Wykorzystanie złożonego indeksu zielonej gospodarki EEPSE do oceny postępu gospodarek rozwijających się w osiąganiu Celów zrównoważonego rozwoju

Sunčica Stanković

suncica.stankovic@vspep.edu.rs
Faculty of Business Economics and Entrepreneurship, Belgrade (Serbia)
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8824-1973

Biljana Ilić


Educons University, Faculty of Project and Innovation Management, Belgrade (Serbia)
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6137-8478

Mihajlo Rabrenović


Faculty of Business Economics and Entrepreneurship, Belgrade (Serbia)
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8188-663X

Abstrakt

Jako koncepcja, zielona gospodarka odnosi się do przejścia z węgla na odnawialne źródła energii w celu ograniczenia zanieczyszczeń, efektywności energetycznej procesów produkcyjnych w celu osiągnięcia oszczędności, ponownego wykorzystania materiałów z odpadów w biznesie i produkcji energii, zmian mających na celu zatrzymać szkodliwe zmiany klimatyczne i stworzyć nowe możliwości rozwoju gospodarczego. W ten sposób rozwiązywane są konflikty pomiędzy rozwojem gospodarczym a kwestiami środowiskowymi, umożliwiając osiągnięcie zrównoważonego rozwoju gospodarki i społeczeństwa. Celem artykułu jest dokonanie analizy porównawczej poziomu rozwoju zielonej gospodarki w wybranych 20 gospodarkach rozwijających się  oraz ich postępu w realizacji Celów zrównoważonego rozwoju (SDGs) wynikających z Agendy 2030 z wykorzystaniem Indeksu Zielonej Gospodarki EEPSE (EEPSE GEI), w oparciu o Model Innowacji Pięciokrotnej Helisy (QHIM) i bada współzależność pomiędzy każdym z 5 podsystemów (jakość systemu edukacji, aspekty ekonomiczne, system polityczny, społeczeństwo obywatelskie i środowisko naturalne) za pomocą tego indeksu. Wyniki wskazują, że wśród obserwowanej grupy krajów najlepiej radzi sobie Estonia, a najgorzej Egipt. Wyniki wskazują także na ważną rolę każdego z podsystemów w EEPSE GEI. Badanie może być przydatne dla decydentów w celu zidentyfikowania słabych punktów w osiąganiu Celów zrównoważonego rozwoju.


Słowa kluczowe:

zielona gospodarka, strategie zrównoważonego rozwoju, model pięciokrotnej helisy, wskaźnik zielonej gospo-darki EEPSE, analiza klastrów, analiza korelacji

AHMED A.A., NAZZAL M.A., DARRAS B.M., 2022, Cyber-Physical Systems as an Enabler of Circular Economy to Achieve Sustainable Development Goals: A Comprehensive Review. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology, 9: 955–975.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40684-021-00398-5   Google Scholar

ALI E.B., ANUFRIEV V.P., AMFO B., 2021, Green economy implementation in Ghana as a road map for a sustainable development drive: A review, Scientific African, 2: e00756.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2021.e00756   Google Scholar

AVTAR R., AGGARWAL R., KHARRAZI A., KUMAR P., KURNIAWAN T.A., 2019, Utilizing geospatial information to implement SDGs and monitor their Progress, Environmental monitoring and assessment, 192(35), https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s10661-019-7996-9.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-019-7996-9   Google Scholar

BARCELLOS-PAULA L., DE LA VEGA I., GIL-LAFUENTE A.M., 2021, The Quintuple Helix of Innovation Model and the SDGs: Latin-American Countries’ Case and Its Forgotten Effects, Mathematics, 9(4): 416.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/math9040416   Google Scholar

CARAYANNIS E.G., BARTH T.D., CAMPBELL D.F., 2012, The Quintuple Helix innovation model: Global warming as a challenge and driver for innovation. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 1(2): 1-12.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/2192-5372-1-2   Google Scholar

CHAABEN N., ELLEUCH Z., HAMDI B., KAHOULI B., 2022, Green economy performance and sustainable development achievement: empirical evidence from Saudi Arabia, Environment, Development and Sustainability, https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02722-8.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02722-8   Google Scholar

ĐORIĆ Ž., 2021, Green economy and sustainable development in the Western Balkan countries, Ekonomske ideje i praksa [Economic ideas and practice], 41: 67-91.
  Google Scholar

EVANS J.D., 1996, Straightforward statistics for the behavioral sciences, Thomson Brooks/Cole Publishing Co.
  Google Scholar

GIBBONS M., LIMOGES C., NOWOTNY H., 1994, The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies, SAGE Publications Ltd.
  Google Scholar

GRUNDEL I., DAHLSTRÖM M., 2016, A Quadruple and Quintuple Helix Approach to Regional Innovation Systems in the Transformation to a Forestry-Based Bioeconomy, Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 7: 963–983.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-016-0411-7   Google Scholar

ILIĆ B., 2020, Social Component of Sustainable Development and Quality of Life: Region of the Balkans, Eastern Serbia, Handbook of Research on Creating Sustainable Value in the Global Economy, ed. Akkucuk U., IGI Global: 452-462.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-1196-1.ch026   Google Scholar

ILIĆ B., STOJANOVIC D., DJUKIC G., 2019, Green economy: mobilization of international capital for financing projects of renewable energy sources, Green Finance, 1(2): 94-109.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3934/GF.2019.2.94   Google Scholar

JAFARZADEGAN M., SAFI-ESFAHANI F., BEHESHTI Z., 2019, Combining hierarchical clustering approaches using the PCA method, Expert System with Applications, 137: 1–10.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2019.06.064   Google Scholar

JIN X., 2012, Guang Yuan Low-carbon Development Path Based on SWOT Analysis, Journal of Sustainable Development, 5(8): 78-83.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/jsd.v5n8p78   Google Scholar

KÖNIG J., SUWALA L., DELARG, C., 2021, Helix Models of Innovation and Sustainable Development Goals, Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure. Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals, eds. Leal Filho W., Azul A.M., Brandli L., Lange Salvia A., Wall T., Springer, Cham: 1-15.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71059-4_91-1   Google Scholar

LAFORTUNE G., FULLER G., SCHMIDT-TRAUB G., KROLL C., 2020, How Is Progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals Measured? Comparing Four Approaches for the EU, Sustainability, 12(18): 7675.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187675   Google Scholar

LAVRINENKO O., IGNATJEVA S., OHOTINA A., RYBALKIN O., LAZDANS D., 2019, The Role of Green Economy in Sustainable Development (Case Study: The EUStates), Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 6(3): 1113-1126.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2019.6.3(4)   Google Scholar

ŁĄCKA I., 2020, Barriers to Using of Quintuple Helix Model to Create Innovations in Polish Regions, Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology, Organization and Management Series No 146, Silesian University of Technology Publishing House: 233-251.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.29119/1641-3466.2020.146.18   Google Scholar

MILLARD J., 2018, How social innovation underpins sustainable development, Atlas of Social Innovation: New Practices for a Better Future, ed. Howaldt, J., Kaletka, C., Schröder, A., Zirngiebl, M., SI-DRIVE: 41-43.
  Google Scholar

MIOLA A., SCHILTZ F., 2019, Measuring sustainable development goals performance: How to monitor policy action in the 2030 Agenda implementation? Ecological economics: The Journal of the International Society for Ecological Economics, 164: 106373.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106373   Google Scholar

NAIDOO D., NHAMO L., LOTTERING S., MPANDELI S., LIPHADZI S., MODI A. T., TROIS C., MABHAUDHI T., 2021, Transitional Pathways towards Achieving a Circular Economy in the Water, Energy, and Food Sectors, Sustainability, 13(17): 9978.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179978   Google Scholar

OSPANOVA A., POPOVYCHENKO I., CHUPRINA E., 2022, Green Economy – Vector of Sustainable Development, Problemy Ekorozwoju/ Problems of Sustainable Development, 17(1): 171-181.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.35784/pe.2022.1.16   Google Scholar

PRASAD A., LOUKOIANOVA E., XIAOCHEN FENG A., OMAN W., 2022, Mobilizing Private Climate Financing in Emerging Market and Developing Economies, Staff Climate Notes, 2022(007), International Monetary Fund.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9798400216428.066   Google Scholar

QUACOE D., KONG Y., QUACOE D., 2023, Analysis of How Green Growth and Entrepreneurship Affect Sustainable Development: Application of the Quintuple Helix Innovation Model in the African Context, Sustainability, 15: 907.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15020907   Google Scholar

RYBALKIN O., 2022, Sustainable development goals progress in the European Union: correlation with EEPSE green economy index, Access to science, business, innovation in digital economy, ACCESS Press, 3(2): 121-135.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.46656/access.2022.3.2(3)   Google Scholar

RYBALKIN O., LAVRINENKO O., IGNATJEVA S., DANILEVICA A., 2021, Introduction of EEPSE Green Economy Index for the analysis of regional trends. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 9(1): 415-435.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2021.9.1(26)   Google Scholar

RYSZAWSKA B., 2015, Towards a green economy. From ideas to practice, ed. Burchard-Dziubińska, M., Chapter: Green Economy Indicators, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódź, Poland: 31-52.
  Google Scholar

SWART J., GROOT L., 2020, Sustainable development: The transition to the green economy, Quality - Access to Success, 15(SUPPL.1): 129-133.
  Google Scholar

TADASHI H., 2022, A balancing act between economic growth and sustainable development: Historical trajectory through the lens of development indicators. Sustainable Development, 30(6): 1900-1910.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2357   Google Scholar

UNITED NATIONS, 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable development, New York/
  Google Scholar

UNSTAT, 2022, Global indicator framework for the Sustainable Development Goals and targets of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development,
  Google Scholar

https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/indicators/Global%20Indicator%20Framework%20after%202022%20refinement_Eng.pdf (April 28, 2023).
  Google Scholar

VENKATESH G., 2021, Sustainable Development Goals – Quo Vadis, Cities of the World? Problemy Ekorozwoju/Problems of Sustainable Development, 16(1): 171-179.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.35784/pe.2021.1.18   Google Scholar

VERTAKOVA Y., PLOTNIKOV V., 2017, Problems of sustainable development worldwide and public policies for green economy, Economic Annals-XXI, 166(7–8): 4-10.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V166-01   Google Scholar

ZHAO L., HE W., WANG A., ZHU F., 2023, Time and Frequency Spillovers between the Green Economy and Traditional Energy Markets, Systems, 11(3): 153.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/systems11030153   Google Scholar

ZHIRONKIN S., CEHLÁR M., 2022, Green Economy and Sustainable Development: The Outlook, Energies, 15(3): 1167.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en15031167   Google Scholar


Opublikowane
2024-01-08

Cited By / Share

Stanković, S., Ilić, B., & Rabrenović, M. (2024). Wykorzystanie złożonego indeksu zielonej gospodarki EEPSE do oceny postępu gospodarek rozwijających się w osiąganiu Celów zrównoważonego rozwoju . Problemy Ekorozwoju Problems of Sustainable Development, 19(1), 78–88. https://doi.org/10.35784/preko.5751

Autorzy

Sunčica Stanković 
suncica.stankovic@vspep.edu.rs
Faculty of Business Economics and Entrepreneurship, Belgrade Serbia
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8824-1973

Autorzy

Biljana Ilić 

Educons University, Faculty of Project and Innovation Management, Belgrade Serbia
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6137-8478

Autorzy

Mihajlo Rabrenović 

Faculty of Business Economics and Entrepreneurship, Belgrade Serbia
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8188-663X

Statystyki

Abstract views: 236
PDF downloads: 423


Licencja

Creative Commons License

Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0 Międzynarodowe.