Ocena realizacji zrównoważonego rozwoju i alternatywnych koncepcji w grupie krajów rozwiniętych w Europie

1. ASARA V., OTERO I., DEMARIA F., CORBERA E., 2015, Socially sustainable degrowth as a social-ecological transformation, Sustainability Science 10(3): 375-384, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-015-0321-9.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-015-0321-9   Google Scholar

2. ATKISSON A., 2013, A fresh start for sustainable development, Development 56(1): 52-57.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/dev.2013.2   Google Scholar

3. BARBIER E.B., 2012, The green economy post Rio+20, Science 338: 887-888.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1227360   Google Scholar

4. BEEKS J.C., 2016, Which of the current diverse ideas on alternative economics are the best for adequately and comprehensively addressing the great transition to climate, energy, and biodiversity sustainability?, California Institute of Integral Studies, San Francisco, CA.
  Google Scholar

5. BELING A.E., VANHULST J., DEMARIA F., RABI V., CARBALLO A.E., PELENC J., 2018, Discursive synergies for a ‘great transformation’ towards sustainability: Pragmatic contributions to a necessary dialogue between human development, degrowth, and buen vivir, Ecological Economics 144: 304-313, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.08.025.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.08.025   Google Scholar

6. BELMONTE-UREÑA L.J., PLAZA-ÚBEDA J.A., VAZQUEZ-BRUST D., YAKOVLEVA N., 2021, Circular economy, degrowth and green growth as pathways for research on sustainable development goals: A global analysis and future agenda, Ecological Economics 185: 107050, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107050.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107050   Google Scholar

7. BINA O., 2013, The green economy and sustainable development: An uneasy balance?, Environment and Planning C-Government and Policy 31(6): 1023-1047, https://doi.org/10.1068/c1310j.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/c1310j   Google Scholar

8. BINA O., LA CAMERA F., 2011, Promise and shortcomings of a green turn in recent policy responses to the ‘double crisis’, Ecological Economics 70(12): 2308-2316.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.06.021   Google Scholar

9. BLOMSMA F., BRENNAN G., 2017, The emergence of circular economy: A new framing around prolonging resource productivity, Journal of Industrial Ecology 21(3): 603-614, https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12603.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12603   Google Scholar

10. BOWEN A., FANKHAUSER S., STERN N., ZENGHELIS D., 2009, An outline of the case for a ‘green’ stimulus, Policy Brief, Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment, and the Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy.
  Google Scholar

11. BRIGHTON C., 2017, Unlikely bedfellows: The evolution of the relationship between environmental protection and development, International Comparative Law Quarterly 66(1): 209-233.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S002058931600052X   Google Scholar

12. BROWN E., CLOKE J., GENT D., JOHNSON P.H., HILL C., 2014, Green growth or ecological commodification: Debating the green economy in the global south, Geographical Annals: Series B, Human Geography 96(3): 245-259.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/geob.12049   Google Scholar

13. BÜCHS M., KOCH M., 2017, Postgrowth and wellbeing: Challenges to sustainable welfare, Springer, Cham, Switzerland, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59903-8.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59903-8_5   Google Scholar

14. CAPASSO M., HANSEN T., HEIBERG J., KLITKOU A., STEHEN M., 2019, Green growth – A synthesis of scientific findings, Technological Forecasting & Social Change 146: 390-402.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.06.013   Google Scholar

15. COLBY M., 1989, The evolution of paradigms of environmental management in development, Strategic Planning and Review Department, World Bank, Washington, DC.
  Google Scholar

16. COSTANZA R., DALY L., FIORAMONTI L., GIOVANNI E., KUBISZEWSKA I., MORTENSEN L.F., PICKETT K.E., RAGNARSDOTTIR K.V., DE VOGLI R., WILKINSON R., 2016, Modelling and measuring sustainable wellbeing in connection with the UN sustainable development goals, Ecological Economics 130: 350-355, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.07.009.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.07.009   Google Scholar

17. D’ALISA G., DEMARIA F., KALLIS G. (Eds.), 2014, Degrowth: A vocabulary for a new era, Routledge, Taylor & Francis, New York.
  Google Scholar

18. DALE G., MATHAI M.V., PUPPIM DE OLIVEIRA J.A., 2015, Green growth: Ideology, political economy and the alternatives, Zed Books, London.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350220553   Google Scholar

19. DEMARIA F., SCHNEIDER F., SEKULOVA F., MARTINEZ-ALIER J., 2013, What is degrowth? From an activist slogan to a social movement, Environmental Values 22(2): 191-215, https://doi.org/10.2307/23460978.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3197/096327113X13581561725194   Google Scholar

20. DRASTICHOVÁ M., 2024, SWOT analysis of the sustainable development concept, Problemy Ekorozwoju/ Problems of Sustainable Development, 19(1): 6-30, https://doi.org/10.35784/preko.5431.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.35784/preko.5431   Google Scholar

21. DRASTICHOVÁ M., 2023, Sustainable development and sustainable science. Where we came from, where we are now and where we are heading? Part II: An in-depth analysis of the concept of sustainable development, Problemy Ekorozwoju/ Problems of Sustainable Development, 18(1): 9-27, https://doi.org/10.35784/pe.2023.1.02.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.35784/pe.2023.1.02   Google Scholar

22. DRASTICHOVÁ M., 2022, Sustainable development and sustainable science. Where we came from, where we are now and where we are heading? Part I: The history of the concept, Problemy Ekorozwoju/ Problems of Sustainable Development, 17(2): 7-18, https://doi.org/10.35784/pe.2022.2.01.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.35784/pe.2022.2.01   Google Scholar

23. DRASTICHOVÁ M., 2018, The theory and measurement of sustainable development, SAEI 52, VSB-TU Ostrava, Ostrava.
  Google Scholar

24. DRASTICHOVÁ M., FILZMOSER P., GAJANIN R., 2023, Relationships between wellbeing and sustainable development in a group of selected developed countries, Problemy Ekorozwoju/ Problems of Sustainable Development, 18(2): 49-77, https://doi.org/10.35784/preko.3941.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.35784/preko.3941   Google Scholar

25. DRASTICHOVÁ M., FILZMOSER P., 2021, Factors of quality of life in a group of selected European Union and OECD countries, Problemy Ekorozwoju/ Problems of Sustainable Development, 16(2): 75-93.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.35784/pe.2021.2.09   Google Scholar

26. DRASTICHOVÁ M., FILZMOSER P., 2019, Assessment of sustainable development using cluster analysis and principal component analysis, Problemy Ekorozwoju 14(2): 7-24.
  Google Scholar

27. DRYZEK J.S., 1998, The politics of the earth: Environmental discourses, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  Google Scholar

28. DRYZEK J.S., 2013, The politics of the earth: Environmental discourses, 3rd ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  Google Scholar

29. DUNLAP R.E., MERTIG A.G., 1992, American environmentalism: The US environmental movement, 1970-1990, Taylor & Francis, New York.
  Google Scholar

30. FOURNIER V., 2008, Escaping from the economy: The politics of degrowth, International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 28(11/12): 528-545, https://doi.org/10.1108/01443330810915233.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/01443330810915233   Google Scholar

31. FOWLER S., HOPE C., 2007, A critical review of sustainable business indices and their impact, Journal of Business Ethics 76: 243-252, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9590-2.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9590-2   Google Scholar

32. GEISSDOERFER M., SAVAGET P., BOCKEN N.M.P., HULTINK E.J., 2017, The circular economy – A new sustainability paradigm?, Journal of Cleaner Production 143: 757-768, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048   Google Scholar

33. GIDDENS A., 2011, The politics of climate change, Polity Press, Cambridge.
  Google Scholar

34. GIAMPIETRO M., MAYUMI K., SORMAN A.H., 2012, The metabolic pattern of societies: Where economists fall short, Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, New York and London.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203635926   Google Scholar

35. HICKEL J., 2020, The sustainable development index: Measuring the ecological efficiency of human development in the Anthropocene, Ecological Economics 167: 106331, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.05.011.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.05.011   Google Scholar

36. HOPWOOD B., MELLOR M., O’BRIEN G., 2005, Sustainable development: Mapping different approaches, Sustainable Development 13(1): 38-52, https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.244.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.244   Google Scholar

37. IPCC, 2018, Global warming of 1.5°C: An IPCC special report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty, https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/ (31.12.2024).
  Google Scholar

38. JACKSON T., 2009, Prosperity without growth? The transition to a sustainable economy, Sustainable Development Commission, London.
  Google Scholar

39. JACKSON T., 2017, Prosperity without growth: Foundations for the economy of tomorrow, 2nd ed., Routledge, Taylor & Francis, London and New York.
  Google Scholar

40. JÄNICKE M., 2012, ‘Green growth’: From a growing eco-industry to economic sustainability, Energy Policy 48: 13-21.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.04.045   Google Scholar

41. KERSCHNER C., 2010, Economic de-growth vs. steady-state economy, Journal of Cleaner Production 18(6): 544-551, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.10.019.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.10.019   Google Scholar

42. KIRCHHERR J., REIKE D., HEKKERT M., 2017, Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions, Resources, Conservation and Recycling 127: 221-232, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005   Google Scholar

43. KOTHARI A., SALLEH A., ESCOBAR A., DEMARIA F., ACOSTA A. (Eds.), 2019, Pluriverse: A post-development dictionary, Tulika Books and Authors Upfront, New Delhi, and Columbia University Press, New York.
  Google Scholar

44. KOTHARI A., DEMARIA F., ACOSTA A., 2014, Buen vivir, degrowth and ecological swaraj: Alternatives to sustainable development and the green economy, Development 57: 362-375.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/dev.2015.24   Google Scholar

45. LINNÉR B.-O., WIBEBCK V., 2019, Sustainability transformations: Agents and drivers across societies, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108766974.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108766975   Google Scholar

46. MARTÍNEZ-ALIER J., 2009, Socially sustainable economic degrowth, Development and Change 40(6): 1099-1119, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.2009.01618.x.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.2009.01618.x   Google Scholar

47. MARTÍNEZ-ALIER J., PASCUAL U., VIVIEN F.-D., ZACCAI E., 2010, Sustainable de-growth: Mapping the context, criticisms and future prospects of an emergent paradigm, Ecological Economics 69(9): 1741-1747, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.04.017.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.04.017   Google Scholar

48. MARTÍNEZ-ALIER J., KALLIS G., VEUTHEY S., WALTER M., TEMPER L., 2010, Social metabolism, ecological distribution conflicts, and valuation languages, Ecological Economics 70(2): 153-158, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.09.024.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.09.024   Google Scholar

49. MARTÍNEZ-ALIER J., 2002, The environmentalism of the poor: A study of ecological conflicts and valuation, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781843765486   Google Scholar

50. MUNDA G., 1997, Environmental economics, ecological economics, and the concept of sustainable development, Environmental Values 6(2): 213-233, https://doi.org/10.3197/096327197776679158.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/096327199700600206   Google Scholar

51. MUNDA G., 2016, Beyond welfare economics: Some thoughts on ecological economics and the political economy of sustainability, European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention 13(1): 57-66.
  Google Scholar

52. NÆSS A., 1989, Ecology, community, and lifestyle: Outline of an ecosophy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511525599   Google Scholar

53. O’NEILL D.W., FANNING A.L., LAMB W.F., STEINBERGER J.K., 2018, A good life for all within planetary boundaries, Nature Sustainability 1: 88-95, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0021-4.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0021-4   Google Scholar

54. PIKETTY T., 2014, Capital in the twenty-first century, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, USA.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674369542   Google Scholar

55. POLIMENI J.M., MAYUMI K., GIAMPIETRO M., ALCOTT B., 2008, The Jevons paradox and the myth of resource efficiency improvements, Earthscan, London.
  Google Scholar

56. REICHEL A., SEEBERG B., 2011, From business to multipliers: Integrating the idea of decoupling into the prevailing economic concepts, Environmental Values 20(4): 493-517.
  Google Scholar

57. ROCKSTRÖM J., STEFFEN W., NOONE K., PERSSON Å., CHAPIN F.S., LAMBIN E.F., LENTON T.M., SCHEFFER M., FOLKE C., SCHELLNHUBER H.J., NYKVIST B., DE WIT C.A., HUGHES T., VAN DER LEEUW S., RODHE H., SÖRLIN S., SNYDER P.K., COSTANZA R., SVEDIN U., FALKENMARK M., KARLBERG L., CORELL R.W., FABRY V.J., HANSEN J., WALKER B., LIVERMAN D., RICHARDSON K., CRUTZEN P., FOLEY J.A., 2009, Planetary boundaries: Exploring the safe operating space for humanity, Ecology and Society 14(2): 32, https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-03180-140232.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-03180-140232   Google Scholar

58. SANYÉ-MENGUAL E., LOZANO R.G., FARRENY R., OLIVER-SOLÀ J., MONTERO J.I., RIERADEVALL J., 2014, Introduction of urban rooftop agriculture to increase the sustainability of the built environment: A life cycle assessment of the Mediterranean context, Journal of Cleaner Production 74: 167-177, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.03.030.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.03.030   Google Scholar

59. SCHNEIDER F., KALLIS G., MARTINEZ-ALIER J., 2010, Crisis or opportunity? Economic degrowth for social equity and ecological sustainability. Introduction to this special issue, Journal of Cleaner Production 18(6): 511-518, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.01.014.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.01.014   Google Scholar

60. SOLOW R.M., 1993, An almost practical step toward sustainability, Resources Policy 19(3): 162-172, https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-4207(93)90001-4.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-4207(93)90001-4   Google Scholar

61. THROSBY D., 2005, On the sustainability of cultural capital, Macquarie Economics Research Papers 5/2005, Department of Economics, Macquarie University.
  Google Scholar

62. UN, 1987, Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  Google Scholar

63. UNEP, 2011, Towards a green economy: Pathways to sustainable development and poverty eradication, United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi, https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/126GER_synthesis_en.pdf (31.12.2024).
  Google Scholar

64. VICTOR P.A., 2008, Managing without growth: Slower by design, not disaster, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781848442993.00016   Google Scholar

65. VAN DEN BERGH J.C.J.M., KALLIS G., 2012, Growth, a-growth or degrowth to stay within planetary boundaries?, Journal of Economic Issues 46(4): 909-920, https://doi.org/10.2753/JEI0021-3624460405.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2753/JEI0021-3624460404   Google Scholar

66. ANDEVENTER J.S., CATTANEO C., ZOGRAFOS C., 2019, A degrowth transition: Pathways for the degrowth niche to replace the capitalist-growth regime, Ecological Economics 156: 272-286, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.10.002.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.10.002   Google Scholar

67. WCED, 1987, Our Common Future, Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York.
  Google Scholar

68. WEISS M., CATTANEO C., 2017, Degrowth–Taking stock and reviewing an emerging academic paradigm, Ecological Economics 137: 220-233, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.01.014.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.01.014   Google Scholar

69. WIEDMANN T.O., SCHANDL H., LENZEN M., MORAN D., SUH S., WEST J., KANEMOTO K., 2015, The material footprint of nations, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 112(20): 6271-6276, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1220362110.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1220362110   Google Scholar

70. WORLD BANK, DRC, 2012, China 2030: Building a modern, harmonious, and creative high-income society, The World Bank and the Development Research Center of the State Council, the People’s Republic of China, Washington, DC, http://www.worldbank.org/content/dam/Worldbank/document/China-2030-complete.pdf (31.12.2024).
  Google Scholar

71. ZWIERS J., JAEGER-ERBEN M., HOFMANN F., 2020, Circular literacy: A knowledge-based approach to the circular economy, Culture and Organization 26(2): 121-141, https://doi.org/10.1080/14759551.2019.1709065.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14759551.2019.1709065   Google Scholar