Log-based learning analytics of gamified Moodle activities: Quantifying student engagement
Article Sidebar
Issue Vol. 22 No. 2 (2026)
-
Path planning in swarm robotics exploration using SARSA and ACO algorithms
Aicha HAFID, Riadh HOCINE, Lahcene GUEZOULI1-15
-
Detection of suspicious facial objects in neutral ATMs using deep learning architectures based on YOLOV8 and Faster R-CNN
Marco Manuel ARAGON PAUCAR, Kelvin Yhonson FERNANDEZ ACERO, Erasmo SULLA ESPINOZA16-32
-
Assessing the effectiveness of one-stage and two-stage methods for identifying high-voltage power grid equipment in UAV imagery
Thi Thanh Tan NGUYEN, Thi Thu Nga VU33-47
-
An automatic speech recognition approach for controlled medications prescription with natural language processing
Luis Enrique COLMENARES-GUILLÉN, Angel Axel MÉNDEZ-MENESES48-66
-
Improving image retrieval using CNN with PCA and Optimized K-Means clustering
Mohsin Hasan HUSSEIN, Ali Mohsin Ahmed AL-SABAAWI, Zakaria A. Hamed ALNAISH67-84
-
Numerical investigation into the hydrodynamic characteristics of water vortex turbines with varied blade angles
Sarwo EDHY SOFYAN, Zamzami, Akhyar AKHYAR, Suriadi, Agus SASMITO85-104
-
Optimization of the corporate cluster structure using the Tabu Search method
Andrzej IMIEŁOWSKI, Łukasz BANAŚ, Bogusław TWARÓG, Janusz BYTNAR105-116
-
Application controls audit framework in the context of ERP systems
Sakchai TANGPRASERT, Nalinpat BHUMPENPEIN117-125
-
Autonomous AI agents in digital markets: Economic implications for competition, pricing, and regulation
Elmira KYDYRBAYEVA, Balhiya SHOMSHEKOVA, Asset ABZHAKOV, Ainur ASHIMOVA, Assel NURTAYEVA126-137
-
Multi-criteria analysis of parameter impact in large-scale robotic 3D printing
Łukasz SOBASZEK, Ivan GAJDOŠ, Pavol ŠTEFČÁK138-147
-
Designing cloud-based knowledge management systems to improve organizational innovation
Hayfaa Subhi MALALLAH, Sherzad Mohammad AJEEL148-168
-
Data normalisation methods on microarray data
Inggih PERNAMA, Shir Li WANG, Hoi Yeh LEE, Suliana SULAIMAN, Hasnatul Nazuha HASSAN169-179
-
Log-based learning analytics of gamified Moodle activities: Quantifying student engagement
Iva GRUBJEŠIĆ, Tomislav IVANJKO, Vedran JURIČIĆ180-192
-
SFAB-Net: Semantic segmentation network for railway track surface defects based on Spatial Fusion and Adaptive Bottleneck feature enhancement
Qike WU, Sharafiz ABDUL RAHIM, Sai Hong TANG, Muhammad Azim AZIZI, Li ZHANG193-207
-
Machine learning approach to detect GAI-disguised academic programming plagiarism
Oscar KARNALIM, Yehezkiel David SETIAWAN, Maresha Caroline WIJANTO, Rossevine Artha NATHASYA208-224
Archives
-
Vol. 22 No. 2
2026-06-30 15
-
Vol. 22 No. 1
2026-03-31 15
-
Vol. 21 No. 4
2025-12-31 12
-
Vol. 21 No. 3
2025-09-30 12
-
Vol. 21 No. 2
2025-06-30 12
-
Vol. 21 No. 1
2025-03-31 12
-
Vol. 20 No. 4
2024-12-31 12
-
Vol. 20 No. 3
2024-09-30 12
-
Vol. 20 No. 2
2024-06-30 12
-
Vol. 20 No. 1
2024-03-30 12
-
Vol. 19 No. 4
2023-12-31 10
-
Vol. 19 No. 3
2023-09-30 10
-
Vol. 19 No. 2
2023-06-30 10
-
Vol. 19 No. 1
2023-03-31 10
-
Vol. 18 No. 4
2022-12-30 8
-
Vol. 18 No. 3
2022-09-30 8
-
Vol. 18 No. 2
2022-06-30 8
-
Vol. 18 No. 1
2022-03-31 8
Main Article Content
Authors
Abstract
This study presents a log-based learning analytics pipeline for quantifying user engagement in Moodle, demonstrating how event log data can be transformed into analyzable interaction patterns through extraction, anonymization, categorization, and statistical modeling. The approach applies distributional testing using chi-square statistics and Cramér’s V to identify structural differences in user activity. As a case study, the method was implemented in an English for Specific Purposes (ESP) course, comparing a control group following a traditional LMS configuration (N = 40) and an experimental group using a gamified Moodle environment (N = 40). Results indicated that the gamified configuration generated significantly higher frequencies of system-level and assessment-related interactions, as well as more sustained activity across the instructional period, while the control group relied primarily on static content access and exhibited declining participation over time. Engagement was operationalized through event frequencies, capturing observable behavioral differences rather than cognitive or learning outcomes. Beyond the educational setting, the study illustrates how reproducible event-log analytics can be used to detect behavioral shifts in technology-supported environments, offering a methodological template that is potentially transferable to similar contexts in applied computer science.
Keywords:
Sustainable Development Goals (SDG)
- 4 - Quality education
- 9 - Industry, Innovation, Technology and Infrastructure
References
Balalle, H. (2024). Exploring student engagement in technology-based education in relation to gamification, online/distance learning, and other factors: A systematic literature review. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 9, Article 100870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.100870
Bogost, I. (2015). Why gamification is bullshit. In S. Walz & S. Deterding (Eds.), The gameful world: Approaches, issues, applications (pp. 65–79). MIT Press.
Clark, R. E., & Mayer, R. E. (2016). E-learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119239086
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. Harper and Row.
Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Harvard University Press.
Dawson, S., Heathcote, L., & Poole, G. (2010). Harnessing ICT potential: The adoption and analysis of ICT systems for enhancing the student learning experience. International Journal of Educational Management, 24(2), 116–128. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231011027825
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125(6), 627–668. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.627
Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011). From game design elements to gamefulness: Defining gamification. In Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments (pp. 9–15). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2181037.2181040
Domínguez, A., Sáenz-de-Navarrete, J., De-Marcos, L., Fernández-Sanz, L., Pagés, C., & Martínez-Herráiz, J.-J. (2013). Gamifying learning experiences: Practical implications and outcomes. Computers & Education, 63, 380–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.020
Dudley-Evans, T., & St. John, M. J. (1998). Developments in English for specific purposes: A multi-disciplinary approach. Cambridge University Press.
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
Goh, T.-T. (2025). Learning management system log analytics: The role of persistence and consistency of engagement behaviour on academic success. Journal of Computers in Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-025-00358-x
Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., & Sarsa, H. (2014). Does gamification work?—A literature review of empirical studies on gamification. In Proceedings of the 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 3025–3034). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2014.377
Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1987). English for specific purposes: A learner-centered approach. Cambridge University Press. https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511733031
Ifenthaler, D., & Yau, J. Y.-K. (2020). Utilising learning analytics to support study success in higher education: A systematic review. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(4), 1961–1990. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09788-z
Kirschner, P., & Selinger, M. (2003). The state of affairs of teacher education with respect to information and communications technology. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 12(1), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759390300200143
Macfadyen, L. P., & Dawson, S. (2010). Mining LMS data to develop an “early warning system” for educators: A proof of concept. Computers & Education, 54(2), 588–599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.008
Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511811678
Mayer, R. E. (2014). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2nd ed., pp. 43–71). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139547369.005
Ngulube, P., & Ncube, M. M. (2025). Leveraging learning analytics to improve the user experience of learning management systems in higher education institutions. Information, 16(5), Article 419. https://doi.org/10.3390/info16050419
Niemiec, C. P., & Ryan, R. M. (2009). Autonomy, competence, and relatedness in the classroom: Applying self-determination theory to educational practice. Theory and Research in Education, 7(2), 133–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878509104318
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Press.
Seaborn, K., & Fels, D. I. (2015). Gamification in theory and action: A survey. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 74, 14–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.006
Selwyn, N. (2011). Education and technology: Key issues and debates. Continuum International Publishing Group.
Shernoff, D. J., Csikszentmihalyi, M., Shneider, B., & Shernoff, E. S. (2003). Student engagement in high school classrooms from the perspective of flow theory. School Psychology Quarterly, 18(2), 158–176. https://doi.org/10.1521/scpq.18.2.158.21860
Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1), 3–10. https://www.itdl.org/Journal/Jan_05/article01.htm
Siemens, G., & Long, P. (2011). Penetrating the fog: Analytics in learning and education. EDUCAUSE Review, 46, 31–40.
Vansteenkiste, M., Simons, J., Lens, W., Sheldon, K. M., & Deci, E. L. (2004). Motivating learning, performance, and persistence: The synergistic effects of intrinsic goal contents and autonomy-supportive contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(2), 246–260. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.2.246
Article Details
Abstract views: 11
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles published in Applied Computer Science are open-access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
