Oszacowanie roli globalizacji, rozwoju technologicznego i poziomu konsumpcji gospodarstw domowych na ślad ekologiczny w krajach Grupy Wyszehradzkiej

1. ABEYSEKERA I., MANALANG L., DAVID R., GRACE GUIAO B., 2022, Accounting for environmental awareness on green purchase intention and behaviour: Evidence from the Philippines, Sustainability 14(19): 12565, https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912565.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912565   Google Scholar

2. ACAR S., AŞICI A. A., 2017, Nature and economic growth in Turkey: what does ecological footprint imply?, Middle East Development Journal 9(1): 101-115, https://doi.org/10.1080/17938120.2017.1288475.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17938120.2017.1288475   Google Scholar

3. ADEBAYO T. S., KIRIKKALELI D., 2021, Impact of renewable energy consumption, globalization, and technological innovation on environmental degradation in Japan: application of wavelet tools, Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23, 16057-16082, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01322-2.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01322-2   Google Scholar

4. AHMED Z., WANG Z., MAHMOOD F., HAFEEZ M., ALI N., 2019, Does globalization increase the ecological footprint? Empirical evidence from Malaysia, Environmental Science and Pollution Research 26: 18565-18582, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05224-9.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05224-9   Google Scholar

5. ALOLA A. A., ADEBAYO T. S., ONIFADE S. T., 2021, Examining the dynamics of ecological footprint in China with spectral Granger causality and quantile-on-quantile approaches, International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology 29(3): 263-276, https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2021.1990158.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2021.1990158   Google Scholar

6. AMEGAVI G. B., LANGNEL Z., AHENKAN A., BUABENG T., 2022, The dynamic relationship between economic globalisation, institutional quality, and ecological footprint: evidence from Ghana, The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development 31(6): 876-893, https://doi.org/10.1080/09638199.2022.2033303.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638199.2022.2033303   Google Scholar

7. ANSARI M. A., AHMAD M. R., SIDDIQUE S., MANSOOR K., 2020, An environment Kuznets curve for ecological footprint: evidence from GCC countries, Carbon Management 11(4): 355-368, https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2020.1790242.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2020.1790242   Google Scholar

8. ANSARI M. A., HAIDER S., MASOOD T., 2021, Do renewable energy and globalization enhance ecological footprint: an analysis of top renewable energy countries?, Environmental Science and Pollution Research 28: 6719-6732, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10786-0.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10786-0   Google Scholar

9. AWOSUSI A. A., ADEBAYO T. S., KIRIKKALELI D., ALTUNTAŞ M., 2022, Role of technological innovation and globalization in BRICS economies: policy towards environmental sustainability, International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology 29(7): 593-610, https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2022.2059032.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2022.2059032   Google Scholar

10. AYDIN M., KOC P., SAHPAZ K. I., 2023, Investigating the EKC hypothesis with nanotechnology, renewable energy consumption, economic growth and ecological footprint in G7 countries: panel data analyses with structural breaks, Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy 18(1), https://doi.org/10.1080/15567249.2022.2163724.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15567249.2022.2163724   Google Scholar

11. AYTUN C., ERDOGAN S., PATA U. K., CENGIZ O., 2024, Associating environmental quality, human capital, financial development and technological innovation in 19 middle-income countries: a disaggregated ecological footprint approach, Technology in Society 76: 102445, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102445.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102445   Google Scholar

12. BALSALOBRE-LORENTE, D., GOKMENOGLU, K. K., TASPINAR, N., CANTOS-CANTOS, J. M., 2019, An approach to the pollution haven and pollution halo hypotheses in MINT countries, Environmental Science and Pollution Research 26: 23010-26, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05446-x.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05446-x   Google Scholar

13. BALTAGI B. H., FENG Q., KAO C., 2012, A lagrange multiplier test for cross-sectional dependence in a fixed effects panel data model, Journal of Econometrics 170(1): 164-177, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2012.04.004.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2012.04.004   Google Scholar

14. BAZ K., XU D., ALI H., ALI I., KHAN I., KHAN M. M., CHENG J., 2020, Asymmetric impact of energy consumption and economic growth on ecological footprint: using asymmetric and nonlinear approach, Science of the Total Environment 718: 137364, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137364.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137364   Google Scholar

15. BEKELE M., SASSI M., JEMAL K., AHMED B., 2024, Human capital development and economic sustainability linkage in Sub-Saharan African countries: novel evidence from augmented mean group approach, Heliyon 10: e24323, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24323
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24323   Google Scholar

16. BEŞE E., FRIDAY H. S., 2022, The relationship between external debt and emissions and ecological footprint through economic growth: Turkey, Cogent Economics & Finance 10(1), https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2022.2063525.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2022.2063525   Google Scholar

17. BOISCHIO A., SÁNCHEZ A., OROSZ Z., CHARRON D., 2009, Health and sustainable development: challenges and opportunities of ecosystem approaches in the prevention and control of dengue and Chagas disease, Cadernos de saúde pública 25: S149-S154, https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-311x2009001300014.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-311X2009001300014   Google Scholar

18. BOUKHELKHAL A., 2022, Impact of economic growth, natural resources and trade on ecological footprint: do education and longevity promote sustainable development in Algeria?, International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology 29(8): 875-887, https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2022.2112784.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2022.2112784   Google Scholar

19. BREUSCH T. S., PAGAN A. R., 1980, The lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics, The Review of Economic Studies 47(1): 239-253, https://doi.org/10.2307/2297111.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2297111   Google Scholar

20. BULUT U., 2020, Environmental sustainability in Turkey: an environmental Kuznets curve estimation for ecological footprint, International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology 28(3): 227-237, https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2020.1793425.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2020.1793425   Google Scholar

21. CAIADO R. G. G., FILHO W. L., QUELHAS O. L. G., NASCIMENTO D. L. D. M., ÃVILA L. V., 2018, A literature-based review on potentials and constraints in implementing the sustainable development goals, Journal of Cleaner Production 198: 1276-1288, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.102.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.102   Google Scholar

22. CENGIZ O., MANGA M., 2023, Towards a political economy of renewable energy: does democracy and globalization matter for central and eastern European countries (CEECs), Problemy Ekorozwoju/ Problems of Sustainable Development 18(2): 86-101, https://doi.org/10.35784/preko.3947.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.35784/preko.3947   Google Scholar

23. CHEN Y., LEE C. C., 2020, Does technological innovation reduce CO2 emissions? Cross-country evidence, Journal of Cleaner Production 263: 121550, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121550.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121550   Google Scholar

24. HENG C., REN X., WANG, Z., 2019, The impact of renewable energy and innovation on carbon emission: an empirical analysis for OECD countries, Energy Procedia 158: 3506-3512.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2019.01.919   Google Scholar

25. CHENG Y., LIU H., WANG S., CUI X., LI Q., 2021, Global action on SDGs: policy review and outlook in a post-pandemic era, Sustainability 13(11): 6461, https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116461.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116461   Google Scholar

26. DELANKA-PEDIGE H. M. K., MUNASINGHE-ARACHCHIGE S. P., ABEYSIRIWARDANA-ARACHCHIGE I. S. A., NIRMALAKHANDAN N., 2020, Wastewater infrastructure for sustainable cities: assessment based on UN sustainable development goals (SDGs), International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology 28(3): 203-209, https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2020.1795006.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2020.1795006   Google Scholar

27. DRITSAKI M., DRITSAKI C., 2024, The relationship between health expenditure, CO2 emissions, and economic growth in G7: evidence from heterogeneous panel data, Journal of the Knowledge Economy 15: 4886-4911, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01349-y.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01349-y   Google Scholar

28. EBERHARDT M., BOND S., 2009, Cross-section dependence in nonstationary panel models: a novel estimator, MPRA Paper 17692, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  Google Scholar

29. ELIAS A., SANDERS K., HU J., 2023, The Sustainable Human Resource Practices and Employee Outcomes Link: An HR Process Lens, Sustainability 15(13): 10124, https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310124.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310124   Google Scholar

30. FEI W., OPOKU A., AGYEKUM K., OPPON J A., AHMED V., CHEN C., LOK K. L., 2021, The critical role of the construction industry in achieving the sustainable development goals (SDGs): delivering projects for the common good, Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute 13(16): 9112-9112, https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169112
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169112   Google Scholar

31. GLOBAL FOOTPRINT NETWORK, 2024, https://www.footprintnetwork.org/ (5.08.2024).
  Google Scholar

32. GOI C. L., 2017, The impact of technological innovation on building a sustainable city, International Journal of Quality Innovation 3(6): 1-13, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40887-017-0014-9.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40887-017-0014-9   Google Scholar

33. GRAINGER-BROWN J., MALEKPOUR S., 2019, Implementing the sustainable development goals: A review of strategic tools and frameworks available to organisations, Sustainability 11(5), 1381, https://doi.org/10.3390/su11051381.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11051381   Google Scholar

34. GU G., WANG Z., 2018, Research on global carbon abatement driven by R&D investment in the context of INDCs, Energy 148: 662-675, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.01.142.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.01.142   Google Scholar

35. GUAN C., RANI T., YUEQIANG Z., AJAZ T., HASEKI M. I., 2022, Impact of tourism industry, globalization, and technology innovation on ecological footprints in G-10 countries, Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja 35(1): 6688-6704, https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2022.2052337.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2022.2052337   Google Scholar

36. GUO L., 2017, Income inequality, household consumption and CO2 emissions in China, The Singapore Economic Review 62(2): 531-553, https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217590817400239.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217590817400239   Google Scholar

37. GYAMFI B. A., ONIFADE S. T., ERDOGAN S., ALI E. B., 2023, Colligating ecological footprint and economic globalization after COP21: insights from agricultural value-added and natural resources rents in the E7 economies, International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology 30(5): 500-514, https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2023.2166141.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2023.2166141   Google Scholar

38. GYGLI S., HAELG F., POTRAFKE N., STURM J. E., 2019, The KOF globalisation index-revisited, The Review of International Organizations 14: 543-574, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-019-09344-2.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-019-09344-2   Google Scholar

39. HAIDER M., SHANNON R., MOSCHIS G. P., 2022, Sustainable consumption research and the role of marketing: a review of the literature (1976-2021), Sustainability 14(7): 3999, https://doi.org/10.3390/su14073999.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14073999   Google Scholar

40. HASAN M. M., NAN S., WARIS U., 2024, Assessing the dynamics among oil consumption, ecological footprint, and renewable energy: role of institutional quality in major oil-consuming countries, Resources Policy 90: 104843, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.104843.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.104843   Google Scholar

41. HIRSCHNITZ-GARBERS M., TAN A. R., GRADMANN A., SREBOTNJAK T., 2016, Key drivers for unsustainable resource use-categories, effects and policy pointers, Journal of Cleaner Production 132: 13-31, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.038.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.038   Google Scholar

42. HUMBATOVA S. I., HAJIYEVA N., FODOR M. G., SOOD K., GRIMA S., 2024, The impact of economic growth on the ecological environment and renewable energy production: evidence from Azerbaijan and Hungary, Journal of Risk and Financial Management 17(7): 275, https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm17070275.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm17070275   Google Scholar

43. IBRAHIEM D. M., HANAFY S. A., 2020, Dynamic linkages amongst ecological footprints, fossil fuel energy consumption and globalization: an empirical analysis, Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal 31(6): 1549-1568, https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-02-2020-0029.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-02-2020-0029   Google Scholar

44. JOOF F., SAMOUR A., ALI M., REHMAN M. A., TURSOY T., 2024, Economic complexity, renewable energy and ecological footprint: the role of the housing market in the USA, Energy and Buildings 311: 114131, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2024.114131.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2024.114131   Google Scholar

45. KALINAUSKAITE I., BRANKAERT R., LU Y., BEKKER T., BROMBACHER A., VOS, S., 2021, Facing societal challenges in living labs: towards a conceptual framework to facilitate transdisciplinary collaborations, Sustainability 13(2): 614, https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020614.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020614   Google Scholar

46. KAYMAZ Ç. K., BIRINCI S., KIZILKAN Y., 2022, Sustainable development goals assessment of Erzurum province with SWOT-AHP analysis, Environ Dev Sustain 24: 2986-3012, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01584-w.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01584-w   Google Scholar

47. KHAN A., IDREES A. S., 2023, Environmental impact of multidimensional eco-innovation adoption: an empirical evidence from European Union, Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy 13(1): 17-33, https://doi.org/10.1080/21606544.2023.2197626.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21606544.2023.2197626   Google Scholar

48. KHAN A., MUHAMMAD F., CHENGGANG Y., HUSSAIN J., BANO S., KHAN M. A., 2020, The impression of technological innovations and natural resources in energy-growth-environment nexus: a new look into BRICS economies, Science of The Total Environment 727: 138265, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138265.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138265   Google Scholar

49. KHIZAR H. M. U., IQBAL M. J., RASHEED M. I., 2021, Business orientation and sustainable development: a systematic review of sustainability orientation literature and future research avenues, Sustainable Development 29(5): 1001-1017, https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2190.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2190   Google Scholar

50. KHOI N. H., LE N. H., NGOC B. H., 2021, The effect of tourism development on the ecological footprint in Singapore: evidence from asymmetric ARDL method, Current Issues in Tourism 25(15): 2500-2517, https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2021.1971165.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2021.1971165   Google Scholar

51. KIRIKKALELI D., ADEBAYO T. S., KHAN Z., ALI S., 2021, Does globalization matter for ecological footprint in Turkey? Evidence from dual adjustment approach, Environmental Science and Pollution Research 28: 14009-14017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11654-7.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11654-7   Google Scholar

52. KIRIKKALELI D., SOFUOGLU E., OJEKEMI O., 2023, Does patents on environmental technologies matter for the ecological footprint in the USA? Evidence from the novel Fourier ARDL approach, Geoscience Frontiers 14(4): 101564, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2023.101564.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2023.101564   Google Scholar

53. KIZILKAYA O., KIZILKAYA O., AKAR G., MIKE F., 2024, The role of energy consumption and economic growth on human development in emerging (E-7) countries: fresh evidence from second-generation panel data analyses, Problemy Ekorozwoju/ Problems of Sustainable Development 19(2): 186-202, https://doi.org/10.35784/preko.5798.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.35784/preko.5798   Google Scholar

54. KLEESPIES M.W., DIERKESP. W., 2022, The importance of the Sustainable Development Goals to students of environmental and sustainability studies-a global survey in 41 countries, Humanit Soc Sci Commun 9 218, https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01242-0.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01242-0   Google Scholar

55. KOSTAKIS I., ARAUZO-CAROD J. M., 2023, The key roles of renewable energy and economic growth in disaggregated environmental degradation: evidence from highly developed, heterogeneous and cross-correlated countries, Renewable Energy 206: 1315-1325, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2023.02.106.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2023.02.106   Google Scholar

56. KOZIK N., 2020, Sustainable packaging as a tool for global sustainable development, SHS Web of Conferences 74: 4012, https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20207404012.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20207404012   Google Scholar

57. LI B., DANISH KHAN S. U. D., HANEKLAUS N., 2022, Ecological footprint analysis of the phosphorus industry in China, Environmental Science and Pollution Research 29: 73461-73479, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20878-8.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20878-8   Google Scholar

58. LI R., WANG Q., LI L., 2023, Does renewable energy reduce per capita carbon emissions and per capita ecological footprint? New evidence from 130 countries, Energy Strategy Reviews 49: 101121, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2023.101121.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2023.101121   Google Scholar

59. LIU J., MURSHED M., CHEN F., SHAHBAZ M., KIRIKKALELI D., KHAN Z., 2021, An empirical analysis of the household consumption-induced carbon emissions in China, Sustainable Production and Consumption 26: 943-957, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.01.006.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.01.006   Google Scholar

60. LOREK S., SPANGENBERG J. H., 2001, Indicators for environmentally sustainable household consumption, International Journal of Sustainable Development (IJSD) 4(1): 101-101, https://doi.org/10.1504/ijsd.2001.001549.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSD.2001.001549   Google Scholar

61. LV J., WANG N., JU H., CUI X., 2022, Influence of green technology, tourism, and inclusive financial development on ecological sustainability: exploring the path toward green revolution, Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja 36(1), https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2022.2116349.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2022.2116349   Google Scholar

62. MENSAH C. N., LONG X., BOAMAH K. B., BEDIAKO I. A., DAUDA L., SALMAN M., 2018, The effect of innovation on CO2 emissions of OCED countries from 1990 to 2014, Environmental Science and Pollution Research 25: 29678-29698, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2968-0.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2968-0   Google Scholar

63. MOHAMED E. F., ABDULLAH A., JAAFFAR A. H., OSABOHIEN R., 2024, Reinvestigating the EKC hypothesis: does renewable energy in power generation reduce carbon emissions and ecological footprint?, Energy Strategy Reviews 53: 101387, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2024.101387.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2024.101387   Google Scholar

64. MUÑOZ L. A., TAMAYO L. P., MARULANDA D. P., PELÁEZ G. C., PÉREZ M. H., 2021, Integral diagnosis on the use of sustainable water treatment technologies, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 1203(3): 032001, IOP Publishing, https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/1203/3/032001.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1203/3/032001   Google Scholar

65. MURSHED M., ALI S. R., BANERJEE S., 2021, Consumption of liquefied petroleum gas and the EKC hypothesis in South Asia: evidence from cross-sectionally dependent heterogeneous panel data with structural breaks, Energy, Ecology and Environment 6(4): 353-377, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40974-020-00185-z.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40974-020-00185-z   Google Scholar

66. MURSHED M., NURMAKHANOVA M., AL-TAL R., MAHMOOD H., ELHEDDAD M., AHMED R., 2022, Can intra-regional trade, renewable energy use, foreign direct investments, and economic growth mitigate ecological footprints in South Asia?, Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy 17(1), https://doi.org/10.1080/15567249.2022.2038730.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15567249.2022.2038730   Google Scholar

67. NKETIAH E., SONG H., OBUOBI B., ADU-GYAMFI G., ADJEI M., CUDJOE D., 2022, The impact of ecological footprint in West Africa: the role of biocapacity and renewable energy, International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology 29(6): 514-529, https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2022.2051637.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2022.2051637   Google Scholar

68. OHCHR 2024, COVID-19 and the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. OHCHR and the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, https://www.ohchr.org/en/sdgs/covid-19-and-2030-agenda-sustainable-development (1.10.2024).
  Google Scholar

69. OUR WORLD IN DATA, 2024, https://ourworldindata.org/ (6.08.2024).
  Google Scholar

70. PATA U. K., NAIMOGLU M., KARLILAR S., KARTAL M. T., 2024, Analyzing the EKC hypothesis for the top 10 energy-importing countries: a perspective for the COP27 targets, Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health 17: 953-966, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-023-01490-2.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-023-01490-2   Google Scholar

71. PESARAN M. H., YAMAGATA T., 2008, Testing slope homogeneity in large panels, Journal of Econometrics 142(1): 50-93, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.010.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.010   Google Scholar

72. PESARAN M. H., 2004, General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels, IZA Discussion Paper No. 1240, The Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Germany, https://docs.iza.org/dp1240.pdf (6.08.2024).
  Google Scholar

73. PESARAN M. H., 2007, A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence, Journal of Applied Econometrics 22(2): 265-312, https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.951.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.951   Google Scholar

74. PRADHAN P., COSTA L., RYBSKI D., LUCHT W., KROPP J. P., 2017, A systematic study of Sustainable development goal (SDG) interactions, Earth’s Future 5: 1169-1179, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017ef000632.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/2017EF000632   Google Scholar

75. QING L., USMAN M., RADULESCU M., HASEEB M., 2024, Towards the vision of going green in South Asian region: the role of technological innovations, renewable energy and natural resources in ecological footprint during globalization mode, Resources Policy 88: 104506, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.104506.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.104506   Google Scholar

76. QIU H., WAN Q., 2023, Inclusivity between digital trade, human development, and environmental quality: moderating role of green innovations in BRICS countries, Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja 36(3), https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2022.2150872.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2022.2150872   Google Scholar

77. RABBI M. F., ABDULLAH M., 2024, Fossil Fuel CO2 emissions and economic growth in the Visegrád region: a study based on the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis, Climate 12(8): 115, https://doi.org/10.3390/cli12080115.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/cli12080115   Google Scholar

78. RAHMANE A., BENELBAR M., TRAICH M., 2021, The nexus between sustainable energy and ecological footprint: evidence from Algeria, Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy 17(1): 323-333, https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2021.1946298.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2021.1946298   Google Scholar

79. RAIHAN A., VOUMIK L. C., ZIMON G., SADOWSKA B., RASHID M., AKTER S., 2024, Prioritising sustainability: how economic growth, energy use, forest area, and globalization impact on greenhouse gas emissions and load capacity in Poland?, International Journal of Sustainable Energy 43(1), https://doi.org/10.1080/14786451.2024.2361410.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14786451.2024.2361410   Google Scholar

80. RAZA A., HABIB Y., HASHMI S. H., 2023, Impact of technological innovation and renewable energy on ecological footprint in G20 countries: the moderating role of institutional quality, Environmental Science and Pollution Research 30: 95376-95393, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-29011-9.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-29011-9   Google Scholar

81. REHMAN A., RADULESCU M., MA H., DAGAR V., HUSSAIN I., KHAN M. K., 2021, The impact of globalization, energy use, and trade on ecological footprint in Pakistan: does environmental sustainability exist?, Energies 14: 5234, https://doi.org/10.3390/en14175234.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en14175234   Google Scholar

82. SHAYANMEHR S., RADMEHR R., ALI E. B., OFORI E. K., ADEBAYO T. S., GYAMFI B. A., 2023, How do environmental tax and renewable energy contribute to ecological sustainability? New evidence from top renewable energy countries, International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology 30(6): 650-670, https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2023.2186961.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2023.2186961   Google Scholar

83. SILVA F. C., SHIBAO F. Y., KRUGLIANSKAS I., BARBIERI J. C., SINISGALLI P. A. A., 2019, Circular economy: analysis of the implementation of practices in the Brazilian network, Revista de Gestão 26(1): 39-60, https://doi.org/10.1108/rege-03-2018-0044.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/REGE-03-2018-0044   Google Scholar

84. SOHAG K., BEGUM R. A., ABDULLAH S. M. S., 2015, Dynamic impact of household consumption on its CO2 emissions in Malaysia, Environment, Development and Sustainability 17: 1031-1043, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-014-9588-8.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-014-9588-8   Google Scholar

85. STANOJEVIC S., 2020, Embracing sustainability in the drive from ordinary to outstanding: case examples from Emirates, Jumeirah and Rotana, Worldwide Hospitality and Tourism Themes 12(5): 575-586, https://doi.org/10.1108/whatt-06-2020-0050.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/WHATT-06-2020-0050   Google Scholar

86. SULICH A., SOŁODUCHO-PELC L., 2021, Renewable energy producers’ strategies in the Visegrád group countries, Energies 14(11): 3048, https://doi.org/10.3390/en14113048.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en14113048   Google Scholar

87. SUN Y., GUAN W., MEHMOOD U., YANG X., 2022, Asymmetric impacts of natural resources on ecological footprints: exploring the role of economic growth, FDI and renewable energy in G-11 countries, Resources Policy 79: 103026, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.103026.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.103026   Google Scholar

88. SWAMY P. A. V. B., 1970, Efficient inference in a random coefficient regression model, Econometrica 38(2): 311-323.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1913012   Google Scholar

89. THACH N. N., NGOC B. H., 2023, Nexus between tourism and ecological footprint in RCEP: fresh evidence from Bayesian MCMC random-effects sampling, Cogent Business & Management 10(1), https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2208703.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2208703   Google Scholar

90. TUGCU C. T., 2018, Panel data analysis in the energy-growth nexus (EGN), The economics and econometrics of the energy-growth nexus, ed. Menegaki A. N., Academic Press: 255-271.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-812746-9.00008-0   Google Scholar

91. ULUCAK Z. S., ILKAY S. Ç., OZCAN B., GEDIKLI A., 2020, Financial globalization and environmental degradation nexus: evidence from emerging economies, Resources Policy 67: 101698, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101698.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101698   Google Scholar

92. VÁZQUEZ-BURGUETE J. L., LANERO-CARRIZO A., SAHELICES-PINTO C., VÁZQUEZ-GARCIA J. L., VÁZQUEZ-GARCIA J. M., 2023, Responsible production and consumption as a requirement for sustainable development, SHS Web of Conferences 176: 02001, https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202317602001.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202317602001   Google Scholar

93. WORLD BANK, 2024, https://data.worldbank.org/ (5.08.2024).
  Google Scholar

94. WORLD METEOROLOGICAL ORGANIZATION, 2024, State of the Global Climate 2023, WMO-No. 1347.
  Google Scholar

95. YU Z., GUO X. D., 2022, Integration of ecological innovation, institutional governance, and human capital development for a sustainable environment in Asian Countries, Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja 36(3), https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2022.2155681.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2022.2155681   Google Scholar

96. ZHANG Q., SHAH S. A. R., YANG L., 2022, Modeling the effect of disaggregated renewable energies on ecological footprint in E5 economies: do economic growth and R&D matter?, Applied Energy 310: 118522, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.118522.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.118522   Google Scholar