Badanie związku między globalizacją a zrównoważonością migracji w krajach OECD

1. ABADAN-UNAT N., 2002, Bitmeyen Göç: Konuk İşçilikten Ulus-Ötesi Yurttaşlığa, Istanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  Google Scholar

2. ACHTERBERG P., HOUTMAN D., 2006, Why do so Many People Vote ‘Unnaturally’ ? A Cultural Explanation for Voting Behaviour. European Journal of Political Research 45(1): 75-92, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2005.00291.x.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2005.00291.x   Google Scholar

3. ADIGÜZEL Y., 2021, Küreselleşme Çağında Göç Ders Notları, İstanbul Üniversitesi AUE Fakültesi Yayınları.
  Google Scholar

4. AKYILDIZ I.E., 2016, Göç Teorilerinin Karşılaştırmalı Analizi, Uludağ Journal of Economy and Society / U.Ü. İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 35(2):, 127-176.
  Google Scholar

5. ALAKUŞ E., UZAN Y., 2020, İnsan Ticaretine Konu Olma Potansiyeli Bakımından Türkiye’nin Afgan Düzensiz Göçmen Gerçeği, Göç Araştırmaları Dergisi 6(1), 92-117, https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/gad/issue/55181/757003.
  Google Scholar

6. BERRIANE M., HAAS H., NATTER K., 2016, Revisiting Moroccan Migrations, Routledge, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315619897.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315619897   Google Scholar

7. BOERI T., BRUCKER H., 2005, Migration, Co-ordination Failures and EU Enlargement, Discussion Paper No. 1600.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.728963   Google Scholar

8. BORJAS G., 1987, Self-Selection and the Earnings of Immigrants. American Economic Review 77(4): 531-553, https://www.jstor.org/stable/1814529.
  Google Scholar

9. BORJAS G., FREEMAN R., KATZ L., 1991, On the Labor Market Effects of Immigration and Trade, NBER, https://www.nber.org/papers/w3761.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w3761   Google Scholar

10. BORJAS G., 1999, Immigration. The Reporter: No. 4, National Bureau of Economic Research, https://www.nber.org/reporter/fall-1999/immigration.
  Google Scholar

11. BOUBTANE E., CAULIBALY D., RAULT C., 2013, Immigration, Unemployment and GDP in the Host Country: Bootstrap Panel Granger Causality Analysis on OECD Countries, Economing Modelling 33(1): 261-269, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2013.04.017.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2013.04.017   Google Scholar

12. BREUSCH S., PAGAN R., 1980, The Lagrange Multiplier Test and its Applications to Model Specification in Econometrics, The Review of Economic Studies 47(1): 239-253, https://doi.org/10.2307/2297111.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2297111   Google Scholar

13. CASTLES S., 2002, Migration and Community Formation Under Conditions of Globalization, The International Migration Review, 36(4): 1143-1168, http://www.jstor.org/stable/4149495?origin=JSTOR-pdf.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7379.2002.tb00121.x   Google Scholar

14. CASTLES S., MILLER M.J., 2008, Göçler Çağı: Modern Dünyada Uluslararası Göç Hareketleri, Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları. İstanbul, Türkiye.
  Google Scholar

15. CLEMENS M.A., 2011, Economics and Emigration: Trillion-Dollar Bills on the Sidewalk?, Journal of Economic Perspectives 25 (3): 83-106, https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.25.3.83.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.25.3.83   Google Scholar

16. COLEMAN D., 2015, Migrants and migration in Europe. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, Second Edition, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/book/9780080970875.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.31122-9   Google Scholar

17. COLIC-PEISKER V., 2017, Globalization and Migration, Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance, ed. Farazmand: 1-7, https://doi.org/ 10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_3130-1.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_3130-1   Google Scholar

18. CZAIKA M., de HAAS H., 2014, The Globalization of Migration: Hasthe World Become More Migratory?, International Migration Review 48(2): 283-323, https://www.jstor.org/stable/24542790.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/imre.12095   Google Scholar

19. ÇALDIRAN T., 2023, İzlanda Göçmenlik Şartlar ve İzlanda'da Göçmen Olmak, https://vizem.net/izlanda/gocmenlik/ (08.11.2023).
  Google Scholar

20. ÇEŞTEPE H., 2012, Türkiye’nin Seçilmiş Ortadoğu Ülkeleriyle Ticaretinin Analizi, Ekonomik ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergis 8(2) 23-43.
  Google Scholar

21. de HAAS H., CZAIKA M., FLAHAUX M.L., MAHENDRA E., NATTER K., VEZZOLI S., VILLARES-VARELA M., 2019, International Migration: Trends, Determinants, and Policy Effects, Population and Development Review 45(4): 885-922, https://doi.org/10.1111/padr.12291.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/padr.12291   Google Scholar

22. DOKOS T., 2017, Migration and Globalization– Forms, Patterns and Effects. Background Paper, Trilogue Salzburg: 102-114, https://www.bertelsmann-stiftung.de/fileadmin/files/Faktencheck/Leaders__Dialogues/Salzburger_Trilog_2017/7_Migration_and_Globalization.pdf.
  Google Scholar

23. ENDERWICK P., 2006, Globalization and Labor, Chelsea House Publishers, Philadelphia.
  Google Scholar

24. FERTIG M., KAHANEC M., 2015, Projections of Potential Flows to the Enlarging EU from Ukraine, Croatia and other Eastern Neighbors,. IZA Journal of Migration 4(6): 3-27, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40176-015-0029-8.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40176-015-0029-8   Google Scholar

25. FRANK T., 2018, Paul Krugman Got the Working Class Wrong. That Had Consequences, The Guardian 01.10.2018, https://www.americanproject.org/paul-krugman-got-working-class-wrong-consequences/.
  Google Scholar

26. GAVONEL M., ADGER W.,CAMPOS R., BOYD E., CARR E., FABOS A., FRANSEN S., 2021, The Migration-Sustainability Paradox: Transformations in Mobile Worlds, Environmental Sustainability 49(1): 98-109, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2021.03.013.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2021.03.013   Google Scholar

27. GFMD, 2024, Global Process on Migration. Global Forum on Migration and Development, https://www.iom.int/global-forum-migration-and-development-gfmd.
  Google Scholar

28. GIB., 2021, Kitlesel Akınlar, Göç İdaresi Başkanlığı, T.C İçişleri Bakanlığı. https://www.goc.gov.tr/kitlesel-akinlar.
  Google Scholar

29. GIDDENS A., 1991, The Consequences of Modernity. Stanford University Press, Stanford.
  Google Scholar

30. GILPIN R.G., 2001, Global Political Economy: Understanding the International Economic Order, Princeton University Press, Princenton.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400831272   Google Scholar

31. GIOVANNI J., ORTEGA F., LEVCHENKO A., 2015, A Global View of Cross-Border Migration, Journal of the European Economic Association 13(1): 168-202, https://www.jstor.org/stable/24539137.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jeea.12110   Google Scholar

32. GOMEZ G., GIRALDEZ O., 2017, The Causality Between Economic Growth and Immigration in EU/EFTA Member States, Working Papers No 1701.
  Google Scholar

33. GÖV A., DÜRRÜ Z., 2017, Göç ve Ekonomik Büyüme İlişkisi: Seçilmiş OECD Ülkeleri Üzerine Ekonometrik Bir Analiz, Uluslararası Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi 3(4): 491-502, https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/ead/issue/48244/610735.
  Google Scholar

34. GÜÇ Y., 2023. Sümerlerin Uğradığı Felakete Uğrayabiliriz, Adana Toros Gazetesi, https://adanatorosgazetesi.net/sumerlerin-ugradigi-felakete-ugrayabiliriz/.
  Google Scholar

35. GYGLI S., HAELG F., POTRAFKE N., STURM E., 2019, The KOF Globalisation Index, The Review of International Organizations 14(3): 543-574, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-019-09344-2.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-019-09344-2   Google Scholar

36. HATTON T.J., 2014, The economics of international migration: A short history of the debate, Labour Economics 30(1): 43-50, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927537114000797?via%3Dihub.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2014.06.006   Google Scholar

37. HIGHAM J., 1955, Strangers in the Land: Patterns of American Nativism 1860-1925, Rutgers University Press.
  Google Scholar

38. HOFFMANN S., 1960, Contemporary Theory in International Relations, Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall, New York.
  Google Scholar

39. ILO., 2021a, Extending Social Protection to Migrant Workers, Refugees and Their Families, International Labour Organization, Geneva.
  Google Scholar

40. ILO., 2021b, Global Estimates on International Migrant Workers–Results and Methodology, Report.
  Google Scholar

41. IMMIGRATION ADMINISTRATION PRESIDENCY., 2023, GFMD-Global Forum for Migration and Development, Turkish Ministry of Internal Affairs, https://www.goc.gov.tr/gfmd--kuresel-goc-ve-kalkinma-forumu.
  Google Scholar

42. İÇDUYGU A., KEYMAN E. F., 2000, Globalization, Security and Migration: The Case of Turkey, Global Governance 6(1): 383-398, https://doi.org/10.1163/19426720-00603006.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/19426720-00603006   Google Scholar

43. JESUIT REFUGEE SERVICE, 2022, Annual Report: Hope Makes the Difference, Thomas H. Smolich SJ. www.jrs.net.
  Google Scholar

44. KALIA K., 2008, The Recession-Proof Race for Highly Skilled Migrants, MIR, https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article.
  Google Scholar

45. KALKINMA BAKANLIĞI., 2018, Dış Göç Politikası. Özel İhtisas Komisyonu Raporu: On Birinci Kalkınma Planı (2019-2023), Ankara.
  Google Scholar

46. KAUR A., 2010, Labour Migration Trends and Policy Challenges in Southeast Asia, Policy and Society 29(4): 385-397, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2010.09.001.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2010.09.001   Google Scholar

47. KINMAN J.L., LEE E.S., 1966, Migration and Crime, The International Migration Digest 3(1): 7-14, https://doi.org/10.2307/3002915.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/019791836600300102   Google Scholar

48. KOFMAN E., PHIZACKLEA A., RAGHURAM P., SALES R., 2000, Gender and International Migration in Europe: Employment, Welfare and Politics, Routledge, London.
  Google Scholar

49. KOSER K., 2018, International Migration: A Canary in the Coalmine of Globalisation, https://globalchallenges.ch/issue/3/international-migration-a-canary-in-the-coalmine-of-globalisation/.
  Google Scholar

50. KURT U., 2019, The Causal Effects of Economic, Political and Social Globalizatıon on Migrants: A Panel Data Analysis For Selected OECD Countries, Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi 17(1): 281-296. https://doi.org/10.11611/yead.511544.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.11611/yead.511544   Google Scholar

51. LOWELL B.L., 2005, Trends in International Migration Flows and Stocks, 1975-2005, OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers.
  Google Scholar

52. MASSEY D.S,. ESPINOSA K.E., 1997, What's Driving Mexico-U.S. Migration? A Theoretical, Empirical, and Policy Analysis. American Journal of Sociology 102(4): 939-999, https://www.jstor.org/stable/2782024.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/231037   Google Scholar

53. MEYERS E., 2000, Theories of International Immigration Policy - A Comparative Analysis. International Migration Review 34(4): 1245-1282, https://doi.org/10.1177/019791830003400407.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/019791830003400407   Google Scholar

54. MIGRATION POLICY INSTITUTE., 2023, Top 25 Destinations of International Migrants, International Migration Statistics: Trends over, https://www.migrationpolicy.org.
  Google Scholar

55. MOUNTZ A., 2020, The Many Facets of Pandemic Vulnerability, Open Democracy, https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/pandemic-border/many-facets-pandemic-vulnerability/ (01.07.2023).
  Google Scholar

56. NAR M.Ş., 2020, The Covid-19 Pandemic and The Impact of Transformation: Now and Later, İmgelem 4(7): 363-382, https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/imgelem/issue/58047/815350.
  Google Scholar

57. NAR M.Ş., 2021a, Globalization Process and Cross-Border Migration Movements: The Case of Turkey, Social Sciences Researches Journal 16(2) 214-225, https://doi.org/10.48145/gopsbad.1020128.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.48145/gopsbad.1020128   Google Scholar

58. NAR M.Ş., 2021b, The Correlation Between Cultural Globalization and Internet and Cell Phone Use Rates: The Case of OECD Countries, International Journal of Eurasia Social Sciences (IJOESS) 12(45): 752-765, http://dx.doi.org/10.35826/ijoess.2987.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.35826/ijoess.2987   Google Scholar

59. NAR M.Ş., 2021c, The Relationship Between Education, Ideology, Democracy and Voting Behavior: The Case of Turkey, MECMUA International Journal of Social Science, 6(12): 199-212, https://doi.org/10.32579/mecmua.990437.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.32579/mecmua.990437   Google Scholar

60. OECD., 2023, International Migration Outlook, https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/sites.
  Google Scholar

61. OHMAE K., 1999, The Borderless World: Power and Strategy in the Interlinked World Economy, Harper Collins Publishers, New York.
  Google Scholar

62. PARK J., 2015, Europe's Migration Crisis, Council on Foreign Relations, https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/europes-migration-crisis.
  Google Scholar

63. PAWŁOWSKI A., 2013, Sustainable Development and Globalization, Problemy Ekorozwoju/ Problems of Sustainable Development 8(2): 5-16, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2292396.
  Google Scholar

64. PAWŁOWSKI A., 2020a, Covid-19, Environmental Engineering and the End of the World as We Know it, Problemy Ekorozwoju/ Problems of Sustaiınable Development 15(2): 7-14, https://ph.pollub.pl/index.php/preko/article/view/5095.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.35784/pe.2020.2.01   Google Scholar

65. PAWŁOWSKI A., 2020b, Rozwój Zrownoważony – Idea, Filozofia, Praktyka, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw.
  Google Scholar

66. PESARAN M.H., 2004, General Diagnostic Tests for Cross Section Dependence in Panelsm Working Papers in Economics 0435, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.5113.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.572504   Google Scholar

67. PESARAN M.H., ULLAH A., YAMAGATA T., 2008, A Bias-adjusted LM Test of Error Cross-Section Independence, The Econometrics Journal, 11(1): 105-127, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1368-423X.2007.00227.x.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1368-423X.2007.00227.x   Google Scholar

68. PIJNENBURG A., RIJKEN C., 2021, Moving Beyond Refugees and Migrants: Reconceptualising the Rights of People on the Move, Interventions, 23(2): 273-293, https://doi.org/10.1080/1369801X.2020.1854107.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369801X.2020.1854107   Google Scholar

69. PIORE S., JOSEPH M., 1979, Birds of Passage: Migrant Labor and Industrial Societies, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511572210   Google Scholar

70. RITZEN J., KAHANEC M., 2017, A Sustainable Immigration Policy for the EU, IZA Policy Paper Series No. 126.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57723-4_6   Google Scholar

71. SACD., 2023, Refugees: A Russian Weapon to Empty Syria and Flood Europe!, https://syacd.org/refugees-a-russian-weapon-to-empty-syria-and-flood-europe/.
  Google Scholar

72. SAFI M., 2023, Immigration Theory Between Assimilation and Discrimination, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 50(1): 173-202, https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2023.2207250.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2023.2207250   Google Scholar

73. SALIK R., 2023, İzlanda ile İlgili 10 Gerçek, https://www.milliyet.com.tr/molatik/galeri/izlanda-ile-ilgili-beyin-yakan-10-gercek-74296/1.
  Google Scholar

74. SALT J., 2009, Palgrave Politics of Identity and Citizenship Series, Springer.
  Google Scholar

75. STOUFFER S.A., 1940, Intervening Opportunities: a Theory Relating Mobility and Distance, American Sociological Review 5(6): 845-867, https://doi.org/10.2307/2084520.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2084520   Google Scholar

76. TAHİROĞLU M., 2022, Immigration Politics: Refugees in Turkey and the 2023 Elections, Heinrich Böll Stiftung, https://us.boell.org/en/2022/08/17/immigration-politics-refugees-turkey-and-2023-elections.
  Google Scholar

77. TIMMER A.S., WILLIAMS J.G., 1998, Immigration Policy Prior to the 1930s: Labor Markets, Policy Interactions, and Globalization Backlash, Population and Development Review 24(4): 739-771, https://www.jstor.org/stable/2808023.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2808023   Google Scholar

78. TOIT M., 1990, People on the Move: Rural-urban Migration with Special Reference to the Third World: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives, Human Organization, 49(4): 305-319, https://www.jstor.org/stable/44126749.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17730/humo.49.4.016734370u13v727   Google Scholar

79. TRIANDAFYLLIDOU A., 2018, Globalisation and Migration: An Introduction. in A. Triandafyllidou (ed.), Handbook of Migration and Globalisation, ed. Triandafyllidou, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham:1-16.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781785367519.00006   Google Scholar

80. UN, 2017, International Migration Report 2017, United Nations, New York.
  Google Scholar

81. UN-DESA., 2021, International Migration 2020 Highlights, United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, https://www.un.org/en/desa/international-migration-2020-highlights.
  Google Scholar

82. UN, 2022, World Migration Report, International Organization for Migration, United Nations.
  Google Scholar

83. UN, 2023, Migration: Key Migration Terms, Internatıonal Organızatıon for Mıgratıon, https://www.iom.int/key-migration-terms.
  Google Scholar

84. VOWLES J., XEZONAKIS G., 2016, Globalization, Positional and Valence Politics, and the Global Financial Crisis, Globalization and Domestic Politics: Parties, Elections, and Public Opinion, ds. J. Vowles & G. Xezonakis, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198757986.001.0001   Google Scholar

85. WADE R.H., 2014, The Piketty Phenomenon and the Future of Inequality, Real World Economics Review 69(7): 2-17.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7810/9781927277713_14   Google Scholar

86. WALLERSTEIN I., 1974, The Modern World-System I Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century, Academic Press.
  Google Scholar

87. WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM., 2017, Migration and Its Impact on Cities, The World Economic Forum Report, https://www3.weforum.org/docs/Migration_Impact_Cities_report_2017_low.pdf.
  Google Scholar

88. ZDANOWICZ M., 2023, The Migration Crisis on the Polish–Belarusian Border. Bialystok Legal Studies/ Białostockie Studia Prawnicze, 28(1): 103-115, https://doi.org10.15290/bsp.2023.28.01.06.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15290/bsp.2023.28.01.06   Google Scholar

89. ZELKA M., 1991, Ortadoğu Ülkelerinin İthalat Yapısının Ekononometrik Yapısı, Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 9(1): 111-116.
  Google Scholar