Od etyki środowiskowej do etyki zrównoważonego rozwoju

Hong Du

h.du@foxmail.com
Chongqing Normal University (Chiny)
https://orcid.org/0009-0003-8999-9788

Abstrakt

Współczesna etyka środowiskowa staje przed podwójnym dylematem: rozchwianiem między rozważaniami teoretycznymi i praktycznymi. W odpowiedzi naukowcy podążali różnymi ścieżkami, a podejście zorientowane na praktykę wyłoniło się jako dominujący trend. Praktykę etyki środowiskowej można analizować według dwóch paradygmatów: paradygmatu etyki stosowanej i paradygmatu etyki praktycznej. Oba paradygmaty sugerują możliwość pewnego rodzaju etyki zrównoważonego rozwoju, a mianowicie rozwoju tradycyjnej etyki środowiskowej w publiczną, stosowaną etykę zrównoważonego rozwoju. Innymi słowy, rozwój tradycyjnej etyki środowiskowej, która jest teoretycznie lepsza, w formę publicznej i stosowanej etyki zrównoważonego rozwoju może okazać się skutecznym sposobem rozwiązania obecnych wyzwań stojących przed etyką środowiskową.


Słowa kluczowe:

etyka środowiskowa, podejście zorientowane na praktykę, paradygmat etyki stosowanej, paradygmat etyki praktycznej, etyka zrównoważonego rozwoju

1. ATTFIELD R., 1983, The ethics of environmental concern, Columbia University Press, New York.
  Google Scholar

2. BAILEY J.S., 2021, Practical vs theoretical ethics: A response to Cox, Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 54(1): 192-196.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.788   Google Scholar

3. BIASETTI P., DE MORI B., 2020, Towards a Conservation Ethics, Iride-Filosofia E Discussione Pubblica 33(3): 471-486.
  Google Scholar

4. BLACKSTONEW.T., 1974, Philosophy and Environmental Crisis, The University of Georgia Press, Athens.
  Google Scholar

5. BROWN D.A., 2009, The importance of creating an applied environmental ethics: lessons learned from climate change, Nature in Common?: Environmental Ethics and the Contested Foundations of Environmental Policy, ed. Minteer B., Temple University Press, Philadelphia.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt14bs7w2.16   Google Scholar

6. BUA A., 2017, Scale and Policy Impact in Participatory-Deliberative Democracy: Lessons From A Multi-Level Process, Public Administration 95(1): 160-177.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12297   Google Scholar

7. BUCK S., 1997, Forum on the role of environmental ethics in restructuring environmental policy and law for the next century, Policy Currents 7: 1-13.
  Google Scholar

8. CALLICOTT J.B., FRODEMAN R., 2009, Encyclopedia of environmental ethics and philosophy, Macmillan Reference USA.
  Google Scholar

9. CALLICOTT J.B., 1989, In Defense of the Land Ethic: Essays in Environmental Philosophy, SUNY Press.
  Google Scholar

10. CORNER A., MARKOWITZ E., PIDGEON N., 2014, Public engagement with climate change: the role of human values, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews-Climate Change 5(3): 411-422.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.269   Google Scholar

11. COSTANZA R., DE GROOT R., BRAAT L., KUBISZEWSKI I., FIORAMONTI L., SUTTON P., FARBER S., GRASSO M., 2017, Twenty years of ecosystem services: How far have we come and how far do we still need to go?, Ecosystem Services 28: 1-16.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.008   Google Scholar

12. DICKINSON J.L., SHIRK J., BONTER D., BONNEY R., CRAIN R.L., MARTIN J., PHILLIPS T., PURCELL K., 2012, The current state of citizen science as a tool for ecological research and public engagement, Frontiers in Ecology And The Environment 10(6): 291-297.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1890/110236   Google Scholar

13. FABINYI M., EVANS L., FOALE S.J., 2014, Social-ecological systems, social diversity, and power: insights from anthropology and political ecology, Ecology and Society 19(4).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-07029-190428   Google Scholar

14. FINARDI C., PELLEGRINI G., ROWE G., 2012, Food safety issues: From Enlightened Elitism towards Deliberative Democracy? An overview of EFSA's ‘Public Consultation’ instrument, Food Policy 37(4): 427-438.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2012.03.005   Google Scholar

15. FRASER D., 2012, A ‘Practical" Ethic for Animals’, Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Ethics 25(5): 721-746.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-011-9353-z   Google Scholar

16. FRODEMAN R., JAMIESON D., CALLICOTT J.B., GARDINER S.M., GRUEN L., KLAVER I.J., HARGROVE E., MINTEER B.A., NORTON B., PALMER C., ROLSTON H. III, ROZZI R., STERBA J.P., THROOP W.M. and DAVION V., 2007, Commentary on the Future of Environmental Philosophy, Ethics and the Environment 12(2): 117-150.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2979/ETE.2007.12.2.117   Google Scholar

17. ARGROVE, E.C., 1989, Foundations of Environmental Ethics, Prentice Hall.
  Google Scholar

18. HEAD B.W., ALFORD J., 2015, Wicked Problems: Implications for Public Policy and Management, Administration & Society 47(6): 711-739.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399713481601   Google Scholar

19. HEATH J., 2022, The Failure of Traditional Environmental Philosophy, Res Publica-A Journal of Moral Legal And Political Philosophy 28(1): 1-16.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-021-09520-5   Google Scholar

20. HOURDEQUIN M., 2012, Comments on A New Environmental Ethics: The Next Millennium for Life on Earth, Expositions 6(1): 11-18.
  Google Scholar

21. IRWIN R., 2007, The neoliberal state, Environmental Pragmatism, and its discontents, Environmental Politics 16(4): 643-658.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09644010701419154   Google Scholar

22. LENTON T., ROCKSTR M. J., GAFFNEY O., RAHMSTORF S., RICHARDSON K., STEFFEN W., SCHELLNHUBER H., 2019, Climate tipping points – too risky to bet against, Nature 575: 592-595.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-03595-0   Google Scholar

23. LIGHT A., 2002, Contemporary Environmental Ethics From Metaethics to Public Philosophy, Metaphilosophy 33(4):426-449.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9973.00238   Google Scholar

24. MILLER T.R., MINTEER B.A., MALAN L.-C., 2011, The new conservation debate: The view from practical ethics, Biological Conservation 144(3): 948-957.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2010.04.001   Google Scholar

25. MINTEER, B.A. and COLLINS, J.P., 2005, Why We Need an ‘Ecological Ethics’, Frontiers in Ecology And The Environment 3(6): 332-337.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1890/1540-9295(2005)003[0332:WWNAEE]2.0.CO;2   Google Scholar

26. MINTEER, B.A. and COLLINS, J.P., 2008, From Environmental to Ecological Ethics: Toward a Practical Ethics for Ecologists and Conservationists, Science and Engineering Ethics 14(4): 483-501.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-008-9087-0   Google Scholar

27. MINTEER B.A., 2012, Refounding environmental ethics, Temple University Press, Philadelphia.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt14btd94   Google Scholar

28. NAESS A., 1973, The shallow and the deep, long‐range ecology movement. A summary, Inquiry, 16: 95-100.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00201747308601682   Google Scholar

29. NILES M.T., LUBELL M., 2012, Integrative Frontiers in Environmental Policy Theory and Research, Policy Studies Journal 40: 41-64.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2012.00445.x   Google Scholar

30. NORTON B.G., 1988, Why Preserve Natural Diversity? Princeton University Press, Princeton.
  Google Scholar

31. NORTON B.G., 2003, Searching for sustainability: interdisciplinary essays in the philosophy of conservation biology, Cambridge University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613821   Google Scholar

32. NORTON B.G., 2005, Sustainability: A philosophy of adaptive ecosystem management, University of Chicago Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226595221.001.0001   Google Scholar

33. OUYANG J., ZHANG K.Z., WEN B., LU Y.P., 2020, Top-Down and Bottom-Up Approaches to Environmental Governance in China: Evidence from the River Chief System (RCS), International Journal of Environmental Research And Public Health 17(19).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17197058   Google Scholar

34. PASSMORE, J.A., 1974, Man's Responsibility for Nature: Ecological Problems and Western Traditions, Gerald Duck-worth & Co. Ltd.
  Google Scholar

35. PAUL K.B., 2017, Introducing Interpretive Approach of Phenomenological Research Methodology in Environmental Philosophy: A Mode of Engaged Philosophy in the Anthropocene, International Journal of Qualitative Methods 16(1): 1-10.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917724916   Google Scholar

36. RAMIEL H., LEFSTEIN A., 2022, 'Bottom-up governance': discourse, practices and the duality of the state, Cambridge Journal of Education 52(2): 217-233.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2021.1973373   Google Scholar

37. REGAN T., 1982, The Case for Animal Rights, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
  Google Scholar

38. ROCKSTR M, J., GUPTA J., QIN D., LADE S.J., ABRAMS J.F., ANDERSEN L.S., ARMSTRONG MCKAY D.I., BAI X., BALA G., BUNN S.E., CIOBANU D., DECLERCK F., EBI K., GIFFORD L., GORDON C., HASAN S., KANIE N., LENTON T.M., LORIANI S., LIVERMAN D.M., MOHAMED A., NAKICENOVIC N., OBURA D., OSPINA D., PRODANI K., RAMMELT C., SAKSCHEWSKI B., SCHOLTENS J., STEWART-KOSTER B., THA-RAMMAL T., VAN VUUREN D., VERBURG P.H., WINKELMANN R., ZIMM C., BENNETT E.M., BRINGEZU S., BROADGATE W., GREEN P.A., HUANG L., JACOBSON L., NDEHEDEHE C., PEDDE S., ROCHA J., SCHEFFER M., SCHULTE-UEBBING L., DE VRIES W., XIAO C., XU C., XU X., ZAFRA-CALVO N., ZHANG X., 2023, Safe and just Earth system boundaries, Nature 619: 102-111.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06083-8   Google Scholar

39. ROLSTON H. Ⅲ., 1975, Is There an Ecological Ethic? Ethics, 85: 93-109.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/291944   Google Scholar

40. ROLSTON H. Ⅲ., 1986, Philosophy Gone Wild: Essays in Environmental Ethics, Prometheus Books, Buffalo.
  Google Scholar

41. ROZMARYNOWSKA K., 2015, The Ethical Dimension of Practical Wisdom, Organon F 22(1): 34-52.
  Google Scholar

42. ROZZI R., 2007, Future environmental philosophies and their biocultural conservation interfaces, Ethics and the Environment 12(2): 142-145.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2979/ETE.2007.12.2.142   Google Scholar

43. ROZZI R., ARMESTO J.J., GUTI RREZ J.R., MASSARDO F., LIKENS G.E., ANDERSON C.B., POOLE A., MO-SES K.P., HARGROVE E., MANSILLA A.O., KENNEDY J.H., WILLSON M., JAX K., JONES C.G., CALLICOTT J.B., ARROYO M.T.K., 2012, Integrating Ecology and Environmental Ethics: Earth Stewardship in the Southern End of the Americas, BioScience 62(3): 226-236.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2012.62.3.4   Google Scholar

44. SAGOFF M., 2008, The Economy of the Earth: Philosophy, Law, and the Environment, Cambridge University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511817472   Google Scholar

45. SARKAR I., BEHURA A., 2018, Bioregionalism: Practical Environmental Ethics with an Underlying Pragmatic Ideal, Problemy Ekorozwoju/ Problems of Sustainable Development 13(2): 177-184.
  Google Scholar

46. SARKAR S., 2005, Biodiversity and Environmental Philosophy: An Introduction, Cambridge University Press, New York.
  Google Scholar

47. SHIRK J.L., BALLARD H.L., WILDERMAN C.C., PHILLIPS T., WIGGINS A., JORDAN R., MCCALLIE E., MINARCHEK M., LEWENSTEIN B.V., KRASNY M.E., BONNEY R., 2012,Public Participation in Scientific Re-search: a Framework for Deliberate Design, Ecology and Society 17(2): 29.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-04705-170229   Google Scholar

48. SINGER P., 1975, Animal Liberation: A New Ethics for Our Treatment of Animals, New York Review/Random House, New York.
  Google Scholar

49. SORGEN J., 2020, Beyond the Anthropocentrism Debate: An Adaptive History of Environmental Ethics, Environmental Ethics 42(2): 103-118.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/enviroethics202011911   Google Scholar

50. STEFFEN W., ROCKSTR M. J., RICHARDSON K., LENTON T.M., FOLKE C., LIVERMAN D.M., SUMMER-HAYES C., BARNOSKY A.D., CORNELL S.E., CRUCIFIX M.C., DONGES J.F., FETZER I., LADE S.J., SCHEFFER M., WINKELMANN R., SCHELLNHUBERH.J., 2018, Trajectories of the Earth System in the Anthropocene, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 115: 8252-8259.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1810141115   Google Scholar

51. STEINBOCK B., 2013, How has Philosophical Applied Ethics Progressed in the Past Fifty Years? Metaphilosophy 44: 58-62.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/meta.12003   Google Scholar

52. SULLIVAN L.S., 2024, Comparative Philosophy and Practical Applied Ethics, Journal Of Chinese Philosophy 51(1): 44-53.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15406253-12340128   Google Scholar

53. SWIM J.K., STERN P.C., DOHERTY T.J., CLAYTON S., RESER J.P., WEBER E.U., GIFFORD R., HOWARD G.S., 2011, Psychology's Contributions to Understanding and Addressing Global Climate Change, American Psycholo-gist 66(4): 241-250.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023220   Google Scholar

54. SYLVAN R.R., 1973, Is There a Need for a New, an Environmental Ethic, Proceedings of the Proceedings of the XVth World Congress of Philosophy, Sofia Press, Varna, Bulgaria, 205-210.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/wcp151973136   Google Scholar

55. TAYLOR P., 1986, Respect for nature: A theory of environmental ethics, Princeton University Press.
  Google Scholar

56. THOMPSON P.B., HILDE T.C., 2000, The agrarian roots of pragmatism, Vanderbilt University Press.
  Google Scholar

57. THOMPSON P.B., 2001, The Reshaping of Conventional Farming: A North American Perspective, Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 14(2): 217-229.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011388424793   Google Scholar

58. UNEP, 2019, Global Environment Outlook – GEO-6: Healthy Planet, Healthy People, Cambridge University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108627146   Google Scholar

59. WHITE L.T., 1967, The Historical Roots of Our Ecologic Crisis, Science 155: 1203-1207.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.155.3767.1203   Google Scholar


Opublikowane
2025-01-10

Cited By / Share

Du, H. (2025). Od etyki środowiskowej do etyki zrównoważonego rozwoju. Problemy Ekorozwoju Problems of Sustainable Development, 20(1), 6–14. https://doi.org/10.35784/preko.6834

Autorzy

Hong Du 
h.du@foxmail.com
Chongqing Normal University Chiny
https://orcid.org/0009-0003-8999-9788

Statystyki

Abstract views: 40
PDF downloads: 38


Licencja

Creative Commons License

Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0 Międzynarodowe.