, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 76: 138–154.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.031
Google Scholar
CHOU L. C., ZHANG W. H., WANG M. Y., YANG F. M., 2020, The Influence of Democracy on Emissions and Ener-gy Efficiency in America: New Evidence From Quantile Regression Analysis, Energy & Environment, 31(8): 1318-1334.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305X19882382
Google Scholar
CIEGIS R., RAMANAUSKIENE J., MARTINKUS B., 2009, The Concept of Sustainable Development and Its Use For Sustainability Scenarios, Engineering Economics, 62(2): 28-37.
Google Scholar
CONGLETON R.D., 1992, Political Institutions and Pollution Control, The Review of Economics And Statistics, 74(3): 412-421.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2109485
Google Scholar
CAKMAK E. E., ACAR S., 2022, The Nexus Between Economic Growth, Renewable Energy and Ecological Footprint: An Empirical Evidence From Most Oil-Producing Countries, Journal of Cleaner Production, 352: 131548.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131548
Google Scholar
DESTEK M.A., OZSOY F.N., 2015, Relationships Between Economic Growth, Energy Consumption, Globalization, Urbanization and Environmental Degradation in Turkey, International Journal of Energy And Statistics, 3(4): 1-13.
Google Scholar
DOGAN E., TURKEKUL B., 2016, CO2 Emissions, Real Output, Energy Consumption, Trade, Urbanization and Finan-cial Development: Testing The EKC Hypothesis For The USA, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 23(2): 1203-1213.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-5323-8
Google Scholar
FARZANEGAN M.R., MARKWARDT G., 2018, Development and Pollution in the Middle East and North Africa: Democracy Matters, Journal of Policy Modeling, 40: 350–374.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2018.01.010
Google Scholar
FARZIN H.Y., BOND C.A., 2006, Democracy and Environmental Quality, Journal of Development Economics, 81: 213–235.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2005.04.003
Google Scholar
FREDRIKSSON P.G., NEUMAYER E., DAMANIA R., GATES S., 2005, Environmentalism, Democracy, and Pollu-tion Control, Journal of Environmental Economics And Management, 49(2): 343–365.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2004.04.004
Google Scholar
GALLAGHER K.P., THACKER S.C., 2008, Democracy, Income, and Environmental Quality, PERI Working Papers 124.
Google Scholar
GANI A., SCRIMGEOUR F., 2014, Modeling Governance and Water Pollution Using The Institutional Ecological Eco-nomic Framework, Economic Modelling, 42: 363–372.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2014.07.011
Google Scholar
HASSAN S. T., BALOCH M. A., MAHMOOD N., ZHANG J., 2019, Linking Economic Growth and Ecological Foot-print Through Human Capital and Biocapacity, Sustainable Cities and Society, 47: 101516.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101516
Google Scholar
OTUNLUOĞLU H., YILMAZ G.S., 2018, Does Democracy Level Matter for the Carbon Dioxide Emissions? An Em-pricial Study for Turkey, Siyaset, Ekonomi ve Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6(1) :133-141.
Google Scholar
IEA (The International Energy Agency), 2020, Oil Market Report: March 2020, https://www.iea.org/reports/oil-market-report-march-2020.
Google Scholar
JALIL A., MAHMUD S.F., 2009, Environment Kuznets Curve For CO2 Emissions: A Cointegration Analysis For Chi-na, Energy Policy, 37(12): 5167-5172.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.07.044
Google Scholar
KELSO M.A., 2011, Green Democracy: Political Participation and Environmental Protection, available at SSRN 1816372.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1816372
Google Scholar
KIM S., BAEK J., HEO E., 2019, A New Look at The Democracy–Environment Nexus: Evidence From Panel Data For High- And Low-Income Countries, Sustainability, 11: 1–14.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11082353
Google Scholar
LI Q., REUVENY R., 2006, Democracy and Environmental Degradation, International Studies Quarterly, 50(4): 935.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2006.00432.x
Google Scholar
LING G., RAZZAQ A., GUO Y., FATIMA T., SHAHZAD F., 2021, Asymmetric and Time-Varying Linkages Between Carbon Emissions, Globalization, Natural Resources and Financial Development in China, Environment, Development and Sustainability, 24: 6702-6730.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01724-2
Google Scholar
LIU Z., CIAIS P., DENG Z., LEI R., DAVIS S. J., FENG S., SCHELLNHUBER H. J., 2020, Near-Real-Time Monitor-ing of Global CO2 Emissions Reveals The Effects of The COVID-19 Pandemic, Nature communications, 11(1): 5172.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-18922-7
Google Scholar
LV Z., 2017, The Effect of Democracy On CO2 Emissions in Emerging Countries: Does The Level of Income Matter?, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 72: 900–906.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.096
Google Scholar
MIDLARSKY M.I., 1998, Democracy and The Environment: An Empirical Assessment, Journal of Peace Research, 35(3): 341-361.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343398035003005
Google Scholar
MOUNDIGBAYE M., REA W. S., REED W. R., 2018, Which Panel Data Estimator Should I Use?: A Corrigendum and Extension, Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal, 12 (2018-4): 1–31,
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2018-4
Google Scholar
https://www.doi.org/10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2018-4.
Google Scholar
NAZAROV Z., OBYDENKOVA A., 2022, Environmental Challenges and Political Regime Transition: The Role of Historical Legacies and the European Union in Eurasia, Problems of Post-Communism, 69(4-5), 396-409.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10758216.2021.1995437
Google Scholar
OECD, 2020, The Long-Term Environmental Implications of COVID-19, https://www.oecd.org/coronavirus/policy-responses/the-long-term-environmental-implications-of-covid-19-4b7a9937.
Google Scholar
OLSON M., 1993, Dictatorship, Democracy, and Development, The American Political Science Review, 87(3): 567-576.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2938736
Google Scholar
OZTURK I., ACARAVCI A., 2013, The Long-Run and Causal Analysis of Energy, Growth, Openness, and Financial Development on Carbon Emissions in Turkey, Energy Econ., 36: 262–267.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2012.08.025
Google Scholar
PARK H. M., 2011, Practical Guides To Panel Data Modeling: A Step-by-step Analysis Using Stata, Graduate School of International Relations, International University of Japan, Tutorial Working Paper.
Google Scholar
PATA U.K., 2019, Environmental Kuznets Curve and Trade Openness in Turkey: Bootstrap ARDL Approach With A Structural Break, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(20): 20264-20276.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05266-z
Google Scholar
PAWŁOWSKI A., 2008, How many dimensions does sustainable development have? Sustainable Development, 16: 81–90.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.339
Google Scholar
PAWŁOWSKI A., 2011, Sustainable Development as a Civilizational Revolution: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Challenges of the 21st Century, CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/b11326
Google Scholar
PELLEGRINI L., GERLAGH R., 2006, Corruption, Democracy, and Environmental Policy, The Journal of Environment And Development, 15(3): 332–354.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1070496506290960
Google Scholar
PESRAN M., 2004, General Diagnostic Tests for Cross Section Dependence in Panels, IZA Discussion Paper, 1240. https://docs.iza.org/dp1240.pdf.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.572504
Google Scholar
PODESTÀ F., 2002, Recent Developments in Quantitative Comparative Methodology: The Case of Pooled Time Series Cross-Section Analysis, DSS Papers Soc, 3(2): 5-44.
Google Scholar
REED W.R., YE H., 2011, Which Panel Data Estimator Should I Use?, Applied Economics, 43(8): 985–1000. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/00036840802600087.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840802600087
Google Scholar
ROMUALD K.S., 2011, Democratic Institutions and Environmental Quality: Effects and Transmission Channels, EAAE 2011 Congress Switzerland.
Google Scholar
RUME T., ISLAM S. D. U., 2020, Environmental Effects of COVID-19 Pandemic and Potential Strategies of Sustainabil-ity, Heliyon, 6(9): e04965.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04965
Google Scholar
SCRUGGS L., 2009, Democracy and Environmental Protection: An Empirical Analysis, Annual Meeting of The Mid-west Political Science Association 67th Annual National Conference, The Palmer House Hilton Chicago Illinois.
Google Scholar
SHAHBAZ M., NASREEN S., AHMED K., HAMMOUDEH S., 2017, Trade Openness – Carbon Emissions Nexus: The Importance of Turning Points of Trade Openness For Country Panels, Energy Economics, 61: 221-232.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2016.11.008
Google Scholar
SHARIF A., BARIS-TUZEMEN O., UZUNER G., OZTURK I., SINHA A., 2020, Revisiting The Role of Renewable and Non-Renewable Energy Consumption on Turkey’s Ecological Footprint: Evidence From Quantile ARDL Approach, Sustainable Cities and Society, 57: 102138
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102138
Google Scholar
SHARMA R., SINHA A., KAUTISH P., 2021, Does Renewable Energy Consumption Reduce Ecological Footprint? Evidence From Eight Developing Countries of Asia, Journal of Cleaner Production, 285: 124867.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124867
Google Scholar
TORRAS M., BOYCE J.K., 1998, Income, Inequality, and Pollution: A Reassessment of The Environmental Kuznets Curve, Ecological Economics, 25(2): 147-160.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(97)00177-8
Google Scholar
UN Environmental Programme, 2022, Emissions Gap Report, https://www.unep.org/resources/emissions-gap-report-2022.
Google Scholar
USMAN O., OLANIPEKUN I.O., IOREMBER P.T., ABU-GOODMAN M., 2020, Modelling Environmental Degrada-tion in South Africa: The Effects of Energy Consumption, Democracy, and Globalization Using Innovation Accounting Tests, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(8): 8334–8349.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06687-6
Google Scholar
URSAVAS N., 2021, The Impact of Democracy on Ecological Footprint in Turkey, Third Sector Social Economic Re-view, 56(4): 2745-2757.
Google Scholar
URSAVAS N., 2022, The Impact of Democracy on Environmental Degradation in OECD Countries, Ekoist: Journal of Econometrics and Statistics, 37: 213-235.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26650/ekoist.2022.37.1118226
Google Scholar
VERA I., LANGLOIS L., 2007, Energy Indicators for Sustainable Development, Energy, 32(6): 875-882.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2006.08.006
Google Scholar
WACKERNAGEL M., REES W., 2004, What Is An Ecological Footprint, The Sustainable Urban Development Reader, eds. Wheeler S.M., Beatley T.: 211-219, Routledge, London.
Google Scholar
WACKERNAGEL M., REES W., 1996, Our Ecological Footprint: Reducing Human Impact on The Earth, New Society Publishers, Gabriola Island.
Google Scholar
WARD H., 2006, International Linkages and Environmental Sustainability: The Effectiveness of The Regime Network, Journal of Peace Research, 43(2): 149-166.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343306061545
Google Scholar
WINSLOW M., 2005, Is Democracy Good for The Environment?, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 48(5): 771-783.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09640560500183074
Google Scholar
YASIN I., AHMAD N., CHAUDHARY M. A., 2020, Catechizing The Environmental-Impression of Urbanization, Financial Development, and Political Institutions: A Circumstance of Ecological Footprints in 110 Developed and Less-Developed Countries, Social Indicators Research, 147(2): 621-649.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-019-02163-3
Google Scholar
YASIN I., NASEEM S., ANWAR M. A., MADNI G. R., MAHMOOD H., MURSHED M., 2022, An Analysis of The Environmental Impacts of Ethnic Diversity, Financial Development, Economic Growth, Urbanization, and Energy Con-sumption: Fresh Evidence From Less-Developed Countries, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29:79306-79319.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21295-7
Google Scholar
YOU W.H., ZHU H.M., YUK PENG C., 2015, Democracy, Financial Openness, and Global Carbon Dioxide Emissions: Heterogeneity Across Existing Emission Levels, World Development, 66: 189-207.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.08.013
Google Scholar
ZHANG S., LIU X., BAE J., 2017, Does Trade Openness Affect CO2 Emissions: Evidence From Ten Newly İndustrial-ized Countries?, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 24(21): 17616-17625.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-9392-8
Google Scholar
Autorzy
Neslihan Ursavaşkarakoc.neslihan@gmail.com
University of Liverpool, Geographic Data Science Lab, Liverpool Wielka Brytania
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4640-8135
Autorzy
Şükrü ApaydınNevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli University, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences Nevşehir, Turkey Turcja
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4640-8135
Statystyki
Abstract views: 244PDF downloads: 447